Anonymous ID: 72fb7e May 28, 2020, 4:42 p.m. No.9352154   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9351924 lb

 

Don't be silly

New York City have just overruled the mayor and governor

Social distancing is now over in New York

As long as you wear a mask.

Touch people ALL THAT YOU WANT

 

You know, humans need to be touched

It releases endorphins

And makes us feel happy

These cops want to be loved, that's all.

Many MEME opportunities in frames of that clip

Anonymous ID: 72fb7e May 28, 2020, 4:47 p.m. No.9352234   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2284

WHO doesn't recommend the use of masks outside of medical environments and those who work around the sick and at-risk.

 

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-on-covid-19-and-masks

 

The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses

 

https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses

 

Abstract

Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

 

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

 

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

 

Review of the Medical Literature

Here are key anchor points to the extensive scientific literature that establishes that wearing surgical masks and respirators (e.g., "N95") does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness:

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) "Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial", American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 - 419.

N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.

Cowling, B. et al. (2010) "Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review", Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456. doi:10.1017/S0950268809991658

None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.

bin-Reza et al. (2012) "The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence", Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257-267.

"There were 17 eligible studies. […] None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection."

Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) "Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis", CMAJ Mar 2016, cmaj.150835; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150835

"We identified 6 clinical studies … In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism."

 

Conclusion regarding masks that do not work

No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions. Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more on this below).

 

Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit. Masks and respirators do not work.

 

Precautionary Principle turned on its head with masks

In light of the medical research, therefore, it is difficult to understand why public-health authorities are not consistently adamant about this established scientific result, since the distributed psychological, economic and environmental harm from a broad recommendation to wear masks is significant, not to mention the unknown potential harm from concentration and distribution of pathogens on and from used masks.

 

In this case, public authorities would be turning the precautionary principle on its head (see below).

Anonymous ID: 72fb7e May 28, 2020, 4:50 p.m. No.9352284   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9352234

 

Physics and Biology of Viral Respiratory Disease, and why masks do not work

In order to understand why masks cannot possibly work, we must review established knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, the mechanism of seasonal variation of excess deaths from pneumonia and influenza, the aerosol mechanism of infectious disease transmission, the physics and chemistry of aerosols, and the mechanism of the so-called minimum-infective-dose.

 

In addition to pandemics that can occur anytime, in the temperate latitudes there is an extra burden of respiratory-disease mortality that is seasonal, and which is caused by viruses. For example, see the review of influenza by Paules and Subbarao (2017). This has been known for a long time, and the seasonal pattern is exceedingly regular.

Anonymous ID: 72fb7e May 28, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.9352507   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2525

Mitt Romney's Chappaquiddick and the Kennedy Fixer Connection

 

Like many who had never heard of Chappaquiddick, I was startled to discover that Mitt Romney also had a fatal accident in 1968.

 

April 16, 2018) – I'm looking forward to seeing the newly released film about Ted Kennedy's fatal automobile accident off the Chappaquiddick bridge in 1969, where his 28 year old blonde staffer, Mary Jo Kopechne, was killed. Not out of meanness, or ghoulishness (I'll almost certainly have to look away if they show her slowly dying), but because I hear the young writers had never heard of the incident before, so they just jumped deep into research to find out what really happened, and then wrote the most accurate and honest script they could. So like these young writers who had never heard of Chappaquiddick, last week I was startled to discover, while reading Mitt Romney's Wikipedia page, that Mitt Romney also had a fatal accident in 1968, where his mission president's wife, Leona Anderson, was killed while he was driving the mission car through Southern France. "Is this story even real?" I wondered, "And if so, why didn't I, or absolutely anyone I asked in Utah, ever hear it?" We had closely followed his presidential campaign with hope, prayed for his success, and voted for him in faith, only to be aggrieved at his loss. His 2012 loss to Obama upset me so, I didn't even turn on Fox News, or pay attention to politics for many months, and I had been a daily Fox News junkie since 9-11.

 

So out of curiosity, not malice, I went down the research rabbit hole to find out the details about this accident, and emerged a week later with a troubling conclusion how Mitt Romney and his team have been deliberately distorting the truth of what actually happened after the accident for 50 years. I feel compelled to share my factually based conclusions for two reasons: 1. Because I love sharing the truth when I've found it, whether those truths be religious, political, or practical, and 2. I see a similar pattern of deception in Romney's campaign to take Utah's Senate seat today. Before accusing me of unfairly dredging up an old, horrible, private tragedy, consider this incident is not something Mitt Romney wants buried in the past. Just the opposite! In June 2007, to introduce himself to the nation in preparation for his first run for the U.S. presidency, he worked with the Boston Globe to publish a puff feature article entitled "Touched by Tragedy, a Leader Emerges from a Life of Privilege" in which this 1968 tragedy was the primary focus as a turning point in his life. In 2012, preparing for his second run at the presidency he again worked with Boston Globe writers to produce his biography "The Real Romney" and again chapter 4 "A Brush with Tragedy" is pivotal: taking him from the day before the accident to his decision to join Bain and company.

