Anonymous ID: cc5091 Baking Seminar #12 April 30, 2020, 3:41 p.m. No.11733   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2351 >>2539

LIVE Baking Seminar

 

4/30/2020

 

We in here

 

Welcome To LIVE Baking Classes in the Q Research Utility Kitchen

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

 

We are the bakers who provide the breads for those anons who post Qresearch's open-sourced information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of baking ideas and baking ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

 

VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS

SEMPER FIDELIS

WWG1WGA

 

THE Q MOVEMENT IS ABOUT CHALLENGING THE ESTABLISHMENT -

 

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

 

General Announcements

* Baking Class in /comms/ every Thursday @7pm ET: practice baking, Q&A, all are welcome

 

Past Class links & archives

>>6125 #1 (2/13/20), >>6368 #2 (2/20/20), >>6885 #3 (2/27/20), >>7185 #4 (3/05/20), #5 >>7568 (3/12/20), >>8274 #6 (3/19/20), >>8872 #7 (3/26/20), >>9320 #8 (4/02/20), >>9787 #9 (4/09/20), >>10510 #10 (4/16/20)

Archives: Classes #1 - #8: >>10784

 

Step by Step Baking Instructions

Simpler version on the left; more detailed version on the right.

>>7594 PREPARATION >>11170

>>7606 STEP 1 - Find the Current Dough >>11178

>>7615 STEP 2 - Copy the Current Dough >>11183

>>7624 STEP 3 - Paste The Dough Into Text Editor >>11191

>>7640 STEP 3a - Trim The Notables Section >>11194, >>11204

>>7646 STEP 3b - Make space for your new notables. >>11210

>>7660 STEP 4 - Create A New Thread >>11216

>>7670 STEP 5 - Enter Thread Info And Post Thread >>11242

>>7681 STEP 6 - Post the Rest of the Dough >>11248

>>7698 STEP 7 - Make A New Pastebin & Make The Dough Post >>11256

>>7706 STEP 8 - Post Your New Thread Link >>11259

 

Overview & Extras

>>11161 Modules 1 & II

>>9994, >>11303 Timing the Bake

>>10005, >>11283 Linking between Boards

>>10293 Archiving & teaching files (screenshot; almost current)

 

E-BAKE Instructions

>>9252, >>10776

Anonymous ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 3:42 p.m. No.11734   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2351

Q & A

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #1 (2/13/20)

>>6237 How often do you post a notables list? >>6244, >>6248, >>6266, >>6251, >>6278

>>6253, >>6471 What is "body too long"? How to fix? >>6253, >>6275

>>6252 When do you post next bread link to hit 751 (sniping)? >>6263

>>6283 Last notable post: any special formatting? >>6296, >>6297

>>6302 Better to make the updated pastebin before baking or after (and then post the dough)? >>6304

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #2 (2/20/20)

>>6406 How to deal with "server too long" message? >>6423

>>6672 How to put my text editor notables in pastebin? >>6673

>>6432 How to tell what is notable and what is not? >>6432, >>6434, >>6436, >>6450, >>6466

>>6513 Do real anons actually love the bewbs (or are they just a distraction)? >>6521, >>6523, >>6526, >>6532

>>6533 How do you make a new pastebin? >>6543, >>6537

>>6549 How much practice do I need? >>6550, >>6559

>>6570 How do you format a Q post? >>6573, >>6588, >>6597, >>6598

>>6630 How great is the need for bakers? >>6635

>>6693 What are the //// BREAK \\ in the pastebin [page breaks]? >>6694

>>6732 Do notables go directly in the dough/pastebin file or in a separate Notable file? >>6691, >>6732

>>6833 How to bake: Index vs Catalog? >>6834, >>6839

>>6779 What shifts need bakers? >>6781, >>6802, >>6806, >>6811, >>6822 [rt 6802], >>6824,

>>6845 Feedback on a new bake rt >>6842

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #3 (2/27/20)

>>6908 How do you 'grab the dough'? 10 steps: >>6910, >>6924, >>6928, >>6949, >>6955, >>7042, >>7045, >>7049, >>7055, >>7070

>>6934, >>6938 What is "baker's tools" app & where to find it? >>6943, >>6950, >>6951

>>7073 Anon request for feedback on bake: >>7081, >>7086

>>6966 How does a baker keep up with notables (day, night, Q)? >>6982

>>6983 I got "body too long" - what to do? >>6998, >>7007, >>7015, >>7024, >>7040

>>6984 Anon: plz check my work? >>6994

>>7028 Do I need a pastebin login account? [no!]

>>6995 Max no. of breads in "Previously Collected Notables"? >>7033

>>7033 Can you avoid two-page notables by placing oldest breads in "previously collected notables? [yes!]

>>7025 Body too long: what's the limit? [~4500 char or 100 lines]

>>7030 Why are links in practice bakes green? >>7030, >>7035

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #4 (3/5/20)

>>7193 Baking possible on a cell phone? >>7010, >>7205

>>7210 How do you know who is baking? >>7215, >>7218, >>7222

>>7236 I know I would choke if things got too hectic >>7240

>>7315 How do i get notable bun linked under previously collected notables? >>7319

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #5 (3/12/20)

>>7735 What about sniping? >>7739, >>7752

>>7779 How can you tell a real baker from a shill baker? >>7781, >>7790, >>7803, >>7807, >>7821, >>7861

>>7833 How do i know which baker is baking? >>7838, >>7849, >>7851, >>7866, >>7884, >>7885, >>7906

>>7830 How do bakers delete posts? [they don't] >>7834, >>7837, >>7839, >>7842

>>7853 Should I get a pastebin account? >>7870, >>7875

>>8003 What is the "flood detected" message when baking? >>8011, >>8016

>>8024 Does baker include only anon noms in notables? >>8029

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #6 (3/19/20)

>>8421 Notes: how do you keep up in a fast bred? >>8432, >>8440

>>8500 What is "shadowing the bread"? >>8546

>>8679 Am I too slow to bake? No! >>8679, >>8698, >>8696, >>8700

>>9258 How do you insert General Image in TOR bakes? >>9278

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #7 (3/26/20)

>>9258 How do TOR bakers use the Iwo Jima video?

>>9135 Can we recap?

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #8 (4/02/20)

>>9397 /comms/ with anons from bakers–ok or not? >>9382, >>9397, >>9407, >>9410. >>9411, >>9418

>>9530 How often does BO log in?

>>9918 Bred titles: What's ok & how to format? >>9932, >>9936

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #9 (4/09/20)

>>10020 Why are my notables green? >>10026, >>10041

>>10032 Q about images: when png, TOR, mp4? >>10067

>>9999 When to postbaking? >>10010, >>10079, >>10092

>>10162 How many practice baker b4 a real bake? >>10168, >>10174

β€”β€”β€”β€” Classes #10 (4/16/20)

>>10641 What do when Q posts? >>10645

>>10762 Would like to bake but have no regular schedule >>10763, >>10765

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #11 (4/23/20)

>>11376 Why use both pastebin.com and notepad++? >>11312, >>11321, >>11325

>>11306 How to keep up in fast breads? >>11309, >>11314, >>11320

Anonymous ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 3:42 p.m. No.11735   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

Baker Tips, Tricks & Traps

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #1 (2/13/20)

>>6329, >>6400, >>6468 /comms/ BO Rusty checks in

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #2 (2/20/20)

>>6431 What is "pastebin"?

>>6449 Shill tactic of omitting date–why dates matter,other advice on notabling >>6477

>>6480 Even the worst mistakes are fixable

>>6501, >>6477 How to deal with Q proofs & other anon analyses

>>6525 How to post off-bred links

>>6543 Take care to copypaste entire dough to pastebin - easy to miss top or bottom

>>6658, >>6656 Use Control-F (F3) to search within each bread

>>6665 Every new baker freaks out when when Q posts

>>6676 Never feel dumb

>>6734 When to make a new thread [to prep it, not bake it!]

>>6683, >>6687 Cloning the dough in case pastebin.com goes down

>>6695, >>6735, >>6752, >>6754, >>6769, >>6822 Bakers on nick-names, icons, pastebins

>>6848 Baking trick (what to do while waiting for thread to drop)

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #3 (2/27/20)

>>7340, >>7072 Baking Steps 1 - 9 (slides only)

>>6998 One- vs two-page notables (more: >>7007, >>7015, >>7024, >>7040)

>>7019, >>7027, >>7030, >>7069 Bakers never panic, never tap

>>7051 Advantages of a non-guest pastebin account [no captcha]

>>7054 You don't have to pull marathons to bake

>>7106, >>7177 Baker pleased to see 2 late gy bakers vying for the bread

>>7116 Eight tips for creating notables posts (to help bakers)

>>7175 End-of-bread issues

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #4 (3/5/20)

>>7189 Summary of Baking Steps (eight)

>>7209 "Create a Thread" versus "Post a Reply" >>7212, >>7220

>>7231 Only the first post in baking uses "Create a thread"

>>7216 Laptop is fine for baking

>>7224 The two parts of baking: actual baking & note-taking

>>7252 Funny meme: baker's perspective on baking

>>7287, >>7294 Dough posts with breaks marked /////BREAK\\\

>>7298, >>7303, >>7311 Two-page notables (discussion)

>>7321 How to create a new dough paste

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #5 (3/12/20)

>>7573, >>7575, >>7582 In response to "I suck at baking": How to reduce baking stress

>>7731 Pastebin.com works with Mac OS

>>7642 Text editor for a Mac: Atom >>7643, >>7651, >>7729

>>7768 Bakers need detachment >>7770, >>7773

>>7780 Plz don't edit another baker's notables >>7780, >>7784, >>7798, >>7804, >>7809, >>7811, >>7815, >>7817

>>7896, >>7898 Bakers don't want to be ID'd by number

>>8039 Baker school is attracting shills–must be over the target

>>8139 Q Bakes: when to bake & late-minute Q posts

>>8237 Tell anons to plz state the main point when posting Q proofs, etc.

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #6 (3/19/20)

>>8352 Note-taking wo/baking, baker's assist controversy >>8365, >>8385, >>8413, >>8419, >>8433

>>8544, >>8562 When to drop note-taker notables

>>8788 "8chan" baking vs "WWG1WGA" baking, cooperation w/anons

>>8373 Who's responsible for checking notables (bakers or anons)? >>8388

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #7 (3/26/20)

>>8885 The perfect bake: composition, timing, snipe >>8887, >>8888 (You), >>8889

>>8911 Role of bakers on the board plus bakers/BOs >>8915 (You), >>8923 (You)

>>9127 Baking thread a continuing resource

>>9136 Taking notables/baking for a baker

>>9186 (You), >>9193 (You) New bakers coming online, anon encouragement

>>9181 New baker's dough & notes plus feedback >>9188 (You), >>9191 (You), >>9195

>>9191 How to handle notables when there is more than one baker per bread

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #8 (4/02/20)

>>9411 Differing ideas about baker demeanor >>9375, >>9382, >>9404, >>9411, >>9418

>>9431 Current relationship with /qr/ BO @fj

>>9337 Bread title–put colon AFTER the bread number

>>9373 Qs after @600 - don't let shills distract

>>9375 Notable posting, timing 200-400-600

>>9386 Bakers message to anons

>>9380 Notables post after the bake

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #9 (4/09/20)

>>9970, >>9981, >>10011, >>10017 Formatting bun numbers, notables page

>>10083, >>10106 Tell anons of needed baker changes in advance; timing issues

>>10081 Note-taker steps to bake for first time

>>10087, >>9993 Formatting issues

>>10075 Importance of tagging the dough post

>>10078, >>10101 Ideas for streamlining notables; what to include/exclude?

>>10106, >>10119, >>10116, >>10167 "Last call crew" (anons/shills who call out problems at end of bake)

>>10101, >>10111 Telling anons from shills

>>10132, >>10148, >>10163 Ignore shills when baking

>>10133 Creating a pastebin early

>>10226 Can't make it to class? Suggestions

β€”β€”β€”β€” Class #10 (4/16/20)

>>10547, >>6892 Baker handoffs

>>10555, >>10815 Max post length: 4700-5000 characters, ~200 lines (results vary).

>>10581 Good comms with anons

>>10696 How to report a thread or post

>>10763 Team baking (baker plus note collector) >>10765, >>10764

———– Class #11 (4/23/20)

>>11354 Example of baker get trying to get nommer to be more specific

Anonymous ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 3:43 p.m. No.11736   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

Intro to Baking

Qresearch is a 24/7 beehive of activity where anons post their diggs, memes and prayers.

For this to happen requires ''bakers''--which is why they have been called "the core of this board."

Bakers perform several key functions:

* Post notables for each bread.

* Transition the board from one bread to another (baking).

* Maintain the infrastructure of the board (the dough), keeping it clean, tidy, and up-to-date.

* Set the tone for each bread via their choice of bread title and /comms/ with posters.

When all goes well, baking is a fun & exciting opportunity to serve. When things get wonky and shills attack--bakers carry on anyway.

Shadilay, fellow bakers!

 

OTHER BAKING RESOURCES

 

Baker's grab bag

* Baker's Tools App (Version 0.7.2) >>6646, >>6650, >>6652, >>6654, >>6656, >>9584, >>9589, >>9597, >>9601

* Try Atom as a text editor for Macs >>6925, >>6934, >>7055, >>7070

* Meme-making app kek.gg >>8771

* Crazy Bakes: wonky board, lags, baking from Index, "flood detected", dup breads >>9960

* How's your mouse for baking? >>10617

* Font used for baking school slides: >>10642, https://www.dafontfree.net/find.php?q=impact

* Quik Pic bake instructions >>7549

* Original baking video >>7076 (shows how to make room for new notables)

* Overcoming paywalls >>10844

* Pastebin.com problems & alternatives >>11645, >>11609, >>11619, >>11620, >>11627, >>11640, >>11641, >>11644

 

Dealing with notables

* Ten Baker Tips for Notables >>8177

* Asking anons to state the main point >>8237

* Anon tips for better notables (bakers can tell anons) >>>/qrb/41937, https://pastebin.com/yq7wQyvn

* Bakers on what they look for in notables >>8351, >>8315, >>8698

* Muh Collector "how to" on notables >>9006, >>9009

 

Free image/video screenshots & production tools

* Image screenshots PrtSc/snipping tool + MS-Paint https://youtu.be/KvXxCE1gxOE

* 8kun video limits >>8760

* Bandicam Screen Recorder >>8759, >>8762 (also: OBS, Kdenlive, Audacity)

* VLC Player >>8714, >>8715, >>8766

* Windows Movie Maker for Win 10 >>8712

* YTCutter (makes vid clips from YT) >>8767

* Twitter Video Downloader >>8768

* NVidia cards (can screen-capture vids) >>8785

* Forensically (forensics magnifier) https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/#forensic-magnifier

* ShotCut NLE (open source cross platform video editor) https://shotcut.org/

* MFFmpeg (decodes & plays any format) https://ffmpeg.org/ >>>/qresearch/8507906

* Natron (cross-platform video compositor) >>>/qresearch/8507913

* Handbrake (good for transcoding) >>>/qresearch/8507921

* GIMP & GMIC (image editing) >>>/qresearch/8507956

* Invidio (copies YT vids, restricted or not, no ads or signup) >>8792

 

Baker tips IRL

>>8829 Baker's Tips - Read me first

>>6331 #01 - Ghosting a bred

>>6331 #02 - Baker changes

>>6378 #03 - TOR baking

>>6651 #04 - Defeating shills with facts & humor

>>7339 #05 - Announce you're baking (#11 too)

>>6892 #06 - Baking/note-taking protocols

>>7181 #07 - Use RED TEXT and BOLD in handoffs

>>7363 #08 - Try to notice when a cat is baking

>>7973 #09 - Respecting other bakers' notables

>>8174 #10 - Make sure to copypasta the whole page

>>8803 #11 - Announce you're taking responsibility

>>8822 #12 - Embed baker changes to provide more info

>>8824 #13 - Watch out for unknown bakers bearing gifts

>>8825 #14 - Use named pastebins to defeat shill complaints

>>8826 #15 - Responding to shills trying to suck up baker's time

>>8827 #16 - Be aware of muh joos bakers

>>8828 #17 - All bakers screw up

>>10445 #18 - Just do it--bake!

>>9590 #19 - Don't be afraid to bake

>>10789 #20 - Post notes early so changes can be made

>>10791 #21 - No /comms/ creates misunderstandings

>>10792 #22 - Defeat shills with humor

 

Baker teaching stories

>>10114 How shills attack bakers--an example ("baker saves notables for his twats")

>>10787 LIVE example of picking up a mid-bread bake

>>10710 Why do you bake? >>10729, >>10731, >>10732, >>10744

 

Ideas & proposals

>>10253 Dough revision history proposal

 

''this dough will change as we collect new resources & refine what's here''

Anonymous ID: 929de5 April 30, 2020, 3:54 p.m. No.11742   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1747 >>1749

Checking in to help in anyway or answer questions.

Since Q is posting, it might be slow.

Butis there a set pasta bakers use to let anons know about the Seminar?

If not, there should be one so any baker can post it when they can so more eyes are on it.

Anonymous ID: 6cee99 April 30, 2020, 4:02 p.m. No.11750   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

Good evening, all.

Here to chill and answer questions if need be.

Will be available to bake tomorrow as well; will defer to new/first-time Bakers as needed.

I hope you all are doing well.

Anonymous ID: 929de5 April 30, 2020, 4:03 p.m. No.11751   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11749

>>11747

Well now there's a split bread, so even less trafficking maybe, kek.

But I mean we should come up with a pasta for the announcement and post it here so any baker can let anons know whenever they personally can.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:04 p.m. No.11752   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1755 >>1761

>>11746

Didn't see the discussion. I just ebaked.. abandoned.. and now Q is posting in the ebake.

Idk what to do, but will go and try to salvage.

Thanks for putting that post up. Excellent.

Do you mind to take the class for a while?

>crazy as usual

kek

o7

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 4:07 p.m. No.11754   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1764

>>11746

controversy about image used for this /qr/ bred

sigh….traditional vs change.

Best to consult anons b4 making changes that are pretty fundamental.

Allow changes to be organic

allowing input from others

over time.

 

>split bread

one only has 60 or so posts

not split any longer, for better or worse

doesn't mean the controversy is over tho

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 4:12 p.m. No.11761   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1764 >>1765 >>1796

>>11752

so you ebaked the smaller bred?

bc of image or ghost bred?

Q is posting in the ebake?

well, maybe we DO have a split bake then

gonna be like the last time,

when q posted in an old dup bred was never locked.

 

Here's the catalog right now:

cap

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 4:15 p.m. No.11767   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11755

that's kind of how it worked out last week. there's always a way.

pretty educational for new bakers actually - to see that even when weird shit happens, there's a way to make it work.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 4:18 p.m. No.11774   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1776 >>1780

>>11770

>What would you like to talk about or learn this evening?

 

-pastebins vs live links to non-qr-general threads

-newfag section, how to properly present and where

-decluttering the 3rd post = work done this pm to reconfigure a lot of the dough

 

///

 

>>11772

just saying with a 92, an ebake92 and a 93, the next one should be 95… no?

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:19 p.m. No.11777   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1785 >>1792

>>11770

The Class Plan

As some anons would like to learn to bake we'll do a practical baking class and bakers will run the Q&A at the same time.

 

We'll take it slowly.

 

WELCOME TO BAKING CLASS !

 

Thank you for stepping up to help the kitchen and for coming to the class. Respect.

The class is informal and relaxed. Feel free to ask questions, shout out if or when you're stuck / need some help and remember, there are no dumb questions, ever.

There's usually plenty of flour flying around so feel free to mess up. It's how we learn.

 

One of our bakers usually instructs (m'self today), while GYB facilitates the Q&A and discussions. Regular bakers are also usually in-thread (dropping in when they can), helping to answering the Q&As.

 

So….. feel free to ask any questions about anything regarding baking, even if you're not learing to bake today.

 

We are all here dedicating our time to teach you and pass on our knowledge to you, new bakers. We want to help you in whichever way we can. Please give us feedback and let us know how we can.

 

Once you decide you're ready to bake, we will all continue to help you, so don't feel you'll be out on your own in the wild west.

Thank you bakers, thank you BO.

 

Here's what we'll be doing in this video and slide series -

 

MODULE 1 - BAKING

 

In this module we'll be showing you step-by-step how to make a thread -

Step 1. Getting the most recent version of the dough

Step 2. Copying and pasting it into your text editor

Step 3. Making a new thread and posting it

Step 4. Making a new pastebin and posting it

Step 5. Telling anons where the Fresh Bread is

 

By the end of Module 1 you will -

  1. Have all the knowledge you need to make a thread

  2. Have made your own thread/s in /comms/, the baking practice kitchen

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 4:20 p.m. No.11780   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1782

>>11774

ok, that's what we've been talking about at the end of last thread.

often, we talk about that stuff towards the end so we can give newbies a chance to ask questions.

anybody here who is new or fairly new?

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:25 p.m. No.11792   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1803 >>1815

>>11777

Baking students, follow along with the steps I'll post and bake your own bread here in /comms/ -

 

STEP 1 - PREPARATION

OPEN YOUR TEXT EDITOR & DOWNLOAD THE GENERAL IMAGE

 

  • Save the General Thread image. You'll use it to practice baking in a while.

 

  • Open your text editor;

  • On Windows, Notepad or download Notepad++ (free & multiple tabs)

  • On Mac, TextEdit or download Atom from https://atom.io/ (free & multiple tabs)

Anonymous ID: 929de5 April 30, 2020, 4:25 p.m. No.11793   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1802

>>11790

True. I do give the BO credit because when he is able to be around he's doing a lot apparently by looking at the board log.

But he said he got 2 new BVs but I haven't seen them do anything the last time I checked.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 4:26 p.m. No.11796   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1801 >>1812

>>11761

>>11765

 

<Q ignores the regularly scheduled bred and goes for the ebake straight from the paste.

 

Hm. memes matter. Q clicked on the long-precedented anon image, not the one they (Q) posted.

