LIVE Baking Seminar

4/30/2020

We in here

Welcome To LIVE Baking Classes in the Q Research Utility Kitchen

We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

We are the bakers who provide the breads for those anons who post Qresearch's open-sourced information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of baking ideas and baking ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS

SEMPER FIDELIS

WWG1WGA

THE Q MOVEMENT IS ABOUT CHALLENGING THE ESTABLISHMENT -

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

General Announcements

* Baking Class in /comms/ every Thursday @7pm ET: practice baking, Q&A, all are welcome

Past Class links & archives

>>6125 #1 (2/13/20), >>6368 #2 (2/20/20), >>6885 #3 (2/27/20), >>7185 #4 (3/05/20), #5 >>7568 (3/12/20), >>8274 #6 (3/19/20), >>8872 #7 (3/26/20), >>9320 #8 (4/02/20), >>9787 #9 (4/09/20), >>10510 #10 (4/16/20)

Archives: Classes #1 - #8: >>10784

Step by Step Baking Instructions

Simpler version on the left; more detailed version on the right.

>>7594 PREPARATION >>11170

>>7606 STEP 1 - Find the Current Dough >>11178

>>7615 STEP 2 - Copy the Current Dough >>11183

>>7624 STEP 3 - Paste The Dough Into Text Editor >>11191

>>7640 STEP 3a - Trim The Notables Section >>11194, >>11204

>>7646 STEP 3b - Make space for your new notables. >>11210

>>7660 STEP 4 - Create A New Thread >>11216

>>7670 STEP 5 - Enter Thread Info And Post Thread >>11242

>>7681 STEP 6 - Post the Rest of the Dough >>11248

>>7698 STEP 7 - Make A New Pastebin & Make The Dough Post >>11256

>>7706 STEP 8 - Post Your New Thread Link >>11259

Overview & Extras

>>11161 Modules 1 & II

>>9994, >>11303 Timing the Bake

>>10005, >>11283 Linking between Boards

>>10293 Archiving & teaching files (screenshot; almost current)

E-BAKE Instructions

>>9252, >>10776

Q & A

———— Class #1 (2/13/20)

>>6237 How often do you post a notables list? >>6244, >>6248, >>6266, >>6251, >>6278

>>6253, >>6471 What is "body too long"? How to fix? >>6253, >>6275

>>6252 When do you post next bread link to hit 751 (sniping)? >>6263

>>6283 Last notable post: any special formatting? >>6296, >>6297

>>6302 Better to make the updated pastebin before baking or after (and then post the dough)? >>6304

———— Class #2 (2/20/20)

>>6406 How to deal with "server too long" message? >>6423

>>6672 How to put my text editor notables in pastebin? >>6673

>>6432 How to tell what is notable and what is not? >>6432, >>6434, >>6436, >>6450, >>6466

>>6513 Do real anons actually love the bewbs (or are they just a distraction)? >>6521, >>6523, >>6526, >>6532

>>6533 How do you make a new pastebin? >>6543, >>6537

>>6549 How much practice do I need? >>6550, >>6559

>>6570 How do you format a Q post? >>6573, >>6588, >>6597, >>6598

>>6630 How great is the need for bakers? >>6635

>>6693 What are the //// BREAK \\ in the pastebin [page breaks]? >>6694

>>6732 Do notables go directly in the dough/pastebin file or in a separate Notable file? >>6691, >>6732

>>6833 How to bake: Index vs Catalog? >>6834, >>6839

>>6779 What shifts need bakers? >>6781, >>6802, >>6806, >>6811, >>6822 [rt 6802], >>6824,

>>6845 Feedback on a new bake rt >>6842

———— Class #3 (2/27/20)

>>6908 How do you 'grab the dough'? 10 steps: >>6910, >>6924, >>6928, >>6949, >>6955, >>7042, >>7045, >>7049, >>7055, >>7070

>>6934, >>6938 What is "baker's tools" app & where to find it? >>6943, >>6950, >>6951

>>7073 Anon request for feedback on bake: >>7081, >>7086

>>6966 How does a baker keep up with notables (day, night, Q)? >>6982

>>6983 I got "body too long" - what to do? >>6998, >>7007, >>7015, >>7024, >>7040

>>6984 Anon: plz check my work? >>6994

>>7028 Do I need a pastebin login account? [no!]

>>6995 Max no. of breads in "Previously Collected Notables"? >>7033

>>7033 Can you avoid two-page notables by placing oldest breads in "previously collected notables? [yes!]

>>7025 Body too long: what's the limit? [~4500 char or 100 lines]

>>7030 Why are links in practice bakes green? >>7030, >>7035

———— Class #4 (3/5/20)

>>7193 Baking possible on a cell phone? >>7010, >>7205

>>7210 How do you know who is baking? >>7215, >>7218, >>7222

>>7236 I know I would choke if things got too hectic >>7240

>>7315 How do i get notable bun linked under previously collected notables? >>7319

———— Class #5 (3/12/20)

>>7735 What about sniping? >>7739, >>7752

>>7779 How can you tell a real baker from a shill baker? >>7781, >>7790, >>7803, >>7807, >>7821, >>7861

>>7833 How do i know which baker is baking? >>7838, >>7849, >>7851, >>7866, >>7884, >>7885, >>7906

>>7830 How do bakers delete posts? [they don't] >>7834, >>7837, >>7839, >>7842

>>7853 Should I get a pastebin account? >>7870, >>7875

>>8003 What is the "flood detected" message when baking? >>8011, >>8016

>>8024 Does baker include only anon noms in notables? >>8029

———— Class #6 (3/19/20)

>>8421 Notes: how do you keep up in a fast bred? >>8432, >>8440

>>8500 What is "shadowing the bread"? >>8546

>>8679 Am I too slow to bake? No! >>8679, >>8698, >>8696, >>8700

>>9258 How do you insert General Image in TOR bakes? >>9278

———— Class #7 (3/26/20)

>>9258 How do TOR bakers use the Iwo Jima video?

>>9135 Can we recap?

———— Class #8 (4/02/20)

>>9397 /comms/ with anons from bakers–ok or not? >>9382, >>9397, >>9407, >>9410. >>9411, >>9418

>>9530 How often does BO log in?

>>9918 Bred titles: What's ok & how to format? >>9932, >>9936

———— Class #9 (4/09/20)

>>10020 Why are my notables green? >>10026, >>10041

>>10032 Q about images: when png, TOR, mp4? >>10067

>>9999 When to postbaking? >>10010, >>10079, >>10092

>>10162 How many practice baker b4 a real bake? >>10168, >>10174

———— Classes #10 (4/16/20)

>>10641 What do when Q posts? >>10645

>>10762 Would like to bake but have no regular schedule >>10763, >>10765

———— Class #11 (4/23/20)

>>11376 Why use both pastebin.com and notepad++? >>11312, >>11321, >>11325

>>11306 How to keep up in fast breads? >>11309, >>11314, >>11320

Baker Tips, Tricks & Traps

———— Class #1 (2/13/20)

>>6329, >>6400, >>6468 /comms/ BO Rusty checks in

———— Class #2 (2/20/20)

>>6431 What is "pastebin"?

>>6449 Shill tactic of omitting date–why dates matter,other advice on notabling >>6477

>>6480 Even the worst mistakes are fixable

>>6501, >>6477 How to deal with Q proofs & other anon analyses

>>6525 How to post off-bred links

>>6543 Take care to copypaste entire dough to pastebin - easy to miss top or bottom

>>6658, >>6656 Use Control-F (F3) to search within each bread

>>6665 Every new baker freaks out when when Q posts

>>6676 Never feel dumb

>>6734 When to make a new thread [to prep it, not bake it!]

