>>9165638 (PB)
Didn't you read the post about the FB 10,000 meme collection and that it included two-part memes? That post mixed vulgar nudes with a parody of The Lord's Prayer … dragging that foundational Christian teaching into disrepute.
A two part meme does not have to appear in a single file. The example given was a photo of a desert with a caption adjacent saying something to the effect of "I wanted you to know how many people love you."
Neither the photo nor the caption are objectionable, but a human can easily link the two to obtain the intended message.
I posted one comment and got two replies claiming that I didn't belong here and that I was a script. That uniformity of thought makes me think that YOU are the script.
And a vile one at that.