 

 

well, in a way Q just confirmed that the image should not change in the dough format discussed during last seminar.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 4:27 p.m. No.11799   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1809 >>1865

>>11787

yes, i guess i'm hosting and teach is teachin'. maybe i should call myself 'host.'

but i got too many names already.

IRL, i got exactly one.

 

is it my imagination or are things especially crazy now? i mean, they are never dull but….every day, i could tell a long story about what happened. like last night i realized i was working on 3 doughs at the same time: qrb, comms and qr (the last one was e-bake–never drop by a bred if yr not preppred for surprises).

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:39 p.m. No.11815   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1833 >>1836

>>11792

STEP 1a

FIND THE CURRENT DOUGH

 

The first step after you agree to bake is to find the most recent version of the dough.

Or.. as we say, 'grab the dough'.

 

The dough is always found in the current general thread.

It's the last bakers post, has a Pastebin link and is usually marked 'DOUGH'

 

See slide and video, then head to the latest general thread and find it or 'grab the dough'.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:44 p.m. No.11825   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1834 >>1843

>>11803

Yes!

Anons apologies for the little interaction from my side, posting the videos takes a long time and while they're uploading I can't post.

Don't think I'm ignoring anyone, I just miss a lot of posts b/c the above.

o7

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 4:48 p.m. No.11830   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11822

wish i could bake like that

i literally can't do it physically

but doesn't really matter, there is plenty to do

these classes and discussions afterwards are always good

despite the fact that we have 'competition' every week

first, POTUS rallies

next, corona

now, Q

(and if teach had started earlier, peach mint)

everyone likes primetime!

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:49 p.m. No.11833   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1838

>>11815

STEP 2

COPY THE CURRENT DOUGH

 

Let's now copy the current dough from the pastebin.

Details on the slide and video.

 

  • Click 'raw' first. This gives you a copy without formatting.

  • Select and 'copy' all the text in the box.

 

  • Note the 2 browser windows open, the current bread and the pastebin dough link.

It's a good idea to keep your windows tidy and not have too many open.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 4:53 p.m. No.11837   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1840 >>1879

>>11821

 

would not be surprised if Q has a lurk here at any given time. /comms/ is in the dough they also post in on /qr/, after all. On top of it… posting here would not violate their statement re: not having outside comms from the platform.

 

 

So if something good enough (or egregious enough) happened here in /comms/, they could shock the shit out of people and drop the mic hahaha

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 4:53 p.m. No.11838   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1847

>>11833

STEP 3

PASTE IT ALL INTO A TEXT EDITOR, OR EDIT STRAIGHT INTO PASTEBIN

 

Paste the dough into a text editor on your 'puter.

Use notepad or notepad++ (free download).

 

Or… ANOTHER METHOD -

When you open the dough paste in pastebin.com, just click 'clone'.

This creates a cloned dough you can add your notables into.

 

You will enter new Q posts and notables to the text doc, or the cloned pastebin doc.

Whatever you prefer.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 4:59 p.m. No.11846   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1848 >>1856

>>11840

 

haha.. I was being sarcastic… Doubt Q would actually post here. Lurk? absolutely!

 

They understand full well that the act of them posting here would convey the capacity to appeal to authority though, so I doubt they would want to hand weapons to bakers' enemies.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5 p.m. No.11847   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1857

>>11838

STEP 3a - VIDEO 3a - SLIDE 3a

TRIM YOUR DOUGH - REDUCE THE NOTABLES SECTION

 

Once you've 'grabbed the dough', the next step is to prepare it.

We will now cut the Notables Section down to make it a postable size.

The maximum size of one post is 4700 characters, so we'll make sure Notables is under 100 lines.

 

Check out the slide and video and then let's do it -

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:02 p.m. No.11849   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1850 >>1852 >>1855 >>2418

>>11844

definitely worth trying.

mp4s are a real pain on 8kun.

i just loaded some on endchan and they are much faster. btw, endchan says you can have up to 350mgs. In theory maybe. IRL, more like 50mgs. but that's still a lot compared to here. And they load faster--that board is just not under the same kind of attack.

 

try loading these ~50mg mp4s sometime:

>>5730, >>5731, >>5732 (it's the two docs who got banned by yt for contradicting the CDC, made an mp4 in case they get banned on all platforms)

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:05 p.m. No.11853   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1867

On videos, they're taking the same time as usual to upload, around 3-4 mins each on my connection (preddy fast rn).

 

They do take a while to load as well, as some are 12 - 13mbs. Follow the advice above to solve.

 

Aiming to tweak them, incorporating everyone's feedback, then I'll post to YT under a dedicated anon acct and embed them in class. That'll be much easier all round. Any thoughts / feedback on that let me know.

 

W&B, did you get your wizzarded images? I left them in the last class last week. Hope you like them !

 

Hey doc, always good to see you.

 

Hey everyone, thanks for coming. Sorry for the mild delays this evening.

Anonymous ID: 929de5 April 30, 2020, 5:06 p.m. No.11855   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1865

>>11849

>they load faster–that board is just not under the same kind of attack.

That's what I assume. The changes CM is making are amazing actually. The site hasn't run like this in a while; since 8chan definitely.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.11857   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1860

>>11847

STEP 3b - VIDEO 3b

MAKE SPACE FOR YOUR NEW NOTABLES

 

Let's make a space for your new notables to go into.

Check the video for a simple explain.

 

It's good practice to double and tripple check that you're listing them under correct thread number.

Run down the previous batches to check the numbering and check the current thread number that they match.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:11 p.m. No.11860   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1864 >>1869

>>11857

STEP 4 - VIDEO 4 - SLIDE 4

CREATE A NEW THREAD

 

When live baking, at around 650 - 670 posts, create a new thread.

If it's busy, start at 630 - 650 posts.

Bake earlier rather than later.

 

Tell the group you areBaking

Or post the Notables Bun

This assures everyone that there's a baker.

 

Open the Catalog in a new window.

Click 'Create a thread'.

Follow the steps in the slides & video.

 

We will be baking in the practice bakery at /comms/.

The /comms/ catalog link: https://8kun.top/comms/catalog.html

Open it up, follow along in this thread and actually bake your first BrEaD.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 5:12 p.m. No.11863   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1868

>>11856

>Don't know whether Q focuses much on the baking process most of the time, except when doc got a ty last month. Noice.

 

call this anon paranoid but, for better or worse, regardless if you only bake one ebake ever, or bake a shitload all the time:

 

Q knows exactly who everyone is.

How many breads you've posted.

What your note content focused on.

All other posts by all of your hashes.

 

Military people do not give blind compliments. GJ Doc o7

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:17 p.m. No.11868   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1878 >>1902

>>11863

well, i'm thinkin' that's true. have had one post that i'm 99% sure was from Q team, and i seldom guess about that kind of thing. But baking process is different than bakers. Not creepy to me, i figure God sees everything and that this movement is aligned with God's uh emissaries, so that part just seems natural. My end of it is to figure out the best way to serve. Remarkable experience.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:17 p.m. No.11869   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1881

>>11860

>>11864

STEP 5 - VIDEO 5 - SLIDE 5

ENTER THE THREAD INFO

 

If, after clicking on 'New Thread', the posting bar sticks at 100%,

open a new catalog window and look there for it. If it's not there keep

refresing the page.

Sometimes it can take from 30 - 60secs for a thread to post / show.

 

See the slide and video, and then let's enter the info and create our new thread -

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:19 p.m. No.11871   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1883 >>1909 >>1925

>>11866

I know the vids are better anon, but you can also learn through the slides.

Really sorry you're having issues.

I'll get them up on YT for next class.

Even if they change out later, that's fine.

 

It'll be much easier all round.

Thanks for persevering.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:19 p.m. No.11874   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1909 >>1925

>>11866

that is a long time.

there's a slight possibility is could be due to other posting problems OR bandwidth of comms - bc i was trying to post doughs on both /comms/ and /qrb/ after making edits, to see if they looked ok. And they just never posted (got the "posted" message for 20 mins or so). That's why i went over to /qr/ at one point - to see if it was the same there.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:22 p.m. No.11881   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1896

>>11869

STEP 6 - VIDEO 6 - SLIDE 6

ENTER THE REST OF THE DOUGH

 

Once you've made the new thread with the first dough section, open it up if not open already.

 

Let's add the next 3 dough sections from the pastebin as 'replies' -

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.11883   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1888

>>11871

>uploading vids

when you figure it out, let me know how you did it, plz.

whether for yt or any other platform.

BUT

if you decide the vids are too cumbersome, i think the slides are sufficient for almost everything. The only time where the vids is super helpful is showing the lag and making room for more notables.

What do you think?

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:28 p.m. No.11888   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1894 >>1897

>>11883

Sure will let you know how gyb.

Was thinking to make a YT channel for class materials and share the keys with Rusty so someone else has them apart from me (if you all think that's a good plan and Rusty agrees).

 

I think some people learn better from images and some learn better from video, some from text, so if we provide all 3 mediums we can cover all learning styles.

 

Having them on YT will let us embed them here instead of posting them every time (and waiting for upload) and will stream right away for students.

 

YT vids will mean we can make longer videos as well, and not be limited by the upload max size here.

 

What do you all think?

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:29 p.m. No.11889   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11844

will try right now.

a minutes later…..

well, what i just found:

vids are loading MUCH faster for me than before CM upgraded the speed.

But the trick seemed to work too.

Great idea, will put in the dough. will also try it with a machine that's got less ram, slower processing and see if it works there.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 5:34 p.m. No.11892   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1901 >>1920

>>11890

>A quick glance and it's perfect. Bravo.

thanks, but changed the order of posts 3&4 a lot, that rustled feathers earlier… warrants a close look, considering resistance to change. update should be solid… if anyone feels some sections in 3/4 would work better otherwise, jump in, i tried a good few combinations earlier to see what fits

Anonymous ID: 905f04 April 30, 2020, 5:36 p.m. No.11894   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1898

>>11888

Trippy trips teach, hot numbers.

 

Needed the slides and video, then practice… I can go back and look at where I missed a step in the vids.. Also watching how long it takes to do the steps in the vids are helpful.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 5:36 p.m. No.11895   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1906 >>1907 >>1912

>>11891

oh, i wasn't worried about execution, baked a good while back - rusty anon not Rusty anon, if you will…

it's more about where i wound up wanting to fix the pastebin shortcuts+newfag section+room in the often cramped 3rd post, and if it could be tighter still

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:36 p.m. No.11896   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1905

>>11881

STEP 7 - VIDEO 7 - SLIDES 7 & 7a

COPY THE DOUGH INTO A NEW PASTE

 

You've made your new thread with 4 dough sections? NICE WORK.

ARE YOUR LINKS GREEN? Don't worry. They're broken because we're linking to QR links, when we're in another board. Just ignore them for now, I'll explain fully about links in a short while.

 

The last dough post (the 5th at the moment), is the DOUGH post.

 

Now let's make a new pastebin - the fresh dough including your new imaginary notables.

Let's go….>>11881

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:36 p.m. No.11897   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1899 >>1911

>>11888

the only reservation i have about ty is that it's yt. very public. know what i mean?

 

Now, if you put them there, would i still be able to use them if you are not here? Would any special access be needed or would the teacher just ask students to go watch Step 1 (etc) and be available for questions? Trying to envision it.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 5:39 p.m. No.11902   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1912

>>11868

>>11878

 

Word. This anon literally watched the agreement between Q and anons in rt… where sometimes, Q will just post as an anon; and anons that do recognize it should just not have shitty opsec because wwg1wga and q has the right to be anon like anyone else.

 

Can I show proof of this? No. Happened in /cbts/ and was deleted by consensus.

 

Can I prove that? No. nor will I..

 

Shadilay o7

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:41 p.m. No.11905   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1917

>>11896

STEP 8 - VIDEO 8 - SLIDE 8

POST YOUR NEW THREAD LINK

 

That's it - Baked!

How's it looking? Let us know.

 

Now we need to go back to the current bread and tell the folks where to go next.

Post it any time from 730 posts onwards.

 

Let's just practice here, in our new thread.

First, let's grab the link, then paste it in this thread, pretending it's the end of the General.

 

Take your time, I'll have a short break while you go through it all.

 

Once your new thread link is posted, we'll take a look at it unless you tell us it's too bad to.

kek

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:44 p.m. No.11911   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1915 >>1916 >>1927

>>11900

Hey d'oh, good to see you.

>>11904

WnB did you get your wizzarded bake images? I dropped them in the last class, last week for ya.

 

>>11897

I understand. That was my only reservation as well. I pondered it and thought well… no-one can access unless they have links, and the links would only be posted here. So…

 

And yes, everyone would be able to use them. I'd post a paste with the videos and the urls to each one. Then anyone could embed the video along with the corresponding slide and text. As we do now, but the video would be embedded just.

Anonymous ID: 6cee99 April 30, 2020, 5:45 p.m. No.11912   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11895

Ah. Understood.

 

>>11902

Also came up some time during /qr/ 8ch.

Was a matter of adding non-trip Q posts to dough when poster ID was the same (non-000000).

Protocol: same as before; if no trip, then carry on.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:48 p.m. No.11917   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1922 >>1926 >>1931

>>11905

STEP 9

TIMING

 

This slide gives an idea on timing, and the sequence we generally make when baking.

Note that with timing, all bakers are different and all shifts are different.

Play it by ear and find your own timing.

 

If Q posts and it's day or evening shift (busy), or if there are issues with the board, you may want to start baking at 630 posts.

 

If it's a slower bread for instance graveyard, you could start baking at 700.

It all depends, and one of the skills you'll learn while baking is timing.

Bakers are constantly working on getting their timing bang on, so don't worry if you're early or late, we all are sometimes.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 5:50 p.m. No.11920   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1926

>>11892

>ruffled feathers

you have to understand–it's not just about ruffled feathers, it's about why they are ruffled. About organic change vs qwik fixes, about allowing people input and enough time to consider the ramifications of things.

 

Analogy:

Ever get presented with a list of 10 nommed posts at end of bred?

Assuming it's an anon, some posts might be decent, some not. But whatever their merits, such a list is too much to consider all at once.

 

Anons need instead to nom posts over the course of the bred, show why each one is notable, and wait for baker to think about it–and other anons to either do a second nom or say "no, not notable!"

 

That is the kind of process by which change can happen organically.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:51 p.m. No.11922   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1923 >>1924 >>1933

>>11917

STEP 10

LINKING

If you're posting from /comms/ threads to /comms/ thread, your link just needs >in front of the post or thread number.

 

If you're posting a QR link from here, or from QR to Q's board, you need the longform. Memorize it by the '3/2 rule'

 

3 >>and 2 // and the board name sits in the middle

 

>>>/qresearch/8980446

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 5:54 p.m. No.11924   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1930

>>11922

How's it going class?

Take your time and bake some threads.

Any questions which haven't been answered?

Any questions?

I'll post the class wrap up now, but we can continue the Q n A.

 

FEEDBACK & GOING FORWARD

Hope you've enjoyed the seminar, and please, your feedback is very, very welcome and helps us to constantly improve.

 

We'll keep an eye on this thread throughout the week, so if you come up against any issues, or have any questions, post them and we'll help you.

 

Recommend coming back to /comms/ anytime and making as many threads as you can.

Doing this will cement what you've learned here this eve. You start to get into a rhythm.

 

Next week we'll cover 'Notables, Timing, Tips and Traps', and do another practical sesh the week after that. Drop in any time, any week. We are here for you and dedicated to teaching and supporting you.

 

Thank you for coming!

WELL DONE NEW BAKERS & THANK YOU, BAKERS & RUSTY

o7

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 5:55 p.m. No.11926   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1955 >>1965

>>11917

yeah, that part's always a challenge… but also hella fun.

a bitch to deal with when the board's fucked, though, that's gotta not be fun…

 

what i had the biggest problem with?

the damn notables…

i know, i know, to many it's the primary purpose, but i always prefered the posting and organizing to running after notables, dealing with requests/complaints etc… i can admit if it wasn't for those i could probably bake a lot more often…

 

>>11920

true, makes sense.

but i came here, out of the bustle of the general, where discussions re this are the purpose… so… if not here, where/when?

it's still - and has been all day - in feedback mode, i didn't hijack the bake to impose it - and you're reacting a little as if i did, which is why i've been so surprised with the reaction(s).

but hey, whycantwebefrens and all, i like it here after all

 

>comfyfeatherspicrelated

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:02 p.m. No.11946   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1948 >>1953 >>1976

>>11942

>Best night

hm, lot of competition on that front, but a solid contender…

now i can't quite forget but a few months back an anon added a bit to the story, said DTTT admitted a little later his message was faked? not sure that's what it was

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:08 p.m. No.11953   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1956 >>1958

>>11946

>>11950

>Was that real? I mean, did the team called that guy?

been wondering same for quite a while.

one theory was that, if you read the longer cap for context, you see that by the time Q posted, DTTT had figured out his mistake, so maybe the call was then used to pass on info - what DTTT quoted over the phone and then posted on the board, in that that message could just as well have been an anon post.

or it was all a show, i have no idea.

as i said, i vaguely recall someone saying DTTT admitted making all or part of it up, but don't remember

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:10 p.m. No.11955   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1963 >>1965

>>11926

>damn notables

good topic to bring up.

Notables are what i like the best but i know it's not true for many bakers - and prolly deters some anons from baking. Have taught tech comm, understand some stuff about why.

Any way i can help?

 

>>11926

not a problem discussing anything. but if there's a strong push for many changes, you will of course get a "whoa, slow down" response. often better to propose fewer changes at a time.

 

>i didn't hijack the bake to impose it - and you're reacting a little as if i did

Actually, i don't know anything about that. Don't really know who's been baking (except doc), have been mostly on /qrb/ or here since last night. So i'm was only looking at the stuff you posted on #11.

 

Mostly just in the 'let's slow down' mode, that's all. Not triggered nor upset.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:13 p.m. No.11959   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1969

>>11940

yeah, i noticed coz i'm all over the dough. As long as it's consistent, should be good, so i don't have to change it. also, i like to keep up on your approach so i can easily step in if you can't be here.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:16 p.m. No.11963   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1991

>>11955

>notes/Any way i can help?

well, for a while, there was a more regular practice of split tasks: notetaker and baker working in tandem.

it's pretty much come back by now, though, no?

there was a lot of resistance to it back then, didn't have much allies there but when we did it worked wonders.

 

>>11955

> Not triggered nor upset.

great, haven't been all too diplomatic either.

the reason i jumped in today in the first place, was irritation at seeing the same old baking problems coming up again (arguments over pastebins=no room, etc), with added uncertainty with the patch anon and his how to start an OP posts (and if it's him or if i'm just confusing anons) etc etc.

 

//

dunno if anon who posted this in 11 is around?

>>11732 (11)

>positioning matters just not content

>yes, the welcome page has a lot of CEREMONY

 

curious to hear feedback re the 1st post in

>>11872 Q Research General #11999: parallel universe practice bread

now

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 6:18 p.m. No.11965   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1995 >>1999

>>11926

the notables are made moar difficult for a few reasons. 1) have newsfaggit with the 20 plus posts and although some of it is relevant most is older than a few hours. I give them a few early on and then cut it off.

2) on proofs that are submitted-it is up to the anon to submit a clear, concise title for the crumb..also up to the nommer to do the same as to why they have nommed it. When it's fast shit will get missed and you will always have complainers so know that going in and it's easier.

Remember it's just you at YOUR computer..no one else around so even though it's a public board you are operating in a vacuum so to speak.

once you get in a zone it's easier to deal with these things.

Headphones with you're fav music is always a good option.

 

>>11955

>Have taught tech comm

we have some common ground gy

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 6:21 p.m. No.11968   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1973 >>1979

>>11960

you fuckin' savage…

>>11961

my favorite. I've not even found those settings and if I did i would ruin it, for me, so I enjoy seeing them-they made several for me late 2018 I still have. We worked well together when the note/bake combo started.

teach ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 6:21 p.m. No.11969   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2012 >>2013

>>11959

Sure thing, I understand. Here's the 'Baking Class Teaching Plan I'm working from just now.

Anyone could take the class using this, the slides and the videos.

It's just cut and paste for everything and if needed, the text can be changed to each baker's style.

This is just a template.

 

https://pastebin.com/gqfunWCR

 

Really I want to get a full day free to tweak the materials and make new videos. Would like to rename them so there's no 'Step 3a and 3b', so all the steps, slides and videos are numbered in order.

And to incorporate all the feedback everyone's provided.

So they will change, but I'll test drive them all with you before we use, so everyone can check and feedback, then I can edit anything.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:23 p.m. No.11970   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1998

> >>11872 Q Research General #11999: parallel universe practice bread

also, regarding the reshufffling of posts 3&4 in there, it ended up being a deliberate strategic decision to separate GMT maps section from WarRoom section, being that those have regular updates and having them both at once increases changes of a mess - made more sense to have warroom closer to the meme archives, and reciprocally the posts/breads archives collated

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:25 p.m. No.11976   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1986

>>11946

Here is my baking story about the Night of the Two Breds:

 

Middle of the night, shill baked a real bad bred

But no other bakers so anons sort of posted there

 

Two hours later, anon comes along and decides to bake another bred but barely knows how; but anons jump to new bred. but anon isn't baking anymore.

 

I wake up about an hour later and wander onto the bred to find these two breds - one with 350 or more posts that looks like crap and another better looking bread with far fewer posts.

Only been baking for maybe a month?

 

But fools rush in….

Anons were real happy to get even a beginner baker so even tho i was a total klutz, we were able to shut down shill bread and get things back on track.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:27 p.m. No.11982   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1987 >>2008

>>11966

>some great baking stories to put in the dough

can't say i had much epic happen when i did, but what remains most is the memory of that feeling, that incredible rush..

toking and riding the bread that just flies by as you tweak your next post and hunt for notables - and going out for a quick take out club sandwich among normie city folk with that insane step in my shoe of BEING THE FUCKING BAKER for a few moments…

dat was sweet.