>>6683, >>6687 Cloning the dough in case pastebin.com goes down

>>6695, >>6735, >>6752, >>6754, >>6769, >>6822 Bakers on nick-names, icons, pastebins

>>6848 Baking trick (what to do while waiting for thread to drop)

———— Class #3 (2/27/20)

>>7340, >>7072 Baking Steps 1 - 9 (slides only)

>>6998 One- vs two-page notables (more: >>7007, >>7015, >>7024, >>7040)

>>7019, >>7027, >>7030, >>7069 Bakers never panic, never tap

>>7051 Advantages of a non-guest pastebin account [no captcha]

>>7054 You don't have to pull marathons to bake

>>7106, >>7177 Baker pleased to see 2 late gy bakers vying for the bread

>>7116 Eight tips for creating notables posts (to help bakers)

>>7175 End-of-bread issues

———— Class #4 (3/5/20)

>>7189 Summary of Baking Steps (eight)

>>7209 "Create a Thread" versus "Post a Reply" >>7212, >>7220

>>7231 Only the first post in baking uses "Create a thread"

>>7216 Laptop is fine for baking

>>7224 The two parts of baking: actual baking & note-taking

>>7252 Funny meme: baker's perspective on baking

>>7287, >>7294 Dough posts with breaks marked /////BREAK\\\

>>7298, >>7303, >>7311 Two-page notables (discussion)

>>7321 How to create a new dough paste

———— Class #5 (3/12/20)

>>7573, >>7575, >>7582 In response to "I suck at baking": How to reduce baking stress

>>7731 Pastebin.com works with Mac OS

>>7642 Text editor for a Mac: Atom >>7643, >>7651, >>7729

>>7768 Bakers need detachment >>7770, >>7773

>>7780 Plz don't edit another baker's notables >>7780, >>7784, >>7798, >>7804, >>7809, >>7811, >>7815, >>7817

>>7896, >>7898 Bakers don't want to be ID'd by number

>>8039 Baker school is attracting shills–must be over the target

>>8139 Q Bakes: when to bake & late-minute Q posts

>>8237 Tell anons to plz state the main point when posting Q proofs, etc.

———— Class #6 (3/19/20)

>>8352 Note-taking wo/baking, baker's assist controversy >>8365, >>8385, >>8413, >>8419, >>8433

>>8544, >>8562 When to drop note-taker notables

>>8788 "8chan" baking vs "WWG1WGA" baking, cooperation w/anons

>>8373 Who's responsible for checking notables (bakers or anons)? >>8388

———— Class #7 (3/26/20)

>>8885 The perfect bake: composition, timing, snipe >>8887, >>8888 (You), >>8889

>>8911 Role of bakers on the board plus bakers/BOs >>8915 (You), >>8923 (You)

>>9127 Baking thread a continuing resource

>>9136 Taking notables/baking for a baker

>>9186 (You), >>9193 (You) New bakers coming online, anon encouragement

>>9181 New baker's dough & notes plus feedback >>9188 (You), >>9191 (You), >>9195

>>9191 How to handle notables when there is more than one baker per bread

———— Class #8 (4/02/20)

>>9411 Differing ideas about baker demeanor >>9375, >>9382, >>9404, >>9411, >>9418

>>9431 Current relationship with /qr/ BO @fj

>>9337 Bread title–put colon AFTER the bread number

>>9373 Qs after @600 - don't let shills distract

>>9375 Notable posting, timing 200-400-600

>>9386 Bakers message to anons

>>9380 Notables post after the bake

———— Class #9 (4/09/20)

>>9970, >>9981, >>10011, >>10017 Formatting bun numbers, notables page

>>10083, >>10106 Tell anons of needed baker changes in advance; timing issues

>>10081 Note-taker steps to bake for first time

>>10087, >>9993 Formatting issues

>>10075 Importance of tagging the dough post

>>10078, >>10101 Ideas for streamlining notables; what to include/exclude?

>>10106, >>10119, >>10116, >>10167 "Last call crew" (anons/shills who call out problems at end of bake)

>>10101, >>10111 Telling anons from shills

>>10132, >>10148, >>10163 Ignore shills when baking

>>10133 Creating a pastebin early

>>10226 Can't make it to class? Suggestions

———— Class #10 (4/16/20)

>>10547, >>6892 Baker handoffs

>>10555, >>10815 Max post length: 4700-5000 characters, ~200 lines (results vary).

>>10581 Good comms with anons

>>10696 How to report a thread or post

>>10763 Team baking (baker plus note collector) >>10765, >>10764

———– Class #11 (4/23/20)

>>11354 Example of baker get trying to get nommer to be more specific

Intro to Baking

Qresearch is a 24/7 beehive of activity where anons post their diggs, memes and prayers.

For this to happen requires ''bakers''--which is why they have been called "the core of this board."

Bakers perform several key functions:

* Post notables for each bread.

* Transition the board from one bread to another (baking).

* Maintain the infrastructure of the board (the dough), keeping it clean, tidy, and up-to-date.

* Set the tone for each bread via their choice of bread title and /comms/ with posters.

When all goes well, baking is a fun & exciting opportunity to serve. When things get wonky and shills attack--bakers carry on anyway.

Shadilay, fellow bakers!

OTHER BAKING RESOURCES

Baker's grab bag

* Baker's Tools App (Version 0.7.2) >>6646, >>6650, >>6652, >>6654, >>6656, >>9584, >>9589, >>9597, >>9601

* Try Atom as a text editor for Macs >>6925, >>6934, >>7055, >>7070

* Meme-making app kek.gg >>8771

* Crazy Bakes: wonky board, lags, baking from Index, "flood detected", dup breads >>9960

* How's your mouse for baking? >>10617

* Font used for baking school slides: >>10642, https://www.dafontfree.net/find.php?q=impact

* Quik Pic bake instructions >>7549

* Original baking video >>7076 (shows how to make room for new notables)

* Overcoming paywalls >>10844

* Pastebin.com problems & alternatives >>11645, >>11609, >>11619, >>11620, >>11627, >>11640, >>11641, >>11644

Dealing with notables

* Ten Baker Tips for Notables >>8177

* Asking anons to state the main point >>8237

* Anon tips for better notables (bakers can tell anons) >>>/qrb/41937, https://pastebin.com/yq7wQyvn

* Bakers on what they look for in notables >>8351, >>8315, >>8698

* Muh Collector "how to" on notables >>9006, >>9009

Free image/video screenshots & production tools

* Image screenshots PrtSc/snipping tool + MS-Paint https://youtu.be/KvXxCE1gxOE

* 8kun video limits >>8760

* Bandicam Screen Recorder >>8759, >>8762 (also: OBS, Kdenlive, Audacity)

* VLC Player >>8714, >>8715, >>8766

* Windows Movie Maker for Win 10 >>8712

* YTCutter (makes vid clips from YT) >>8767

* Twitter Video Downloader >>8768

* NVidia cards (can screen-capture vids) >>8785

* Forensically (forensics magnifier) https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/#forensic-magnifier

* ShotCut NLE (open source cross platform video editor) https://shotcut.org/

* MFFmpeg (decodes & plays any format) https://ffmpeg.org/ >>>/qresearch/8507906

* Natron (cross-platform video compositor) >>>/qresearch/8507913

* Handbrake (good for transcoding) >>>/qresearch/8507921

* GIMP & GMIC (image editing) >>>/qresearch/8507956

* Invidio (copies YT vids, restricted or not, no ads or signup) >>8792

Baker tips IRL

>>8829 Baker's Tips - Read me first

>>6331 #01 - Ghosting a bred

>>6331 #02 - Baker changes

>>6378 #03 - TOR baking

>>6651 #04 - Defeating shills with facts & humor

>>7339 #05 - Announce you're baking (#11 too)

>>6892 #06 - Baking/note-taking protocols

>>7181 #07 - Use RED TEXT and BOLD in handoffs

>>7363 #08 - Try to notice when a cat is baking

>>7973 #09 - Respecting other bakers' notables

>>8174 #10 - Make sure to copypasta the whole page

>>8803 #11 - Announce you're taking responsibility

>>8822 #12 - Embed baker changes to provide more info

>>8824 #13 - Watch out for unknown bakers bearing gifts

>>8825 #14 - Use named pastebins to defeat shill complaints

>>8826 #15 - Responding to shills trying to suck up baker's time

>>8827 #16 - Be aware of muh joos bakers

>>8828 #17 - All bakers screw up

>>10445 #18 - Just do it--bake!

