CONFIRMED: Governor Whitmer Bans Michiganders from Traveling to their Summer Home — Then Her Cars Are Seen Parked Outside of HER SUMMER HOME!

Tyrannical Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed an executive order that banned regular Michiganders from traveling between residences in the state. Whitmer banned travel to summer homes.

Whitmer extended the ban on traveling to summer homes thru April 30th. The ban is still in effect.

Evidently the law does not apply to the elites like Gretchen Whitmer or her family.

Radio host Randy Bishop posted a photo today of several vehicles at Governor Whitmer’s summer home in or near Birch Lake, Michigan.

Tonight we researched the license plate on the Tahoe in Gretchen’s summer home driveway.

Guess what we found?

Gretchen is your typical tyrant.

She must love her new power.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/confirmed-governor-whitmer-bans-michiganders-traveling-summer-home-cars-seen-parked-outside-summer-home/

UK: Home Office will release grooming gang report after public outcry

The United Kingdom’s Home Office has agreed to release a report it had prepared describing the characteristics of grooming gangs after initially refusing to do so. Its release comes as the result of a public campaign demanding that it be disclosed.

Grooming gangs are criminal organisations which exploit children for the aims of pornography, prostitution, and human trafficking. They have become a serious problem in the United Kingdom in recent years, with evidence having emerged that law enforcement looked the other way while these gangs were brutally victimising children due to the fact that the people running such groups are typically migrants — frequently Pakistanis. Last month, two migrant men were convicted of raping underage girls as part of a grooming gang in Huddersfield, England, as previously reported by Voice of Europe.

The previous Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, said in July 2018 that he was ordering the preparation of a report on grooming gangs following a number of high-profile cases involving them, most famously in Rotherham, as previously reported by Voice of Europe. When the report was completed, however, its findings were kept secret. The British newspaper The Independent then filed a Freedom of Information request to compel the Home Office to release the report, but in February the Home Office refused the request on the grounds that doing so would not be in the “public interest” and that the report was purely for internal use.

In response, a petition was circulated demanding that the government release its research into grooming gangs in full. As of now, the petition has been signed by nearly 126,000 British citizens. Survivors of the grooming gangs likewise are accusing the government of making “empty promises.”

Yesterday, however, the Home Office reversed itself and announced that it will “publish a paper into group-based child sexual exploitation in order to better understand the characteristics of group-based offending and help deliver justice for victims,” according to a report by The Independent. In their statement, the Home Office said that the report will include the characteristics of both offenders and victims involved in child sexual exploitation.

The announcement came on the date that had been set by a parliamentary committee to consider whether or not a House of Commons debate on the issue of why the report had not been released should be held.

The report is scheduled to be published later this year following a review by a panel of experts. Sarah Champion, an MP from the Labour Party for Rotherham, said she is pleased the report will finally be issued but is disappointed that the government has set no publication date, given that “every day we are waiting there’s the possibility of another victim.”

“What happened to these children remains one of the biggest stains on our country’s conscience,” Priti Patel, the current Home Secretary, said. “It is shameful. I am determined to deliver justice for victims and ensure something like this can never happen again.”

https://voiceofeurope.com/2020/05/uk-home-office-will-release-grooming-gang-report-after-public-outcry/

Whose alternative facts? Facebook consigns PragerU to ‘reduced visibility’ purgatory after challenge to polar bear myth

Conservative channel PragerU has been sidelined on Facebook after a clip challenging climate change dogma ran afoul of fact-checkers. Accused of repeatedly sharing “false news,” they've demanded Facebook stop censoring the Right.

PragerU was sentenced to the shadow realm of “reduced distribution” after posting a video to its Facebook page debunking the oft-deployed environmentalist trope that polar bear populations are on the brink of extinction because of the melting ice caps. Informed that third-party fact-checker Climate Feedback had taken issue with the clip, the conservative video-maker was told that if it wanted to return its page to good standing, it would have to appeal to the fact-checker directly.

Insisting that all the facts in the video had been reliably sourced, PragerU pushed back, slamming Facebook for “hiding behind fact-checkers target[ing] ideas they disagree with” and pretending to be “the arbiter of truth.”

“If you truly value freedom of expression, as you often claim, you wouldn’t hide behind fact-checkers targeting ideas they disagree with,” the nonprofit tweeted, demanding Facebook reverse its censorship - or at least own up to it.

https://www.rt.com/news/489273-facebook-prageru-polar-bears/

The Boston Tea Party - a Plot by Jewish Merchants to Foment War for Profit (FTN Podcast, Audio + Transcript)

In addition to their 'Week in Review' coverage of political news, the FTN team does an amazing job with their so-called 'Deep Dives', in-depth investigations on varied subjects, from historical revisionism to how are dirt poor Latinos getting the money for the expensive journey to the US (you guessed it, 'money-lenders', charging 50% per year.) - and many, many more. It is a hugely valuable archive, available to subscribers.

FTN recently made this episode available to the general public, (it was behind their pay-wall). You can fine the whole thing on their YouTube Channel or at the website.

This episode is one of their most earth-shattering, and sure to be a big draw for anyone interested in US history. Highly recommended. Truth to Power will be bringing you excerpts from this important episode over the coming days.