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 6:28 p.m. No.11983   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1988 >>2008

>>11966

have a ponder on that and post if I have one.

>>11967

have just such a bottle for that occasion. bought two 12yr ones in 2018..hopefully they won't become aged much moar.

One for us and one for the frens of the board I've made

>>11973

ty rusty, I truly appreciate that

bows head in respect

>secrets out kek!

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:30 p.m. No.11986   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1989 >>1992 >>1996

>>11976

> able to shut down shill bread and get things back on track.

oh well that reminds me of another of my fave souvenirs, not my baking but i think it was shortly before i did…

 

the usual shortage of bakers, and it was the highpoint of Nassim shitposting…

welp, nassimposter took the bake, and fucked it up real bad but in many hilarious ways…

ohman, anons were pissed. off.

but a few of them learned to bake right then and there.

lesson learned…

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f April 30, 2020, 6:33 p.m. No.11988   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2000 >>2008

>>11983

the collection of notables can be an art

 

the proper digg, with graphic and sauce when coupled with the right tagline… magic

 

as the Mind Slave Media learned from Bernays so well was the art of the headline

 

you see it abused in clickbait

but here, it's actual factual news

 

and when the whole is appealing and intriguing and true…

 

as I say it can be an art

and you do good work

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 6:34 p.m. No.11990   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1997

>>11979

good evening to you.

just sort of habbened that way.

fooled a few but not a concerted effort to do it as some thought it was three different people.

there is a baker now who uses the d'oh on the full bake-totally good with that as well.

Actually like the role i have

most of these bad ass mofo's know who is who.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:34 p.m. No.11991   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>1998 >>2000 >>2007 >>2024

>>11963

>11732 pb

that was me (you can trace back the uid, i just stopped using my name bc i know it can be traced back to class)

pretty much the same feedback, not real fond of new format, but always willing to talk. there's a history here too complicated to discuss right now, but this has been going back and forth for a while. it's ok, will all come out in the wash.

 

>>11995

re note taking

started out as a note taker, would have been happy to remain so, it's in my wheelhouse. but baker was what was needed, so learned that eventually.

Can you say the one or two things that most put you off about note-taking?

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:41 p.m. No.11995   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11965

newsfaggit is annoying, kek. most annoying is that so much of what's posting is semi-notable but not quite good enough to motivate me to type 30 notables just for his stuff. every. bred.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 6:41 p.m. No.11997   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2020

>>11990

>fooled a few but not a concerted effort to do it as some thought it was three different people.

 

word. for a hot minute when gyb first popped up I thought they were you.

 

then you popped up again, kek..

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:43 p.m. No.11998   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2007 >>2022

>>11991

>not real fond of new format, but always willing to talk.

i tried to have it close to what it was… it's the newfag section in there you mostly didn't like, right?

it's true there's more room in the 3rd post now with the shortened GMT maps sections (yet another proposed update that's been lingering around back n forth. normally i'm for the most links possible, but they're all on the same thread anyway).

or are there issues with reshuffled 3&4 too?

on those: >>11970

 

>Can you say the one or two things that most put you off about note-taking?

main thing, might sound dumb, but… ME.

the pressure/perfectionism.

not wanting to miss, wanting to evaluate, having to juggle that with speed of bread, etc.

also had to learn the hard way about a few tech issues, but once past that, twas ok.

but yeah, biggest hiccup for notables was all in the mental.

why i liked it so much having partnership with anon who liked gathering notables but couldn't bake, team-up was perfect

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:43 p.m. No.11999   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2001 >>2005 >>2006

>>11965

>Q proofs and anon analyses

send me screamin' from the room.

anons almost never give descriptions coz it's too damned hard–leave it to baker or note taker, haha. what they lack in eloquent they often make up for in vehemence (thenotable afapproach)

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 6:44 p.m. No.12000   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11988

it can be difficult for some but in my case it is do it long enough and you will get good. Also had much of the background- finance, political, tech in previous careers-a little space stuff too-can't say wut-shhh!

also way better at it now than when I started -had great mentors that were patient and watched this place (well not this place but you know what I mean) since early 2016 and saw all the shit go on.

 

>>11991

>would have been happy to remain so

someone else had other ideas about that whole thing. you and I had that "talk" on that sat night too. I laugh about it now

kek!

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 6:52 p.m. No.12005   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2011

>>11999

I've told them to "relax you have enough" and usually they back off. I don't understand the lack of discipline with always having 25 posts of that crap.

>>12001

they love you too.. MOSSAD COMPED BAKER!!

>>12002

yea fuck that shit! that was hilarious. Fucked with him the sunday night before that.

"wut's up essay..you let the chickens out right?"

the bunkbeds..classic

I left when after two breds of that shit.

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f April 30, 2020, 6:52 p.m. No.12006   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11999

> what they lack in eloquent they often make up for in vehemence (thenotable afapproach)

 

I often found that when I was at a loss for a tagline or a next bread title all I had to do was ask

 

of course some of the suggestions weren't useful

kek

entertaining sometimes but not useable

 

wuhan longpig roast is a recent example of humorous but unworkable… dark humor is like food in a communist system… some don't get it

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 6:52 p.m. No.12007   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11998

>>11991

>why i liked it so much having partnership with anon who liked gathering notables but couldn't bake, team-up was perfect

i ended up covering most of the notables anyway a lot of the time, but was in a comfy headspace to do so knowing i had a taker, i could switch to focus on other things (or deal with shitty puter)

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:53 p.m. No.12008   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2015

>>11960 "ima bakin raght naow"

>>11982 "the rush o' the bake"

>>11983 "must ponder….

>>11985 "weird stuff''

>>11989 love it

>>11988 the art of zee notable

>>11989 she's pretty

>>11980 only private gatherings (now i'm REALLY curious)

 

apologies if i left anybody out, just grabbed em as i went….so funny

u guise are puttin' me into a rotflmao state, i won't be responsible for what happens next….

Anonymous ID: 3daad9 April 30, 2020, 6:53 p.m. No.12010   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>11958

ty

 

I went to read that to the archives. I think it's real, mostly because Q posts 'Can’t wait for the green light./Teams on standby.' after that. Btw, amazing how the exact same 'q is a larp' has come this far.

 

anon out. Love you all, thank you for you hard work! <3

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 6:55 p.m. No.12013   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2026

>>11969

i understand, this is just part of the process of working things out. i'm doing the same thing with the dough, just collecting stuff and then figuring out what to do with it. it's a process, takes time.

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f April 30, 2020, 7:02 p.m. No.12015   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2049

>>12008

 

I've lived near the Amish and the idea that all your efforts, your work product can be a prayer…

 

just somehow appeals to me

plus I've always admired good journalism

and we don't see much of that these days

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 7:08 p.m. No.12020   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2082

>>11997

can't do the full bake and thought those issues would be solved with a new 'box but alas it's my connection and that is not going to change.

ISP is lying shitbag.

had to walk the line to find the truth..way past where I should get a signal. it's 6 at it's best.

only option is sat now so have what I have.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 7:09 p.m. No.12022   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2027 >>2028 >>2083

>>11998

>>11998

not dumb, but perfectionism is one of those double edged swords. Try to figure out where the rub is–specifically. And how to improve the stuff that can be better and let go of everything else.

 

>>11998

re dough, am realizing that i can't really talk much about that right at this moment, all i've been doing for two days is thinking about doughs–three different doughs. also, got burned out on recent changing /qr/ doughs bc we had baker misunderstandings over that and it took some time to straighten out. Everything is fine now but just wanna let the dough alone at this point, let the dust settle for a bit. If i get left behind or overruled by others about dough stuff, i've said my bit. Others can decide what they think is best.

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f April 30, 2020, 7:10 p.m. No.12023   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12017

>there are days when I swear there isn't an anon on the board, just shills and bots

 

and there are days I wonder if most of them aren't just deeply MSM programmed NPCs trying to achieve self awareness

 

as for botz… an interesting subject for the truly paranoid

Anonymous ID: 81354a April 30, 2020, 7:10 p.m. No.12026   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2034

>>12012

Kewl. Always good to have a sys backup.

>>12013

It is a process. An exciting and fulfilling one as well. It’s positive in a way in that it’s organic and evolves around everyone’s feedback and experience. It’s grown with the class… also like your dough.

We can see how it all goes, change anything g along the way if needed and strive for the best possible result.

Teach out as well, s’been a long day.

 

G’nite all, see you out there or next week.

Thanks for another top night of chill and keks.

o7

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 7:14 p.m. No.12034   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2047

>>12026

it is sort of 'my' dough at the moment, just as the lessons are sort of 'yours.' but neither of us want it to be 'ours' at the end, but to be something else. can't explain how much pleasure it provides to work in this way. really an honor.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.12036   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2040 >>2052

>>12024

favor: slow down a little and i won't be so burned out later. just can't think right now, was racing right up until class.

>not a matter of right vs wrong, really

nothing will happen if the dough doesn't change today, right? or tomorrow? dough has been with us for some time and whatever it's shortcomings, it's pretty darn good. just like the whole board–pretty remarkable what goes on here.

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 7:18 p.m. No.12037   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2039

>>12031

still sawing Z's then but about when I get in here pst..been late last few days though.

>>12032

too much in a day takes it out of you for sure especially with all the drops. Did the tag with wnd the other day and three crumbs after note drop..BANG a drop. they waited and they know

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 7:24 p.m. No.12044   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12025

>GlobalYheadBaker

what r all the bad names you've been called? I remember GaYbaker (by BO), Daybaker, Leaty/AFLB, Mossad, and C_A. my fav is me being told i couldn't be just one person but head to be a team coz i was on the board "20 hours a day." That was when BO posted the slaughtered 'whole buffalo' pics and asked who was paying me.

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 7:25 p.m. No.12046   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2053

>>12039

all are that..the entire team. And to think no "meetings" or direction needed…it's just done.

and why I absolutely love this place.

How many things should work.

I had a nice drinkey after that one and then went back with the next B for two moar.

Anonymous ID: 274287 April 30, 2020, 7:29 p.m. No.12052   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2055

>>12036

(also, pretty much all the other feedback i got earlier for the test thread was positive, seemed fine to most… anyway)

 

>>12045

>if that was you

maybe? chimed in sometimes, but also annoyed at the barkers, i'm just trying to get things fixed because i could see a clear path to do it, tried a few things to suggest a solution(s)…

you can see

> >>11872 Q Research General #11999: parallel universe practice bread

and ponder it all

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f April 30, 2020, 7:30 p.m. No.12053   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2061

>>12046

 

I saw something the other day that talked about military units

how in times of need a platoon or larger group could spontaneously break into functional units and complete complex tasks all with out command structure

they just knew what needed to be done and did it

doc ID: 4de2ca April 30, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.12055   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12052

I brought that over to comms specifially when it was mentioned so gy could take a look at it, Rusty too, I don't do that sort of thing, at all

we have shills that pick up on suggestions like yours and make a mountain out of them, attacking bakers, I wanted to nip it fast, nothing more

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 7:38 p.m. No.12058   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2418

>>12028

>>>12028

>hope it's ended–i dealt with war room pressures plenty bc of endchan. Those fags worse than shills bc they are actually sincere and think what they do is the best. So i always have to set limits with them or they'll push and push til they get what they want ("they" usually being sgrvl).

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 7:40 p.m. No.12061   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2062 >>2067

>>12053

perfect example-some frens I've had over the yrs said about civilians (they were mil and I'm not) you choose what and who you are by how you react in a pressure situation.

They did not accept me as one of them to start but gradually did so I could join in on the jokes about different branches and all that back-slapping stuff.

Those times long ago but still fond of them all.

No longer in contact

 

we didn't have the training. Just the greatest civilian collection of doer's (imo) ever assembled in one place.

I've always believed (and it sounds corny ) that this entire thing chose the participants.

Things done in years leading to this were the preparation-some good and bad-but all towards it.

gyb ID: cc5091 April 30, 2020, 7:47 p.m. No.12065   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>>12040

>>>12052

>>seemed fine to most

>no worries. it will be what it will be. nice meetin' yous–if indeed we have not met before. i fully expect that i'm still confused about at least half the bakers around–who is who or who bakes when or whatever. doesn't matter, just glad bakers are here.

 

>>>12056

>same time, same station. but always different!

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 7:50 p.m. No.12066   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2068

>>12057

goodnight to you my fren

 

>>12062

It does. Up an down each new day

Why I'm honored to have a place alongside each and every one of you. consider you all my family and not the extended version either.

You get some rest as we do it all again tomorrow.

I'll get my exercise done earlier now as mentioned so the availability will be better later in your shift as mentioned as needed.

 

See everyone next week in the lounge

doc ID: 4de2ca April 30, 2020, 7:53 p.m. No.12068   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2071

>>12066

thanks d'oh

g1 learned today from nurse that he might be graduating from hospice, it's finally sinking in, not sure how that is going to go but life here is diff everyday, I appreciate your help, I hope that's always shown

ttyt

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 7:58 p.m. No.12071   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2072

>>12068

I am always appreciative. you know that.

What you did for me last year with the raising of profile after what habbened with 8bit will never be forgotten..ever.

 

wut does it mean to graduate from hospice…not the end? I know why they do hospice but not that term in that way.

doc ID: 4de2ca April 30, 2020, 8:06 p.m. No.12072   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2073

>>12071

hospice was called because he'd lost so much blood and at 91, with failing kidneys we weren't sure he was going to live, hospice steps in, I gave them my take and they listened, took him off all the nonsense meds and gave him time to either heal or die, seems he's going to live, he's can't take blood thinners to prevent another stroke and he will have one, this is his second and more damaging, the big one is coming, don't know when, but hospice will only keep them if death is coming, he's gotten on his feet again so they can't keep him, will find another agency, same kind of set up, help to come in for baths, that sort of thing, he might go back to church, he talks about it, we'll see, until he has the big one, make more sense?

gb d'oh or mc ID: 11f6aa April 30, 2020, 8:14 p.m. No.12073   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2074

>>12072

got it.. much clearer now-ty

Good for him. Glad to see improvement but feel ya on the thinner thing.

Mother that way but not involved-their choice-not the side I told you about or some of it.

thanks for taking the time to explain that

don't even know if I want to be that old.

mebby 80 or so.

 

See you in the morning

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 1, 2020, 4:22 a.m. No.12083   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2103 >>2202

MORNING!

henlo all

 

man what a wild Q posting nite

but still

um

on what was discussed yesterday pm + class…

not rushing anyone, but any reason NOT to go ahead with revised bake?

>>11872 ?

 

now again, i:

-didn't impose it on the real board

-came over here to discuss it

-presented alternatives

-took in objections and corrections

-reposted for feedback

-asked for feedback

-asked again for more because not that much given

-most feeback eventually given is positive, negative feedback not specified or all that constructive because stated objections aren't so related to actual content but more a reflection of a single baker's present feelz? ( >>12022 ).

Again, i'm just sat there asking what parts are still a problem so it can be adjusted and good to go, but i got nothing.

 

Tryin to workshop here, just to implement basic tweaks - in order to settle things that have been problems for quite a while - which might just be a good part of why dude is so burned out and doesn't want change in the first place, funnily enough.

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 1, 2020, 2:29 p.m. No.12105   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2203

Just made another post on the general, regards the dough change -

 

We've all, as a group, updated the dough since we were on 4chan.

Changes have always been discussed in the General thread.

I note that you didn't discuss these changes with anyone, and took it upon yourself to bake and change it all on your own.

 

Why should one person who no one knows, come in here and change the dough?

Do you honestly thing that's going to work?

Do you not know the lengths we all go to, as a board to prevent this happening?

Are you new that you don't know this?

Anonymous ID: 9170c2 May 1, 2020, 2:31 p.m. No.12106   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2107 >>2202

>>12097

>IF they do, it was all done out in the open, where people can see it, so… kek.

WAS IT FUCK YE SICK CUNT!

A bunch of fuckin' tits sitting in a bread teaching/learning to bake CANNOT possibly believe they're savvy enough to make such decisions and impose them upon MILLIONS, WORLDWIDE when they can't even sit and read through instructions on how to bake i.e. they need their little fucking helpers in a goddamned bread which is brewing a shit tip of fucking DIVISION!!!

Anonymous ID: 6cee99 May 1, 2020, 4 p.m. No.12116   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2117

>>12113

Dough change occurred between #11503 and #11504.

See: >>>/qresearch/8986844

Baker appears to have taken a dough that filled in a missing Q post, but had the graphics section significantly modified, per >>11872

All pastes seem to confirm this.

Anonymous ID: 11f6aa May 1, 2020, 5:02 p.m. No.12120   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2202

graphics anon..

SHUT THE FUCK UP

you tactless, impatient piece of ungrateful SHIT.

leave the ego at the door…I know that's hard to do when you think you have it all figured out and are above anyone else here.Your attitude and demeaning comments at everyone is on display for all to see.

Get a fucking life

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 1, 2020, 5:24 p.m. No.12122   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2123

>>12117

I asked you 'who changed the dough?' as it appeared you had knowledge of it in this post >>12097

 

I didn't say you'd changed it. I'd just read the convo from last night in the other class and saw that anon was pushing for dough changes. I figured it was that anon who had changed the dough and thought that you might know who that anon was.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 1, 2020, 5:29 p.m. No.12123   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2124

>>12121

 

The post was referring to the changes that were being proposed last night in sem #11.

 

If you like I can scrape every you of mine since last night :)

 

>>12122

 

I was talking about the proposed changes. Would you like me to scrape my yous here too?

 

Or better yet, have rusty do it, he's got my hash and so does fastjack.

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 1, 2020, 6:26 p.m. No.12130   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2131 >>2132 >>2203 >>2418

Dough Reverts Made

I noticed a lot of changes had been made to the dough. I've changed them back -

 

  • Added back the Int Research Threads List - Had been removed / put into a paste

  • Same for the Other Dedicated Research Threads

  • Removed Endchan WarRoom Ops, they're not from our WarRoom

  • Removed the 'Newfag' Section which replaced the Research Threads list by someone who didn't discuss the change with anons

All for changes here if anons have input, not when they're done sneakily.

o7

ID: cc5091 May 1, 2020, 9:30 p.m. No.12161   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12085

hey baker

no worries and no apologies necessary

go easy on yourself

8kun board is different from 8chan

kinda glitchy

like dancing with a klutzy partner

main thing is this:

  • bake early (like 670 when getting up to speed)

  • allow a lot of time for stuff to 'drop'

  • if u get 'flood detected' on the bake, it's gonna drop - eventually

  • sometimes when things are crappy, i just drop a line to anons telling them that and to wait - there will eventually be a bread

 

if u have any specific q's, can try to answer.

or you can also try to shadow bake here in /comms/ - to review and also build up confidence

i did it for a month before i was willing to actually bake

ID: cc5091 May 1, 2020, 10:34 p.m. No.12165   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2166 >>2203 >>2418

>>12101

Came over here to see what conversation ensued due to dough changes and dough reversion. Will take a look at breads and see what i can figure out. Have been following the recent dough drama since almost the start and got caught up in it, making the first reversion. Am pretty damn 'done' with it, having spent hours previously dealing with revisions, /comms/ with other bakers, etc. All i wish at the moment is that the bread remains mainly as it was a month ago, before this whole circus began.

= = = = = = = =

AFTER SOME INVESTIGATION……

 

Here is the offending pastebin - which was inherited by WNB.

About 99% sure i know who posted it,

bc i baked a LOT of his wonky dough's last Sept/Oct: sgrvl.

Recognized the format right away. He has a habit of putting the bread no. at the top of the dough; i tried to get him not to do it bc it's different than in /qr/ and we had a new baker on endchan (didn't want him to get into bad habits).

 

https://pastebin.com/JJpDbwQB

Dough begins like this:

 

Q Research General #12345: …

 

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////BREAK 0\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

 

This dough WAS snuck in, see CAP.

But not by any baker, but by sgrvl. He presented it as though it were a regular updated dough. BUT said to "try it out."

 

Sgrvl never learned to bake on /qr/; finds it too confusing. Perhaps bc he is confused himself–some kind of schizoid problem, he would admit that himself. Endchan anons know but maybe not everyone here does. Anons there tried to help him but he gets agitated sometimes, that's why he persists and cannot be deterred. Must be handled with unyeilding firmness both for his sake and ours.

o7

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 1, 2020, 10:49 p.m. No.12166   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12165

It's okay. His stuffs been removed and the sneaky shit put back to normal. I know that dough like the back of my hand because I've tended it daily for years. I know what's been put in and taken out behind backs and it's back to normal now.

End of story.

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 1, 2020, 11:09 p.m. No.12171   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2172 >>2173

>>12169

It's still back to how it was before.

They requested to add this which will keep all their stuff in their thread.

If they want to post ops they can post in-thread like everyone else does.

Should be end of story.

 

War Room

>>8758804 WARROOM #1 This Memes War ← go here for current up to date ops

Get Everyone at ONCE and HIT 'Them' With Everything You Got! THINK PICARD MANUEVER! [POST STORM - THE WAVE]

[1] MEME MEME and MEME some MOAR! Stay Focused on Current HOTTOPICS

[2] Pick 2-3 hashes from the target area htps://www.trendolizer.com Hijack them to get your #hash out.

[3] Post @ 10-11Am | 12-3Pm | 6-9Pm EST

[4] Always Post meme or Cap

[5] Use .@them to respond to all their following.

[6] Remember to be Quirky in your posts.

[7] RT other's tweets

[8] ReTweet LASERFAST. Use https://tweetdeck.com

[9] Information WarFare https://archive.is/E0oJm

#WAKEUPAMERICA #FACTSMATTER #SAVEAMERICA #UNITEDNOTDIVIDED #WWG1WGA

ID: cc5091 May 1, 2020, 11:36 p.m. No.12177   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2178 >>2204 >>2418

>>12168

yes sgrvl would like endchan to be the hub.

no they are not the ones ddosing the board.

endchan is a shoestring op, still don't have their time converter function fixed, out since Sept.

Owner left mods run the place now.

>>12170

still got the country threads unconsolidated, and that may cause body too long at some point. so there's that if anons or bakers care.