>>9590 #19 - Don't be afraid to bake

>>10789 #20 - Post notes early so changes can be made

>>10791 #21 - No /comms/ creates misunderstandings

>>10792 #22 - Defeat shills with humor

Baker teaching stories

>>10114 How shills attack bakers--an example ("baker saves notables for his twats")

>>10787 LIVE example of picking up a mid-bread bake

>>10710 Why do you bake? >>10729, >>10731, >>10732, >>10744

Ideas & proposals

>>10253 Dough revision history proposal

''this dough will change as we collect new resources & refine what's here''

dough:

https://pastebin.com/QjbD6xGw

Welcome everyone!

to the 12th consecutive baking seminar.

Plz have some Fiji water while you wait.

Any questions or comments before class begins?

>>11743

Good to see you too

Things are crazy as usual

See the discussion in #11?

>>11742

i put a notice in just now on /qr/

saying it's ok to be late, we'll be here

>>11742

we always put notices on /qr/ prior to baking class

it's also in the /qr/ dough in between

>>11746

controversy about image used for this /qr/ bred

sigh….traditional vs change.

Best to consult anons b4 making changes that are pretty fundamental.

Allow changes to be organic

allowing input from others

over time.

>split bread

one only has 60 or so posts

not split any longer, for better or worse

doesn't mean the controversy is over tho

>>11752

so you ebaked the smaller bred?

bc of image or ghost bred?

Q is posting in the ebake?

well, maybe we DO have a split bake then

gonna be like the last time,

when q posted in an old dup bred was never locked.

Here's the catalog right now:

cap

>>11760

hello. r u a baker, or a would-be baker or note collector?

>>11754

see

>>11761

>>11755

that's kind of how it worked out last week. there's always a way.

pretty educational for new bakers actually - to see that even when weird shit happens, there's a way to make it work.

wow, suddenly the posting is really fast

it's alternated between super fast and wonky (404s, endless "posted") for the last 2 days

>>11769

that's pretty cagey, ha-ha.

i learn tons here every week.

>>11774

ok, that's what we've been talking about at the end of last thread.

often, we talk about that stuff towards the end so we can give newbies a chance to ask questions.

anybody here who is new or fairly new?

>>11778

well, everybody gets to hang the way they like to. mainly, i just wanna know enough so i'm not explaining the abc's to some baker who can bake me under the table.

>>11782

either way, don't know what's up in that thread now, anons/bakers tend to drift over here but discussion might still be ongoing.

>>11787

yes, i guess i'm hosting and teach is teachin'. maybe i should call myself 'host.'

but i got too many names already.

IRL, i got exactly one.

is it my imagination or are things especially crazy now? i mean, they are never dull but….every day, i could tell a long story about what happened. like last night i realized i was working on 3 doughs at the same time: qrb, comms and qr (the last one was e-bake–never drop by a bred if yr not preppred for surprises).

>>11796

>q confirmed traditional image

possibly. but Q also posts wherever he can, as you know.

+++++++

Wow, just heard like 7 or 8 q drops in a row on my phone. QR must be crazy. Wonder which bred they're in now.

>>11803

It's habbening.

>>11809

all i did yesterday was prep breads. baked qr last night, qrb this am, seminar bread this afternoon.

>>11814

maybe the message is "expect the unexpected."

KEK.

Do we have any lurqers out there?

Maybe not – since Q is posting – but it yer there and want to say anything, we are listening.

>>11818

Glad to see we are keeping standards up, teach. Elegant venues are sure to elevate the baking experience to new heights.

>>11822

wish i could bake like that

i literally can't do it physically

but doesn't really matter, there is plenty to do

these classes and discussions afterwards are always good

despite the fact that we have 'competition' every week

first, POTUS rallies

next, corona

now, Q

(and if teach had started earlier, peach mint)

everyone likes primetime!

>>11827

i'll take a run over there now

>>11837

well i just put a notice in on /qr/

so if Q's still there maybe he'll follow the link

that would be fun

>>11825

posted again on qr just now.

so vids are still posting pretty slowly?

>>11836

they are slow. how long have you waited?

>>11844

definitely worth trying.

mp4s are a real pain on 8kun.

i just loaded some on endchan and they are much faster. btw, endchan says you can have up to 350mgs. In theory maybe. IRL, more like 50mgs. but that's still a lot compared to here. And they load faster--that board is just not under the same kind of attack.

try loading these ~50mg mp4s sometime:

>>5730, >>5731, >>5732 (it's the two docs who got banned by yt for contradicting the CDC, made an mp4 in case they get banned on all platforms)

>>11849

sorry, you'll need a full link:

first vid:

https://endchan.net/qrbunker/res/5695.html#q5730

>>11846

Nope, no Q posts for us. Don't know whether Q focuses much on the baking process most of the time, except when doc got a ty last month. Noice.

>>11855

when i go to endchan, it reminds me of what posting and baking used to be like here. like drivin' a hot car. but if it were easy i guess we wouldn't be here.

>>11859

5

>>11858

7

i did three, but all slo, see >>11799

>>11863

well, i'm thinkin' that's true. have had one post that i'm 99% sure was from Q team, and i seldom guess about that kind of thing. But baking process is different than bakers. Not creepy to me, i figure God sees everything and that this movement is aligned with God's uh emissaries, so that part just seems natural. My end of it is to figure out the best way to serve. Remarkable experience.

>>11866

that is a long time.

there's a slight possibility is could be due to other posting problems OR bandwidth of comms - bc i was trying to post doughs on both /comms/ and /qrb/ after making edits, to see if they looked ok. And they just never posted (got the "posted" message for 20 mins or so). That's why i went over to /qr/ at one point - to see if it was the same there.

>>11871

>uploading vids

when you figure it out, let me know how you did it, plz.

whether for yt or any other platform.

BUT

if you decide the vids are too cumbersome, i think the slides are sufficient for almost everything. The only time where the vids is super helpful is showing the lag and making room for more notables.

What do you think?

>>11844

will try right now.

a minutes later…..

well, what i just found:

vids are loading MUCH faster for me than before CM upgraded the speed.

But the trick seemed to work too.

Great idea, will put in the dough. will also try it with a machine that's got less ram, slower processing and see if it works there.

>>11888

the only reservation i have about ty is that it's yt. very public. know what i mean?

Now, if you put them there, would i still be able to use them if you are not here? Would any special access be needed or would the teacher just ask students to go watch Step 1 (etc) and be available for questions? Trying to envision it.

>>11895

bread looks just fine, a-ok.

still am not a fan of making qwik changes to dough, but that's another topic.

>>11892

>ruffled feathers

you have to understand–it's not just about ruffled feathers, it's about why they are ruffled. About organic change vs qwik fixes, about allowing people input and enough time to consider the ramifications of things.

Analogy:

Ever get presented with a list of 10 nommed posts at end of bred?

