Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 4:26 p.m. No.11796   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1801 >>1812

>>11761

>>11765

 

<Q ignores the regularly scheduled bred and goes for the ebake straight from the paste.

 

Hm. memes matter. Q clicked on the long-precedented anon image, not the one they (Q) posted.

 

 

well, in a way Q just confirmed that the image should not change in the dough format discussed during last seminar.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 4:53 p.m. No.11837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1840 >>1879

>>11821

 

would not be surprised if Q has a lurk here at any given time. /comms/ is in the dough they also post in on /qr/, after all. On top of itโ€ฆ posting here would not violate their statement re: not having outside comms from the platform.

 

 

So if something good enough (or egregious enough) happened here in /comms/, they could shock the shit out of people and drop the mic hahaha

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 4:59 p.m. No.11846   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1848 >>1856

>>11840

 

haha.. I was being sarcasticโ€ฆ Doubt Q would actually post here. Lurk? absolutely!

 

They understand full well that the act of them posting here would convey the capacity to appeal to authority though, so I doubt they would want to hand weapons to bakers' enemies.

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 5:12 p.m. No.11863   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1868

>>11856

>Don't know whether Q focuses much on the baking process most of the time, except when doc got a ty last month. Noice.

 

call this anon paranoid but, for better or worse, regardless if you only bake one ebake ever, or bake a shitload all the time:

 

Q knows exactly who everyone is.

How many breads you've posted.

What your note content focused on.

All other posts by all of your hashes.

 

Military people do not give blind compliments. GJ Doc o7

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 5:39 p.m. No.11902   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1912

>>11868

>>11878

 

Word. This anon literally watched the agreement between Q and anons in rtโ€ฆ where sometimes, Q will just post as an anon; and anons that do recognize it should just not have shitty opsec because wwg1wga and q has the right to be anon like anyone else.

 

Can I show proof of this? No. Happened in /cbts/ and was deleted by consensus.

 

Can I prove that? No. nor will I..

 

Shadilay o7

Anonymous ID: db101c April 30, 2020, 6:41 p.m. No.11997   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2020

>>11990

>fooled a few but not a concerted effort to do it as some thought it was three different people.

 

word. for a hot minute when gyb first popped up I thought they were you.

 

then you popped up again, kek..

Anonymous ID: db101c May 1, 2020, 5:29 p.m. No.12123   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2124

>>12121

 

The post was referring to the changes that were being proposed last night in sem #11.

 

If you like I can scrape every you of mine since last night :)

 

>>12122

 

I was talking about the proposed changes. Would you like me to scrape my yous here too?

 

Or better yet, have rusty do it, he's got my hash and so does fastjack.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 8:01 a.m. No.12194   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2195

>>12193

 

looking at that again, i can see what happened.

 

1) that poster made a comment on what was happening in /qr/.

2) ! figured they were talking about the dough discussion.

3) Wasn't aware of the true nature of events until I was accosted.

 

You can either remember that, or you can remember my actual actions as a baker; your choice, as always..

 

Either way, I probably will be going lurk only here. The shills don't like me much to begin with.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 8:43 a.m. No.12200   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2201

 

>>12198

 

K.

 

there are TWO bredds

 

ONE IS TEST (in comms)

 

THE OTHER IS LIVE (in qr)

 

I WAS REFERENCING THE TEST ONE AT ALL TIMES.

Concurrently to this going on, the bullshit in qr was ensuing.

 

Since I am here, talking about this dough under consideration, I assumed all commentary posted here about it was LIMITED TO THE DOUGH __HERE._

 

So I was referencing shilling from the end chan douches, HERE. NOT IN QR.

 

Do we have an understanding?

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:14 a.m. No.12207   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2208

>>12201

 

eh, it feels like the same infiltration shit that's gone on in /qr/. It's pretty much feeling like a poser came in, and got people riled up with intentional confusionโ€ฆ

 

Feels like a feature of the dough bickering in /qr/ too.

