>>9064384

>https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/

Non-deterministic outputs. Due to bugs, the code can produce very different results given identical inputs. They routinely act as if this is unimportant.

This problem makes the code unusable for scientific purposes, given that a key part of the scientific method is the ability to replicate results. Without replication, the findings might not be real at all – as the field of psychology has been finding out to its cost. Even if their original code was released, it’s apparent that the same numbers as in Report 9 might not come out of it.

Non-deterministic outputs may take some explanation, as it’s not something anyone previously floated as a possibility.

The documentation says:

The model is stochastic. Multiple runs with different seeds should be undertaken to see average behaviour.

“Stochastic” is just a scientific-sounding word for “random”. That’s not a problem if the randomness is intentional pseudo-randomness, i.e. the randomness is derived from a starting “seed” which is iterated to produce the random numbers. Such randomness is often used in Monte Carlo techniques. It’s safe because the seed can be recorded and the same (pseudo-)random numbers produced from it in future. Any kid who’s played Minecraft is familiar with pseudo-randomness because Minecraft gives you the seeds it uses to generate the random worlds, so by sharing seeds you can share worlds.

Clearly, the documentation wants us to think that, given a starting seed, the model will always produce the same results.

Investigation reveals the truth: the code produces critically different results, even for identical starting seeds and parameters.

>>9064390

Easy over Pepe

Sometime you have to flip her to see the best bits

>>9064384

Conclusions. All papers based on this code should be retracted immediately. Imperial’s modelling efforts should be reset with a new team that isn’t under Professor Ferguson, and which has a commitment to replicable results with published code from day one.

On a personal level, I’d go further and suggest that all academic epidemiology be defunded. This sort of work is best done by the insurance sector. Insurers employ modellers and data scientists, but also employ managers whose job is to decide whether a model is accurate enough for real world usage and professional software engineers to ensure model software is properly tested, understandable and so on. Academic efforts don’t have these people, and the results speak for themselves.

>>9063328 pb

>>9064516

Ignore the guy who is telling you that you are in too deep.

He's an idiot.

There is a simpler way to describe your situation.

People who are attracted to this type of magic are afraid of something and unwilling to face your fear.

This is a PSYCHOLOGICAL problem and in our modern society we have ways to solve this

Without resorting to ritual magic.

So, I am also suggesting that you do not start doing the Lesser Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram, because it is a rathole.

You don't need it.

You will get more benefits by reading some psychology self-help books,

Or even browsing web articles about facing your fears.

The actual banishing of demons haunting you is incredibly simple.

You just say NO!

Tell them to GO AWAY!

And do it with a firm resolve.

If you tried this and it didn't work, ask yourself honestly if you had a firm resolve, an inner calmness and feeling of personal power.

Probably you did not.

So work on that.

Find a quiet place in a peaceful setting.

Close your eyes, and silently ask God or whatever you want to call the source of the universe, to provide you with clarity and guidance.

Meditate. Pray.

The more you trust in your internal LINK with the source of All That Is, the less you will fear.

And the best part is that it not only banishes dreams and fears that rise up in the daytime,

It will actually improve the quality of your whole life.

Good things will happen in your life.

Many will be small events, but treasure them and thank God, and you will get more.

Reread Psychic Self-Defense and you should notice that much of the advice is just psychological self-help.

Which is a good thing, by the way.

>>9064673

If people have a choice of insurer and can fire the bad ones, then yes, it will keep things honest.

Blue Cross is too much like a single-payer health insurance system and we know those are corrupt at the core, like in Canada and the UK.

>>9064759

Not on QResearch, we don't know it.

But we do know you are a moron

Because you posted a photo of Paula Shy

With AOC's head.

https://buceta.com/galleries/2017/02/metart-p-shy-in-revaza-by-erro/index.php

Just give up the stupid memes already.

Nobody believes them except your moron buddies.

>>9064792

And what does Gabi Encina, the Periscope girl, have to do with AOC?

Are you a racist? Can't you tell one latina from another?

You can watch Gabriela undress and hear her voice in this video:

https://ibradome.com/nude-streamer/video/291/gabiencinaa-nude-tits

>>9064903

If I can dig for a few minutes and find this stuff

What could you accomplish by digging?

I often have multiple notables in a bread, and one time I even had 13 notables.

If I can do this, you can do it too.

But you need to practice digging because you learn a lot, even if you are just trying to ID nude pictures that Anons post. It's called image analysis and if you dig, you can even find several books available for free, published by intelligence agencies, which you can read on the subject.

It is your choice whether to know.

>>9064956

Not a joke. The original image came from the video whose link I posted.

Q told us to dig.

So I went digging, and now I know

That was not a photo of AOC.

Digging leads to knowing.

>>9065002

Rest assured, I am NOT a howling mom.