>>12172

endchan a honeypot

i think it's just sgrvl, he is not entirely "there" mentally. not a hypothesis. he can be both paranoid and grandiose.

>>12174

>their infiltration and underhandedness

i always knew he wanted anons to bring everything back to his board but knew he wouldn't succeed.

i just confronted him about it on /qr/ not unkindly but i did ask. he says he didn't do it bu t in an unconvincing way, by citing an alibi. but it's his signature way of doing a dough. there's some possibility that he does not remembermultiple pers? this is not a secret, anons asked him about it. it's something like that (they thought he was compd but eventually figured it out). It's why a second board exists on endchanthe one i claimed, qrbunker: it's bc many of us just couldn't take it any more, the craziness of s's board. So we broke off and started a new one.

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 1, 2020, 11:43 p.m. No.12178   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2179 >>2180 >>2183 >>2204

>>12176

Word. I feel ya. No prisoners bro. The dough's not their personal fucking pinboard.

Feel bad as well b/c yesterday in here I said that practice dough looked gud. Thought it was a student baker legitimately practicing and had formatted the dough how they wanted to practice. Man… sneaky.

Didn't see the comms convo until today.. was close to losing it and then saw the dough changed. Then I lost it.

>>12177

Definitely looks n sounds like multiple personality dissorder stuff there. Was he the anon in class pushing for the dough changes do you think? That's some switch if so.

ID: cc5091 May 1, 2020, 11:59 p.m. No.12180   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2186 >>2204 >>2418

>>12178

>>12178

i asked him but he didn't answer although he's still posting on /qr/ right now. he's very easy to peg, so much compulsivity. anons on endchan got suspicious when they saw he had a different tripcode for each each function he performed (BO, baker, BV, anon). He makes endless lists; his doughs kept getting more and more detailed, longer and longer. Then he started creating pinned threads on each and every separate DS character, they were starting to take up the entire board….that's about the time i left.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 12:03 a.m. No.12182   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2183 >>2186

>>12179

mental illness but fluctuates, was better when he and i first met. i think he attracts others who are uh similarly manic and wanting to "do something" (frantic meme campaigns). pretty sure he thinks just that any board activity other than meme campaigns is not very useful. messianic.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 12:13 a.m. No.12185   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2212 >>2418

>>12181

>push anons to endchan when 8kun is down.

Don't agree, I am BO of the other endchan q board, qrbunker, and i'm definitely not interested in driving anybody anywhere. but do want to provide a place to work if 8kun goes down. It's actually selfishit's ME who wants a place to work, to digbc i can barely tolerate twatter, etc. That's why i was bakering on qanonresearch–coz bakers have to baker, diggers have to dig, etc. Nothing wrong with endchan as a bu board; but it's not home.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 12:36 a.m. No.12187   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2188

>>12186

thx for what you did, somebody had to do something. not thinking this particular thing will be a problem in the future. But something will be. This thread, this class - highly successful. Attracts its opposite, even on an energetic level. We'll recognize this "pitch" next time, but it'll be something new next time. New yet the same….man, can't stop yawning.

 

Have to go, tired. Had to walk a long ways to get to the lakeside part of the park. Parks are open but they cordon off 90% of the parking, isn't that great? So i got a lot of exercise just getting to the park. Got warned by a park employee against sitting on a bench for too long - by myself….i kid u not. told him to report me as non-compliant - might as well push the bureaucracy hard enough to push govenor to do something even more stupid than usual.

Sleep now,

o7

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 2, 2020, 6:55 a.m. No.12190   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2192 >>2204 >>2418

>>12179

> going to be og graveyard bakes tonight ;p

What do you mean, anon?

 

If the dough’s changed overnight, in any way, it’ll be reverted, again. It’s simple.

And, if Endchan faggots start on bakers again, ever, there’ll be war. Just sayin’.

They have 12 lines in the dough for ops, and can post op call to actions in-thread like we all do.

There’ll be no more encroachment on the dough or deleting QR material from the dough to get more room for endchan ops.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 7:16 a.m. No.12192   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2193

>>12190

>And, if Endchan faggots start on bakers again

 

That's what I meant. Fuck it. Assholes want to fuck with my bakers?

 

It will fucking rain notables. In the og bred to make anons comfy and faggots cry :D

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 2, 2020, 7:37 a.m. No.12193   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2194

>>12192

Kewl.

And if it happens again that you see the dough’s been changed, maybe alert someone rather than cheer it on ala >>12097

Anons who protect the integrity of the dough aren’t shills. It’s the shills who change anons dough, not the other way around.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 8:01 a.m. No.12194   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2195

>>12193

 

looking at that again, i can see what happened.

 

1) that poster made a comment on what was happening in /qr/.

2) ! figured they were talking about the dough discussion.

3) Wasn't aware of the true nature of events until I was accosted.

 

You can either remember that, or you can remember my actual actions as a baker; your choice, as always..

 

Either way, I probably will be going lurk only here. The shills don't like me much to begin with.

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 2, 2020, 8:09 a.m. No.12195   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2196 >>2197 >>2198 >>2204

>>12194

Yes, they were talking about the dough discussion. Here’s the post you replied to >>12095

You replied -

> yeah, the shills haven't spoken up yet. IF they do, it was all done out in the open, where people can see it, so… kek.

 

So from where I’m sitting, you said that anyone who spoke out about the dough being changed was a shill. Am I mistaken?

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 8:37 a.m. No.12199   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12198

>>12197

The discussion you two are having right now illustrates why it's important to do things slowly and carefully with the dough or anything. Because in a format like this, it's super easy to have misunderstandings. And then it takes forever to clear it up.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 8:43 a.m. No.12200   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2201

 

>>12198

 

K.

 

there are TWO bredds

 

ONE IS TEST (in comms)

 

THE OTHER IS LIVE (in qr)

 

I WAS REFERENCING THE TEST ONE AT ALL TIMES.

Concurrently to this going on, the bullshit in qr was ensuing.

 

Since I am here, talking about this dough under consideration, I assumed all commentary posted here about it was LIMITED TO THE DOUGH __HERE._

 

So I was referencing shilling from the end chan douches, HERE. NOT IN QR.

 

Do we have an understanding?

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 9 a.m. No.12201   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2205 >>2207

>>12198

>>12200

Since you guise are here, there's something you might want to take a closer look at.

Yes, sgrvl & crew can be a problem. But sgrvl has a very particular way of talking/writing; you can see it in these posts right here:

>>12167

Very easy to recognize.

 

The anon who posted the proposed dough changes in #11–well, listen to how he talks in a reply to me, saying "why so triggered?" (below)

 

This is not how sgrvl talks. Doesn't have a subtle bone in his body. But it IS the way that aflb talks. Not necessarily aflb, but not sgrvl, either. Some chance that we now have a third party who's trying to throw spanners whenever possible. And assuming we'll think it's just sgrvl.

 

proposed dough changes from #11:

>>11675

>>11676

>>11677

>>11678

(etc)

 

some of the replies to me:

>>11729

>>11730

>>11744

 

d13c46 << this UID from #11

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 2, 2020, 9:07 a.m. No.12202   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2209 >>2213 >>2214 >>2237 >>2240 >>2410

well that… escalated. good GOD.

what the HELL are you guys doing?

this is how you responsibly manage change and baking decisions?

by making a scene and going full scorched earth, spending bread after bread screaming at anons, accusing one after the other… look at you bunch of paranoid fucks, this is ridiculous.

way to show you're NOT a bunch of self-proclaimed ruling class, control-freak hypocritical elitist gatekeepers.

 

let's recap.

2 days ago, on the qr board:

-"ah shit, again problems with the dough. i tried to help them with that many times before, but those curmudgeon baker dick-taters always mess it up back"

-"come to comms, there we can take time to talk and think, that is where we do these things"

-"well ok, i admit i do have apprehensions about the club but i can try i guess"

-"no no it's not a baker club we're not like that anymore those are old rumors"

-"ok so here is a proposed solution to many problems, basically ALL THE SAME INFO just reshuffled around"

-"ALL say it's good, except one who doesn't like it, but won't really say why, because, you know, it's all so tiresome, you know? anyway these things take time, child."

-"ok, ok, fine."

 

yesterday:

-"…" [crickets]

-"ok. but, um, you know those issues that were why do this in the first place? they're still around, and going to be… why not just go ahead with this one? all the other guys liked it, what's wrong with it now?" * >>12083

-"…" [crickets]

-"ok. well, i'll just keep this work pastebin updated so it's ready to go, just in case. Oh, anons are pointing out baker missed a Q drop, there's a deadlink in the globals, wrong caps for a Q drop… is he seeing all this? well i'm seeing so might as well add to the parallel paste. New bread, he saw just one of the fixes needed, here brah you can try this one out. Oh, he took the whole thing, oh well ok. Maybe see if he keeps it for next bread? Oh he does. No anon complaints, but better keep the baker crew updated: guys, it went live…"

-"looking good", "great, all fine until the shills come over to fuck it up"… * >>12096 , >>12097

 

and fuck it up they did. because when some controlfreak came over and was outraged, he just flat out reverted to old bread. IMMEDIATELY AND UNILATERALLY.

all while REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEING and kvetching at the fuckers who change the dough… immediately and unilaterally. Irony proof? probably not.

but the thing is, i don't know what dough he took to go back in time, but it messed up way more than just the cosmetics that got him so furious.

WR section reverted back to an older state, the stupid fucking pastebins instead of research threads came back, meme ammo section reverted to an older section…

YEAH, NICE CLEAN UP BRO. WAY TO DEAL WITH A "CRISIS", WHAT GLORIOUS LEADERSHIP YOU ARE DEMONSTRATING.

all the while, now anons are getting pissed off because they don't quite understand what's going on and they see a mad baker putsching the dough.

bakers jump on a narrative that it was an evil plan by evil anons or worse still their mortal enemies the endchans or gerbil or sgrvbl or someone else (look i don't into this namefaggotry. i tolerate it for bakers because they're useful, but holyfuck does this whole episode show WHY anons are so weary of fucking namefags and their lazy asses sat on their deluded thrones of "authority".

 

IT IS AT THIS POINT IN THE STORY THAT YOU ARE KINDLY INVITED TO NOTICE THAT ALL THE KVETCHING AND COMPLAINING AND REEEEEEING CAMEAFTERTHE BAKERCLUB BARGED IN TO GET THINGS THEIR WAY.

NOTWITH THE INTRODUCTION OF THE REVISED DOUGH.

except for when GMT map anon came in, but that's another story.

i mean seriously, holyfuck: >>12106 , >>12120

>graphics anon..

>SHUT THE FUCK UP

>you tactless, impatient piece of ungrateful SHIT.

>leave the ego at the door…I know that's hard to do when you think you have it all figured out and are above anyone else here.Your attitude and demeaning comments at everyone is on display for all to see.

 

i approve of that message. this is just embarassing. at that point the baker club started going after each other, it was an ugly sight.

but you know what's funny? reducing the redundant GMT part was neither my suggestion nor my work, another baker anon did, and i just went with it because it made sense.

you know, this "collaboration" they speak of…

 

then all sorts of things happened, haven't seen all of it, especially catching up on QR, but…

 

(1/3)

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 2, 2020, 9:07 a.m. No.12203   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2410

…cuntinued. 2/2

 

>>12105

> you didn't discuss these changes with anyone, and took it upon yourself to bake and change it all on your own.

no, i came here to discuss all these changes, AS I WAS ASKED TO DO, and did, and i asked again and again for feedback, and wasn't the one who baked it, and did none of this "on my own"… it was all part of the process.

>Why should one person who no one knows, come in here and change the dough?

because sometimes all it takes to solve a problem is one person?

because i was invited in here to do exactly that?

what the fuck else is this cuntry club for anyway?

also notice this weasely shit: "one person who no one knows"

OF COURSE YOU DON'T KNOW ME. I AM AN ANON. IT'S HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE.

WHAT PART OF THAT IS SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU FUCKS TO UNDERSTAND?

doesn't mean i haven't been along you pretty much all that time, posting and baking, and ebaking as anon.

i just have never, ever, ever tried to build a persona out of it, as you creeps are on about.

it's all about "who is this", "who are you"… who fucking cares? LOOK AT THE WORK. THAT'S WHAT WE ARE HERE FOR.

 

>>12130

>- Removed the 'Newfag' Section which replaced the Research Threads list by someone who didn't discuss the change with anons

but that was already fixed: yet another bug that was a direct result of triggered baker reverting back without even looking at what he was doing.

 

>>12165

>All i wish at the moment is that the bread remains mainly as it was a month ago, before this whole circus began.

bakers being bakers fighting for the STATUS QUO - if not even going back in time.

>bc i baked a LOT of his wonky dough's last Sept/Oct: sgrvl.

>Recognized the format right away

ooooh look at the detective work! baker lives on baker street, what a sherlock.

but no.

unless that's a name YOU've given me, i am not that anon.

>Sgrvl never learned to bake on /qr/; finds it too confusing. Perhaps bc he is confused himself–some kind of schizoid problem, he would admit that himself. Endchan anons know but maybe not everyone here does. Anons there tried to help him but he gets agitated sometimes, that's why he persists and cannot be deterred. Must be handled with unyeilding firmness both for his sake and ours.

geezus, we're into deep psychoanalytics now. just unfortunate that it's all on the wrong person.

 

then it gets into ever more paranoid territory:

>>12168

>This was all a ploy to push anons to ENDchan.

>>12172

>It was the point of all of the shilling. Endchan is a honeypot.

just all sorts of wild accusations, completely unrelated to me.

now, are the shills that came in the shitstorm related to Endchan? maybe, i don't know.

but we all saw this coming, the few level-headed bakers there agreed, of course shills might come in and use this to scream.

way to fall DEEP into it, guys.

way to overreact, get angry, get the board angry, and fall back into a position that favors the shills.

 

>>12174

>The positive things about today is that everyone's aware of their infiltration and underhandedness now.

i, um… maybe not the best lesson learned, but ok

>We can all also keep a very close eye on the dough and any changes revert back right away.

you should always keep a close eye. problem is, for a while you've been keeping eyes closed, so there were issues.

>And if they ask for anything to be put in the dough again, we can tell them where to go.

DUDE what did we just say about shills?

this kind of over-reaction is EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT:

-legit anon comes in to help

-is welcomed by Rusty and a few nice bakers

-proceeds to help, shills jump in to confuse things

-REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ANYONE WHO WANTS TO HELP IS EVIL AND MUST BE BANNED

 

don't you see the problem?

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 2, 2020, 9:07 a.m. No.12204   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2410

…cuntinued. 3/3

 

>>12177

>still got the country threads unconsolidated

sigh, again with the consolidation. NO. ONE. CLICKS. ON. A. PASTEBIN.

>i think it's just sgrvl, he is not entirely "there" mentally. not a hypothesis. he can be both paranoid and grandiose.

again with the psychiatry and "confirmed" feelz.

>i just confronted him about it on /qr/ not unkindly but i did ask. he says he didn't do it bu t in an unconvincing way, by citing an alibi.

has it not crossed your oblivious mind for a single second that you MIGHT BE WRONG? i was deep asleep then, definitely not me.

 

>>12178

>Feel bad as well b/c yesterday in here I said that practice dough looked gud. Thought it was a student baker legitimately practicing and had formatted the dough how they wanted to practice.

well, yes, sort of.

 

>>12180

>i asked him but he didn't answer although he's still posting on /qr/ right now. he's very easy to peg, so much compulsivity.

no wonder the poor schizo he was confronting was confused.

"very easy to peg", huh? you little detective, you.

 

>>12186

>Well I guess we have to keep our eyes open for that anon who was pushing for dough changes, and any other sneaky additons to the dough.

HELLO

LOOK AT ALL THIS SNEAKY I DONE DID

 

>>12190

> if Endchan faggots start on bakers again, ever, there’ll be war. Just sayin’.

just flat out stating to the shills how and where to attack them to create yet more fighting and kvetching. sad.

 

>>12195

>> yeah, the shills haven't spoken up yet. IF they do, it was all done out in the open, where people can see it, so… kek.

>So from where I’m sitting, you said that anyone who spoke out about the dough being changed was a shill. Am I mistaken?

these are the great intellects at work baking: "anyone who spoke out"… sigh, no, you pathetic simpleton.

 

then they start getting mad at each other again

>>12197

>Fucking no, I was talking about the endchan people for God's sake.

 

then they continue being confused by their own theories that aren't theories because they know better

>>12198

>Why would the endchan crew complain about the dough being changed when it was them who changed it?

>Why would they change it sneakily and then complain about it?

>Doesn’t make sense.

 

So these are the bakers, folks.

Just a peek.

 

Apologies for the shitshow, but looking at the dough now, and gazing upon the fuming remains of this battle, i'm glad it happened.

This accidental kick to the hornet's nest seemed to be badly needed.

It's only unfortunate that many bakers conclusions is to be even more entrenched in their clique and traditions.

I'm not going to pursue the "debating", infighting and drama, you guys are experts at it on your own.

 

Apologies and congratulations to Rusty, because he was one of the few how was proper and focused on work all along.

there were others, but i haven't followed IDs or names or anything (anon creed you know). You guys really, really rock.

and you are absolute SAINTS to be dealing with this whining, screaming, controlfreak bunch of cunts.

 

have a lovely day

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 9:08 a.m. No.12205   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12201

gotta go sleep some more for now. but if anyone has the time, might go back and take a really close look at the discussion in #11, espec what was said by d13c46.

 

the following is a bit controversial, but would like to encourage bakers when discussing things here to namefag. if they don't want to use "real" baker names, maybe they could use others (like "Teach"), just for the sake of easier comms. Coz we have a pretty big gp of bakers hanging out here now and it would be helpful for better understanding. don't have to do it every time (espec outside of class) but sticking in a name so we can pair it with an id - that would make it easier to talk. Might help a little with shills, as well.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:14 a.m. No.12207   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2208

>>12201

 

eh, it feels like the same infiltration shit that's gone on in /qr/. It's pretty much feeling like a poser came in, and got people riled up with intentional confusion…

 

Feels like a feature of the dough bickering in /qr/ too.

 

 

oh and look, the spam shill douche themselves just showed up late to the party… Typical.

 

See you guys in the big stream o7

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 9:26 a.m. No.12209   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2408

>>12202

First, who the fuck are you that you think you can come in and create discord after we spent hours cleaning up a mess caused by anon trying to sneak changes into the dough yesterday morning. Sneaky changes will always be reverted.

 

Second, why do you think your opinions should trump those of the half a dozen bakers who are here every single day and have been for at least 10 months minimum? Or worse, the opinions of anons, who weren't consulted at all?

 

Third, why are you acting like such a dick?

 

–over and out.

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 2, 2020, 9:33 a.m. No.12210   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2211

*oh right, just one more thing: if i wanted to SNEAKILY change things all on my own, i could have just grabbed the bake and done it.

but it was all done out through here, following the process of posting and feedback and collective work.

cheers!

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 2, 2020, 10:12 a.m. No.12211   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2213 >>2214 >>2408 >>2874

>>12210

Untrue. That’s not how changes are made.

They’re made in the general with the whole board. We don’t change the dough. You’re in the wrong place. We teach anons how to bake if they want to, sharing knowledge so others can participate.

Now -neckyourself.jpg-

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 12:22 p.m. No.12213   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2237 >>2408

>>12211

>You're in the wrong place.

BINGO. Right on the money.

Although bakers do change the dough, they do not do it as the result of discussions here.

 

This thread in not a bakers' council with decision making powers. It's a class thread that allows ongoing comment on baking matters and feedback to new bakers.

 

Decisions about dough changes are indeed made on /qr/ not here.What's more, they are virtually always small decisions, not grand redesigns of the dough. Only time that was attempted was by FJ - and we all also saw how that ended.

 

The worth of our current /qr/ dough has been proven many times over. It has stood the test of time. While it can be tweaked in response to current events (like elections), gradual shifts in how we do things (two-page notes), or the availability of new tools or techniques (bakers tools), the basic organization remains the same.

 

How doughs are built up

I'm currently in the process of creating a dough for this thread. It's based on the /qr/ dough but adapted to our needs on this board. Each week, that dough is posted, so anyone can look at it and give feedback, because it's still a work in progress.

 

Several different parties have made suggestions and many bakers and anons have contributed so far. Slow & steady, we build something up, making small changes along the way.

 

cc:

>>12202

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 12:28 p.m. No.12214   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2215 >>2219 >>2408

>>12202

>IT IS AT THIS POINT IN THE STORY THAT YOU ARE KINDLY INVITED TO NOTICE THAT ALL THE KVETCHING AND COMPLAINING AND REEEEEEING CAMEAFTERTHE BAKERCLUB BARGED IN TO GET THINGS THEIR WAY.

>

>NOTWITH THE INTRODUCTION OF THE REVISED DOUGH.

The blow up last night started when I asked

"Why the fuck do we need this shit in the dough?" after which, for simply asking the question I was attacked by all the teamwork shills that had came here to push for a link to end chan. Didn't take more than 1 bread before the Endchan link was there and people were trying to direct anons to it.

>>12211

>Now -neckyourself.jpg-

Good to see you again.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 12:34 p.m. No.12216   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2217 >>2218

>>12212

If you don't want a discussion, then why post here?

>done by those who attack bakers 24/7

Bakers attacks have many sources, not just one. Not exactly surprised sgrvl would funnel anons to endchan - or try to 'manipulate' the /qr/ board. But he's not the only one trying to change the board, is he?

 

Bakers deal with attempts to change the dough all the time. Feedback - such as your screenshot - is helpful. Gives anons an idea of what's going on, but all anons not just bakers.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 12:47 p.m. No.12218   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2408

>>12216

>Gives anons an idea of what's going on, but all anons not just bakers.

Exactly the reason I did what I did last night. Sometimes you have to get the enemy to expose themselves. Mission accomplished.

 

Information warfare, chess not checkers.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 12:56 p.m. No.12220   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2238 >>2240 >>2408

>>12219

>>bakers club.