Assuming it's an anon, some posts might be decent, some not. But whatever their merits, such a list is too much to consider all at once.

Anons need instead to nom posts over the course of the bred, show why each one is notable, and wait for baker to think about it–and other anons to either do a second nom or say "no, not notable!"

That is the kind of process by which change can happen organically.

>>11909

Good! fingers crossed, it keeps working.

>>11911

>wizzarded images

i saw them, admired them, and was wondering if wnb got them. think i even left a message for him once saying to look in #11. VERY nice images.

>>11916

but you may have gone off-bred by then.

>>11917

ok - so the timing step is number 9 now, not 10. i think it's better than way, makes more sense.

>>11926

>damn notables

good topic to bring up.

Notables are what i like the best but i know it's not true for many bakers - and prolly deters some anons from baking. Have taught tech comm, understand some stuff about why.

Any way i can help?

>>11926

not a problem discussing anything. but if there's a strong push for many changes, you will of course get a "whoa, slow down" response. often better to propose fewer changes at a time.

>i didn't hijack the bake to impose it - and you're reacting a little as if i did

Actually, i don't know anything about that. Don't really know who's been baking (except doc), have been mostly on /qrb/ or here since last night. So i'm was only looking at the stuff you posted on #11.

Mostly just in the 'let's slow down' mode, that's all. Not triggered nor upset.

>>11940

yeah, i noticed coz i'm all over the dough. As long as it's consistent, should be good, so i don't have to change it. also, i like to keep up on your approach so i can easily step in if you can't be here.

hey all bakers and muh noters

want some great baking stories to put in the dough, try and write up a paragraph of one you think would be guud ok?

anytime it's convenient, i scan the thread for nuggets all the time…..

>>11946

Here is my baking story about the Night of the Two Breds:

Middle of the night, shill baked a real bad bred

But no other bakers so anons sort of posted there

Two hours later, anon comes along and decides to bake another bred but barely knows how; but anons jump to new bred. but anon isn't baking anymore.

I wake up about an hour later and wander onto the bred to find these two breds - one with 350 or more posts that looks like crap and another better looking bread with far fewer posts.

Only been baking for maybe a month?

But fools rush in….

Anons were real happy to get even a beginner baker so even tho i was a total klutz, we were able to shut down shill bread and get things back on track.

>>11974

Bet u could write a book…..ha-ha….

>>11963

>11732 pb

that was me (you can trace back the uid, i just stopped using my name bc i know it can be traced back to class)

pretty much the same feedback, not real fond of new format, but always willing to talk. there's a history here too complicated to discuss right now, but this has been going back and forth for a while. it's ok, will all come out in the wash.

>>11995

re note taking

started out as a note taker, would have been happy to remain so, it's in my wheelhouse. but baker was what was needed, so learned that eventually.

Can you say the one or two things that most put you off about note-taking?

>>11960

edgewalker extraordinaire, no fun it it's easy, right?

>>11961

this board…..only place you can get that unique combo of fukken badassery and refined discussions on art.

>>11965

newsfaggit is annoying, kek. most annoying is that so much of what's posting is semi-notable but not quite good enough to motivate me to type 30 notables just for his stuff. every. bred.

>>11965

>Q proofs and anon analyses

send me screamin' from the room.

anons almost never give descriptions coz it's too damned hard–leave it to baker or note taker, haha. what they lack in eloquent they often make up for in vehemence (thenotable afapproach)

>>11960 "ima bakin raght naow"

>>11982 "the rush o' the bake"

>>11983 "must ponder….

>>11985 "weird stuff''

>>11989 love it

>>11988 the art of zee notable

>>11989 she's pretty

>>11980 only private gatherings (now i'm REALLY curious)

apologies if i left anybody out, just grabbed em as i went….so funny

u guise are puttin' me into a rotflmao state, i won't be responsible for what happens next….

>>11969

will put in dough, good to have an overall plan.

espec if you sub is a little brain-dead, which sometimes happens.

>>11969

i understand, this is just part of the process of working things out. i'm doing the same thing with the dough, just collecting stuff and then figuring out what to do with it. it's a process, takes time.

>>11998

>>11998

not dumb, but perfectionism is one of those double edged swords. Try to figure out where the rub is–specifically. And how to improve the stuff that can be better and let go of everything else.

>>11998

re dough, am realizing that i can't really talk much about that right at this moment, all i've been doing for two days is thinking about doughs–three different doughs. also, got burned out on recent changing /qr/ doughs bc we had baker misunderstandings over that and it took some time to straighten out. Everything is fine now but just wanna let the dough alone at this point, let the dust settle for a bit. If i get left behind or overruled by others about dough stuff, i've said my bit. Others can decide what they think is best.

>>12026

it is sort of 'my' dough at the moment, just as the lessons are sort of 'yours.' but neither of us want it to be 'ours' at the end, but to be something else. can't explain how much pleasure it provides to work in this way. really an honor.

>>12024

favor: slow down a little and i won't be so burned out later. just can't think right now, was racing right up until class.

>not a matter of right vs wrong, really

nothing will happen if the dough doesn't change today, right? or tomorrow? dough has been with us for some time and whatever it's shortcomings, it's pretty darn good. just like the whole board–pretty remarkable what goes on here.

>>12025

>GlobalYheadBaker

what r all the bad names you've been called? I remember GaYbaker (by BO), Daybaker, Leaty/AFLB, Mossad, and C_A. my fav is me being told i couldn't be just one person but head to be a team coz i was on the board "20 hours a day." That was when BO posted the slaughtered 'whole buffalo' pics and asked who was paying me.

>>12015

there are many writers on /qr/, enjoy listening to them express their thoughts. one of the advantages of night shift.

>>12028

>>>12028

>hope it's ended–i dealt with war room pressures plenty bc of endchan. Those fags worse than shills bc they are actually sincere and think what they do is the best. So i always have to set limits with them or they'll push and push til they get what they want ("they" usually being sgrvl).

>>12048

>hey, dats muh meme, bro. glad ya like it.

>>>12040

>>>12052

>>seemed fine to most

>no worries. it will be what it will be. nice meetin' yous–if indeed we have not met before. i fully expect that i'm still confused about at least half the bakers around–who is who or who bakes when or whatever. doesn't matter, just glad bakers are here.

>>>12056

>same time, same station. but always different!

>>12061

>>12062

i waited all my life to meet a group of 'friends'. Dreams brought me to DJT and thence here. Everything seems familiar but hard to explain

>>12063

Yes, a common goal. But perhaps a bit more….

g'nite,

o7.

>>12069

rest well,

o7

i gotta go see what Q posted…..

>>12085

hey baker

no worries and no apologies necessary

go easy on yourself

8kun board is different from 8chan

kinda glitchy

like dancing with a klutzy partner

main thing is this:

• bake early (like 670 when getting up to speed)

• allow a lot of time for stuff to 'drop'

• if u get 'flood detected' on the bake, it's gonna drop - eventually

• sometimes when things are crappy, i just drop a line to anons telling them that and to wait - there will eventually be a bread

if u have any specific q's, can try to answer.

or you can also try to shadow bake here in /comms/ - to review and also build up confidence

i did it for a month before i was willing to actually bake

>>12101

Came over here to see what conversation ensued due to dough changes and dough reversion. Will take a look at breads and see what i can figure out. Have been following the recent dough drama since almost the start and got caught up in it, making the first reversion. Am pretty damn 'done' with it, having spent hours previously dealing with revisions, /comms/ with other bakers, etc. All i wish at the moment is that the bread remains mainly as it was a month ago, before this whole circus began.

= = = = = = = =

AFTER SOME INVESTIGATION……

Here is the offending pastebin - which was inherited by WNB.

