>>9039268 lb
The linked post compared the Ghidra toolkit to a Forensic Analysis toolkit using a GCMS
Image shows analysis of Vape liquids
Great analogy and I think we can take it even further. The Inspectors General in the Federal Executive Branch are a toolkit to verify that the departments and agencies can really be trusted. Even the THREE BRANCHES of government are a toolkit to verify trust.
I think Q is not really suggesting that everybody learn how to reverse engineer code, but that we all look for opportunities to do verification before we give our trust. Whether it is to software or medicine or food or cars or washing machines.
Washing machines?
Wouldn't you read Consumer Reports to see how they are tested and verified?
And didn't Consumer Reports publish an article with this picture?
https://www.consumerreports.org/gift-giving/give-the-gift-of-health/
You could say that a Reverse Image Search on that gift image is kind of like doing Reverse Engineering of Software using Ghidra. You wouldn't use an app for Q drops unless it was verified, would you?
Who do we trust?
Why do we trust them
How can we verify before giving our trust?
And if verification is beyond our skillset, then how can we verify a 3rd party expert before we trust that expert?
The whole sequence of Q drops has really been trying to give us atoolkitfor thinking about trust and verification. The criminal acts and actors, are just a side show. Because when they are all in jail, there will be new faces, and if we do not have atoolkit of trust verificationready to handle the situation, the Cabal will form again out of nothing.