news people?
no, we don't know for sure who started the other bread. sauce it if you canl
Come bake with us!
7 pm ET tonite
3 hours from now.
Baking seminar #14: >>>/comms/13590
Or come LURQ and learn the esoteric secrets of baking.
(Or at least the practical steps.)
You don't have to say you're there, do practice bakes, or commit to man the kitchen.
(Although would be great if ya wanna.)
Lotsa 'controversy' over notables today.
What do you think? Got questions? Ideas?
See what bakers think, add your own 2cents.
o7
>>9172360 pb
TYB for your hard work, baker. Support your approach as one variation in the many ways that posts are selected as notable.
o7
>why don't news people have their own thread?
They could, but really, a lot of breaking news is relevant to our work. The question is always: Which news? And different anons (and bakers) answer that question differently.
During busy breads, bakers are making very quick decisions about notes - and wo/knowing what will come next. Once they're posted, they're posted. Sometimes a lot , sometimes a little. Best would be to go back and take out 'lower priority' notes later in bread. Tried that once - never again, ha-ha.
But my main q was about who did the alternative bake. Not likely news fags, coz of this:
>>9173129
The notables were a bunch of garbage from 'demoralizing news spammer'
So here's a thread that doesn't start you off in a bad mood.
Could be trolls, shills, anybody. Everyone's out ta get us, considering what's habbenin.
Shadilay anons!
Nice one, anon. Finally a use for that incredibly awful advert.
>Recent Decisions of the Court of Appeals for DC Circuit Show Sullivan Must Dismiss Flynn Case
Great work, anon. But you left the part out about the MSM treating his opinion like it's the 10 tablets from down from the mountain.
KEK.