About 99% sure i know who posted it,

bc i baked a LOT of his wonky dough's last Sept/Oct: sgrvl.

Recognized the format right away. He has a habit of putting the bread no. at the top of the dough; i tried to get him not to do it bc it's different than in /qr/ and we had a new baker on endchan (didn't want him to get into bad habits).

https://pastebin.com/JJpDbwQB

Dough begins like this:

Q Research General #12345: …

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////BREAK 0\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

This dough WAS snuck in, see CAP.

But not by any baker, but by sgrvl. He presented it as though it were a regular updated dough. BUT said to "try it out."

Sgrvl never learned to bake on /qr/; finds it too confusing. Perhaps bc he is confused himself–some kind of schizoid problem, he would admit that himself. Endchan anons know but maybe not everyone here does. Anons there tried to help him but he gets agitated sometimes, that's why he persists and cannot be deterred. Must be handled with unyeilding firmness both for his sake and ours.

o7

>>12168

yes sgrvl would like endchan to be the hub.

no they are not the ones ddosing the board.

endchan is a shoestring op, still don't have their time converter function fixed, out since Sept.

Owner left mods run the place now.

>>12170

still got the country threads unconsolidated, and that may cause body too long at some point. so there's that if anons or bakers care.

>>12172

endchan a honeypot

i think it's just sgrvl, he is not entirely "there" mentally. not a hypothesis. he can be both paranoid and grandiose.

>>12174

>their infiltration and underhandedness

i always knew he wanted anons to bring everything back to his board but knew he wouldn't succeed.

i just confronted him about it on /qr/ not unkindly but i did ask. he says he didn't do it bu t in an unconvincing way, by citing an alibi. but it's his signature way of doing a dough. there's some possibility that he does not remembermultiple pers? this is not a secret, anons asked him about it. it's something like that (they thought he was compd but eventually figured it out). It's why a second board exists on endchanthe one i claimed, qrbunker: it's bc many of us just couldn't take it any more, the craziness of s's board. So we broke off and started a new one.

>>12178

>>12178

i asked him but he didn't answer although he's still posting on /qr/ right now. he's very easy to peg, so much compulsivity. anons on endchan got suspicious when they saw he had a different tripcode for each each function he performed (BO, baker, BV, anon). He makes endless lists; his doughs kept getting more and more detailed, longer and longer. Then he started creating pinned threads on each and every separate DS character, they were starting to take up the entire board….that's about the time i left.

>>12179

mental illness but fluctuates, was better when he and i first met. i think he attracts others who are uh similarly manic and wanting to "do something" (frantic meme campaigns). pretty sure he thinks just that any board activity other than meme campaigns is not very useful. messianic.

>>12182

i think i meant it for >>12178 but it doesn't matter, everybody reads everything here, kek.

>>12181

>push anons to endchan when 8kun is down.

Don't agree, I am BO of the other endchan q board, qrbunker, and i'm definitely not interested in driving anybody anywhere. but do want to provide a place to work if 8kun goes down. It's actually selfishit's ME who wants a place to work, to digbc i can barely tolerate twatter, etc. That's why i was bakering on qanonresearch–coz bakers have to baker, diggers have to dig, etc. Nothing wrong with endchan as a bu board; but it's not home.

>>12186

thx for what you did, somebody had to do something. not thinking this particular thing will be a problem in the future. But something will be. This thread, this class - highly successful. Attracts its opposite, even on an energetic level. We'll recognize this "pitch" next time, but it'll be something new next time. New yet the same….man, can't stop yawning.

Have to go, tired. Had to walk a long ways to get to the lakeside part of the park. Parks are open but they cordon off 90% of the parking, isn't that great? So i got a lot of exercise just getting to the park. Got warned by a park employee against sitting on a bench for too long - by myself….i kid u not. told him to report me as non-compliant - might as well push the bureaucracy hard enough to push govenor to do something even more stupid than usual.

Sleep now,

o7

>>12198

>>12197

The discussion you two are having right now illustrates why it's important to do things slowly and carefully with the dough or anything. Because in a format like this, it's super easy to have misunderstandings. And then it takes forever to clear it up.

>>12198

>>12200

Since you guise are here, there's something you might want to take a closer look at.

Yes, sgrvl & crew can be a problem. But sgrvl has a very particular way of talking/writing; you can see it in these posts right here:

>>12167

Very easy to recognize.

The anon who posted the proposed dough changes in #11–well, listen to how he talks in a reply to me, saying "why so triggered?" (below)

This is not how sgrvl talks. Doesn't have a subtle bone in his body. But it IS the way that aflb talks. Not necessarily aflb, but not sgrvl, either. Some chance that we now have a third party who's trying to throw spanners whenever possible. And assuming we'll think it's just sgrvl.

proposed dough changes from #11:

>>11675

>>11676

>>11677

>>11678

(etc)

some of the replies to me:

>>11729

>>11730

>>11744

d13c46 << this UID from #11

>>12201

gotta go sleep some more for now. but if anyone has the time, might go back and take a really close look at the discussion in #11, espec what was said by d13c46.

the following is a bit controversial, but would like to encourage bakers when discussing things here to namefag. if they don't want to use "real" baker names, maybe they could use others (like "Teach"), just for the sake of easier comms. Coz we have a pretty big gp of bakers hanging out here now and it would be helpful for better understanding. don't have to do it every time (espec outside of class) but sticking in a name so we can pair it with an id - that would make it easier to talk. Might help a little with shills, as well.

>>12207

look at the post that just showed up, shit-stirring on a grand scale. not what we need right now. intentional?

>>12202

First, who the fuck are you that you think you can come in and create discord after we spent hours cleaning up a mess caused by anon trying to sneak changes into the dough yesterday morning. Sneaky changes will always be reverted.

Second, why do you think your opinions should trump those of the half a dozen bakers who are here every single day and have been for at least 10 months minimum? Or worse, the opinions of anons, who weren't consulted at all?

Third, why are you acting like such a dick?

–over and out.

>>12211

>You're in the wrong place.

BINGO. Right on the money.

Although bakers do change the dough, they do not do it as the result of discussions here.

This thread in not a bakers' council with decision making powers. It's a class thread that allows ongoing comment on baking matters and feedback to new bakers.

Decisions about dough changes are indeed made on /qr/ not here.What's more, they are virtually always small decisions, not grand redesigns of the dough. Only time that was attempted was by FJ - and we all also saw how that ended.

The worth of our current /qr/ dough has been proven many times over. It has stood the test of time. While it can be tweaked in response to current events (like elections), gradual shifts in how we do things (two-page notes), or the availability of new tools or techniques (bakers tools), the basic organization remains the same.

How doughs are built up

I'm currently in the process of creating a dough for this thread. It's based on the /qr/ dough but adapted to our needs on this board. Each week, that dough is posted, so anyone can look at it and give feedback, because it's still a work in progress.

Several different parties have made suggestions and many bakers and anons have contributed so far. Slow & steady, we build something up, making small changes along the way.

cc:

>>12202

>>12212

If you don't want a discussion, then why post here?

>done by those who attack bakers 24/7

Bakers attacks have many sources, not just one. Not exactly surprised sgrvl would funnel anons to endchan - or try to 'manipulate' the /qr/ board. But he's not the only one trying to change the board, is he?

Bakers deal with attempts to change the dough all the time. Feedback - such as your screenshot - is helpful. Gives anons an idea of what's going on, but all anons not just bakers.

>>12214

>bakers club.

There is no bakers club.

>i got attacked

Well, poor you. You just attacked bakers in your post, and now you want tea and sympathy?

Don't need help of the brand you are offering,

over and out.

