>>9063328 (PB)
Dude. BTDT. Won't tell you who I am or what makes me an expert on the subject, but allow me to toss you a very few words of advice.
You are already in deeper than you know. Don't go even a single step further. Back up. Find the truths in the stupid platitudes you've been given all your life and change direction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWQHOCDnGXc
No it isn't. It's taken off the channel of the guy who pirated it. Fox News owns the material and it's still available on THEIR channel.
That's old shit, Anon. First of all … it's illegal surveillance of a motel room. Second, most Dads cuddle up with their FULLY DRESSED children for bedtime story-telling, giggles and just plain family time – especially so when traveling and the kids are away from their normal lives.
It's part of being a GOOD Dad.
Don't go running with this … as 8chan, we've been embarrassed by it a couple times already. There is no crime in this photo EXCEPT for the crime of it existing. The photo, apparently of children in their night clothes using a camera hidden in either a light fixture or a smoke alarm, should not exist.
I think it safe to say that the family was unaware of the camera and did not consent to be filmed.
That family had a very reasonable expectation of privacy and the video may have captured juvenile nudity as a normal part of family care. "Okay kids, get in your jammies and let's get ready for bed … big day tomorrow."
>>9063920 (PB)
Conversely, if we do not have the right to say what we wish, neither does he.
I thought Blue Angels were supposed to be over NC today. Not on ADSB. Anybody got a clue I could borrow?
I've seen the occasional F-16, F-35 and B2. Not often and certainly not as many as logic tells me are aloft (escorting AF-1, AF-2 and Venus 1 and Venus 2 and overflight at DC and Mar a Lago for instance), but scattered here and there.
I DEFINITELY don't like the new UI. The old one worked better, I think.