 

 

oh and look, the spam shill douche themselves just showed up late to the partyโ€ฆ Typical.

 

See you guys in the big stream o7

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 1:28 p.m. No.12225   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2226 >>2228

>>12223

 

>>>/qresearch/8996067, was issued in response to people bitching back and forth about the dough in that bred. So all of the contestants were given the same answer. because at that point, it was unknown whether both sides were being played. Hence the reference to the usual shills that do that shit.

 

Since BOTH sides were confusing the issue, I said fuck it, told people to neck themselves, took the og dough, and BAKED WITH IT. Pics relate.

 

 

so if you think I am part of this tripe, kindly go fuck yourself :)

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 2:18 p.m. No.12236   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2246

>>12234

 

โ€ฆ.Because a comfy anon will dig and post, as my fucking bun screenshots prove.

 

A non comfy anon will not post digs, and will just shitpost.

 

The buns fucking prove it. get off your fucking high horse.

 

GROW THE FUCK UP.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 3:13 p.m. No.12239   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2240 >>2241

>>12237

 

For my own part, I apologize tot he bread for sliding this seminar; I'm going to defend myself from bullshit, and call bullshit out every time, though. Sorry for the mess.

 

>too many hair triggers and too much "friendly fire"

 

As far as that goesโ€ฆ How much "friendly fire" is to be tolerated until one starts to wonder if they are being culled? This has happened enough times over the last 3 sems (the only ones I've attended, including this one) that it really makes me wonder.

 

Shadilay, for what it's worth..

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 3:32 p.m. No.12244   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2254

>>12243

 

I'm a baker starting cbts. Granted I only started keeping buns during /qr/, because I would only ebake on the previous 2 boards, but the shills will still know this.

 

They would know it even if I did not imagefag, just like any anon can.

Because personality traits. and image searches. and patterns.

 

Do sleepers exist?

can they be good and/or bad?

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 5:01 p.m. No.12255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2257

>>12254

>But doubt very much that you are being especially targeted,

 

me personally? I agree with you. i already said it isn't about me; It's about making any baker that aspires to be one (especially after leaving for whatever reason) feel like the bullshit is not worth it.

 

or that coming here to comms, is not worth it. so it's not about me. it's about making this place inhospitable to any incomers.

 

>Current baking crew work well together, there is mutual respect and relationships of trust.

 

never had a problem in qr. only in here. Kind of makes me regret posting here (Sorry Rusty, it's not your fault.).

 

I've already posted the last two breds of my work here, that should speak for itself.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 5:26 p.m. No.12256   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2271 >>2283

>>12241

>But nobody is being culled from classes, anyone can come.

(forgot to actually answer this)

 

Do you think new visitors make sense of the bullshit that happens at the bottom of the seminars due to the shilling and infighting?

 

Because to the casual observer, the bullshit at the bottom of last one looked like god knows what because it was literal shilling, from offboard

 

the bullshit at the bottom of this one.. looks like infighting to the casual observer.

 

So you tell me? I never said the owner and volunteers of this board were doing the culling; But it is happening if you choose to see it.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 6 p.m. No.12272   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2283 >>2347

>>12271

 

Do you control who posts here?

actually I could delete posts, ban users etcโ€ฆ but that defeats the purpose of free speech

 

DO you KNOW all the hashes and who they are?

some of them yes, most of them no, and if the anon IP hops it's anybody's guess. that's why tripcodes are allowed here

 

Use your head rusty.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 7:11 p.m. No.12321   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2391

>>12302

I'll get the trip for use here, if I choose to post again.

 

>I see you backing off your assertion of the BO

 

SHOW ME where I accused Rusty of doing that.

 

i will not be getting a known pastebin. having to do a fucking captcha for every post while baking makes watching people bitch about the pastebin oneโ€ฆ comical.

 

>>12308

 

yeah, I know. point remains that my hash has been consistent through this entire thread, and the grief being brought here..

 

including for the bakes I did in qr that I posted in this thread.