>>12220

ok i screwed up, bakers club was green text reference to other post. but complaint about getting attacked–no use complaining, just make an argument.

>>12237

GMT consolidation would make sense.

except if you're the GMT guy, i guess.

Never thought about it until is was brought up, it's a good idea but not worth fighting over.

>>12239

Somehow, we all have to step back, let the dust settle. Dough is ok for now, we are all ok, no use worrying about who said what to whom. This got riled up again after the three page post starting here:

>>12202

But it's hard to sort out who is who at this point and what positions have been taken. Better to let things go, imo.

Got someone interested in baking for next class, sounds serious. That's really what matters.

>>12220

Sorry i got the bakers club thing wrong, mixed up the iuds. Confusing at this point, so many different posters.

>>12239

Can you explain what you mean about being 'culled'? I take it you mean yourself. But nobody is being culled from classes, anyone can come.

>>12242

>>12242

i know what culling is but not how it would apply to last 3 classes.

>>12237

>>12237

Yep, discussions are good. In fact, they are so goodand so helpful for creating a vibrant kitchenthat it wouldn't be surprising if we started getting visitors in this thread who are less interested in discussion than in disruption.

I know i'm stating the obvious here, but bakers are always the 'weak link' because there aren't that many. Renewed attacks must be expected now that our numbers are increasing when (((they))) want the opposite: a tiny, overworked crew who makes mistakes and works themselves to a frazzle.

Some observations about intentional disruptors (as opposed to those who just fly of the handle easily):

1. tend to focus on who is to blame rather than trying to solve the problem

2. keep whipping up the flames of dissension rather than finding ways to decrease tensions

3. often use purposely insulting terms and a mocking tone while stating their points in absolutist terms

Normal bakersthe ones who bake regularlyjust don't do that stuff. Not very often. If we flare up, we look for ways to smooth things over or work them out. We use common sense most of the time and forgive small errors on the part of anons or other bakers. We focus on amplifying what works and making the board a viable place for Q posts and anon productivity.

Those who can't or won't take that approach are probably not well-suited to baking.

>>12249

sorry about purple text, will take me forever to get use to the loss of em dashes

>>12244

baker, i think i hear your concerns. But doubt very much that you are being especially targeted, espec in baking classes. We've all been thru the mill in the last year–and many for years before that. You are welcome to come to class or to this thread and share your thoughts. As is anyone.

Current baking crew work well together, there is mutual respect and relationships of trust. Also personality difs. But things work best to this extent that we forget about them and instead focus on how to keep the board open 24/7 and in good working order.

As new and returning bakers come into the kitchen, the composition of the baking group changes and we have readjust. Can be annoying at times but having more hands on deck makes for a better kitchen in the long run.

As for sleepers, shills and the like: if we stick together, they will never get the best of us.

>>12255

well baker, hard to discern what you think is a problem with class. those who teach it are interested but can't read your mind. Class focus is on baking not board issues, dough, or other stuff like that. Whatever your ideas are ("your work"), that's separate from class.

>>12262

Really have no interest in this kind of thing, never did, will always try to get along with anyone halfway decent anon who wants to get along with me. And that is my cue to exit stage left……

>>12263

*any

>>12267

Nice to know who's posting. Thx for info on gaslighting, as i think i said then, this is ongoing. but appreciate the thought.

>>12350

same comment as above. i'm trying to get along with all bakers and end of spending a lot of time trying to even figure out if it's a baker i'm talking to.

= = = = =

you guise are both proficient bakers who make a helluva contribution to the board. So what's the beef? why all this arguing? just what the shills want.

Check out fdcca0.

>>12358

>the one namefagging.

have no interest in interacting with you.

>>12308

Good evening, Rusty.

How are you today?

>>12308

Just found out i'm owner of /qrb/ on endchan. put in a claim for it because it knew it was there and it was unclaimed since Aug, when it had been overrun by shills. a bu to the bu, i guess.

>>12302

well-said re culling

<tit-for-tat squabbling is not a productive use of time

even better said.

>>12321

>having to do a fucking captcha for every post while baking

per post catpcha never necessary, just one captcha for uploading the pastebin, with or without a named pastebin

>>12356

trying to follow your argument, not clear to me that anybody is shilling for endchan except sgrvil, who is always doing so. but he is either schizophrenic or has mpd. he's not all there mentally or emotionally.

>>12357

your bakes are top-kek, know you did not screw up the dough. paste was almost certainly inserted by sgrvl whorememberis not very balanced.

>>12380

the main way to show what you are as a baker is to produce a good pastebin. KB's pastebin's are pristine, among the best. other than the two of you trading insults (and bad feelz as a result), what can you show that he is aligned with endchan faggots. i just don't see it. how can you prove someone else is running two UID's?

also the idea that endchan qanonresearch is a honeypot – sgrvl not really competent enough for that kind of op, imo.

>>12394

i looked at that bred, saw that i was there for part of it, got tired of the arguing and departed. That's what i saw there before - arguing & insults but not evidence. Listing rhetorical devices used in arguments is not providing evidence of wrong-doing. If you want to say that another baker insulted you and you didn't like it - okay.

But do you think you are the first baker that's ever gotten shorted by another baker? Far from it. We are not perfect here, friend. Some things are best ignored or better yet, forgotten, in the interests of doing work that transcends personal squabbles. It is amazing how well things can work when bakers move through this stuff instead of getting stuck on it.

>defending his? you mean "this"?

I'm not at all defensive about the endchan boards. Did a lot of good work there in Sept and Oct, was thankful for the opportunity. Now thankful for the the ability to maintain a bu place for q work. Endchan is not a boogeyman, just a platform for work if things go south unexpectedly. If no one else goes there in that event, one anon at least will be able to continue doing digs that go straight into qresear.ch at end of each bred.

>>12398

Mean endchan qrbunker or qrb, not endchan qanonresearch (srgvl's board). He is not a bad guy but is just about impossible to work with, imo.

>>12401

baker, i'm not working hard at all. i''m tired. trying to get two good bakers to stop arguing, don't really care about muh 2 computers or other legalistic arguments, it all begins to sound like Capn Queeg after a while.

Do you want to know the real reason that more anons don't bake, or at least not forever? Because they find it difficult to let go. No other job here requires so much letting go as baking. No other job requires as much flexibility–or forgiveness. In the end, everything that happens here has to be water under the bridge. Otherwise, you will burn out.

gyb, over and out.

>>12406

Morning, Rusty. Was up for a bit, did a little /qr/ cleanup. Now time to re-sleep, kek. Here's to a peaceful and productive day.

o7

>>12408

>reactions have been interesting, haven't they?

>fascinating to see unfold…

Your attitude sucks, anon.

You are judging everybody else reactions to the mess you created.

Who are you to judge anybody or anything?

And while we're at it, who are you, anyway?

What do you want here?

As one of the two anons who teach the class, i am responsible for ensuring that it stays on track and does not degenerate into a complete shitshow. This thread is not a place for lobbing grenades and then sitting back to see how others respond. You want that? Go to /pol/.

It's not our job as bakers to judge other bakers or to try to poke at their weak spots. The exact opposite is true. Best results come from trying to find strong points and build on them. If feedback is needed, it's given wo/ undue provocation. Because we are a crew, not just individuals.

You are nobody special. None of us are. Anyone is welcome to the class or to the thread, but unidentified anons who see shit-stirring as their "contribution" are gonna get a mouthful from me in the future.

• gyb

>>12418

I know endchan pretty well, spent every day there for six weeks when 8chan was down, most of it on qanonresearch. Had many interations w/BO. I and one other baker did a lot to keep the place running, since BO sgrvl refused to bake as soon as we started. He only likes to do war room stuff.

