Anonymous ID: 4e9921 May 25, 2020, 11:37 a.m. No.9311373   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Many of these sites remain active,as an NSA presentation displaying the primary foreign collection operations bases shows. The presentation36detailsboth the US sites distributed around the world as well as the 2ndparty bases as follows:TypeLocationCountryCodenameUS siteYakimaUSJACKNIFEUS siteSugar GroveUSTIMBERLINEUS siteSabana SecaPuerto RicoCORALINEUS siteBrasilliaBrasilSCSUS siteHarrogate (aka Menwith Hill)UKMOONPENNYUS siteBad Aibling37GermanyGARLICKUS siteNew DelhiIndiaSCSUS siteThailandThailandLEMONWOODUS siteMisawa38JapanLADYLOVE2ndParty BudeUKCARBOY2ndPartyOmanOmanSNICK2ndPartyNairobiKenyaSCAPEL2ndPartyGeraldtonAustraliaSTELLAR2ndPartyCyprusCyprusSOUNDER2ndPartyNew ZealandNew ZealandIRONSANIt is important to notethat,just because a base is being operated from within a particular country, this does not forestall Five Eyes parties from collecting intelligence therein on the host country. Ex-NSA staff have confirmed that communications are monitored from “almost every nation in the world, including the nations on whose soil the intercept bases are located.”

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20140106052052/https://www.privacyinternational.org/sites/privacyinternational.org/files/file-downloads/eyes_wide_open_v1.pdf

Anonymous ID: 4e9921 May 25, 2020, 11:44 a.m. No.9311454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1503 >>1523

>>9311441

That's not entirely true.

 

It was Obama that created the Omaha datacenter to track everyone with social media.

 

As best can be ascertained, therefore, it seems there is no prohibition on intelligence-gathering by Five Eyes States with respect tothe citizens or residents of other Five Eyes States. There is instead, it seems, a general understanding that citizens will not be directly targeted, and where communications are incidentally intercepted there will be an effort to minimize the use and analysis thereof by the intercepting State. This analysis has been confirmed by a leaked draft 2005NSAdirectiveentitled “Collection, Processing and Dissemination of Allied Communications.”63This directive carries the classification marking “NF” meaning “No Foreign”, short for “NOFORN” or"Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals."The directive states:“Under the British-U.S. Communications Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 (commonly known as the United Kingdom/United States of American (UKUSA) Agreement), both governments agreed to exchange communications intelligence products, methodsand techniques as applicable so long as it was not prejudicial to national interests. This agreement has evolved to include a common understanding that both governments will not target each other’s citizens/persons. However when it is in the best interestof each nation, each reserve the right to conduct unilateral COMINT against each other’s citizens/persons. Therefore, under certain circumstances, it may be advisable and allowable to target Second Party persons and second party communications systems unilaterally when it in the best interests of the U.S and necessary for U.S national security. Such targeting must be performed exclusively within the direction, procedures and decision processes outlined in this directive.

Anonymous ID: 4e9921 May 25, 2020, 11:50 a.m. No.9311534   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1552

>>9311503

I don't think you are totally getting the whole picture. You need to blame someone else for all of your own mistakes and all of your own actions. Better buckle up cupcake.