>>9320929 (PB)
As long as there is nothing sexually suggestive, I've never heard of a restriction. We do not ridicule kids. Particularly, we do not ridicule kids with mental or physical handicaps.
Well, except for Greta, but she lives her life in the public eye and says and does ridiculous shit. When that ends, the ridicule should stop soon afterward.
>>9321140 (PB)
I posted a bio for him two days ago. I don't know if it hit Notables or not (I post and go). Kid doesn't sound like the sort to just kill people for no reason. He's a relatively high achiever, active volunteer ... all the role model stuff you could ask for.
I think he was being hunted before he started stealing things that roll and killing people. He started out with (maybe) a machete and has upgraded to firearms from the early victims.
I just don't know where else to go with it.
Wrong question. Should ANY form of censorship exist to decide winners where there is a difference of opinion or even facts? What makes an "authoritative" source more factual? The two qualities are not bound to each other. If MSNBC says there are 200 deaths in a disaster and CNN says it's only 187, how can you know if either number is the correct one? Suppose David Icke says it's only 12 … but the disaster happened in the street in front of his house and he saw everyone who was loaded into the ambulances? Should we submit the matter to an online "fact checker" who wasn't there and hasn't even seen any of the video yet?
We are burying healthy public discourse. Let viewers / readers decide who they will believe based on a wide variety of factors, including track record, plausibility and so on. (neither 200 nor 187 people will fit in a Cessna, but 12 is possible for some models of that brand). If it collided with an empty helicopter, I think we have to trust Icke this time. If it collided with a full 747, Icke gets pitched in the dustbin (for now) and either of the other two is likely "close enough."
Someone else offered up that it might refer to interleukin something or other. It also fit and, given the tendency of Anons to take the first blind alley they can find, the interleukin lead is the more likely path.