Anonymous ID: bc6948 July 11, 2020, 6:44 p.m. No.9933938   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3953 >>4093 >>4308 >>4467 >>4522 >>4565

Seems to me that the BLM rioting has died down. Is this true everywhere? Or are there still pockets of activity?

MUST READ: Body Cam Transcript Tells a Different Story on the Death of George Floyd

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/must-read-body-cam-transcript-tells-different-story-death-george-floyd/

 

The transcript from the body camera worn by J. Alexander Kueng shows clear evidence that George Floyd was suffering respiratory distress before police laid hands on him. He died from a Fentanyl overdose, not from being choked out by Minneapolis police. This news will not bring joy to the crazed, leftist mob screaming to lop off the heads of the Minneapolis police officers who stand accused of “murdering” George Floyd and little attention has been paid to the transcript since its release on July 7. I hope to correct that oversight.

 

First a note about Officer J. Alexander Kueng. He also is a black man. He was adopted shortly after birth by a white woman and single mother. Can’t have that story out there. Simply does not promote the meme that white Americans are inherently and irredeemably racist. How can a racist white woman be a loving mother to a black child? Racists don’t do that.

Anonymous ID: bc6948 July 11, 2020, 6:59 p.m. No.9934095   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4103 >>4153

Use this painting to show people WHY people are digging into suspicious activities at Wayfair

Little birdies

 

https://litvinova.artstation.com/projects/nQG96E

 

My illustration for the amazing Evilbook2

 

You can buy the book here: http://evilbook2.tilda.ws/

 

also prints are available here: https://www.inprnt.com/gallery/yuuliya/little-birdies/

 

As Q says…

YOU MUST SHOW THEM.

ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.

Anonymous ID: bc6948 July 11, 2020, 7:06 p.m. No.9934142   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4192 >>4601

>>9934026

Paul is right!

 

When are we going to wake up to the insanity of wearing masks? I don’t really know why OSHA hasn’t come forward and stopped the nonsense..

N95 masks: are designed for CONTAMINATED environments. That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breath straight out without filtration. They don’t filter the air on the way out. They don’t need to. Conclusion: if you’re in Target and the guy with Covid has a N95 mask, his covid breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Target. N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.

Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. …The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it. It’s filtration works on the exhale, to protect the patient from doctor’s breath. ..The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are CLOGGING these masks very, VERY quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask will render it “useless” if you come in contact with Covid and your mask traps it, you become a walking virus dispenser.

Cloth masks: ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever. As you exhale, you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks your health, rather than protect it. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask. Cloth masks are WORSE than none. It’s equivalent to using a chain link fence to stop mosquitos.

Conclusion: The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work. They’re being used to provide false comfort and push forward a political agenda.

Anonymous ID: bc6948 July 11, 2020, 7:12 p.m. No.9934192   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4264 >>4302

>>9934142

And Paul is not just posting his opinion. He did his research

The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses

Dr. Denis G Rancourt, PhD — researchgate.net

 

https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses

 

Abstract

Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

 

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 ÎĽm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

 

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

Anonymous ID: bc6948 July 11, 2020, 7:23 p.m. No.9934302   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>9934192

If you would like the whole 14 page paper

Masks Don't Work: A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy

It is attached to this post as a PDF file.

 

also, I found this periodicity chart from 1999 through 2020 to be astounding. What pandemic?

Anonymous ID: bc6948 July 11, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.9934382   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>9934304

I doubt that many Anons have any clue what you are saying. But here are the details

AMERICAN STRATEGY AND THE SIX PHASES OF GRIEFOCTOBER 6, 2016

 

https://warontherocks.com/2016/10/american-strategy-and-the-six-phases-of-grief/

 

Editor’s Note: This article is the first of a new series in which thinkers from the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) will explore the U.S. military’s phasing construct and the line between war and peace.

From Chinese expansion in the South China Sea, to Russian aggression in the Ukraine, to Iranian activities across the Middle East, many of the U.S. military’s toughest challenges today are not “war” as we traditionally define it. They aren’t peace either. They lie in a “gray zone,” as many have called these situations, somewhere in between.

 

The United States struggles to meet these challenges. They fall below the threshold for triggering a violent response, which of course is no coincidence. U.S. adversaries intend to operate in this gray space, where they can advance their objectives through coercion and intimidation, changing facts on the ground while exploiting the ambiguity of their actions to avoid triggering an overt U.S. military response.

 

One of the challenges of competing in gray zones is that the U.S. military is sub-optimized – conceptually and organizationally – to do so short of conflict. The Pentagon’s dominant paradigm for allocating resources and granting authorities centers around operation plans (OPLANS), which generally address major conflict. To counter gray-zone tactics, combatant commanders need the right authorities, resources, and plans. But the fact that these may not lead to major combat operations actually throws a wrench in the way that Pentagon plans. If counter-gray zone approaches work, they would secure U.S. objectives without resorting to major war. Yet even the term the U.S. military uses to refer to steady-state military “shaping” operations, “phase 0,” implies that they are the starting point for a larger multi-phase campaign.

 

The U.S. military’s dominant paradigm for operations is a six-phase planning construct, consisting of phase 0 (shape), phase I (deter), phase II (seize initiative), phase III (dominate), phase IV (stabilize), and finally, phase V (enable civil authority). This implies a linear progression of conflict through a culminating phase (phase III) of major combat operations, and then a “post-conflict” period of stabilization and transition. Within this paradigm, the central decisive point is assumed to be phase III, and the bulk of the U.S. military’s attention for resourcing, modernizing, training, and allocating risk is found there. While the United States is getting ready for the big fight, however, its adversaries are working to accomplish their objectives short of open conflict.