>>9899795
I would dismiss AS as being linked to anything Q, anons are not gonna reply much it is so absurd, and never in a supportive way.
It accomplishes nothing we are about (anons) or what Q' role is. Using confirmation bias to support AS assertions is a waste of time– believe what you want it does not affect us.
>people are so mean here and
AS mentions put you on the shill list (as you saw in the replies), and discussing it loses cred for you, but we are anon so you get a fresh start every login.
>I don't think they actually read all the drops
There are a few hundred of many of the same people here every day, various levels and focuses. If you have something good or contribute you will get noticed for what you add.
Never underestimate the skill of many. No one is trying to impress or charm. Many are legit working sharing data, some are working Ops, some are sifting, scrubbing data.
If you are digging a topic you will be anon guided from a hidden hand if you are effective and valuable, it seems like a hangout but for many it is a job.
Read notables every login and develop a focus and add value if you dig, if you decode go for it, if you have tech specialty tie that in to things.
you can chat and b.s. too and share stuff, but keep in mind the focus is research.
we all were newfags or migrated in at some point.