Anonymous ID: bb1b40 July 7, 2020, 4:16 a.m. No.9882702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2707 >>2714 >>2717 >>2721 >>2724 >>2730 >>2739 >>2777 >>2788 >>2886

Okay, guys, seriously? What is the consensus, if any, on face masks? Because I gotta be honest, these things creep me out. I don't know if it's because they hide people's faces or what, but these fucking things are seriously starting to give me the heebie-jeebies. They spook me. I think they might actually be the mark or a precursor to it.

I don't care who thinks I'm a luddite.

I walked into the 7-11 today and it just hit me like a ton of bricks how creepy these things are. This is not about a virus. This is a social phenomenon and it seriously has started to freak me out.

Anonymous ID: bb1b40 July 7, 2020, 5:08 a.m. No.9882906   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9882895

What is the purpose? They're pushing increasingly degenerate shit even on mainstream porn sites. Like incest. Is it really just to corrupt people's souls?

Anonymous ID: bb1b40 July 7, 2020, 5:18 a.m. No.9882944   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9882908

I was just mentioning it offhandedly, not offended or anything.

And Anon is correct, clearnet hosts massive amount of degenerate shit behind obscure passwords. I don't know how you'd prove this, but I think pedo rabbit hole on YouTube and Google probably use the same algorithms as porn sites to target pedos and match them with content. There is no way this is an accident, so the question remains as to what they want to accomplish.

There is also an increasing trend towards pushing taboo or especially immoral porn on mainstream sites, like incest and abuse porn. The algorithms seem like they were set up to promote it, and they use them to match users with specific fetishes. You can even set up your own profile now and connect with other degenerates.

Something about it and the normalization of pornography in general seems very calculated and sinister.

Anonymous ID: bb1b40 July 7, 2020, 5:44 a.m. No.9883046   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3105

Before I sack out, I should mention this:

Some Anon last bread asked for Gavin Newsom's liquid investments. Turns out the Governor of California trades in silver bars.

 

>Over the past several years, the couple made several hundred thousand dollars trading silver. In 2011, for example, they made $499,452 trading the metal.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Gavin-Newsom-reports-nearly-1-3-million-in-2016-12849486.php

 

>The tax returns show the Newsoms made hundreds of thousands of dollars trading silver bars during Newsom’s tenure as lieutenant governor. In 2011 alone, they turned a profit of $499,452 on the sale of silver bars.

 

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-gavin-newsom-tax-returns-20170509-htmlstory.html

 

Sketchy? Looks like money laundering to me.