>There is no bakers club.

Show me where I said there was a bakers club retard.

 

>>12219

>>i got attacked

>

>Well, poor you. You just attacked bakers in your post, and now you want tea and sympathy?

I forced them to attack me purposely, retard.

 

>>12219

>Don't need help of the brand you are offering,

>over and out.

Hit and Run, Vanish.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 1:28 p.m. No.12225   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2226 >>2228

>>12223

 

>>>/qresearch/8996067, was issued in response to people bitching back and forth about the dough in that bred. So all of the contestants were given the same answer. because at that point, it was unknown whether both sides were being played. Hence the reference to the usual shills that do that shit.

 

Since BOTH sides were confusing the issue, I said fuck it, told people to neck themselves, took the og dough, and BAKED WITH IT. Pics relate.

 

 

so if you think I am part of this tripe, kindly go fuck yourself :)

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 1:40 p.m. No.12228   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2230

>>12225

>>12225

>so if you think I am part of this tripe, kindly go fuck yourself :)

People weren't arguing back and forth, 10 shills jumped on me for bringing it up and you jumped in with them.

>>12227

>I DEFEND YOUR ASS AND YOU FUCKING ATTACK ME.

How exactly was calling me fag boi and telling me to neck myself defending? You got lumped into the trip because you inserted yourself into the it.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 1:56 p.m. No.12234   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2235 >>2236 >>2580

>>12227

>I DEFEND YOUR ASS AND YOU FUCKING ATTACK ME.

>>12230

>YOU WORDS WERE IDIOTIC, AND I FUCKING MOCKED THEM

>>12232

>exactly. because you were BEING ONE.

 

 

>I was defending you

>I was comparing you to rainman

>I was defending you

>I was calling you fag boi

>I was defending you

>I was calling your words idiotic

>I was defening you

>I was using my baker tag to help create a consensus

>I was defending you

 

>>12230

 

>iF i WASN'T DEFENDING YOUR ACTIONS, i WOULD HAVE LEFT YOUR PASTEBIN TO ROT AND WENT TO BED.

Thanks white knight, I didn't have a pastebin.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 1:59 p.m. No.12235   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12233

>>12234

 

You clearly do not understand where this baker was coming from;

 

yes, hurr durr, the pastebin can be replaced.

 

I was looking to make anons feel comfy overnight.

 

fuck you for being divisive.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 2:18 p.m. No.12236   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2246

>>12234

 

….Because a comfy anon will dig and post, as my fucking bun screenshots prove.

 

A non comfy anon will not post digs, and will just shitpost.

 

The buns fucking prove it. get off your fucking high horse.

 

GROW THE FUCK UP.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 2, 2020, 2:50 p.m. No.12237   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2239 >>2240 >>2249 >>2408

>>12202

>but you know what's funny? reducing the redundant GMT part was neither my suggestion nor my work, another baker anon did, and i just went with it because it made sense.

>you know, this "collaboration" they speak of…

 

you're right on the money in a few places there

I suggested the reduction in GMT area

I had no idea GMT anon would be so upset about it

 

many things get discussed here

a place to put dough revision history is one I"ve suggested that didn't come to pass

 

The main problems that I see are twofold

 

hair triggers on too many anons

 

you are in too much of a hurry to get things done

while I agree with some of the changes you wanted to make, and the practice bake

>>11872 looks good

 

It is impossible to ram changes like this thru

I think I tried to warn you of that

Too much of a hurry and now look at the situation

 

I think part of your problem is that you do not understand the paradigm here

It is NOT a vertical hierarchy

It isn't even a true collaboration although that comes closest to describing this phenomena, it has…

some elements of a meritocracy

some elements of a true democracy

some elements… defy any past definition that I know of

 

>>12213

>Decisions about dough changes are indeed made on /qr/ not here.What's more, they are virtually always small decisions, not grand redesigns of the dough. Only time that was attempted was by FJ - and we all also saw how that ended.

 

I can give you several examples from the distant past

a. when the bread expanded to more than one page

b. then the next expansions to 3 & 4 pages

b (1.) the inclusion and removal of the Q quote, and latin phrases

c. several times with re-arranging of sections since then

 

I agree that changes are not made here

but they should be discussed here

 

however…

too many hair triggers and too much "friendly fire"

for my taste

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 3:13 p.m. No.12239   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2240 >>2241

>>12237

 

For my own part, I apologize tot he bread for sliding this seminar; I'm going to defend myself from bullshit, and call bullshit out every time, though. Sorry for the mess.

 

>too many hair triggers and too much "friendly fire"

 

As far as that goes… How much "friendly fire" is to be tolerated until one starts to wonder if they are being culled? This has happened enough times over the last 3 sems (the only ones I've attended, including this one) that it really makes me wonder.

 

Shadilay, for what it's worth..

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 3:20 p.m. No.12240   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2409

>>12237

GMT consolidation would make sense.

except if you're the GMT guy, i guess.

Never thought about it until is was brought up, it's a good idea but not worth fighting over.

 

>>12239

Somehow, we all have to step back, let the dust settle. Dough is ok for now, we are all ok, no use worrying about who said what to whom. This got riled up again after the three page post starting here:

>>12202

But it's hard to sort out who is who at this point and what positions have been taken. Better to let things go, imo.

Got someone interested in baking for next class, sounds serious. That's really what matters.

 

>>12220

Sorry i got the bakers club thing wrong, mixed up the iuds. Confusing at this point, so many different posters.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 3:32 p.m. No.12244   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2254

>>12243

 

I'm a baker starting cbts. Granted I only started keeping buns during /qr/, because I would only ebake on the previous 2 boards, but the shills will still know this.

 

They would know it even if I did not imagefag, just like any anon can.

Because personality traits. and image searches. and patterns.

 

Do sleepers exist?

can they be good and/or bad?

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 3:44 p.m. No.12246   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2247 >>2248 >>2408

>>12236

> but complaint about getting attacked–no use complaining

I wasn't complaining. I saw what was happening and said what I did so they would attack me. Part you are missing GYB. That's why I specifically said "Why theFUCK" Sorry I called you a retard.

 

>>12236

>A non comfy anon will not post digs, and will just shitpost.

I was posting the way I did so they would continue to attack me and expose themselves.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 4:01 p.m. No.12247   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12238

see

>>12246

 

>> but complaint about getting attacked–no use complaining

>

>I wasn't complaining. I saw what was happening and said what I did so they would attack me. Part you are missing GYB. That's why I specifically said "Why theFUCK" Sorry I called you a retard.

Was for you, apologies I called you retarded.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 4:09 p.m. No.12249   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2250

>>12237

>>12237

Yep, discussions are good. In fact, they are so goodand so helpful for creating a vibrant kitchenthat it wouldn't be surprising if we started getting visitors in this thread who are less interested in discussion than in disruption.

 

I know i'm stating the obvious here, but bakers are always the 'weak link' because there aren't that many. Renewed attacks must be expected now that our numbers are increasing when (((they))) want the opposite: a tiny, overworked crew who makes mistakes and works themselves to a frazzle.

 

Some observations about intentional disruptors (as opposed to those who just fly of the handle easily):

  1. tend to focus on who is to blame rather than trying to solve the problem

  2. keep whipping up the flames of dissension rather than finding ways to decrease tensions

  3. often use purposely insulting terms and a mocking tone while stating their points in absolutist terms

 

Normal bakersthe ones who bake regularlyjust don't do that stuff. Not very often. If we flare up, we look for ways to smooth things over or work them out. We use common sense most of the time and forgive small errors on the part of anons or other bakers. We focus on amplifying what works and making the board a viable place for Q posts and anon productivity.

 

Those who can't or won't take that approach are probably not well-suited to baking.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 4:47 p.m. No.12254   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2255

>>12244

baker, i think i hear your concerns. But doubt very much that you are being especially targeted, espec in baking classes. We've all been thru the mill in the last year–and many for years before that. You are welcome to come to class or to this thread and share your thoughts. As is anyone.

 

Current baking crew work well together, there is mutual respect and relationships of trust. Also personality difs. But things work best to this extent that we forget about them and instead focus on how to keep the board open 24/7 and in good working order.

 

As new and returning bakers come into the kitchen, the composition of the baking group changes and we have readjust. Can be annoying at times but having more hands on deck makes for a better kitchen in the long run.

 

As for sleepers, shills and the like: if we stick together, they will never get the best of us.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 5:01 p.m. No.12255   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2257

>>12254

>But doubt very much that you are being especially targeted,

 

me personally? I agree with you. i already said it isn't about me; It's about making any baker that aspires to be one (especially after leaving for whatever reason) feel like the bullshit is not worth it.

 

or that coming here to comms, is not worth it. so it's not about me. it's about making this place inhospitable to any incomers.

 

>Current baking crew work well together, there is mutual respect and relationships of trust.

 

never had a problem in qr. only in here. Kind of makes me regret posting here (Sorry Rusty, it's not your fault.).

 

I've already posted the last two breds of my work here, that should speak for itself.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 5:26 p.m. No.12256   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2271 >>2283

>>12241

>But nobody is being culled from classes, anyone can come.

(forgot to actually answer this)

 

Do you think new visitors make sense of the bullshit that happens at the bottom of the seminars due to the shilling and infighting?

 

Because to the casual observer, the bullshit at the bottom of last one looked like god knows what because it was literal shilling, from offboard

 

the bullshit at the bottom of this one.. looks like infighting to the casual observer.

 

So you tell me? I never said the owner and volunteers of this board were doing the culling; But it is happening if you choose to see it.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 5:30 p.m. No.12257   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2259 >>2262

>>12255

well baker, hard to discern what you think is a problem with class. those who teach it are interested but can't read your mind. Class focus is on baking not board issues, dough, or other stuff like that. Whatever your ideas are ("your work"), that's separate from class.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 5:31 p.m. No.12258   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2260 >>2580

>>12252

Damn Fagevelli you just playedyourselvesextra hard.

 

>>12230

> i DID NOT CALL YOU RAINMAN i SAID YOU WERE ACTING LIKE THEM. -ID 758382

 

>>12232

>>I said you called me fag boi and told me to neck myself. -ID 5b9a87 (Baker)

>exactly. because you were BEING ONE.

 

Not only were you baking as5b9a87you were shilling forWRandendchanas758382

 

Chess, not checkers you dumb fuck

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 5:52 p.m. No.12267   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2268 >>2354 >>2580

>>12259

>see the post below yours, and above this one.

>>12260

> looks like all my responses in that shot convey exactly what I asserted here, in this thread.

Show me where you asserted that you were both baking last night and shilling under 2 sep IDs.

 

>>12262

>>hard to discern what you think is a problem with class.

>see the post below yours, and above this one.

 

Also, if you're trying to blame for division in baking class Rusty can see who was and was not in baking classes. Last time I was on /COMMS/ before this chain of events was to warn GYB shills were trying to gaslight him >>10301 Which was 04/11/2020. And just so there's no confusing here's who just wrecked you shill. (pic related)

 

>>12262

>You need more proof? pff. it's like it was on cue.

  1. Become incredulous and indignant

  2. Use a straw man.

  3. Question motives.

  4. Associate opponent charges with old news.

  5. Ignore proof presented

  6. Change the subject.

  7. Silence critics

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 5:56 p.m. No.12269   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2270

>>12268

  1. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

 

  1. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

ID: 5f9c2f May 2, 2020, 5:58 p.m. No.12271   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2272

>>12256

> I never said the owner and volunteers of this board were doing the culling; But it is happening if you choose to see it.

 

< never said you were a goat feltching queen but it is happening if you choose to see it.

 

why would you post that?

do you actually think it's true?

if you do think it's true sauce it.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 6 p.m. No.12272   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2283 >>2347

>>12271

 

Do you control who posts here?

actually I could delete posts, ban users etc… but that defeats the purpose of free speech

 

DO you KNOW all the hashes and who they are?

some of them yes, most of them no, and if the anon IP hops it's anybody's guess. that's why tripcodes are allowed here

 

Use your head rusty.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 6:02 p.m. No.12273   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2274

>>12270

>why is that?

Maybe I like picking on morons. Maybe I just hate shills. It's apparent now to all that read this you fit into both categories, yo.

 

Still trying to ignore the fact that you just got exposed for who and what you were involved in. Time to switch to a new personality.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 6:04 p.m. No.12274   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2275

>>12273

 

please. you're acting exactly like tiresias or aflb or ay of the other stupid personas right now.

 

Do you honestly think your virtiol is going to stap me from baking, helping anons? Q Trump?

 

Fuck you.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 6:06 p.m. No.12275   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2276 >>2277

>>12270

>>12274

>please. you're acting exactly like tiresias or aflb or ay of the other stupid personas right now.

Keep using strawmans, it's definitely working. Since I've already made you my bitch theres no reason to continue this convo, you got wrecked. It's a wrap.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 2, 2020, 6:40 p.m. No.12283   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2296 >>2298 >>2409

>>12272

and I noticed you did not answer the question

 

why would you say

>>12256

> I never said the owner and volunteers of this board were doing the culling; But it is happening if you choose to see it.

 

sauce it

 

I take serious offense at the implications of that statement.

If anything I've helped foster and mentor bakers, provided them with work area

My personal feelings are that if you cannot figure it out on your own no amount of lessons will make you great at it.

We need bakers, and I'll take all the good ones I can get and won't hold my breath on trying to train "great ones"

 

>But it is happening if you choose to see it.

answer the question: why do you say I cull bakers

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 6:43 p.m. No.12296   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2302 >>2323 >>2329

>>12283

 

YOU do not. You are the best anon I have ever met for bakers.

 

The VISITORS TO YOUR SITE are doing it.

 

Not your mods, not the teach. not even the known bakers.

 

ANYONE can imposter here. except YOU.

 

There is no need to sauce that.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 2, 2020, 6:56 p.m. No.12302   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2321 >>2323 >>2391 >>2409

>>12296

>ANYONE can imposter here. except YOU.

 

see

>>5101

get a trip

use it here to prove authorship

 

any anon can use a tripcode here

 

I see you backing off your assertion of the BO here culls the baking herd

 

competition culls them

attrition culls them

baking can be very demanding and it does cause baker burn out

mostly it's lack of a thick skin, lack of common sense that culls them

 

I and most of the bakers do everything within our power to help aspiring bakers and to relieve tired ones.

 

this kindergarten tit-for-tat squabbling is not a productive use of time

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 2, 2020, 7 p.m. No.12308   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2321 >>2366 >>2374 >>2401

>>12298

> my ENTIRE post history

 

I can see the post history of that IP hash

Nobody but CM can see actual IP nums, a unique hash is all BO & BVs can see

 

unless you IP hop and I cannot follow that, it appears as a new unique poster with a new IP hash

 

I have no way to know if you or any anon IP hops here

don't care

those with some pride in their work are not ashamed to sign their work and be known by a handle so long term conversations can take place about that work

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 7:11 p.m. No.12321   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2391

>>12302

I'll get the trip for use here, if I choose to post again.

 

>I see you backing off your assertion of the BO

 

SHOW ME where I accused Rusty of doing that.

 

i will not be getting a known pastebin. having to do a fucking captcha for every post while baking makes watching people bitch about the pastebin one… comical.

 

>>12308

 

yeah, I know. point remains that my hash has been consistent through this entire thread, and the grief being brought here..

 

including for the bakes I did in qr that I posted in this thread.

 

I have all my recent pastes and some bun shots too, so if anyone wants to play the lit naker game, I'm down.

 

I don't like being attacked despite doing good work and will hit back at anyone that fucks with me. I dont care how og they think they are. this isn't a game and everyone here knows it.

 

tip: combofix + ccleaner changes your hash without changing your ip. ymmv.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 7:12 p.m. No.12323   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2325 >>2329 >>2350 >>2580

>>12302

>this kindergarten tit-for-tat squabbling is not a productive use of time

Nor is shilling while baking and dual boxing. Especially when targeting anons calling out shills for trying to direct people to endchan.

 

>>12296

>YOU do not. You are the best anon I have ever met for bakers.

  1. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions

 

Plain and simple homeboy was baking and shilling dual-box last night, was pushing for the WR links to endchan, he was called out and is now trying to change the subject to anything and everything other than the fact he was involved in what happened last night.

 

>>12277

>traducing

Funny how all the sudden you talk like a fed instead of a gangsta, yo. Guess the mask fell off.

Traducing would involve me being deceptive, I didn't IP hop, I didn't manipulate the bread, I didn't go along with a raid of shills from endchan and give them what they want while attacking anons that were defending QR.

 

Those were all the things you did. No amount of blame shifting or straw man arguments are going to change that. You admitted to it here >>12227, >>12230, >>12232 where you admit to both comments that were from two different ID's one of which was the baker.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 7:23 p.m. No.12329   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2356

>>12323

 

wait.. are you classifying yourself as a visitor to the site and not a known baker?

(tags… this post?) β†’ >>12296 (Me)

 

because that shouldn't trigger you if you are a known baker, you know..

 

but whatever, keep going.. what was it? I'm the clown? kek.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 8:05 p.m. No.12351   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2352 >>2353 >>2400 >>2401 >>2409

>>11733

>>11734

why would bakers spend so much time to post bs in the bread, instead of actually helping anons with baking notables in the general breads?

 

why was last 'baking seminar' so much different than others?

were bakers called out for much obvious fuckery again?

were bakers so confused/panicking that they actually forgot to fake the 'hey, how is this baking thing working?' conversations?

 

you maybe want to go check:

all lb:

>>10510 Baking Seminar #10

>>11115

>>11141

>>11193

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 8:10 p.m. No.12353   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

ItΒ΄s interdasting to see that bakers (the ones that are clowns) are so much aware how much they glow, that they feel the need to spend so much time to post here, hoping they would be perceived as real patriots.

however, just as every other thing the deep state tries, itΒ΄s just destined to fail.

 

>>12351

>why would bakers spend so much time to post bs in this bread, instead of actually helping anons with baking notables in the general breads?

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 8:13 p.m. No.12354   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2355 >>2356

>>12267

Nice to know who's posting. Thx for info on gaslighting, as i think i said then, this is ongoing. but appreciate the thought.

 

>>12350

same comment as above. i'm trying to get along with all bakers and end of spending a lot of time trying to even figure out if it's a baker i'm talking to.

 

= = = = =

you guise are both proficient bakers who make a helluva contribution to the board. So what's the beef? why all this arguing? just what the shills want.

 

Check out fdcca0.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 8:30 p.m. No.12356   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2357 >>2358 >>2391 >>2408

>>12329

>>12347

>>12350

You're like as ex who just won't stop texting. Not very thug life. Gotta keep up appearance though (pic related)

 

>>12354

We had no beef until he started dual-boxing to shill for Endchan along with the raid last night.

 

Let me make something clear,crystal clear.I don't care about any of your personalities, your egos, or your motives. I will defend /QR/ - Q - and the Anons all day everyday with all of my abilities. I don't hide who I am. If you are helping the cause you're my ally. If you are trying to hurt it, or especially hurt the less in-the-know anons by doing things like sending them somewhere comped you are not.

 

> I don't care about any of your personalities, your egos, or your motives

Pertains to no one in particular.

 

>>12355

> posts ridiculous bs

Who exactly are you speaking to?

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 8:42 p.m. No.12357   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2359 >>2391

>>12356

>You're like as ex who just won't stop texting. Not very thug life. Gotta keep up appearance though (pic related)

 

just fuck right off. You think I'm shilling? I'm defending myself.. From YOUR FUCKING ACCUSATIONS TO BEGIN WITH

 

why… do you think I told you to neck yourself in the first place?

 

I do not, nor ever had ANY interest in tendchans garbage.

 

this is what it's about right?

 

keeping the dough og… right?

 

I did.

 

And you hav ebeen an asshole for half a bred about it.

 

fuck you.

 

. and you respond with… that?

 

okay..

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 8:49 p.m. No.12358   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2360 >>2361 >>2362 >>2400

>>12356

>Who exactly are you speaking to?

Obviously I was speaking to the ID I replied to, the one namefagging.

Obviously you know that.

 

Obviously clowns tried to post in /comms/ and have 'baking classes' hoping to be able to blend in again, after so many anons called out clowns in the kitchen.

obviously clowns not realize that this is not gonna work, and try to fill these breads with bs again, hoping this would at least make this board appear a little stupid.

 

hint: nothing you do, nothing you could think of, nathing at all can stop what is coming.

if you donΒ΄t realize that truly WWG1WGA and break free, you will go down.

(I pray for you that you will break free, but, itΒ΄s your own decision. God wonΒ΄t force you to repent and be forgiven your sins, he offeres a chance though.)

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 8:50 p.m. No.12359   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2363 >>2365 >>2367

>>12357

>YOUR FUCKING ACCUSATIONS TO BEGIN WITH

You seem to not understand the difference between presenting an accusation and presenting evidence. It isn't an accusation when it's proven.

You were dual-boxing (admitted) and lining up against anons that were fighting against the endchan raid (screenshots shown)

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 9 p.m. No.12370   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2409

>>12362

why would he namefag?

why would he namefag the same exact way (having a blank namefield so itΒ΄s not "anonymous" but " ") like a known shill namefags?

NO ANON NAMEFAGS.

clowns do it all the time.

 

and, obviously GYB is known to many anons as a shill baker that leaves out relevant info and pushes bs slides or disinfo.

 

also, most obviously, shill bakers have completely given up on using /comms to blend in, now they are panicking and trying to make this bread appear as ridiculous as possible.

itΒ΄s desperation.

j, r, h should break free if they donΒ΄t want to go down real quick.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 9:02 p.m. No.12372   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12366

why do you namefag, shill?

why do you namefag the same exact way a known shill namefags in general?

>>9007394

 

itΒ΄s real good to see that many shills broke free already, that is why now the few that are left have to shill besides baking bc there simply are not enough shills left.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:03 p.m. No.12373   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2375

>>12371

 

oh stuff your strawman up your own ass.. If you're trying to stop me from baking, that won't happen.