The shill narrative re endchan = BO sgrvl's narrative about qanonresearch, his board. He is not a shill but an single-minded anon who only wants to raid. It is however quite possible that some of his followers are either shills or similiarly afflicted with the idea that only their work matters. Anons initially thought he might be a shill bc of his strange manner. But sooner learned - as i did early on - that he has mental problems. Never underestimate "crazy."

>Anons fighting against the raid from endchan are apparantly the REAL shills. Got it.

Well, i don't have it. This part is still confusing to me, i'm sure there are shills taking advantage of the situation but not sure who all the players or agendas are. I am particularly interested in 274287, what his agenda is. Because he's the one whose posts started the conflict. He needs to come clean.

>>12419

Endchan as a platform

I dealt with endchan admin when i did a global report once; they were available, which was good. Re 8chan/4chan vs endchan google linking: the former are far more notorious in the eyes of the world (and thus Goodle) and are thus most likely to be formally censured. Endchan is a much less traveled site, tiny when compared with 4 or 8.. Last i saw, the owner of endchan had departed, it was being run by mods. they do get around to responding to requests, although it's slow. If it's a honeypot, seems like they'd be a lot less flaky.

It's sgrvl who wants more anons–he's always wanted that. compulsive, driven guy.

nothing has been posted for a long time here - and previous #11 thread is wonky. To check it out, open the thread then go to bottom. it's not complete.

will this post?

>>12430

why clown? who is the clown here?

>>12432

you a good song writer, baker?

>>12432

i'm gonna post something for everyone but since you're here, wouldn't mind your opinion. Don't want to blow things out of proportion but looks like we're gonna have to watch out for dough changes from war room fags. see attached.

>>12434

now all we need is a score.

notice the word "bee" is prominently displayed….

Just a note to say I decided to check out what was going on in qanonresearch on endchan.

Went there and looked some recent posts; not too happy with what i saw. Take a look. Doesn't matter whether these anons are shills or merely deluded; they think what they do is so important that it justifies changing the dough wo/consulting anons outside their little group. They take direction from sgrvl (his posts are distinctive, hard to miss). One anon who bakes was pleased he could sneak changes in recently but disappointed that another baker reverted the dough almost immediately. See CAP.

They also think of bakers that take their stuff out as shills. To them, the war room "ops" are much more important than anything else; so they rationalize their tactics as necessary, i imagine.

Paid shills can obviously take advantage of this situation to create confusion, division, etc.

Implications for anons and bakers

First, watch the dough closely.

Second, keep the dough pretty much the same (except for minor additions) so it's easy to tell if something has been changed.

Third, consider putting possible dough changes in as global notables first so anons can check them out before they are added permanently to the dough.

Four (maybe): Make a Global Notable that says, besides what's already in the war room, (most) other stuff needs to go in the war room thread(s).

my two cents worth. thoughts?

>>12437

happened to be here when he posted and the post annoyed me so i shot something back to say "we in here", get lost shill

>>12439

yep. just wandered in…..

unlike last night's shill who sounds rather like leafy.

Oh, btw, there's something wrong with thread #11 see bottom of thread (cut off). also, can't sign into board as bv, first time worked a coupla weeks ago but this time, no dice.

i'm fine with revision history being added as another page. now i'll mention something that may be controversial, but…..that would be that anyone making dough changes other than q posts and notables have an id'd pastebin. Doesn't impinge of most bakers but would make it harder for anyone to put something in that does not belong there.

>>12451

this is to you Rusty except second paragraph is really for anyone.

>>12448

>>12450

meme warfare thread - yes, i gave you a coupla memes on that. Here's another one i did a while back.

>>12448

page 5 is good.

only problem: newfag bakers. and we'll have to revise ALL the instructions. fun.

>>12457

oh, so that's why everyone's turning up here now. well good, always glad to see fellow bakers.

name fagging should make the conversation easier….

>>12449

tanks for some dank humor, doc

here's my contribution

>>12461

not bad

not baking regular shift coz something (eyes, hands etc) goes out too easy

spot baking only

and digging on Qanonresearch endchan as u can see

those guys getting real cheeky

>>12462

that's a pretty fancy sign-in, KB

no pastebin verification needed, kek.

all u need is one more

"!!!"

>>12464

>>12464

that was fun

best memories of gy all involve community meme-making

Anyone else have to constantly refresh the Quick Reply box in order to post?

>>12469

Works now, tx.

And thread #11 looks ok, too.

>>12471

war room fags can't take over the dough coz bakers will notice - and probably check war room more often. forewarned is forearmed. Only a BO can take over the dough - and only with 24/7 help.

>>12471

late night coverage is not bad right now, even wo/ me, although i sometimes e-bake. Good that i stepped back, lets others step up. Pixels was there very early morning. he is a great baker and note-taker but 'hides' unless there's nobody else around.

>>12473

here's what i got.

>>12475

auto clear is already on.

nothing more fun than memes. not bad with design but don't draw much. wish i had that talent.

>>12477

>have you ever thought of seeking help from a mental health professional?

>>12452

bakers are the soul of compassion

name goes away when i close out reply box

>>12487

>Used to get "posted" now get "Updating Thread"

for me also

is it universal?

when it works right and box clears, posting is really fast

it just doesn't happen very often

>>12483

well, i did look in response to your concerns

but keep in mind, it's not endchan, it's qanonresearch on endchan

they follow sgrvl, who is single-minded and undeterrable. not coz a shill, more like a napoleonic complex. gets 'off his meds' or something every so often and goes on a rampage.

What i still don't know is who this guy is and what his game is. Did not reply to my challenge:

>>12408

Creates chaos and then thinks it's funny.

>>12489

whoops, put in the board rather than my baker name, haha

>>12492

u the fukken shill that said i was a c_a team last spring, here 20 hours a day?

>>12496

yes, /qrbunker/. also /qrb/. I am BO for both now, grabbed the latter so it wouldn't get shilled the way it did last summer. don't know where everyone else when aug-sept-oct, but i was not happy wo/an image board, so went to sgrvl's board than to qrbunker. Claimed it in Feb bc resignationanon wanted to catalog it and it was up to over 900 posts.

>>12500

i mean /qrb/ on endchan, not here.

>>12497

IDK. but it's a free country, anyone can post.

>>12502

i baked this bread and helped teach the baking class. Shills always playing the numbers game.

>>12503

>>12506

would try to get u guise to shake hands, but we can't do it coz social distancing.

>>12512

>>12513

Just stop, stop. U both too valuable to waste time fighting. Besides, u know what they say about those who rub each other the wrong way? Maybe too much alike

(Now you can both get mad at me.)

>>12514

did u see nice song clown baker wrote?

>>12434

maybe you can put it to music and use it for spam. we tired of the same ole shilling over and over again. aren't u?

>>12517

>>12518

i give up, have at it. but leave some space so i don't have to make a new thread just for shit posting.

Time for cookies. would offer to share but….social distancing.

out, o7.

>>12539

Appreciate the thought but would probably be better to just treat #12 as any other thread. When new thread starts on Thursday, this one will fall to the wayside except for historical purposes. And there are posts here that we may want to reference in the future.

But it might be a good idea to extend thread past 751 post count (to to 800 or more) if we start running out of room before Thurs.

I already gave notice about keeping this thread free of random shit-stirring in the future >>12421

We just have to be vigilant. As i said to Teach, the success of this class / class thread means we will attract attention by any party who wants there to be fewer bakers, not more.

>[i'm] just an anon who never played your baker games.

You have just revealed yourself as someone basically suspicious of bakers and their motives.

Daily bakers have been here volunteering their time doing 30 - 60+ hours a week to keep this board open.

