they at least know how to scare you, don't they.
ooohhhh soo powerful when we know who they are and what they did and who they had for breakfst one day at a rave in a cave.
the power lies with the people, not with some old order aristocratic posers who replaced the democrats, one by one, by usurping various families, through cuckoldrey.
your fear porn merely shows how desparate your class of parasitic narrative spawners are.
what will they pay you to say next?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_raid_on_Bari
Read the part about the doctor who did a cover up of mustard gas shipment that got bombed. Interesting if true.
but if true it also shows how military were allowing doctors to do great evil even in the 1940s. even very bad for soldiers and veterans, and the civilians who they are charged with liberating.
The doctor in this case didn't really care much about anyone but his own career.
How could anyone write a story about a doctor being this way? Is it a scurilous piece of propaganda?
so sorry, the doctor was the truthful one after it couldn't be covered up . . .
and it was the brits who tried to cover it up, so the wiki story goes.
those brits, always doing great evil and covering i up . .
how many times do we read that in History?
OK, so I was wrong to go on with my emotional 'oh the evil military doctors' deal a few posts back and then playfully suggested that 'the brits' (note I did not capitalize it, though some may capitalize on my penchant of being grammaitcally sloppy . . . ) however the question comes to mind:
what war attrocities and horrors of science and technology, and botched 'programs' either in wartime or outside of wartime is still being covered up by the powers that have such ability.
I am not saying 'of the brits' specifically, though it seems very likely that they must have other deep and dark secrets.
And why do such things get covered up?
I have no real answer to this question.
sometimes it's too hard for the public to handle?
people jsut covering their asses?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tusculum
29 May 1167 . . .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Monte_Porzio
if you read into all the links you'll go on a romp of mideaval history . . .
wiki pedia has it's uses, anon.
do you deny that the people and places listed actually exist?
of course you don't.
anyway it's good to know history and it being memorial day, and that being an aniversary of a city basically being destroyed through . . . an inability to compromise, how does Wikipedia hide that?
So we should remain ignorant and not use it for what it's good for?
not really a good idea, anon.