>>9282482

Why are you self-notabling, anon?

why not look it up in qresear.ch and give its status?

go ahead, we'll wait….

>>9282518

>Anons should be out there on Twitter giving shoutouts to each other.

They should, huh?

>>9282561

just post the fukken info wo/the self notabling.

3 self-notables

Are u new??

>>9282584

>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/22/physicians-forcing-healthy-americans-to-quarantine-inflicted-devastating-harm/

notable seconded

not in qresear.ch yet

>>9282638

>>9282638

Your answer does not address my critique, anon. Post your articles and let anons decide if it's notable.

>>9282698

Find me one anon who supports routine self-notabling.

>>9282813

>do you self notable?

Rarely. But there are exceptions to every rule. Best is to provide sauce to show why notable (related to Q drop, not posted pb, part of xyz dig, etc.). Anyone can say "notable", showing why is better. The best material tends to speak for itself.

>>9282957

>>9282957

It was a reasonable question. Not many 'nice' anons here, we challenge one another to do a better job, i get called on my shit, too.

>>9282971

Hope Dems keep Biden on as long as possible!

Big thanks Joe!!

>>9283048

chekeked, baker, nice bun.