 

Some will also accuse me of doing this for personal political gain, since I filed to run for this same Senate race, however I know sharing what I found is going to incur a tidal wave of hateful and accusative comments among my fellow Utah Republicans, and by doing so I am almost assuredly sacrificing any chance I had to be chosen in the coming state delegate convention.

 

I'll start with the few indisputable facts about the tragic accident, compare what happened at Beaulac to what happened at Chappaquiddick (Spoiler alert: Mitt was NOT, I repeat, was NOT responsible for the death of his mission president's wife), then the problems with Romney's contrived narrative after the accident, and finish with how it is relevant to Mitt Romney's campaign today.

 

https://newswire.net/newsroom/oped/00101298-mitt-romney-s-chappaquiddick-and-the-kennedy-fixer-connection.html

Anonymous ID: 72fb7e May 28, 2020, 5:08 p.m. No.9352525   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9352507

>>684043

EFF and FPF were quickly subverted and taken over by blackhats. Recall that they were supposed to collect money to help JA & WL but then took ALL that money & then cut off JA & WL. Recall who all were on the boards and part of the org. Well known dirty players in all of this. As well those "secure" places whistle-blowers were to use to make drops were all set ups to take in the evidence & harm those making drops. All intel gathering to harm and stop REAL truth. JA etc have been writing about this. Named names. Then all those people were exposed

 

So I trust NOTHING w/ EFF or FPF at all. They have proven to be the opposite of what they claim. As well Cusack gives it NO credibilty tied so those families like Pivin who is tied to

 

>>663482

The line

>>RATPAC Brett Rat

 

refers to Brett Ratner & James Packer tied to all sorts of dirty stuff.

 

Now here comes why we all wondered WTF was Trump thinking by making a totally known tied into DeepState Elite Globalists Goldmansachs and loyal to israel NOT USA dirty pedo Hollywood ties made Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnunchin who owns runs Dune Capital Partners, that also then set up another entity with MANY dirty players to make Dune-RATPAC. Recently removed Gary Cohn also ties into this stuff and that was another early WTF on Trump also as this stuff is known. tied into the whole RatPac stuff is Robert Evans, Warner Brothers, also creepy Jeremy Pivin (he is from a multi family network in entertainment that connected in the Cusaks, and others in their parents acting club/representation of "acting families in the business"

 

Stuff that ties into dirty playeers twink molester pedo druggie drug pusher Bryan Singer is some ties into Mitt Romney's Bain Capitol (That also had tied into the whole Franklin shit)

 

The RatPac stuff ties into Brett Ratners father, and James Toboc, Russell Simmons etc tin in Kevin Tsujihara

 

That "Shady gaming" company tied to all those ex CIA FBI heads is know for ties to mega drug cartels, murder, online gaming, money laundering, off shore accounts, funding all sorts of black ops etc Tied into Operation Pelican of course

 

Remember Freeh is to total POS like they ALL are & anyone who's duty it was to HONESTLY investigate and expose what really happened in all the Fed operations when they pulled off the Oklahoma City Bombing. Understand this ties IN MANY people and loud asshole anti MAGA voices now.

 

It would be VERY easy for Q to make some BIG total drops on OKC and Trump to release all that info. THAT would begin many people to dig through all those file archive drops and research and expose write stories tell truth. And then force something to be done about it.

 

Because right now pieces are in place with dusted off operators with clone operations to do another like that that IS on the table. The NGO's ((())) & Soros whores are priming the pumps and setting up the boogie men and they already are tying that shit to Trump. So exposing that ALL would stop that and call out all the bad actors, which is also Clintons, but so many FBI/CIA mil intel Dept State Treasury , BATF and foreign actors & the NGO's that are unregistered foreign agents who were involved (who also were fully working w/ Gogglag for censorship across all platforms, and changing those algorithms search results. They also had stage set to deplatform a mass of people either right before or during, when they pulled an event last fall that ties into this. To silence them from being able to fight the preset new cycle narrative that was spun and massive, and set up to harm trump and did.