Baker Notable
I had these two,
>>934989 Teaching principle: New visitor educational memes
>>935013 More Flint water samples show elevated lead levels
ThanQ E-BAKER
re-posted from >>934989
Anonymous 04/03/18 (Tue) 12:35:54 9b4725 No.880021
[Bread #1093 >>880021; or, https:// 8ch.net/ qresearch/res/879967.html#880021]
… wrote:
IGNORE THE SHILLS
How to Quickly Spot a Clown
"Don't get suckered into wasting your time. Hardened anons should already know all this shit; This is more of a crash course for the new visitors."
It seems that the easiest way to foil the bots is to point them out by proxy, by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference and intentionally breaking its post link in your response and/or answering it with a meme until they start misfiring because they can't parse the response to lock onto a target correctly..
NEVER KNOWINGLY ENGAGE A BOT DIRECTLY.
It just wastes bread with their responses, [from further on: '(bots) Add (trash) to (force breads up to) bump limits']
and hands them a target to programmatically lock on to without handler interaction. […]»
==
@ the anon who is the author of the above:
As the ridiclownus 'QAnon radicalization flowchart' correctly (seed the disinfo with a little truth) pointed out, there is a spectrum of new visitors.
Early adopters (early anons) were mostly red-pilled already, and/or on a different spectrum all of their own, already.
The next cohort to arrive (cohorts ovelap: think succession of populations in a maturing ecosystem) were more red-pillable than red-pilled.
Then the next: sorta-kinda half-normie / has had the occasional red-pill thought.
And so on.
Numbers: logistical growth curve. With the Roseanne Twoots and The Monkey Writes' "opinion piece" about this Channel, we're probably at the inflection point between linear-like growth and exponential growth.
Therefore, we should expect ever-larger numbers of arrivals from the "I'm a normie, WTF is all this sh!t" cohorts, driven here by curiosity, trendiness, and cognitive dissonance.
The "crash course for new visitors" needs to be retooled, for each cohort – and as they arrive, i.e., as they slide down the scale from a few fully red-pilled autists to hordes of clueless blue-pills, the course has to become friendlier and friendlier to the clueless.
Teaching principle: repetition. A single instance of WTF clarification at the very top of each bread is probably not enough. But as you point out, almost anything else may provoke the wrath (snicker) of the clownbots.
But therein lies the solution – turn every shillpost and all clownposts into teachable moments: If clownbots' shillposts were always tagged with a meme-only (just a meme, no txt content, for all the reasons you gave, cited above), then …
… the probability of 'WTF-is-this?' new arrivals to this Channel landing on a non-flagged piece of shillery goes down; … the probability of red-pilling new arrivals goes up;
… exposure of bots by them screwing up replies to "just memes", goes up; and,
… the exposure (by inference, on seeing the flagged shillposts) of the 'WTF-is-this?' late adopters to the fact they've landed in the middle of a meme-war that can only be explained by Q being real, is itself very red-pilling.
The Main Channel here needs memes specifically for this. I have been experimenting. I will make many Mark II versions, and dump them in the Memebank streams when they are ready. I cannot keep up with the breads (they are being baked too quickly for me to keep pace), but I can do that for you.
Use them, or don't. As you like it.
Maybe other meme artists will join in, if this shows signs that it is working. Once I dump the Mark II versions in the memebank, they will have models to rip off and riff off.
Thank you for all you do!
That is all.
I'll try to answer that list
>what is entered besides the copy paste notables etc
once you've clicked Create a thread
fill in subject line
past 1st page only into comment box
select banner pic (copy one & use it)
then fill in the captcha and create the ~~thread~~ bread
>I will make a video on how to make a bread once I figure it out .(I will NOT step up to bake until then ) I have all the editing equipment to do video . I already am numb and don't care if I get clowned or not anymore so I am not afraid of doxxing myself by making a demo.
I'll help if I can,
> Also the capcha box said it was over timed and it would not let me enter even though it was exactly what was written .
when this happens you just click on the captcha to re-new it. It should change to a new graphic and you then quickly type in the characters.
you can cycle the captcha this way if you find the graphic hard to decypher
> It was all screwy. As mentioned I volunteered because the baker had to leave right then. I bit off more than I could chew and I sincerely offer my apologies Anon. I really feel like I let you all down .
You TRIED! that is more than most and it is the best way to learn something new.
>No doubt in my mind anymore → Gowdy is a black hat - from interview 3 days ago (no one, esp. POTUS, should ever talk to law enforcement w/o an attorney!!!!!):
>
what if rowdy Gowdy is just playing to the left?
He said what any prosecutor would say.
Anybody with a lick of sense knows that nothing you say can be used in an exculpitory way, it can 'only be used against you so…
"If you have an innocent client, Mr. Dowd, act like it,"
can be interpreted two ways
the statement
> adding later "If you have nothing to hide, sit down … tell him what you know.
is just window dressing, he knows that is what the defense lawyer is for.
> WWG1WGA. Ever heard about that?
never heard of that… what does it stand for again?
just ribbing you BAKER
as you can see I do my part