a bombastic statement, almost a curse, with out attribution.
the trap is that there is no trap and the person who said this thinks there is?
the fruit is growing right over his head but he doesn't know what it is or that it is edible?
such statements of 'trap' are, infact themselves traps.
a version number for some software release?
that makes sense.
here is something to add to your jubelance: many of us don't do Twitter except to go and read.
we don't like, we don't tweet.
so if we were adding to your count, think of how much bigger it would be!
Has Barry made any kind of public statement?
if he just comes out and confesses the truth to the public he might win his neck.
Come on Barry, be honest. Tell us your real story. not the one that Colombia or Harvard or Dopey made up for you.
that would be serious and real news.
but hey, I saw this post in the evening last night and other anon said 'slide'.
I'd need to see someone do it in a video before I'll buy into it. Or post some explaning about it to a tutorial kind of file.
do you have a link to someone who shows how it's done?
PS: there are very many client readers for PDF's. Which one is loaded with Ghidra to do this hack?
Or are you telling me that the PDF format is accepted by Ghidra? I'd be shocked. but that's cool, if true, post me a tutorial or software explaination or, I do agree, this is a timewaste and a slide.
what are you discussing?
fiber?
have you tried looking for US MIL documents?
usually the training materials are freely available.
there are plenty of storage solutions.
the important part is knowing that you really have what is supposed to be there.
the 'tech' or 'platform' on which to store these is abstracted so you do not need to learn the details as you suggest.
If you have critical data you need to back it up in multiples. That way you know that the odds are better of it being available if you need it.
the hardest part is being able to know where it is when you want it, or that it even exists.
so you need methods to catalog it.
for a 'package' you zip it all up. and then you put that in an RPM for distribution. there is no reason that you can't use that same method to create content for other people's systems.
Really it comes down to having the stuff you need to use easily available.
There is no one 'right' solution to these issues.
Understand that storage isn't really the thing. the thing is what you want to store.
I think 'volumes' are a good thing to use.
and also make sure if you really have a lot of large content that you do some kind of verification that the files really are copied correctly. That is why zipping is usually done before archiving.
all in all I'd say you should not focus on just optical. also you assumptions about 'best storage' may, in fact, be incorrect.
so now you show us that you are doing a slide and turning it into an adhominum attack.
I'm not going to list on my resume all my experience in that area.
I will just say one thing: if you do have audio tapes, and you pretend to care so I will actually give you this tip: you keep three.
one is a mater. The second is one you use to make other tapes. And that one is given to someone to rerecord. The original is never removed from the vault unless . . . it's being used to make a new copy of the second.
so that was what I learned in 1980 when I did it as a job.
and on and off over theyears I've been tasked with similar activities. and I've been down the 'giant content ' road 20 years ago.
but if it makes you feel better to lash out, then go right ahead.
PS: if you find a doc in Russian or some other lang, why you don't translate it with a translater and stop crying.
PS: if you send a digital signal off into the galaxy and it reflect back you can demod it on the return and get your data back.
have a nice slide.>>9122158