>>9310866

LE isn't all that necessary, frankly.

We need to take away all unnecessary laws and people should be expected to defend themselves or their own property again.

Why should communities not form their own unpaid militia to enforce community guidelines?

How necessary are traffic laws, for instance? That's the bulk of what LE deals with, is it not?

Look, I'm not speaking to how unpatriotic LE is or something like that. I'm certain the vast majority of them are great people and have honest intentions. While maybe half of them truly grasp their oath and carry it out effectively, I think practically all of them believe they're doing the right thing just about all of the time, but unfortunately they pretty much always do more harm than good. Hell, in life-threatening situations, LE isn't even necessary just about every time.

It's like, traffic accidents make good cases for LE (who are you going to invite in to the situation to mediate instead?), hostage situations (which, again, could be cured with a local militia who doesn't work for money) and maybe property theft. Outside of these things, I don't really understand the need for LE.

I've always enjoyed the idea of a Sheriff, though. Even then, I can see how old western fantasy shows could have prompted this.

>>9310872

gonna have to agree with this.

unfortunately, the majority of bakers are namefags themselves, now. they have their own chat boards and stuff where they get in to petty schoolgirl drama about each other's names and everything.

this is the very antithesis to the /pol/ gambit and you're certainly not alone, anon.

i mean, generals have always been done a specific way but it wasn't until now that these retarded namefaggots and their gay avatarfag club came here that this place got so far diluted.

I remember a year and a half ago when nothing of this sort was ever even noticed, let alone actually occurring.

bakers used to just be another facet of anonymous and we all worked in unison. now we have to deal with shills taking advantage of this vector on the fucking daily because these stupid faggots had the audacity to acquire inflated egos and invoke identity in a the last god damn place it could possibly be needed.

someone needs to explain to these dumb faggots that this is still chan, that we're still anons and that we cannot possibly change just because a bunch of faggot journalists, boomers, Karens and their pet niggers showed up to jump on the freedom train.

>>9311041

I'm suggesting we can revoke those infiltration vectors with introducing new societal tools to uncomplicate those very areas in which our system of Law and Order could be compromised.

I think reducing the tremendous power over the rest of us that LE wields is the first place to look and I think removing their ridiculous budgets is the second imperative.

Hell, they're only needed in overpopulated urban centers because without them roving gangs would just ransack everything, drive out all of the valuable mechanics of local economies, and the system being abused by these very gangs would fix the problem all by itself.

Unfortunately, this cannot be accomplished because they have too many ways to extract that very budget by the civilians living among the urban centers through way of traffic laws and other egregious exaggerations of powers.

Yes, we're uncovering the nature of the top-down paradigm being abused, but it can be combated from both sides if we initiated a campaign whereby citizens in local communities unearthed and extinguished the infestations by themselves.

>>9311058

That's the real question.

Should he be found to never have been a legitimate president, what policies enacted can be withdrawn?

This could get interesting very quickly if #obamagate is furthered.

>>9311073

>i agree with you 90% of all LEO should be local and militia/citizens

>10% fed/state oversight for corrupt locals

Oddly enough, I could agree with this with a few specific conditions.

Funnily enough, I think we're all about to find out why, too.

>>9311122

welcome newfriend.

your digits, however, are pretty neat

>>9310911

Only actual retards make statements like this.

Normies are not supposed to understand how crypto works, so I can't really blame you…

>>9311339 gets it.

If it helps to have this explained to you, Norman, they don't want (You) to learn how to use crypto because doing so would increase the rate at which it's innovated. If humanity can outpace the faggots taking advantage of us, we can circumvent the banks swiftly. Between what was just stated and their using crypto to launder money like mad (see Tether), they deploy a generous amount of psyops against all of us to ensure we don't get sufficient use out of it to work around their bank systems.

paranoia is often a feature of demoralization.