Apologies to other anons if I am repeating someone else's crumbs: there are too many breads in Q Research General, alone. I cannot keep up. That said …

The question I have been pondering is:

Who is P?

It makes no sense for it to be, say, Pelosi, or any other P too obviously far down the NWO 'pyramid' in the USA.

Q uses other shorthands for eg BHO, HRC, etc. – so its not anyone who is near the top of the USA branch of the NWO, either.

Not George Sorrows, nor a Flyrothsfly, for similar reasons. And Q has told us that P is not the Pope.

Some Q-names have multiple meanings: Snow White seeems to be a supercomputer, but also a network of them, and if I understood another anon's reasoning correctly (sorry, no sauce), Snow White could also mean QEII.

So, P could be more than one person. Or, one person, three things, and a bag full of rainbow frog candy.

Similarly, some people/things/events have more than one name: HRC is also the 'Alice' in the SA Wonderland, for example.

So, We could already know who P is, but under another name or niQname. But who? No idea,

But then it occurred to me that there are possibly important pyramid people who we know have to be be somewhere (very) near the top, who don't seem to have a niQname (that people on the spectrum figured out yet).

Finally, Q has told us that P = C.

Wild guess (sauce is the above crumbs and my pure speculation, only):

The Prince is Charles.

Anons, it's free, and worth every penny: make of it what you will. Dig it, or don't.

That is all.

Anonymous 04/03/18 (Tue) 12:35:54 9b4725 No.880021

[Bread #1093 >>880021; or, https:// 8ch.net/ qresearch/res/879967.html#880021]

… wrote:

«IGNORE THE SHILLS

How to Quickly Spot a Clown

"Don't get suckered into wasting your time. Hardened anons should already know all this shit; This is more of a crash course for the new visitors."

[…]

It seems that the easiest way to foil the bots is to point them out by proxy, by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference and intentionally breaking its post link in your response and/or answering it with a meme until they start misfiring because they can't parse the response to lock onto a target correctly..

[…]

NEVER KNOWINGLY ENGAGE A BOT DIRECTLY.

It just wastes bread with their responses, [from further on: '(bots) Add (trash) to (force breads up to) bump limits']

and hands them a target to programmatically lock on to without handler interaction. […]»

==

@ the anon who is the author of the above:

As the ridiclownus 'QAnon radicalization flowchart' correctly (seed the disinfo with a little truth) pointed out, there is a spectrum of new visitors.

Early adopters (early anons) were mostly red-pilled already, and/or on a different spectrum all of their own, already.

The next cohort to arrive (cohorts ovelap: think succession of populations in a maturing ecosystem) were more red-pillable than red-pilled.

Then the next: sorta-kinda half-normie / has had the occasional red-pill thought.

And so on.

Numbers: logistical growth curve. With the Roseanne Twoots and The Monkey Writes' "opinion piece" about this Channel, we're probably at the inflection point between linear-like growth and exponential growth.

Therefore, we should expect ever-larger numbers of arrivals from the "I'm a normie, WTF is all this sh!t" cohorts, driven here by curiosity, trendiness, and cognitive dissonance.

The "crash course for new visitors" needs to be retooled, for each cohort – and as they arrive, i.e., as they slide down the scale from a few fully red-pilled autists to hordes of clueless blue-pills, the course has to become friendlier and friendlier to the clueless.

Teaching principle: repetition. A single instance of WTF clarification at the very top of each bread is probably not enough. But as you point out, almost anything else may provoke the wrath (snicker) of the clownbots.

But therein lies the solution – turn every shillpost and all clownposts into teachable moments: If clownbots' shillposts were always tagged with a meme-only (just a meme, no txt content, for all the reasons you gave, cited above), then …

… the probability of 'WTF-is-this?' new arrivals to this Channel landing on a non-flagged piece of shillery goes down; … the probability of red-pilling new arrivals goes up;

… exposure of bots by them screwing up replies to "just memes", goes up; and,

… the exposure (by inference, on seeing the flagged shillposts) of the 'WTF-is-this?' late adopters to the fact they've landed in the middle of a meme-war that can only be explained by Q being real, is itself very red-pilling.

The Main Channel here needs memes specifically for this. I have been experimenting. I will make many Mark II versions, and dump them in the Memebank streams when they are ready. I cannot keep up with the breads (they are being baked too quickly for me to keep pace), but I can do that for you.

Use them, or don't. As you like it.

Maybe other meme artists will join in, if this shows signs that it is working. Once I dump the Mark II versions in the memebank, they will have models to rip off and riff off.

Thank you for all you do!

That is all.