 

If you're trying to stop me ffrom participating here… well.. you're trying rellly fucking hard at it.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 9:06 p.m. No.12375   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2376

>>12373

No intentions of stopping you from anything, my intentions were to expose you and your actions. I couldn't have done that without you losing your shit and forgetting which ID you posting your shilling from, so thanks.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 9:11 p.m. No.12378   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2409

>>12374

qrb is a clown board, a board Q chooses to not post on, a board that MSM does not refer to, a board no anon should spend valuable time on, a board that is heavily advertised by clowns (divide and rule).

not actually surprising that namefagging clown baker pushes this.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 9:14 p.m. No.12381   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2401

I can see that you try to shitpost as much as possible to hide my posts, bc you are kind of surprised that an anon made his way here.

so, will promise to post some info in every fake conversation /comms bread you bake.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 9:17 p.m. No.12383   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2388

little info on two of the bakers.

at a time when the bread was ghosted bc no baker was available in the general bread (the bread that Q posts in, the bread with digs, info and memes by anons), two of the bakers rather posted bs in /comms then stepping up to bake.

one of them even expressed much amusement over the bake being fucked up.

such bakers are not here to help and they will be called out.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.12386   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2387 >>2388

>>12385

You want me to prove you own 2 computers, that's your fall back.

 

  1. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

 

Keep going.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.12388   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2389 >>2400 >>2405

>>12383

look at this:

3 bakers who do not step up and bake when bread in general (the real and important bread) is ghosted bc no baker available - same 3 bakers have plenty of time to post bs in /comms.

 

would patriots do that?

 

>>12384

>>12385

>>12386

>>12387

and is faking another conversation hoping to fill the bread so my posts 'disappear' really all you can do?

if so, why not just break free?

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:28 p.m. No.12390   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12389

 

you keep claiming I admitted to something I know nothing about.

 

Now you are projecting that I'm telling you to prove a negative.

 

Is this really the hill you want your persona to die on?

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 9:38 p.m. No.12391   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2392 >>2393 >>2394 >>2409 >>2418

>>12302

well-said re culling

<tit-for-tat squabbling is not a productive use of time

even better said.

 

>>12321

>having to do a fucking captcha for every post while baking

per post catpcha never necessary, just one captcha for uploading the pastebin, with or without a named pastebin

 

>>12356

trying to follow your argument, not clear to me that anybody is shilling for endchan except sgrvil, who is always doing so. but he is either schizophrenic or has mpd. he's not all there mentally or emotionally.

 

>>12357

your bakes are top-kek, know you did not screw up the dough. paste was almost certainly inserted by sgrvl whorememberis not very balanced.

 

>>12380

the main way to show what you are as a baker is to produce a good pastebin. KB's pastebin's are pristine, among the best. other than the two of you trading insults (and bad feelz as a result), what can you show that he is aligned with endchan faggots. i just don't see it. how can you prove someone else is running two UID's?

 

also the idea that endchan qanonresearch is a honeypot – sgrvl not really competent enough for that kind of op, imo.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:44 p.m. No.12393   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12391

>the captcha

 

understood, not talking about pastebin.

talking about captchagate on /qr/ before Q told Fastjack to knock it off with the format changes.

 

>Your bakes…

 

o7 appreciated.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 9:49 p.m. No.12394   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2395 >>2398

>>12391

> i just don't see it. how can you prove someone else is running two UID's?

>>12230

> i DID NOT CALL YOU RAINMAN i SAID YOU WERE ACTING LIKE THEM.

>>12231

> I said you called me fag boi and told me to neck myself

>>12232

> I said you called me fag boi and told me to neck myself

>>12232

>>I said you called me fag boi and told me to neck myself.

>exactly. because you were BEING ONE.

 

Fag boi comment - ID 5b9a87 (Baker)

Neck yourself - ID 758382

 

He admitted to both. End of story. The "og" bake in question had links to the outside boards. Next would be to push to add thewarroomlink to dough which had endchan links and anons telling other anons to meet there to chat.

 

>>12374

>Just found out i'm owner of /qrb/ on endchan.

 

Can't imagine why you'd be defending his, total mystery.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 10:07 p.m. No.12398   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2399 >>2401 >>2409

>>12394

i looked at that bred, saw that i was there for part of it, got tired of the arguing and departed. That's what i saw there before - arguing & insults but not evidence. Listing rhetorical devices used in arguments is not providing evidence of wrong-doing. If you want to say that another baker insulted you and you didn't like it - okay.

 

But do you think you are the first baker that's ever gotten shorted by another baker? Far from it. We are not perfect here, friend. Some things are best ignored or better yet, forgotten, in the interests of doing work that transcends personal squabbles. It is amazing how well things can work when bakers move through this stuff instead of getting stuck on it.

 

>defending his? you mean "this"?

I'm not at all defensive about the endchan boards. Did a lot of good work there in Sept and Oct, was thankful for the opportunity. Now thankful for the the ability to maintain a bu place for q work. Endchan is not a boogeyman, just a platform for work if things go south unexpectedly. If no one else goes there in that event, one anon at least will be able to continue doing digs that go straight into qresear.ch at end of each bred.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 10:12 p.m. No.12400   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2401

>>12351

>>12358

>>12388

do you really think you could hide such posts exposing you clowns by just shitposting to fill?

donΒ΄t you think I could repost them in every /comms bread baked and link them to the top posts?

use logic.

see that nothing you could do could ever stop Q.

see that nothing you could do to ever have clown bakers be blended in (other than actually baking legit).

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 2, 2020, 10:16 p.m. No.12401   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2402 >>2404 >>2408

>>12398

> Listing rhetorical devices used in arguments is not providing evidence of wrong-doing

You're working extremely hard to ignore the fact that up bread heplainlyadmit to posting both the neck yourself and fag boi comment which came from 2 separate IDs one being the baker. His fall back is hurr durr I don't own two computers as if cell phones with VPNs and TOR don't exist.

 

I know your games, you'll be pushing for a consensus to haveWARROOMstickied in a no time and trying to divert anons to endchan.

 

>>12400

>It's also obvious who this is.

 

Rusty Confirms he can't see IP-hopping

>>12308

>unless you IP hop and I cannot follow that, it appears as a new unique poster with a new IP hash

 

dipshit thanks him

>>12347

>Thanks for the confirm.

 

2 posts later

>>12351

>why would bakers spend so much time to post bs in the bread, instead of actually helping anons with baking notables in the general breads?

 

>>12381

>I can see that you try to shitpost as much as possible to hide my posts, bc you are kind of surprised that an anon made his way here.

ID: cc5091 May 2, 2020, 10:43 p.m. No.12404   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2405 >>2406 >>2409

>>12401

baker, i'm not working hard at all. i''m tired. trying to get two good bakers to stop arguing, don't really care about muh 2 computers or other legalistic arguments, it all begins to sound like Capn Queeg after a while.

 

Do you want to know the real reason that more anons don't bake, or at least not forever? Because they find it difficult to let go. No other job here requires so much letting go as baking. No other job requires as much flexibility–or forgiveness. In the end, everything that happens here has to be water under the bridge. Otherwise, you will burn out.

 

gyb, over and out.

Anonymous ID: fdcca0 May 2, 2020, 11:01 p.m. No.12405   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12404

gyb = clown baker who rather shitposts in /comms at a time when bake in general is ghosted due to no baker available.

>>12388

 

if you decide to get based, meaning to stop fake conversations here and actually bake like a patriot would bake, I will appreciate that much.

if not, you will be called out and never ever be able to blend in.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 3, 2020, 6:21 a.m. No.12406   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2407 >>2411

>>12404

> No other job here requires so much letting go as baking. No other job requires as much flexibility–or forgiveness. In the end, everything that happens here has to be water under the bridge. Otherwise, you will burn out.

 

baking will teach you about ego like nothing I've ever seen

about ego in others

about ego in yourself

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 3, 2020, 6:50 a.m. No.12408   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2410 >>2413 >>2417 >>2418 >>2421 >>2494

HELLO, lovely morning all

 

reactions have been interesting, haven't they?

fascinating to see unfold…

 

(just 2 posts today)

 

>>12208

>shit-stirring on a grand scale. not what we need right now. intentional?

Look, i was pissed off and ashamed at the pathetic reaction of this bunch of oblivious, powermad little capos.

YES, i dropped a 3-post wall of text, but that just makes it easier to skip over completely, instead of drawing out replies and keeping it going.

as many here have been quite busy doing…

 

>>12209

>who the fuck are you

>your opinions

read what i wrote, you'll get the answer.

 

>>12211

> That’s not how changes are made.

but that is WHAT I WAS ACCUSED OF, and repeatedly so.

Just stating the obvious.

 

>>12212

>That was an organized raid by Endchan, and it was done by the same people that attack bakers 24/7.

so, this guy. dude didn't read a thing i wrote, and is still convinced he got it all figured out.

no pause, no introspection, nothing.

just posting and fuming, posting and fuming.

 

>>12213

>they do not do it as the result of discussions here.

Look, there's no reason to keep on arguing this, but the type of upkeep i was proposing is rare.

I was talking about it on the general, and bakers/anons said there's no time for that, but comms is there for exactly that kind of thing.

anon wasn't wrong when he said:

>>12097

>the shills haven't spoken up yet. IF they do, it was all done out in the open, where people can see it, so… kek

 

>>12214

>The blow up last night started when I asked

well that's interesting, you see, because i didn't go that far.

that's all YOUR blow up, i was just talking about the hustle around the bake reversion…

and here you say

> I asked

>"Why the fuck do we need this shit in the dough?"

but you weren't attacking the endchan stuff, you asked about the research threads…

 

>>12217

> A picture is worth a thousand words.

and truth is worth a thousand lies…

 

>>12237

>you're right on the money in a few places there

Thank you for actually taking time to read.

>I had no idea GMT anon would be so upset about it

ME NEITHER GEESH. Expected some grumbling maybe, but definitely not this. wew

 

>Too much of a hurry and now look at the situation

true, but still. shitstorm ALL came from GMT overreaction, bad reversion management, and SHILLS JUST JUMPING RIGHT IN TO EXPLOIT THE OPPORTUNITY.

that might singlehandedly be the most interesting about all this, seeing how i would be working with you guys here, but then on QR there's always another anon or two also jumping in, warroom/notwarroom, bakers think it's me, much confusion is had.

 

That's one of the things that so pissed me off about kvetching bakers here just losing any shit they had on hand over the endchan thing.

Could you be any more of a whining, attention-whore bitch about it?

Could you do any more to point out to your would be enemies HOW and WHERE and WHY to attack you, maybe put up a big flashing neon sign?

I expected more warfare-wise warriors, around here, is all. Sun tzu n sheit.

 

just look at all this stupid pointless infighting

>>12215 , >>12217 , >>12218 , >>12219 , >>12220 , >>12221 , >>12222 and on and on and on

>You attacked me.

<no you attacked me

>no huh you attack me

<no you attacked me

>>12231

>My WORDS perfectly showed

my words my bake my history bla bla me me me me me me ME ME ME ME ME ME

 

>>12246

>I saw what was happening and said what I did so they would attack me. Part you are missing GYB. That's why I specifically said "Why theFUCK"

>I was posting the way I did so they would continue to attack me and expose themselves.

now this, THIS, is special, though.

this raging ball of fury is right here accusing everyone of being divisive and problematic and whatnot, but he just casually admits to throwing Napalm on the hot coals of the reversion mess.

amazing.

 

>>12355

>why do you namefag

because it's shameless, unrepentant and obviously dumber than it thinks it's smart.

>>12356

>I will defend /QR/ - Q - and the Anons all day everyday with all of my abilities.

you THINK you do, and that's great if have fighting spirit.

but has any part of what you did on the general or here ACTUALLY HELPED?

you admitted deliberately posting inflammatory content on the board just to rile it up and get screenshots, wtf?

 

>>12401

>You're working extremely hard to ignore the fact that up bread heplainlyadmit to posting both the neck yourself and fag boi comment which came from 2 separate IDs one being the baker.

yeah, so what even if he did?

YOU admitted to postingWHY THE FUCKjust to get anons mad.

that's a thousand times worse.

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 3, 2020, 6:50 a.m. No.12409   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2410 >>2412 >>2418

>>12240

>GMT consolidation would make sense.

>except if you're the GMT guy

> , it's a good idea but not worth fighting over.

all true, completely agree.

sort of shoved back the room issue for later, but i like the graphicmaps, so i'm happy with the full list.

 

>>12240

>Somehow, we all have to step back, let the dust settle.

yup, we did.

>Dough is ok for now, we are all ok, no use worrying about who said what to whom.

in a friendly circle of magic unicorns, sure.

but this ended up being an involuntary stress-test. Most passed, some failed.

>This got riled up again after the three page post

Judge them by their fruits, look who's going on and on enjoying throwing shit, take note.

Infantile squabbling, appeal to authority, projection galore… a lot of it ain't pretty.

and the three page post was a necessary moment of transparency.

have you seen it on the general?

it's interesting, i saw the bun later reposted TWICE by other anons (could be more but those i saw), and it got absolutely no traction at all (thank god).

 

>>12283

>If anything I've helped foster and mentor bakers, provided them with work area

absolutely, don't mind him Rusty.

you'll notice i took time begininng and end of my rant to point out you were way more than legit - and some other bakers too, just didn't take their names.

 

>>12302

>this kindergarten tit-for-tat squabbling is not a productive use of time

amen

 

>>12351

>why was last 'baking seminar' so much different than others?

because i was there?

 

>>12370

> shill bakers have completely given up on using /comms to blend in, now they are panicking and trying to make this bread appear as ridiculous as possible.

could be.

they sure haven't seen all this as a growing experience.

 

>>12378

>qrb

was a welcome oasis of peace when stalin BO made his moves. haven't been in ages, but glad it's there.

 

>>12391

>not clear to me that anybody is shilling for endchan

exactly, but that's the shill narrative that got slipped in.

>paste was almost certainly inserted by sgrvl whorememberis not very balanced.

i explained how it went down, it was (sort of) ME and i am NOT sgvrl

 

>>12398

>Endchan is not a boogeyman

that's the shill narrative that they jumped on, though.

as i said, me between in the middle of the crossfire, it's been very interesting.

it's one to say "after we do this some shills might use to exploit", and another to see it all right there.

and ongoing still.

 

>>12404

>Because they find it difficult to let go. No other job here requires so much letting go as baking. No other job requires as much flexibility–or forgiveness. In the end, everything that happens here has to be water under the bridge.

wise man

 

Again, apologies for the good ones in here who got toes stepped on and ears ringing from the noise, but as annoying as the shitshow can be, it's also been very instructive.

I did it all wrong, being mad, but i did present a good few serious questions to the board here.

How bakers chose to react, well, that's their choice and their record. We seem to agree most of it ain't pretty.

Also, to conclude, i didn't really mean to be the Trickster in all this, just fell into it.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 7:50 a.m. No.12411   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2414

>>12406

>baking will teach you about ego like nothing I've ever seen

 

You're not wrong.

Thank you for your service, patriot.

 

Sincerest apologies if you thought I was accusing you of culling. You do the opposite of culling, sir. The visitors spewing the vitriol are a different story altogether. Grime won't be chasing me away. He can sperg all he wants. He hasn't changed much.

 

Thanks again for having a measured response.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 3, 2020, 7:57 a.m. No.12412   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2416

>>12409

you didn't "do it all wrong"

 

you have good ideas

you posted good examples of your ideas

 

that was excellent

 

trying to be in a hurry with these things…

not good

and ya, we've got great bakers, good bakers, novice bakers and we've also got immature anons, subversive anons and anarchist anons

 

great mix 'eh?

Anonymous ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 8:14 a.m. No.12413   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2416

>>12408

>anon wasn't wrong when he said:

 

Thank you for this. Someone at least, read my comment correctly…,

 

>>>12222, and on and on and on.

 

Apparently I got roped into this as well.. Sorry for the mess in defending myself…

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f May 3, 2020, 8:18 a.m. No.12414   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2415 >>2416

>>12411

I am a constituional libertarian at heart

also a bit of a contrarian… kek

 

It has been my great pleasure to serve when I've been able

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

All should study Bruce's words

>pic related

and remember why we're here

>pic related

 

the Qresearch breads have served to feed truth to a hungry world, and I'll remind everyone of JFK's words from half a century ago…

 

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence-on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."

 

We are opposed…

 

speaks to me, how about you?

 

one of the favorite tools of our opposition is to introduce friendly fire by making us doubt each other…

 

may God bless the people of this world and bring enlightenment to all, even those who do not seek it

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 3, 2020, 9 a.m. No.12416   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2553

>>12412

>you didn't "do it all wrong"

well, taking the ragebait and sperging didn't help much: if i'd taken those same 3posts, removed all the swearing and insults and just went cold, i'd have increased the chances of someone actually reading thousandfold, it's just a fact of life.

glad at least some did. but as i said, it was at that point a tactical choice to drop a yuge bun and let it rest, leaving all day and night for others to either just skip it all and go on or react, and by however path taken, show their true colors: admittedly, falling into ragebait myself, you could say. think i managed to keep it at snark level today, at least. getting smoother.

 

>great mix 'eh?

hehe, indeed

 

>>12413

>Thank you for this. Someone at least, read my comment correctly…

welp, seemed pretty damn obvious to me.

also what's forgotten in this whole SNEAKILY thing is that when the new recipe went live, i was there for a good few breads, asking for feedback from warroom anon, spreadsheet anon, anyone willing to answer, pointing out the change and asking if it's all good, etc. Full transparency.

 

*oh, another thing this event has shown: so many anons don't care and/or notice at all, it's pretty funny.

we're all at war defending the integrity of the dough, and rightly so, but get hilariously fixated on details. (but still, important details, don't get me wrong)

 

>Apparently I got roped into this as well.. Sorry for the mess in defending myself…

das ok, i got roped just the same, just made a different kind of mess.

but look who went and stepped in it…

to me one of the biggest WTFs to remain of your whole kerfuffle with that "anon" is that he seems to be most mad at you for admitting to replying to his ragebait, which is a bit weird when you take a step back.

 

>>12414

huzzah

>one of the favorite tools of our opposition is to introduce friendly fire by making us doubt each other…

yeah, somewhat guilty as charged, having thrown a few grenades in.

but then again, sometimes drawing fire helps reveal who is on which side…

 

>>12415

>Shadilay

breaking my rule by replying so soon, but feels all so comfy now, take care

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 3, 2020, 10:58 a.m. No.12417   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2553

>>12408

>but you weren't attacking the endchan stuff, you asked about the research threads…

The research threads were pushed for in the dough by the same people that were pushing the endchan links in WR. Their motives were clear.

 

>>12408

 

>YOU admitted to postingWHY THE FUCKjust to get anons mad.

>

>that's a thousand times worse.

Endchan shills pulling a raid aren't anons, they're shills, no matter how many times you try to shift blame it doesn't change that.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 3, 2020, 11:15 a.m. No.12418   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2422 >>2553

>>12409

Endchan is not a boogeyman

>that's the shill narrative that they jumped on, though.

 

>>11849

>i just loaded some on endchan and they are much faster

 

>>11850

>https://endchan.net/qrbunker/res/5695.html#q5730

 

>>11852

>could you post a vid on the other board, endchan and then link it over?

 

>>11865

>when i go to endchan, it reminds me of what posting and baking used to be like here

 

>>12058

>–i dealt with war room pressures plenty bc of endchan

 

>>12130

>- Removed Endchan WarRoom Ops, they're not from our WarRoom

 

>>12165

>i tried to get him not to do it bc it's different than in /qr/ and we had a new baker on endchan

 

>>12165

> Endchan anons know but maybe not everyone here does.

 

>>12168

>This was all a ploy to push anons to ENDchan.

 

>>12172

>They wanted a warroom thread so they could post links to endchan and direct anons there

 

>>12177

>yes sgrvl would like endchan to be the hub.

>endchan a honeypot

>

>i think it's just sgrvl, he is not entirely "there" mentally. not a hypothesis. he can be both paranoid and grandiose.

 

>>12180

> anons on endchan got suspicious when they saw he had a different tripcode for each each function

 

>>12185

>Don't agree, I am BO of the other endchan q board

 

>>12190

>And, if Endchan faggots start on bakers again, ever, there’ll be war

>There’ll be no more encroachment on the dough or deleting QR material from the dough to get more room for endchan ops

 

>>12198

>Why would the endchan crew complain about the dough being changed when it was them who changed it?

 

>>12374

>Just found out i'm owner of /qrb/ on endchan.

 

>>12391

>trying to follow your argument, not clear to me that anybody is shilling for endchan

>also the idea that endchan qanonresearch is a honeypot – sgrvl not really competent enough for that kind of op, imo.

 

>>12408

>so, this guy. dude didn't read a thing i wrote, and is still convinced he got it all figured out.

>no pause, no introspection, nothing.

>just posting and fuming, posting and fuming.

Pics Related.

 

>>12409

>>not clear to me that anybody is shilling for endchan

>exactly, but that's the shill narrative that got slipped in.

pics related, and your teammate their is a board owner at endchan, can't imagine why he'd agree.

 

>>12409

>>Endchan is not a boogeyman

>that's the shill narrative that they jumped on, though.

Anons fighting against the raid from endchan are apparantly theREALshills. Got it.

Anonymous ID: 80ba29 May 3, 2020, 11:25 a.m. No.12419   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2420 >>2422

ENDCHAN ISN"T A HONEYPOT

 

Cool, who ownsEndchan?

Who are the Admins?

Where are the servers located?

Why is their registrar prohibited from being viewed?

Why doesGOOGLErefuse to link to 4chan, 8chan, 8kun, but has a link directly toENDCHANon page 1 of the search.

 

IKNOWwho owns 8kun.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 11:30 a.m. No.12421   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2550 >>2553

>>12408

>reactions have been interesting, haven't they?

>fascinating to see unfold…

Your attitude sucks, anon.

 

You are judging everybody else reactions to the mess you created.

Who are you to judge anybody or anything?

And while we're at it, who are you, anyway?

What do you want here?

