hi Q!
>https://about.fb.com/news/2020/05/april-cib-report/
'We’re constantly working to find and stop coordinated campaigns that seek to manipulate public debate across our apps. In 2019 alone, we took down over 50 networks worldwide for engaging in coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB), including ahead of major democratic elections.
These efforts are led by a cross-disciplinary team focused on finding and disrupting both the most sophisticated influence operations aimed to manipulate public debate as well as high volume inauthentic behaviors like spam and fake engagement. Over the past several years, our team has grown to over 200 people with expertise ranging from open source research, to threat investigations, cyber security, law enforcement and national security, investigative journalism, engineering, product development, data science and academic studies in disinformation.
You can find more information about our previous enforcement actions here.
Purpose of This Report
Over the past three years, we’ve shared our findings about coordinated inauthentic behavior we detect and remove from our platforms. As part of regular CIB reports, we’re sharing information about all networks we take down over the course of a month to make it easier for people to see progress we’re making in one place.
What is CIB?
While we investigate and enforce against any type of inauthentic behavior — including fake engagement, spam and artificial amplification — we approach enforcement against these mostly financially-motivated activities differently from how we counter foreign interference or domestic influence operations. We routinely take down less sophisticated, high-volume inauthentic behaviors like spam and we do not announce these enforcement actions when we take them.
We view influence operations as coordinated efforts to manipulate public debate for a strategic goal where fake accounts are central to the operation. There are two tiers of these activities that we work to stop: 1) coordinated inauthentic behavior in the context of domestic, non-state campaigns (CIB) and 2) coordinated inauthentic behavior on behalf of a foreign or government actor (FGI).
Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior (CIB)
When we find domestic, non-government campaigns that include groups of accounts and Pages seeking to mislead people about who they are and what they are doing while relying on fake accounts, we remove both inauthentic and authentic accounts, Pages and Groups directly involved in this activity.
Foreign or Government Interference (FGI)
If we find any instances of CIB conducted on behalf of a government entity or by a foreign actor, we apply the broadest enforcement measures including the removal of every on-platform property connected to the operation itself and the people and organizations behind it.
Continuous Enforcement
We monitor for efforts to re-establish a presence on Facebook by networks we previously removed for CIB. Using both automated and manual detection, we continuously remove accounts and Pages connected to networks we took down in the past.
Summary of April 2020 Findings
This month, we removed eight networks of accounts, Pages and Groups. Two of them — from Russia and Iran — focused internationally (FGI), and the remaining six — in the US, Georgia, Myanmar and Mauritania — targeted domestic audiences in their respective countries (CIB). We have shared information about our findings with law enforcement, policymakers and industry partners.
We know that people looking to mislead others — whether through phishing, scams, or influence operations — try to leverage crises to advance their goals, and the coronavirus pandemic is no different. All of the networks we took down for CIB in April were created before the COVID-19 pandemic began, however, we’ve seen people behind these campaigns opportunistically use coronavirus-related posts among many other topics to build an audience and drive people to their Pages or off-platform sites. The majority of the networks we took down this month were still trying to grow their audience or had a large portion of engagement on their Pages generated by their own accounts.
Total number of Facebook accounts removed: 732
Total number of Instagram accounts removed: 162
Total number of Pages removed: 793
Total number of Groups removed: 200
…'
'>>46574
i've heard that b4 but couldn't remember the answer, kek
leak
FLOOD
hmm
i choose leak as the correct answer for now
If leak is correct, then who had a leak?
hrc r had a leak?
If hrc r had a leak, who was the leak?
We know congress/senate/fbi leaky AF, kek.
all to control narrative, which controls …
Who gets the leaks and publishes?
How much media pushes the narrative?
Organic?
Lying #2 300,000,000+ and calling it News, dam near Treason, imo.
Election soon; research/choose great leaders.
Right now, House continues to drag.
Remove the drag, remove nancy/chuck; save Cali
We could research every dem leader or we could simply Vote all dem leaders out, kek
Which dem leader do you Trust?
Which News do you Trust? (90% fake?)
Where do they get their monies?
Why pay for fake news?
Will they be stronger with your money?
Will they))) continue to lie?
a stronger liar in leadership position is more dangerous to our Neighborhoods
schiff, biden, nancy, chuck, ted, etc benefit from fake news, imo
many more also: ohr, strozk, LL, RR, mueller, bho, soros, WHO, hrc, fauci, corney, lisa, huma, podesta(s), weinstein, epstein, bill, etc
sad list but becoming obvious, thankfully; tanks to Gold Star Researchers
the more News Anons push, the moar msm has to keep up or they become irrelevant/obvious.
Normies be like 'how come Anons get all this News but they don't talk about it on tv'.
Newbies be like 'spoopy'.
4/19/2020
5/19/2020
6/19/2020
…..' - Endchan