Tanks Bakes
>How and why did this shill post get baked with zero noms?
>
>Anons keep eyes on for shit like this being put in notables before it gets baked. Call it out when seen
It was a shit show two breads back. Baker syndicate took dough next bread, early on as baker who put that in notables requested hand off at dough post. Syndicate baker said he wouldn't change another baker's Notables. (A good idea, but anons coordinating with each other outside of board could easily abuse this, leading to this).
Some glowNigger tossed a slide, basically calling those of accusing baker of ad-hom, etc. He got his ass handed to him, but it did slide things.
I'm not saying baker who took over did anything wrong. I am saying the rules could be gamed, and, of course, this isn't the first time shit notables were preserved due to early bread baker change.
In any event, it's baked, cooled, and sliced at this point. Could be a rogue shill baker got in.
That's my best recollection.
>Words can't express how happy I am to hear Flynn charges being dropped.
Tis a fine habbening.
And we know Durhams Grand Juries are dropping subpoenas. POTUS let Faucci hang himself, and is upping the rhetoric.
One can feel a serious momentum shift.
You got 738 twice
>Good reminder to check notables before they're baked not after.
There is ZERO legitimate reason for baking that. Further, baker can wait until the last minute and add anything. Those of us who try to defend Bakers find these arguments absurd. Perhaps it would be best if bakers pulled their heads out and agreed:
-
That shit should not be in the notables.
-
Stop knee jerk supporting these antics.
>Each baker is responsible for their own conduct.
If you read what I wrote, that is precisely the conduct I am discussing. Here it is again. You'll note that nothing I wrote suggests changing another baker's notables.
>it would be best if bakers pulled their heads out and agreed:
>
>1. That shit should not be in the notables.
>
>2. Stop knee jerk supporting these antics.
>we couldn't check the notables before they were baked bc the shill baker didn't post any update until around 700 posts, which was the final notables bun
Ok, so just FYI, I wrote the post below way early in the bread. It was my following of the original event, which at the time I stayed out of for several reasons.
> yes. and now all of a sudden bakers can't edit previous notables? which we used to do all the time? when there were corrections or something was later found out to be fake/gay or in cases like this when there is a legitimate shill post that suggests Q is a larp.
Yes, I agree. The syndicate bakers are obviously either the shill bakers, or protecting them. It's why they are always around to quickly relieve shill baker at start of next bread, as, according to rules they enforce amongst themselves, a baker change denies ANY redress for this shit. Further, they argue anons must check notables, knowing FULL well that a baker can just put something in their that's not on the list, and no one will know until next bread. Of course, next bread shill bails and syndicate baker takes dough.
The syndicate actually tried to argue that that unsuaced horseshit was sauced and properly nominated, and inclusion is the baker's call. Well it wasn't sauced, it was just shit. Further, shills attacking Q have been with us since half/pol/, this information IS NOT notable, it's in every fucking bread by some shill, how could an anon be here long enough to bake and not know that? Obviously he couldn't. That ALONE, by syndicate rules, and the syndicates obvious penchant for excluding good notables, just to kick up a kayfabe Notables REEEEE argument the next bread. Obviously anons are sick of this shit, so they dont make much noise, and just tell both sides to shut their gobs. Notables arguments are fucking annoying. Syndicate bakers know this, and seem to pick board fights to maintain anon fatigue and instill in anons a lack of giving fuck all.
<it's from last month and covered
>many times not everyone catches everything.
In agreement with syndicae poster/baker, it's Michael Flynn. Multiple notables of same topic already in a pastBread can help SocMedia newfags adjust to us and not miss KEY habbenings.
Nuff said.
Shits gotta stop.
CheK'T
>Fox and Friends blowing it up right now, clearly explaining the Flynn set up and Hussein connection.
Yeah, quite a surprise on a Friday.
>but i disagree about anons being sick of this shit.
Fair enough. Perhaps, old fags on late Night/graveyard shift are sick of this shit.
But the meat of the issue is the obviously gamable "NEW POLICY" as I already detailed, and you confirmed. It's absolutely assinine that a new baker taking over for a tired or IRL emergency gotta bail baker, can't fix errors like typos, bad formatting etc. Obviously, if bakers are taking notables, it makes sense that some level of consistancy and professionalism be in the product.
But for fuck sake, it is beyond unconscionable for "Q is a larp" to be in Notables.
-
It's not notable. It's fucking posted in every fucking bread by shills. By definition it is UTTERLY COMMON. Any fuckwit syndicate baker doesn't get that, needs to be fucking heckled out of the fucking kitchen.
-
It has no fucking utility. There was no argument nor evidence. It's just an insult. It's fucking UNPROFESSIONAL. Why does the syndicate want to control baking and push out garbage.
-
Claiming "anons" nominated it is just bullshit. Bakers are supposed to be knowledgeable of this place, not fucking blithering idiots, who accept a nom for shit from an IP hopping shill.
I'm pissed.
Time to turn the tide.
> i have a hard time mobilizing concern for notables
The issue is that their are notable scrapers that people who don't come here read. To that end, I should prefer that bakers provide them properly. I prefer their were no notables. It's a target. And without a BO and BV's we have no way to protect notable creators, bakers, thus we have these constant attacks on the kitchen, and this new horseshit that bakers must be respected. No bakers were respected because of their good work, not because they bake.
>this isn't happening anymore. we used to be SHAMED
I suspect the fucking WuFlu. I used to hit dayshifft at work a bit to see what was up or post something. I had sort of a eyes on schedule. Now I'm all over the place, up days on end and that schedule is broken.
Well that's enough for now. Suns fucking up and I gotta force a few hours laying down at least.