 

I have all my recent pastes and some bun shots too, so if anyone wants to play the lit naker game, I'm down.

 

I don't like being attacked despite doing good work and will hit back at anyone that fucks with me. I dont care how og they think they are. this isn't a game and everyone here knows it.

 

tip: combofix + ccleaner changes your hash without changing your ip. ymmv.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 7:23 p.m. No.12329   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2356

>>12323

 

wait.. are you classifying yourself as a visitor to the site and not a known baker?

(tagsโ€ฆ this post?) โ†’ >>12296 (Me)

 

because that shouldn't trigger you if you are a known baker, you know..

 

but whatever, keep going.. what was it? I'm the clown? kek.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 8:42 p.m. No.12357   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2359 >>2391

>>12356

>You're like as ex who just won't stop texting. Not very thug life. Gotta keep up appearance though (pic related)

 

just fuck right off. You think I'm shilling? I'm defending myself.. From YOUR FUCKING ACCUSATIONS TO BEGIN WITH

 

whyโ€ฆ do you think I told you to neck yourself in the first place?

 

I do not, nor ever had ANY interest in tendchans garbage.

 

this is what it's about right?

 

keeping the dough ogโ€ฆ right?

 

I did.

 

And you hav ebeen an asshole for half a bred about it.

 

fuck you.

 

. and you respond withโ€ฆ that?

 

okay..

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:03 p.m. No.12373   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2375

>>12371

 

oh stuff your strawman up your own ass.. If you're trying to stop me from baking, that won't happen.

 

If you're trying to stop me ffrom participating hereโ€ฆ well.. you're trying rellly fucking hard at it.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:28 p.m. No.12390   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12389

 

you keep claiming I admitted to something I know nothing about.

 

Now you are projecting that I'm telling you to prove a negative.

 

Is this really the hill you want your persona to die on?

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 2, 2020, 9:44 p.m. No.12393   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12391

>the captcha

 

understood, not talking about pastebin.

talking about captchagate on /qr/ before Q told Fastjack to knock it off with the format changes.

 

>Your bakesโ€ฆ

 

o7 appreciated.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 7:50 a.m. No.12411   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2414

>>12406

>baking will teach you about ego like nothing I've ever seen

 

You're not wrong.

Thank you for your service, patriot.

 

Sincerest apologies if you thought I was accusing you of culling. You do the opposite of culling, sir. The visitors spewing the vitriol are a different story altogether. Grime won't be chasing me away. He can sperg all he wants. He hasn't changed much.

 

Thanks again for having a measured response.

Anonymous ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 8:14 a.m. No.12413   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2416

>>12408

>anon wasn't wrong when he said:

 

Thank you for this. Someone at least, read my comment correctlyโ€ฆ,

 

>>>12222, and on and on and on.

 

Apparently I got roped into this as well.. Sorry for the mess in defending myselfโ€ฆ

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 8:17 p.m. No.12486   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12482

 

yeah I get that a bunch when I bake lately.. I just make sure the box is like your cap, then close the box, and after that either click on a post I want to grab a note for, or hit the post reply text link at page bottom to reopen.

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 3, 2020, 8:50 p.m. No.12516   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2520 >>2554

>>12513

 

nope, it really is grime. Why you so mad that I called your bullshit out for what it was?

 

Mad that you got caught trolling?

 

because you wEre being disingenuous by doing that; ''That's the entire reason why I am telling you to fuck right off.''

 

i do notcarewhat your reasoning is,you knowingly tricked anons

 

FUCK YOU

kekbees !!taC8nLC47g ID: db101c May 4, 2020, 4:15 a.m. No.12551   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2552

>>12550

>But it might be a good idea to extend thread past 751 post count (to to 800 or more) if we start running out of room before Thurs.

 

Good. I'm done arguing with them. SOrry I fucked up your thread dealing with them. They get memes only as responses now. Too man ycoincidental patterns in this thread for me to value that poster's input any further.

 

-out