From the FTN Website:

Jazz, James, and Borzoi dive deep into the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton, one of America’s most astro-turfed founding fathers. Little is known about Hamilton’s early life, which is odd considering his prominent role as a framer of the U.S. Constitution, first Secretary of the Treasury, creator of the nation’s first national bank, the architect of the inherently corrupt system of debt-financed capitalism we are saddled with today, chief author of The Federalist Papers, master of media manipulation, election meddler, and almost but never actually President of the United States.

Rest assured, we thoroughly smash that early life in order to fully understand the identity of the man himself; who he is, where he comes from, what shaped his worldview, and ultimately, in turn, how he shaped the world itself.

Only once one fully understands Hamilton from those perspectives, do the trajectory and context of subsequent historical events, from war to immigration, finance to foreign policy, and from consumerism to vulture capitalism, become crystal clear.

It turns out The Boston Tea Party, one of the most celebrated acts of resistance in the American revolutionary saga, was most probably a plot by Jewish merchants to selfishly foment another war they could profit from (and certainly never fight in).

Typically portrayed as a bold act of rebellion against tyranny by our scrappy colonial ancestors, a more sober look at events seems to paint the Boston Tea Party as a ploy by merchants and smugglers to protect their business interests, while manipulating the good American patriotism of the colonial commoner to do it.

We’ve included a clip where they go over the controversial lesser known details of the event, but we highly recommend you check out the full epdisode. The full episode is now on FTN's YouTube channel, embedded below, and on the FTN website.

https://russia-insider.com/en/boston-tea-party-plot-jewish-merchants-foment-war-profit-ftn-podcast-audio-transcript/ri30318

International Proposals for Warrantless Location Surveillance To Fight COVID-19

Time and again, governments have used crises to expand their power, and often their intrusion into citizens’ lives. The COVID-19 pandemic has seen this pattern play out on a huge scale. From deploying drones or ankle monitors to enforce quarantine orders to proposals to use face recognition or thermal imaging cameras for monitoring public spaces, governments around the world have been adopting intrusive measures in their quest to contain the pandemic.

EFF has fought for years against the often secretive governmental use of cell phone location data. Governments have repeatedly sought to obtain this data without a court order, dodged oversight of how they used and accessed it, misleadingly downplayed its sensitivity, and forced mobile operators to retain it. In the past, these uses were most often justified with arguments of law enforcement or national security necessity. Now, some of the same location surveillance powers are being demanded—or sometimes simply seized—without making a significant contribution to containing COVID-19. Despite the lack of evidence to show the effectiveness of location data to stop the spread of the virus, a number of countries’ governments have used the crisis to introduce completely new surveillance powers or extend old ones to new COVID-related purposes. For example, data retention laws compel telecom companies to continuously collect and store metadata of a whole population for a certain period of time. In Europe, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared such mandates illegal under EU law.

Like other emergency measures, it may be an uphill battle to roll back new location surveillance once the epidemic subsides. And because governments have not shown its effectiveness, there’s no justification for this intrusion on people’s fundamental freedoms in the first place.

Individualized Location Tracking

Mobile carriers happen to know their subscribers’ phone’s locations (usually the same as the locations of the subscribers themselves) from moment to moment because of the way cellular networks work. That knowledge has turned into one of the most extensive data sources for governments—and not infrequently advertisers, stalkers, or spies—interested in tracking people’s movements. But while phone location data is sufficient to show whether someone went to church or the movies, it simply is not accurate enough to show whether two people were close enough together to transmit the virus (commonly characterized as a distance of two meters, or about six feet).

While location surveillance is problematic at any time, the coronavirus crisis has led to a rapid uptick in its use; many measures to facilitate it have been passed by fast-tracked legislative procedures during national state of emergencies. Some governments have even bypassed legislators entirely and relied on executive power to roll out expanded location surveillance—making it even less transparent and democratically legitimate than usual. Governments may use the urgency of the crisis to erode limits on the ways people’s location histories can be used, demand this data be turned over to authorities in bulk, or require companies to stockpile records of where their customers have been.

https://www.activistpost.com/2020/05/international-proposals-for-warrantless-location-surveillance-to-fight-covid-19.html

>>9259891

> Or horror like the rest of us

hopefully

FFS Rino's

Contrails!

>>9259964

What you have there is a conspiracy theory fren!

Clearly they are contrails! Really thick, hang in the air and spread contrails! ; )

Test Positive for Coronavirus, End Up in a Police Database

So you are curious whether you have coronavirus? You could take a coronavirus test to find out. Well, not really find out, since the test results are not reliable. Nonetheless, you can take a test to obtain at least a Magic 8 Ball level answer of if you are or are not infected with coronavirus.

Here is some information likely unknown to many people when they are tested: The names and addresses of people who test positive are often handed over to police departments that can input or tag those names and addresses in police databases.

Kimberlee Kruesi provides the details in a Tuesday Associated Press article. She starts off her article with the following revelation:

More than 11 million people have been tested in the U.S. for COVID-19, all with the assurance that their private medical information would remain protected and undisclosed.

Yet, public officials in at least two-thirds of states are sharing the addresses of people who tested positive with first responders — from police officers to firefighters to EMTs. An Associated Press review found that at least 10 of those states also share the patients’ names.

Kinda makes those coronavirus tests that many government officials and people in the media have been promoting seem less warm and fuzzy, doesn’t it?

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2020/may/20/test-positive-for-coronavirus-end-up-in-a-police-database/

>>9260070

>What if you specifically REVOKE CONSENT at point of testing ?

>

>If they then share info can you sue ? $$$$$$

Depend on what waivers are hidden in documentation you no doubt have to sign