Most anons do trust them because of their faithfulness and track record over time (pastebins are id'd). If you do not, you are either

• a newfag (unlikely)

• a shill (insincere)

• an infrequent poster or

• someone without much discernment who likes to shit-stir.

Whatever it is, it's on you, not bakers.

>Re coming clean

You can do that in a sentence or two, not a dissertation.

>Re baker accepting your pastebin was comp'd

NO. Busy baker trusting that it was latest pastebin.

If you want to complain about bakers, do so in /qresearch/ not here. This thread is for discussing how to bake, Q and A for new bakers, and checking new baker pastes, not complaints.

>>12562

Thank you Rusty.

One thing:

Bakers and anons interested in baking are still welcome to hang out on this thread as they have always done - to help out newbies, do Q&A, and talk informally.

Posts with complaints about baking, the dough, etc., belong either in the Baker's META or in /qresearch/.

If any kind of major dough change is proposed or issue detected, __such proposals ultimately needs to be discussed with all anons before any change is made, in the interest of openness and good comms.

>>12566

>re "namefagging" (baker id)

posters can choose to be anon or not

but agree with >>12567

Using baker id both here and on /qr/ promotes transparency and better comms: when changes are made, anons know who made them.

>>12591

Haven't been on /qr/ since about 4 am, when wnb was baking. Previous bread had been ghosted, i was aware that someone might pick it up and put qr-endchan material back in. Looks like they waited til later. I'm assuming there is no baker id, but i'll check.

>>12592

sorry, i'm using local time - that would be 6 or 7 am ET.

>>12585

just posted a response on /qr/:

>>>/qresearch/9026752

I'm assuming that the post decrying the baker's "assistance" of qr-endchan fags is yours. You gotta stop slow down and think before you post. Here your are again accusing fellow bakers of stuff, making it sound like they are doing it deliberating to screw the board, even if that is not your intention. You have now said shit about three different bakers, two of whom have been baking every day long hours for a year or more - and at a time when there were only about 6 or 7 bakers. You already said to KB that you were wrong in your assessment of him. But not before you created a big drama around it. Please just bake - that's what we most need.

>>12594

this thread is always monitored, but you know that already. by 'policed,' i assume you mean that crap won't be tolerated. if i see it on the next thread, i will direct posters to META. up to you if there is anything else to be done.

>>12679

These two breads 11517 and 11518 were baked by "guest"

11518 of them used Kekbee icon

(Anyone including pro users can bake as guest if they want of course)

This would not be mv; too late, never see him baking past 3 am ET and that's late for him. and the long notables are not his style at all.

But this discussion needs to go to META

https://8kun.top/comms/res/12561.html

this is the class thread, new bakers need to have access to the last 45 posts.

>>12711

Daybaker is around, anon.

>>12714

>Shore leave, huh?

we got a coupla things going on - some anon trying to make new improved dough and endchan fags thinking /qr/ is a sort of second-rate version of qr-end. Then we got a suspicious baker (new? returning? idk) who thinks about half the bakers are comp'd. Your name was mentioned but looks like i'm not far behind, see META. Oh - and also shills trashing bakers, but nothing new there.

Rusty happy - finally has ONE thread that will reach 751.

>now only pastebin bakers can hold the line?

Nah, not all - just you. ;)

>>12874

Hey Rusty

>>12858 here.

>u putting target on class

u didn't place a target, it's been targeted for some time now. always watching, here and in /qr/. shills started with anti-baking class meme in /qr/ in early March, and now it gets mentioned along with "bakers union" stuff. Class success is what put a target on - as in "over the target." Shill hate well-staffed kitchen.

"Coincidentally"

there have been 3 major pushes to do overhaul on the /qr/ dough: from endchan, from this guy 274287, and now from OSS, who is now suspicious of about half the bakers. All within the last week. That's a lot of activity in a very short time. Continuing to watch.

Re posting the thread in advance tomorrow:

That's a great idea. Been me for a while coz i'm always working on the dough. Now as BV, should I be able to lock/unlock the thread myself? If so, i could do it (fine if you wanna do it, just thought it would be easier).

I logged in, poked around a little but don't see menu for making changes, can you help? Goes wo/saying, would never do it wo/asking. (Especially if i can't figure it out, kek.)

>>12950

So it's on the catalog (hiding in plain sight).

Jeez, OSS is now trying to take me out as a shill. Still in shock. I just thought he was overzealous. Holy crap - what a mess.

>Deleting posts.

Can't be both a host and a cop at the same time, i'm with you: leave stuff and point it out as a bad example. I'll play with board stuff later, still shaky right now.

>>12963

OSS full frontal attack on me now. Just accused me of deliberately making a mistake (an honest one made by someone else).Will contact that baker to let him know.

Like the lollipop idea, kek.

>>12971

yes, it was that night. go to baker META for more.

>>12974

you mean OSS?

>>12971

doc, i'm sure sure what's going on either. may be recalling another night where i held down the fort on the late night bred while you updated notable numbers that had gone wrong 6 breds before.

sorry if i messed up and remembered the wrong night. This was all so long ago, had to go look up the stuff he was talking about.

but i didn't change the numbers here >>12961

don't even know what OSS is getting at with that part. it was no doubt just another usual baker screwup not sabotage. he is paranoid as fuck.

>>12980

spellling sucks right now, should be

*not sure what's going on

BTW, you or anybody can ask me whatever you want about the "changing lb notables" thing, although it's pretty well explained here:

>>>/qresearch/>>9055833

or here

>>12983

>>12982

just saw your message. You are probably right. Again, sorry for my mistake. Got to go, fren came over. Understand your view about PB notables, i don't change them either, but this was a weird thing. Wasn't happy about it but did the best i could.

>>12984

>>>/research/9055833

>>12986

screwed it up twice, not trying for a third.comms info is the same.

o7

>>12985

i saw. was trying to help this guy when he was flaming KB, see above. but…..wow. So easy to get accused of wrong motives.

>>12988

i know that but OSS sees fuckery everyone, not mistakes.

>>12996

tx, Rusty. Just ran outta time, had someone at the door.

We'll run outta bread space soon here - add say 50 to thread or just let it go?

>>13000

Might as well tuck it up at 750 since the muffin spam is now showing up here, too.

>>13003

fukken POS

11875 wasn't the "last good bred"; some subsequent breads were misnumbered but otherwise fine.

Fuck no, never baked as guest, never said i did

>>13002

As for the notes, that was a baker/anon decision.

>>12983

>>13009

>muffin spam

not sure was i was going for then but surely not 'muffin spam'.

>>13010

Already have a very thick skin. some bakers know from last year. But had to get to the bottom and state the truth for the record. Initially could barely remember this situation (and got some of the details wrong). Many breads ago. Had to dig up answers, so i can answer any legit q's accurately.

>>13013. Looks like you're now part of the subversion plot. Welcome. Time to return to the other thread, it's getting mighty crowded in here.

>>13021

hey baker fren

pretty strange day

familiarizing myself with BV tools, finally

i'm in the loop, was planning to bake latest update and lock it for now. reply in meta if there's stuff to talk about.

o7

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I hope you won't mind the edit, but you beat me to post 751

so, I'll edit into your post the post I was getting ready to post…

>>13021

>Unsure that banning or deleting posts is of any benefit and can make things worse.

I'm unsure as well about the final results

I don't think there will be any deletions, a few short term bans… a few edits… who knows…

you never know… it all might be bait to see if certain parties over react in a pre-emptive fashion

it's hard to tell the sincere anons from the "eccentric" ones from the truly subversive

the disruptions, diversions and division that result from the activities of a few…

sad really when you think about it

our goal is to help all of humanity

who could be against that?