 

As one of the two anons who teach the class, i am responsible for ensuring that it stays on track and does not degenerate into a complete shitshow. This thread is not a place for lobbing grenades and then sitting back to see how others respond. You want that? Go to /pol/.

 

It's not our job as bakers to judge other bakers or to try to poke at their weak spots. The exact opposite is true. Best results come from trying to find strong points and build on them. If feedback is needed, it's given wo/ undue provocation. Because we are a crew, not just individuals.

 

You are nobody special. None of us are. Anyone is welcome to the class or to the thread, but unidentified anons who see shit-stirring as their "contribution" are gonna get a mouthful from me in the future.

 

  • gyb

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 12:03 p.m. No.12422   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2553

>>12418

I know endchan pretty well, spent every day there for six weeks when 8chan was down, most of it on qanonresearch. Had many interations w/BO. I and one other baker did a lot to keep the place running, since BO sgrvl refused to bake as soon as we started. He only likes to do war room stuff.

 

The shill narrative re endchan = BO sgrvl's narrative about qanonresearch, his board. He is not a shill but an single-minded anon who only wants to raid. It is however quite possible that some of his followers are either shills or similiarly afflicted with the idea that only their work matters. Anons initially thought he might be a shill bc of his strange manner. But sooner learned - as i did early on - that he has mental problems. Never underestimate "crazy."

 

>Anons fighting against the raid from endchan are apparantly the REAL shills. Got it.

Well, i don't have it. This part is still confusing to me, i'm sure there are shills taking advantage of the situation but not sure who all the players or agendas are. I am particularly interested in 274287, what his agenda is. Because he's the one whose posts started the conflict. He needs to come clean.

 

>>12419

Endchan as a platform

I dealt with endchan admin when i did a global report once; they were available, which was good. Re 8chan/4chan vs endchan google linking: the former are far more notorious in the eyes of the world (and thus Goodle) and are thus most likely to be formally censured. Endchan is a much less traveled site, tiny when compared with 4 or 8.. Last i saw, the owner of endchan had departed, it was being run by mods. they do get around to responding to requests, although it's slow. If it's a honeypot, seems like they'd be a lot less flaky.

 

It's sgrvl who wants more anons–he's always wanted that. compulsive, driven guy.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 6:50 p.m. No.12429   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

nothing has been posted for a long time here - and previous #11 thread is wonky. To check it out, open the thread then go to bottom. it's not complete.

 

will this post?

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.12436   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2442

>>12432

i'm gonna post something for everyone but since you're here, wouldn't mind your opinion. Don't want to blow things out of proportion but looks like we're gonna have to watch out for dough changes from war room fags. see attached.

 

>>12434

now all we need is a score.

notice the word "bee" is prominently displayed….

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 7:30 p.m. No.12438   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2442 >>2443 >>2450 >>2474 >>2483 >>2553

Just a note to say I decided to check out what was going on in qanonresearch on endchan.

 

Went there and looked some recent posts; not too happy with what i saw. Take a look. Doesn't matter whether these anons are shills or merely deluded; they think what they do is so important that it justifies changing the dough wo/consulting anons outside their little group. They take direction from sgrvl (his posts are distinctive, hard to miss). One anon who bakes was pleased he could sneak changes in recently but disappointed that another baker reverted the dough almost immediately. See CAP.

 

They also think of bakers that take their stuff out as shills. To them, the war room "ops" are much more important than anything else; so they rationalize their tactics as necessary, i imagine.

 

Paid shills can obviously take advantage of this situation to create confusion, division, etc.

 

Implications for anons and bakers

First, watch the dough closely.

Second, keep the dough pretty much the same (except for minor additions) so it's easy to tell if something has been changed.

Third, consider putting possible dough changes in as global notables first so anons can check them out before they are added permanently to the dough.

Four (maybe): Make a Global Notable that says, besides what's already in the war room, (most) other stuff needs to go in the war room thread(s).

 

my two cents worth. thoughts?

Anonymous ID: 929de5 May 3, 2020, 7:43 p.m. No.12450   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2456

>>12438

Don't worry, making the /qresearch/ meme warfare thread soon.

They are legitimately using /qresearch/ and 8kun to push their ops, not the other way around. They think they can dictate to anons what to push and what to do, instead of being anons on /qresearch/. They see themselves as outsiders who are better than anons on 8kun, so they don't even care what anons have to say or what they think, they just push their shit onto us.

So, I'm making a meme warfare operations threadfor/qresearch/ andby/qresearch/. They can join us, or do it by themselves.

Plus, they seem like total faggots fwiw.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 7:43 p.m. No.12451   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2454 >>2469

Oh, btw, there's something wrong with thread #11 see bottom of thread (cut off). also, can't sign into board as bv, first time worked a coupla weeks ago but this time, no dice.

 

i'm fine with revision history being added as another page. now i'll mention something that may be controversial, but…..that would be that anyone making dough changes other than q posts and notables have an id'd pastebin. Doesn't impinge of most bakers but would make it harder for anyone to put something in that does not belong there.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 7:43 p.m. No.12452   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2477 >>2488

>>12447

Rusty is one of the bakers that rather likes to spend time to shitpost in /comms (to make bakers appear based at very first glance) at a time when the actually relevant general bread is ghosted by no baker available.

Rusty is not here to help, just like gyb.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 7:46 p.m. No.12455   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12448

 

hmm. bitcoin sucks as a currency

but would it work well as a public ledger for dough?

 

"IF" one transaction can hold a complete dough. That would be the deal breaker..

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 7:54 p.m. No.12465   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2467

>>12460

>namefagging

change of tactics again? so nervous?

in last 'baking seminar' bread all bakers namefagged, as in previous breads.

then bakers did obvious clown moves and were called out.

'coincidentially' bakers became nervous and forgot to fake the "how is this baking think working" conversation, that is only done hoping to have bakers blended in again.

after being called out, not a single 'anon' asked any question at all on baking (exposing this was fake in the first place and exposing clowns who act as bakers are not exactly smart but rather sleepless and confused).

after that, bakers got rid of namefagging (see top of this bread) and now, suddently they again changed tactics and namefag again.

 

desperation.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 7:57 p.m. No.12468   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2474

>>12467

you filter every anon?

or every anon posting notables?

or are you maybe part of the board admin team, have anonΒ΄s IP has history and filter with that?

either way, makes you seem pretty much like a clown.

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f May 3, 2020, 8:05 p.m. No.12477   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2478 >>2480 >>2488

>>12452

 

Rusty is the handle I use

I am and have always been the BO of /comms/ and /comms/ only.

This is common knowledge

 

slandering me won't help your cause

 

btw… your posts reek of paranoia and projection… have you ever thought of seeking help from a mental health professional?

 

>>12462

accountability and proof of authorship is why I enabled that feature here

tripcodes are included in the platform for a damn good reason

there are also reasons of etiquette that require all but Q to be anonymous on /qresearch/

 

this is NOT /qresearch/

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 8:11 p.m. No.12479   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12471

war room fags can't take over the dough coz bakers will notice - and probably check war room more often. forewarned is forearmed. Only a BO can take over the dough - and only with 24/7 help.

 

>>12471

late night coverage is not bad right now, even wo/ me, although i sometimes e-bake. Good that i stepped back, lets others step up. Pixels was there very early morning. he is a great baker and note-taker but 'hides' unless there's nobody else around.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 8:17 p.m. No.12486   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12482

 

yeah I get that a bunch when I bake lately.. I just make sure the box is like your cap, then close the box, and after that either click on a post I want to grab a note for, or hit the post reply text link at page bottom to reopen.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 3, 2020, 8:18 p.m. No.12487   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2489

>>12482

mine tends to lock on that as well

 

when it works

I click post

I get posting xx%

Used to get "posted" now get "Updating Thread"

then after a pause the thread updates and the post appears as the bottom or near bottom of the thread…

 

now from time to time it freezes on "Updating Thread" and using "Update" doesn't clear it

deleting the quick reply box doesn't clear it

I have to re-load the thread to clear that frozen reply box

 

also had problems with reply box not clearing previous post(s)

qrb ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 8:23 p.m. No.12489   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2495

name goes away when i close out reply box

 

>>12487

>Used to get "posted" now get "Updating Thread"

for me also

is it universal?

 

when it works right and box clears, posting is really fast

it just doesn't happen very often

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 8:25 p.m. No.12490   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2491 >>2493

>>12484

I'm nice to everyone until they aren't nice to me. IP hopping while baking toTRADUCEme isn't nice.

 

Still cracking up how homeboy went from "kickin knowlege" to Agent Smith is 2 seconds.

 

>muh why are you trying to traduce me?

 

Hard gay.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 8:27 p.m. No.12492   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2498

So some bakers bake for many hours daily, every day - and when not baking spend hours and hours posting here?

Does anybody think that are really persons?

Would a team of clowns faking 'bakers' be a good explanation for them going without a single hour of sleep for months and years now?

use logic.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 8:30 p.m. No.12494   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2496 >>2497 >>2503 >>2554

>>12483

well, i did look in response to your concerns

but keep in mind, it's not endchan, it's qanonresearch on endchan

they follow sgrvl, who is single-minded and undeterrable. not coz a shill, more like a napoleonic complex. gets 'off his meds' or something every so often and goes on a rampage.

 

What i still don't know is who this guy is and what his game is. Did not reply to my challenge:

>>12408

Creates chaos and then thinks it's funny.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 3, 2020, 8:36 p.m. No.12500   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2501

>>12496

yes, /qrbunker/. also /qrb/. I am BO for both now, grabbed the latter so it wouldn't get shilled the way it did last summer. don't know where everyone else when aug-sept-oct, but i was not happy wo/an image board, so went to sgrvl's board than to qrbunker. Claimed it in Feb bc resignationanon wanted to catalog it and it was up to over 900 posts.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 8:37 p.m. No.12502   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2505 >>2507

>>12498

I am the one who just posted

>Would a team of clowns faking 'bakers' be a good explanation for them going without a single hour of sleep for months and years now?

you having 126 posts in a bread that should be used for /comms to help bakers do their actual job of baking the real breads makes my point.

and I dunno what anybody might have said to you one year ago.

but given I think you are a clown, itΒ΄s pretty likely that other anons came to the same conclusion and called you out - you should be used to that.

 

right now 'bakers' are spending way more time in their effort to try to blend in as patriots then they actually spend time baking.

why? do they know very well that constantly leaving out relevant info while pushing clown posts makes them glow?

 

facts:

clown bakers make BO glow.

clown BO makes Jim and Ron glow.

if they want to be perceived as patriots, they need to act like patriots. (and they could literally do that from one day to another, join the winning site, be welcomed.)

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 8:37 p.m. No.12503   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2506 >>2511

>>12493

>I swear to I don't own 2 computers how could I have 2 IDs. I'm a functional retard.

 

Honestly, how long have you been a federal agent, and how many fake personalities do you have. Watching you switch from a gangsta to lawyer at warp speed was kekworthy.

 

Make sure all the other thugs you kick it with know cause you may fold under questioning yo.

 

>>12496

>>12494

Doesn't matter honestly, I don't trust any of the chans other than 8kun. I went to endchan for about 2 minutes one time when 8chan went down and every intuition I had screamed comped so I've never been back. I saw the raid happening in real time and responded the best way I could to get them to expose what they were up to.

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 8:39 p.m. No.12505   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12502

>you having 126 posts in a bread that should be used for /comms to help bakers do their actual job of baking the real breads makes my point.

As if you have a point.

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 8:46 p.m. No.12513   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2515 >>2516 >>2554

>>12506

duβ€’plicβ€’iβ€’tous

Given to or marked by deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech.

 

exhibiting duplicity{2}; deceitful; double-dealing.

adj.

Given to or marked by deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech

 

>>12510

>doesn't refute the fag claim, just complains moar

Like it was a claim worth refuting, officer.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 8:46 p.m. No.12514   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2519

>>12507

there is no baking class.

there is only clown baker faking a baking class, trying to be perceived as commited patriiots, hoping to have an excuse for not doing what bakers actually shoud do.

the 'baking seminar 10' bread proofs this well.

after clown bakers were called out for fuckery, they simply forgot to fake the 'baking seminar' conversation, leading to the first baking seminar ever w/o a single question asked on that issue.

obvious. as. fuck.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 8:50 p.m. No.12516   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2520 >>2554

>>12513

 

nope, it really is grime. Why you so mad that I called your bullshit out for what it was?

 

Mad that you got caught trolling?

 

because you wEre being disingenuous by doing that; ''That's the entire reason why I am telling you to fuck right off.''

 

i do notcarewhat your reasoning is,you knowingly tricked anons

 

FUCK YOU

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 8:53 p.m. No.12520   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2522

>>12517

>possibly spins the menorah. Was some notable pilpul on display.

>>12516

>because you were being disingenuous by doing that; That's the entire reason why I am telling you to fuck right off.

 

Case in point, gets blatantly caught dual boxing, admits to it, reverses, plays the victim cardmuh traducingand now tries to reverse the situation and say I am someone else. Mildly retarded, heavily juden.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 8:59 p.m. No.12525   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2531 >>2554

>>12519

you, as 'baker' made 134 posts in the /comms bread that should be used for some admin stuff to help bakers bake - and you now use the one word that makes you glow bright af fuck?

no anon says "we".

and itΒ΄s pretty obvious that the 'baker' that magically go without a single hour of sleep for many months and even years are actually a team of clowns, with different (and differently skilled/experienced) people posting as those 'bakers'.

 

(not all, but most bakers - clown bakers and BO try hard to get legit bakers off the board.)

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 9:01 p.m. No.12527   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12522

>and you definitely claimed to knowingly do it to draw..whatever out.

It 100% worked, you're just upset you chose the wrong side and got caught dual boxing. Shit happens, I'm done fucking with you. Please try to less emotional

 

>good luck in life, loser.

Kek further, my life is already very successful.

 

>>12524

<a day later and still with this shit?

I picked it up again because the evidence was presented showing endchan was raiding the board and I was correct. I'm not above twisting the knife a bit. You be fake Tupac, I'll be Tom Petty.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 9:04 p.m. No.12530   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2531 >>2554

if you donΒ΄t like clowns baking,

if you donΒ΄t like clowns that shitpost in here at a time when no baker is collecting notables in the actual bread,

if you see through the 'brilliant tactic' of making all anons who call out obvious clown bakers look stupid by clowns doing the same thing in a stupid way on purpose while namefagging

>>12524

 

…you should let Jim, Ron, BO know:

@FastJack (Board Owner)

@CodeMonkeyZ, @isitwetyet (Ron)

@infinitechan (Jim)

 

this forces them to act more based, this was proven many times now.

controlled opposition only works if they are perceived based.

as soon as they realize they glow harder, they act more based.

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 9:19 p.m. No.12538   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2540

>>12535

qr is a clown board. a board that Q does not post on. a board that the MSM does not refer to.

a board that clowns heavily advertise hoping to be able to "divide and weaken" anons and make them spend valuable time ona board that nobody cares about.

 

anons wil keep posting here.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 3, 2020, 9:20 p.m. No.12539   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2550

>>12535

>>12537

 

blowing off steam from time to time is a necesary thing to prevent explosions

 

I'm just sorry it de-rails the teaching aspect

the bickering seems to scare off the new ones…

 

>>11733

with your permission I will make this thread a cyclic and maybe we can keep this stuff out of your next class

OSS - Clearnet down ID: 000000 May 3, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.12542   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>if you donΒ΄t like clowns baking,

>if you donΒ΄t like clowns that shitpost in here at a time when no baker is collecting notables in the actual bread,

>if you see through the 'brilliant tactic' of making all anons who call out obvious clown

Anonymous ID: 2e7572 May 3, 2020, 9:35 p.m. No.12545   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

This is the time of truth.

Clowns will never be perceived based.

Clowns can become based however.

And if they donΒ΄t choose to do so, they will be called out and made visible.

Nothing clowns could do or think of could stop or even slow down the plan.

WWG1WGA.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 2:37 a.m. No.12550   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2551 >>2554 >>2557

>>12539

Appreciate the thought but would probably be better to just treat #12 as any other thread. When new thread starts on Thursday, this one will fall to the wayside except for historical purposes. And there are posts here that we may want to reference in the future.

 

But it might be a good idea to extend thread past 751 post count (to to 800 or more) if we start running out of room before Thurs.

 

I already gave notice about keeping this thread free of random shit-stirring in the future >>12421

We just have to be vigilant. As i said to Teach, the success of this class / class thread means we will attract attention by any party who wants there to be fewer bakers, not more.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 4, 2020, 4:15 a.m. No.12551   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2552

>>12550

>But it might be a good idea to extend thread past 751 post count (to to 800 or more) if we start running out of room before Thurs.

 

Good. I'm done arguing with them. SOrry I fucked up your thread dealing with them. They get memes only as responses now. Too man ycoincidental patterns in this thread for me to value that poster's input any further.

 

-out

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 4, 2020, 4:49 a.m. No.12553   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2580

wussup

>>12417

>research threads were pushed for in the dough by the same people that were pushing the endchan links in WR. Their motives were clear.

THEIR motives, ok, maybe.

What about anons who would approve of having those threads in there, and chime in? Would they not immediately be counted as "endchain raid" as well in your duplicitous charade?

You are so utterly and obliviously sure of yourself, and yet you deliberately lie and pursue anon infighting on the board (there was a lot more than just those screenshots).

Worse still, you blame everyone and everything but yourself, and fall right back into it after being called out, not missing a beat.

You've really shown yourself, through and through.

 

>>12418

>>so, this guy. dude didn't read a thing i wrote, and is still convinced he got it all figured out.

>>no pause, no introspection, nothing.

>>just posting and fuming, posting and fuming.

>Pics Related.

are unrelated to those 3 lines, which still hold true.

>your teammate their

if you could read (or write) proficiently, you'd have read those endchan shills aren't my teammates at all.

honestly, to me you're much, much, much more likely to be one of them - or their mortal enemy trying to make em look bad.

either way, your tactics are immoral, destructive, untrustworthy and not quite effective, so you fell into shill territory long ago.

 

>>12421

>Your attitude sucks, anon.

my attitude changed, anon.

can't say the same for all of us here.

came in uncertain but willing, got mad/disgusted at incompetence, calmed down.

have mostly kept to single post replies instead of spreading shit all over.

 

>>12421

>who are you, anyway?

i adressed that question in first 3post reply.

just an anon who never played your baker games.

just because people don't chat & chill don't mean they don't have eyes on.

except this time, i opened my mouth, too.

>What do you want here?

 

>It is however quite possible that some of his followers are either shills

i dun tried to tells you, i just came in here to get some things fixed.

we did, things were fine but we expected shills to come in the opening, and come in they did.

now i'm not sure about the nature of them, though, likely a mix of pro-endchans and anti-endchans, but either way clearly THAT was the main focus/story.

but you either haven't read me, or don't believe me. choice is yours, kek

>This part is still confusing to me, i'm sure there are shills taking advantage of the situation but not sure who all the players or agendas are.

exactly. judge em by their fruits/smell, and see, that's a start.

 

>>12422

> I am particularly interested in 274287, what his agenda is. Because he's the one whose posts started the conflict. He needs to come clean.

brah, i wrote 5+ walls of text ( >>12410 , >>12416 ) and you still want MORE?

please re-read what you have already, i've been pretty direct.

and my intervention only "started" a conflict that was latent and had to burst sooner or later, and whose roots had been rotting for months.

 

>>12434 , >>12432

or a band. i'd jam with Clown Baker

 

>>12438

>Paid shills can obviously take advantage of this situation to create confusion, division, etc.

i'd say they are, this was the main point of my 2post update: not ongoing drama, but more info of how they jumped on this episode.

i was caught right in the crossfire, that's what's so interesting about it, vantage point.

Anonymous ID: 274287 May 4, 2020, 4:49 a.m. No.12554   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2558 >>2562

after that still more shills

 

>>12459

calvin & hobz <3

 

>>12471

> their warroom strategy to take over the dough

what would make sense is, the baker that accepted my new recipe pastebin and just rolled with it WAS one of them, glad to take it because it had their latest updates.

while the jaded bakers here, tired of dealing with WR stuff, hung on to an older version of the war room section. (see 11 or early 12 for such admissions - hey it's only normal, i'm just saying)

 

>>12494

>What i still don't know is who this guy is and what his game is.

can i suggest reading my posts?

>Did not reply to my challenge:

you might throw a glove next, i should be careful.

if you're so curious about me and my motives, get off that high horse a minute, re-read my posts.

 

i'd recommend the same thing for TOR bro, but clearly there's no hope for that thing.

so it's OSS baker, at least allegedly?

 

>>12513

>duβ€’plicβ€’iβ€’tous

> Given to or marked by deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech.

>exhibiting duplicity{2}; deceitful; double-dealing.

>adj.

>Given to or marked by deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech

now go read PROJECTION

 

>>12516

and he squirms away from this accusation again

>>12517

>I don't even own 2 computers

2 computers on the same provider would still just be one ID, you idiot.

squirms.

>>12522

>So you're okay with tricking anons into bickering?

>Because you definitely own that slide.

>and you definitely claimed to knowingly do it to draw..whatever out.

still true, and still squirms away from answering to this.

just goes on with the delusional "LALALALLA I WAS RITE U ARE WRONG LALALLA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" attitude.

and yet i'm the "chaos starter"

 

>>12534 , >>12550

yeah, would be a shame to lose posts, not being ironic.

the class was over anyway, but these kind of things are bound to happen and i wouldn't want to mess with the teaching, now.

and there will always be interventions like >>12530 , >>12525

time for a Baking General?

 

>>12550

>random shit-stirring

bruh… "random", really? RANDOM?

again, y'all have acted like i was born the day i came in here - because the baker clique effect is real.

it is tolerated by anons, because baking is crucial and not all namefaggoty is necessarily bad, but… not all deal very well with the power and control.

