Anonymous ID: 7e8646 May 18, 2020, 10:03 a.m. No.9225664   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5705

4203

 

Q

!!Hs1Jq13jV6

11 May 2020 - 12:22:13 PM

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-moving-full-throttle-on-russia-probe-review-with-top-federal-prosecutors-involved-sources📁

Keywords are fun for the whole family.

“They FARMED the investigation out because it is too much for Durham and he didn’t want to be distracted,” one of the sources told Fox News.

“He’s going full throttle, and they’re looking at everything,” the source told Fox News.

Breadcrumbs were being dropped in the days preceding the decision that his case could be reconsidered.

Q

 

Two sources told Fox News that Jeff Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri who was tapped by the Justice Department in February to review the case of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, is continuing to help with Durham’s investigation even after the DOJ’s move last week to drop the case against Flynn.

 

The sources told Fox News that interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Timothy Shea is also assisting with components of the investigation.

 

“They farmed the investigation out because it is too much for Durham and he didn’t want to be distracted,” one of the sources told Fox News.

 

"Keywords are fun for the whole family.-Q

Anonymous ID: 7e8646 May 18, 2020, 10:21 a.m. No.9225904   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9225705

I'm thinking they are going after Muller and his 17 evil Dems first.

 

Biden is no threat in 2020 election.

 

Obama will be exposed later.

 

Tables turned on Mueller prosecutors: Ten actions ripe for scrutiny

 

Recent revelations from the Flynn case fit an emerging, more general pattern of questionable prosecutorial tactics.

 

Justice Department documents released in connection with the withdrawal of charges against retired Lt. Gen Michael Flynn mark the first official unraveling of one of Russia special counsel Robert Mueller’s cases.

 

The DOJ’s court filings provide telling new public indications that the department’s investigative searchlight has swiveled around to shine on a pattern of questionable tactics employed by prosecutors working for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into now-debunked claims of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign to hijack the 2016 election.

 

Based on the filings and conversations with senior Trump administration sources, it now appears that U.S. Attorney John Durham’s inquiry into the origins and conduct of the Russia probe is widening, and several senior U.S. officials — Mueller prosecutors as well as top FBI leadership — may be under scrutiny.

 

The recent revelations raising questions of prosecutorial misconduct in the Flynn case fit an emerging, more general pattern of questionable tactics employed by the Mueller probe, including withholding relevant exculpatory evidence and misrepresenting the government’s interactions with investigative targets. Here are nine more examples:

 

Scope memo used debunked Steele Dossier to set investigative parameters: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s Aug. 2, 2017 memorandum laying out the scope of the special counsel investigation relied on the discredited “Steele Dossier” of Clinton campaign opposition research to set some of the Mueller prosecution’s parameters. For instance, the scope memo includes allegations that Trump campaign advisors Carter Page and Paul Manafort “committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States.” These allegations must have come from the Steele Dossier, as their provenance is unique to that compilation.

 

By the time Rosenstein wrote the scope memo, the dossier had already been disavowed by Steele’s alleged main source. Questioned by the FBI in January, March, and May 2017, the dossier’s so-called primary subsource said that the intelligence on Trump-Russia ties he is alleged to have given Steele was “word of mouth and hearsay.” Team Mueller would go on to spend nearly two years and $40 million to “investigate” a collusion narrative which, as they knew from Steele’s primary subsource, issued from remarks made in “jest” and conversation “with friends over beers.”

 

Mueller final testimony ignores Steele Dossier: In his July 24, 2019 congressional testimony regarding his investigation into Russian election meddling, Mueller said he would not discuss “matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The SCO's final report makes little mention of the former British spy’s collection of reports, even though it was the source underlying the central premise Mueller was tasked to investigate — whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia.

 

Deceptive editing of Dowd voicemail: The Mueller Report also deceptively edits a Nov. 22, 2017 voicemail from White House lawyer John Dowd to Flynn’s previous counsel to bolster a narrative that Trump was obstructing the investigation.

 

The secret side deal: According to Flynn’s current lawyer Sidney Powell, special counsel prosecutor Van Grack made a secret side deal with Flynn’s previous counsel. After threatening to indict Michael Flynn Jr., Van Grack agreed not to indict the general’s son as a material term of the plea agreement but required that it be kept between himself and Flynn’s previous counsel in order to avoid having to disclose it to the courts..

 

Improper acquisition of transition emails: In December 2017, a lawyer for the Trump transition team alleged that the SCO had improperly obtained the transition team’s emails from the General Services Administration. “We understand that the special counsel’s office has subsequently made extensive use of the materials it obtained from the GSA, including materials that are susceptible to privilege claims," wrote transition team lawyer Kory Langhofer. Flynn’s emails are believed to have been among the cache appropriated by the prosecutors.

 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/tables-turned-mueller-prosecutors-ten-actions-ripe