& if any anon coming in here without your baggage is seen as shit-stirring, then maybe that means there was a LOT of shit laying around.

as i said, i've admitted i could've been a LOT more diplomatic, to say the least, but none of what i wrote or did was just random… pretty sure if you read up my history you'll see i got mad around the 3poster, but besides that haven't been feeding the fire like some have.

also, maybe try and be a little less paranoid?

could be, some anons coming in here really are anons coming in here? maybe?

now how are they supposed to feel welcomed being called out as endchan shills?

takes more than that to run me away, but i can see the problem.

anyway, if you're interested, read my posts and i might take precise questions if you have em, but we're running out of room here.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 4, 2020, 6:53 a.m. No.12563   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2566

>>12562

 

Thank you, was looking for that first time you suggested, could not find.

 

Will be lurking there going forward, not interested in disrupting seminars due to attracting shitbags.

OSS - Clearnet still down ID: 000000 May 4, 2020, 9:28 a.m. No.12580   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2585

>>12553

>are unrelated to those 3 lines, which still hold true.

Those 3 lines mean absolutely nothing. I didn't place blame on you for anything, I don't even know nor care who you are. But you obviously have an agenda.

 

> your tactics are immoral, destructive, untrustworthy and not quite effective

Kek

Endchan was BTFO

Warroom hasn't had a post in it since

No links to Endchan in the dough (which was the motive shown by screenshots)

GYB went to endchan and got evidence of the raid - because of my actions in his own words

Magevelli was shown to be dual boxing, admitted it and then played the victim card - "muh why do you persecute me so, I don't even own 2 computers"

Everyone on this board and anyone that was here that evening now is aware of the actions of the idiots from endchan.

 

I'd say it was pretty effective.

 

>your teammate their

Oh god he made a typo let me pounce it like it's relevant.

 

>now go read PROJECTION

I haven't dual boxed, projected, or been duplicitous. I stated my case, provided evidence, was confirmed with posts from endchan and exposed what the idiots from endchan were up to. End of story.

 

>I don't even own 2 computers

>2 computers on the same provider would still just be one ID, you idiot.

>squirms.

I was making fun of the other bakers response >>12376 which was an attempt to divert the convo when he was caught dual boxing, that was sarcasm. You say we don't read your posts but you're apparently completely lost in this conversation.

 

>I'd recommend the same thing for TOR bro, but clearly there's no hope for that thing. so it's OSS baker, at least allegedly?

It is OSS, I never try to hide who I am. Your attempts to goad an emotional response are as frivolous as they are transparent.

 

>and he squirms away from this accusation again

>2 computers on the same provider would still just be one ID, you idiot. squirms.

>still true, and still squirms away from answering to this. just goes on with the delusional "LALALALLA I WAS RITE U ARE WRONG LALALLA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" attitude.

I haven't squirmed from anything, I screenshotted all the relevant posts from the bread in question and posted them here >>12258, I made it known whom I was here >>12267, I exposed the duplicitous baker here >>12224, >>12226, >>12230, >>12231, >>12232, >>12234, >>12258, >>12323

 

That's called transparency, try it sometime.

 

Funny how you are here to backup the baker that was on duty and admitted to dual boxing while shilling for the endchan crew. Teamwork.

 

.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 10:17 a.m. No.12586   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>[i'm] just an anon who never played your baker games.

You have just revealed yourself as someone basically suspicious of bakers and their motives.

Daily bakers have been here volunteering their time doing 30 - 60+ hours a week to keep this board open.

Most anons do trust them because of their faithfulness and track record over time (pastebins are id'd). If you do not, you are either

  • a newfag (unlikely)

  • a shill (insincere)

  • an infrequent poster or

  • someone without much discernment who likes to shit-stir.

 

Whatever it is, it's on you, not bakers.

 

>Re coming clean

You can do that in a sentence or two, not a dissertation.

 

>Re baker accepting your pastebin was comp'd

NO. Busy baker trusting that it was latest pastebin.

 

If you want to complain about bakers, do so in /qresearch/ not here. This thread is for discussing how to bake, Q and A for new bakers, and checking new baker pastes, not complaints.

gyb ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 10:38 a.m. No.12590   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2591 >>2594

>>12562

Thank you Rusty.

One thing:

Bakers and anons interested in baking are still welcome to hang out on this thread as they have always done - to help out newbies, do Q&A, and talk informally.

 

Posts with complaints about baking, the dough, etc., belong either in the Baker's META or in /qresearch/.

If any kind of major dough change is proposed or issue detected, __such proposals ultimately needs to be discussed with all anons before any change is made, in the interest of openness and good comms.

 

>>12566

>re "namefagging" (baker id)

posters can choose to be anon or not

but agree with >>12567

Using baker id both here and on /qr/ promotes transparency and better comms: when changes are made, anons know who made them.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 10:44 a.m. No.12592   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2593

>>12591

Haven't been on /qr/ since about 4 am, when wnb was baking. Previous bread had been ghosted, i was aware that someone might pick it up and put qr-endchan material back in. Looks like they waited til later. I'm assuming there is no baker id, but i'll check.

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 4, 2020, 10:47 a.m. No.12594   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2600

>>12590

my pleasure to serve

 

>but agree with

>>12567

I could not say it better

I yam wut I yam, an it's all wut I yam

 

the class threads will be policed from now on

I agree that all are welcome, and all are welcome to contribute in a meaningful way

 

shitposting, shit stirring and all other shit will be directed to

>>12561

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 11:51 a.m. No.12599   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2602 >>2603

>>12585

just posted a response on /qr/:

>>>/qresearch/9026752

 

I'm assuming that the post decrying the baker's "assistance" of qr-endchan fags is yours. You gotta stop slow down and think before you post. Here your are again accusing fellow bakers of stuff, making it sound like they are doing it deliberating to screw the board, even if that is not your intention. You have now said shit about three different bakers, two of whom have been baking every day long hours for a year or more - and at a time when there were only about 6 or 7 bakers. You already said to KB that you were wrong in your assessment of him. But not before you created a big drama around it. Please just bake - that's what we most need.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 11:53 a.m. No.12600   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12594

this thread is always monitored, but you know that already. by 'policed,' i assume you mean that crap won't be tolerated. if i see it on the next thread, i will direct posters to META. up to you if there is anything else to be done.

Anonymous ID: c8d62c May 4, 2020, 12:59 p.m. No.12602   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12599

> You already said to KB that you were wrong in your assessment of him. But not before you created a big drama around it. Please just bake - that's what we most need.

No I didn't that's complete bullshit. He was dual boxing, he admitted to it. What are you talking about.

Anonymous ID: c8d62c May 4, 2020, 1 p.m. No.12603   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2604

>>12599

> You already said to KB that you were wrong in your assessment of him. But not before you created a big drama around it. Please just bake - that's what we most need.

No I didn't that's complete bullshit. He was dual boxing, he admitted to it. What are you talking about.>>12599

doc ID: 178c09 May 4, 2020, 1:13 p.m. No.12604   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2609

>>12603

are these QR or EndChan?

 

War Room

>>8758804 WARROOM #1 This Memes War ← go here for current up to date ops

>>9021616 Q Research Meme Warfare Operations ← go here for current up to date ops

Anonymous ID: 8eb6cd May 4, 2020, 1:13 p.m. No.12606   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2608

Comms has been sketchy cringe from the start Β―_(ツ)_/Β―

 

WE FIGURED OUT WHY THEY FLOODED US WITH CP, why they created Sgt. <fucka>B.aby

Why did they choose to deploy a distraction after a demoralizing raid? πŸ€”

Now the bakers changed over to new aliases? πŸ€”

The thread creation isthat important to them

A CP raid and an ongoing bit to cover up suspicions, only makes more suspicions warranted~

Sgt. <fucka>B.abyand crew are protecting their hijacked thread creation. eb<i9ytch>oTdeploys subliminals that Sgt. <fucka>B.aby uses in their posts. It's a team effort. To maintain their control.

 

BAKERS UNION 2.0 OUTED

>>>/comms/10938

BAKERS UNION 2.0 OUTED

>>>/comms/10938

BAKERS UNION 2.0 OUTED

>>>/comms/10938

>"we play for keepsies"

Says the satanic controllers here…

 

Ctrl-F d0608c

Looks like the 'facts about Jews' spammer is dictating so "sincerely" the direction of the baking process.

You're right, post history is a bitch πŸ€£πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

 

Infact, we can take this one step further and see that this poster is on very friendly terms with each Baker who posts here.

They know who this is.

Judging from the spurts of activity, we can see they jump on at around the same time to discuss things that already seemed agreed on.

So what other means of communication are you all using outside of this?

Bakers Union 2.0~

 

>The (4)[ word jew invokes hate ] spell was broken a while ago anon.

>this stream is less active, so the babysitter is present more often. but the talking points will be tailored to this stream's content.

>>think of all the young minds i am leaving an impression upon!

>an impression that tells their better senses that [you] are fucking evil as you… are fucking evil!

>can [you] say "KEK"? :D

>Muh faithful Traitors who would sell america's soul to muh church in a NY second!

>gosh you have those pretty memes and all I have are Q DROPS AND NEWS STORIES…

>Am I making you

>annoyed?

>angry?

>question why you are here?

>THAT IS THE PRIMARY GOAL.

 

Is our thread creation [Made in China]?

We remember why you created this charade.

We know you're using it to reassert control with your (4)[Jew hate] anger script.

We know it was to memory hole your exposed bakers Union 2.0~

Remember "mossad massacre"?

I remember that was your cover for me getting into your head. Psychological damage is hard to heal sweetie~

We know why you deploy your B.its

We remember.

Anonymous ID: c52870 May 4, 2020, 7:19 p.m. No.12673   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2674 >>2676

>>12612

ah i see

so the new meme thread was brought up here first

>>12663

i dont do much here in comms, obviously

 

i dont care about the bunker stuff

the thread war room #1 was a good cludge to end the initial dough war a few nights ago

 

those who are old school know, its not common to just make a new thread and get it added to the dough

 

but i guess comms is good

since Rusty set up the council during the notables war

>>12671

 

we good now

just dont call me out for being comped

next to nightbaker i got the most bakes

now that RGB isnt baking and until ODB gets more into the rotation

 

we good

Anonymous ID: c52870 May 4, 2020, 7:21 p.m. No.12676   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12616

yes i added that

>>12673

 

it was a cludge to the initial dough edit from nightbaker the other night

 

i dont make war

i dont hate on anyone, end chan included

its not fair to hate on people

 

i believe all are good intentions

and they say the way to hell is paved on good intentions, that goes both ways

 

out

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 8:02 p.m. No.12690   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2698

>>12679

These two breads 11517 and 11518 were baked by "guest"

11518 of them used Kekbee icon

(Anyone including pro users can bake as guest if they want of course)

This would not be mv; too late, never see him baking past 3 am ET and that's late for him. and the long notables are not his style at all.

 

But this discussion needs to go to META

https://8kun.top/comms/res/12561.html

this is the class thread, new bakers need to have access to the last 45 posts.

Anonymous ID: c52870 May 4, 2020, 8:37 p.m. No.12714   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2750

so let me get this straight

you go through all this 'seminar' to recruit new bakers

someone here thinks they have a leg up on nefarious behavior by endchan

they get one simple line removed from the dough (war room #1)

they then think endchan group is trying to hijack (over 1 line)

now only pastebin bakers can bake

to hold the line?

 

im due for some shore leave

i suggest the soldier who is leading this battle take it as well

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 4, 2020, 10:08 p.m. No.12750   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2781

>>12714

>Shore leave, huh?

we got a coupla things going on - some anon trying to make new improved dough and endchan fags thinking /qr/ is a sort of second-rate version of qr-end. Then we got a suspicious baker (new? returning? idk) who thinks about half the bakers are comp'd. Your name was mentioned but looks like i'm not far behind, see META. Oh - and also shills trashing bakers, but nothing new there.

 

Rusty happy - finally has ONE thread that will reach 751.

>now only pastebin bakers can hold the line?

Nah, not all - just you. ;)

Anonymous ID: a3c7c8 May 4, 2020, 11:53 p.m. No.12753   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2868

yes, showed up before this

is why suspicious that someone claimed to be daybaker (via graphic) and said they were just now back first time since 8chan and instantly baking so as not to let the bread ghost.

go back and read it.

Anonymous ID: 6cee99 May 5, 2020, 6:37 p.m. No.12868   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12711

>>12747

Someone rang?

Pic related.

>>12753

Did not bake either Monday or today this week owing to workfagging.

May bake tomorrow, though.

Reassumed responsibilities (first time since 8ch) a couple of weeks ago, that is true.

Life circumstances have allowed return to contribution/volunteering.

Suspicion is warranted and understood.

Will not shy away from questions if you have any.

Will answer tomorrow owing to need to sleep.

Rusty ID: 5f9c2f May 5, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.12874   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2938 >>3021

>>12211

yo

teach

I'd like to confabulate on this weeks class

the following are suggestions

take 'em or leave 'em

 

bake the class thread early and I'll lock it

in this way the advance announcement for class can contain the actual class thread

when class time nears, at your discretion I'll unlock it

 

I've placed a bit of a target on this next class, I've stated that I'll keep it well policed, since there is now a dedicated meta for bakers there is no reason to allow any more shenanigans or mayhem in the classroom if you don't want it there

I have my personal line on what I'll allow and what I won't, but I am seriously interested in your view on tolerable vs intolerable posting in the classroom thread

I'd also like to hear from

>>12858

on this subject

gyb ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 10:59 a.m. No.12938   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2950

>>12874

Hey Rusty

>>12858 here.

>u putting target on class

u didn't place a target, it's been targeted for some time now. always watching, here and in /qr/. shills started with anti-baking class meme in /qr/ in early March, and now it gets mentioned along with "bakers union" stuff. Class success is what put a target on - as in "over the target." Shill hate well-staffed kitchen.

 

"Coincidentally"

there have been 3 major pushes to do overhaul on the /qr/ dough: from endchan, from this guy 274287, and now from OSS, who is now suspicious of about half the bakers. All within the last week. That's a lot of activity in a very short time. Continuing to watch.

 

Re posting the thread in advance tomorrow:

That's a great idea. Been me for a while coz i'm always working on the dough. Now as BV, should I be able to lock/unlock the thread myself? If so, i could do it (fine if you wanna do it, just thought it would be easier).

 

I logged in, poked around a little but don't see menu for making changes, can you help? Goes wo/saying, would never do it wo/asking. (Especially if i can't figure it out, kek.)

Anonymous ID: 5f9c2f May 6, 2020, 12:23 p.m. No.12950   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2962

>>12938

>>12938

we are on the same page

 

I may not be available until just after class time tomorrow so you've got the helm

 

my suggestion would be to bake early & lock it

announce in general early with actual class link and start time

 

during class

you are released from my admonition not to delete anything here, the classroom is yours.

 

IF you feel it necessary do so, but I personally like leaving the post as example

 

you can use the edit function to warn and ban those who need it for a few minutes to a few hours as you see fit

 

when you are logged in you'll be able to 'mouse over' the functions and they'll 'pop up' the label

try it

if you have questions I'll try to answer them

> poked around a little but don't see menu for making changes,

 

what type of change?

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 1:45 p.m. No.12962   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2963 >>2998

>>12950

So it's on the catalog (hiding in plain sight).

Jeez, OSS is now trying to take me out as a shill. Still in shock. I just thought he was overzealous. Holy crap - what a mess.

 

>Deleting posts.

Can't be both a host and a cop at the same time, i'm with you: leave stuff and point it out as a bad example. I'll play with board stuff later, still shaky right now.

Anonymous ID: 731288 May 6, 2020, 3:28 p.m. No.12976   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12975

I'm not sure what I'm lookin for saw some of it in bread

don't get it

I mess up numbers all the time

I caught it myself today

blows on knuckles and polishes on chest

but changing numbers isn't changing notables

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 3:50 p.m. No.12980   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2982 >>2984

>>12971

doc, i'm sure sure what's going on either. may be recalling another night where i held down the fort on the late night bred while you updated notable numbers that had gone wrong 6 breds before.

 

sorry if i messed up and remembered the wrong night. This was all so long ago, had to go look up the stuff he was talking about.

 

but i didn't change the numbers here >>12961

don't even know what OSS is getting at with that part. it was no doubt just another usual baker screwup not sabotage. he is paranoid as fuck.

Anonymous ID: 731288 May 6, 2020, 3:58 p.m. No.12982   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2984

>>12980

I was thinking the numbers I messed were 113 but I could be wrong, it doesn't mater, changing numbers is common for me, we all know it but I don't change notables, changing number for anyone is not changing notables, that is all I can attest to

I vehemently oppose changing notables once baked, even my own, it's like historical revision, I don't do it, that said, I fixed a couple of misspellings along the way but let the screamer know I wasn't happy about it, drew a line in the sand, bakers can fix anything whack in the dough but not change notables, we all know that

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 4:04 p.m. No.12984   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2986

>>12980

spellling sucks right now, should be

*not sure what's going on

 

BTW, you or anybody can ask me whatever you want about the "changing lb notables" thing, although it's pretty well explained here:

>>>/qresearch/>>9055833

or here

>>12983

 

>>12982

just saw your message. You are probably right. Again, sorry for my mistake. Got to go, fren came over. Understand your view about PB notables, i don't change them either, but this was a weird thing. Wasn't happy about it but did the best i could.

Anonymous ID: cff432 May 6, 2020, 6:17 p.m. No.12999   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>12989

>i know that but OSS sees fuckery everyone, not mistakes.

I see fuckery in people that purposely delete notables other bakers baked. ESPECIALLY notables related to human trafficking and cannibalism. when Q has just made a drop on it. The more you talk the deeper you dig.

Anonymous ID: 6cee99 May 6, 2020, 6:25 p.m. No.13001   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3010

>>12997

Let it die.

With all this paranoia posting, you might as well reset the clocks one year+.

With all due respect, thank God it's not badgering against 8bit this time.

God bless his patience.

Not sure how he tolerated Pen/the 5th column for as long as he did.

Anonymous ID: cff432 May 6, 2020, 6:28 p.m. No.13003   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3009

>>12993

>reminds me of the TYB shit last year. Comes in and stirs shit then just leaves

I didn't leave, I've been here the whole time cataloging.

 

Your boy admitted to baking the last good bread, He admitted to deleting the notables, he admitted to baking as a guest, yet here the other bakers are supporting his subversion.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 6:47 p.m. No.13009   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3011 >>3012 >>3014

>>13000

Might as well tuck it up at 750 since the muffin spam is now showing up here, too.

 

>>13003

fukken POS

11875 wasn't the "last good bred"; some subsequent breads were misnumbered but otherwise fine.

Fuck no, never baked as guest, never said i did

>>13002

As for the notes, that was a baker/anon decision.

>>12983

Anonymous ID: cff432 May 6, 2020, 6:50 p.m. No.13011   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>13009

>11875 wasn't the "last good bred

11875 isn't and never was in discussion,

 

You deleted other bakers notes

 

You turned of pastebin name

 

You fucked up notables numbers so it would be hard to find in archive, literally had to go back search for (pb) through 5 breads to get to where you hid your tracks

 

You admitted to baking 11181 as a guest after admitting to baking 11175 as your paste bin

 

You said you never baked as a guest

 

You ignored anons telling you not to delete previous bakers notables

 

You deleted the title of only 2 of the notables you deleted, just the BRONFMAN related ones

 

You ignored anons telling you it was an ongoing dig

 

You said you knew it was another baker that messed up the titles

 

You tried to get Doc to cover for you in baking sem 12 (archived) http://archive.is/2pJAD

 

AND YOU STILL DON"T HAVE AN ANSWER FOR WHY YOU CHOSE TO DELETE THE NOTABLES>>13009

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 7 p.m. No.13014   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3015

>>13009

>muffin spam

not sure was i was going for then but surely not 'muffin spam'.

 

>>13010

Already have a very thick skin. some bakers know from last year. But had to get to the bottom and state the truth for the record. Initially could barely remember this situation (and got some of the details wrong). Many breads ago. Had to dig up answers, so i can answer any legit q's accurately.

 

>>13013. Looks like you're now part of the subversion plot. Welcome. Time to return to the other thread, it's getting mighty crowded in here.

Anonymous ID: cff432 May 6, 2020, 7:03 p.m. No.13015   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>13014

>Looks like you're now part of the subversion plot. Welcome. Time to return to the other thread, it's getting mighty crowded in here.

I'm not the one deleting notables on NXIVM, cannabalism, and human trafficking. We'll see who the anons believe are subverting the board.

Anonymous ID: 81354a May 6, 2020, 8:06 p.m. No.13021   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3022

>>12874

Yo Rusty. Don't know if this'll get in in time.

>bake the class thread early and I'll lock it

Sure thing, great thinking. gyb usually posts it, so maybe we can ask him to do that if we see him this eve / tomorrow. I will if I see him.

 

>I've stated that I'll keep it well policed

Really appreciate all you've done in making the meta thread etc to support. That should really help.

For policing, i'm all for freedom of speech and letting it all flow. muffins can easily be ignored as we usually do. Unsure that banning or deleting posts is of any benefit and can make things worse. I'm good to just let it be and we can see how tomorrows class is, however it's your place, I respect and trust you and if you want to deal with it how you think is best that's great and we can see how it goes that way. Easy.

Thanks again for everything.

Anonymous ID: cc5091 May 6, 2020, 8:14 p.m. No.13022   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>13021

hey baker fren

pretty strange day

familiarizing myself with BV tools, finally

i'm in the loop, was planning to bake latest update and lock it for now. reply in meta if there's stuff to talk about.

o7

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I hope you won't mind the edit, but you beat me to post 751

so, I'll edit into your post the post I was getting ready to post…

>>13021

>Unsure that banning or deleting posts is of any benefit and can make things worse.

 

I'm unsure as well about the final results

I don't think there will be any deletions, a few short term bans… a few edits… who knows…

 

you never know… it all might be bait to see if certain parties over react in a pre-emptive fashion

it's hard to tell the sincere anons from the "eccentric" ones from the truly subversive

 

the disruptions, diversions and division that result from the activities of a few…

sad really when you think about it

our goal is to help all of humanity

who could be against that?