>>9961971

We have been fortunate to not be attacked like General was last night. Perhaps protected. Btw, we had an odd visit by a shill at the end of last bread. Seemed like a non-English visitor (perhaps Asian?). They seemed to be scraping on the Lisa/Embankment post u made early in the bread. Makes one wonder why (they) should be concerned about the “joint-reason” Q mentioned re those pics. Just something to keep in the back of one’s mind.

Things that cone to mind are the U1 transfer. Specifically NK. Game comms having been exposed in 2013. The December 2013 Guardian article on Game Comms.

>>9963586

Great posting, Anon. An inspiration for us here to keep on digging. Thanks very much.

>>9963453

>Things that cone to mind

Sorry typo. Not cone. Come.

Others may have already identified this as a cyclist, but it looks like a cyclist at the bike rack wearing a 2-tone red/black cyclist jacket with hood (in the CORINTHIA HOTEL pic). See similar jacket advert on Amazondotcom. Not perfect match but you get the idea.

>>9965785

Fixed that for you, anon. Tracked it back to Ytube. Re-embedding for you.

>>9966863

Noice werk, Anon. Def some work to be done looking at hours of operation. Time of flight? Is it a case of the PS TATTERSHALL. CASTLE being closed early that night when the RS HISPANIOLA was shown still open for business? Or perhaps just a case of one restaurant ship turning out the lights at closing whilst the other left some “Christmas” celebration lights on after closing?

Werk to be done. Good posting.

>>9966863

The title given to the photo-essay, “WHILE LONDONERS SLEEP”, may be our clue that he was on a “red-eye” flight preparing to land at Heathrow. It is of course the author’s choice of phrase but he also reveals a key bit of information. And that is that he is a Londoner, that he has just flown over his house and will be landing in 5 minutes, and that it will take him 2 hours to get back home upon landing. My take is he is a Londoner, and he knows it’s very late and most people are in bed.

My guess is the RS HISPANIOLA has left the lights on after-hours as it was Christmas time.

>>9969156

>Any dates ring a bell regarding tattersall castle?

If you mean around 2013/2014,

consider this: (from an article on how North Korea was able to acquire it’s current nuclear capabilities).

“In early 2015, debris from a North Korean satellite launch were analyzed by experts and found to contain components manufactured in the U.K. and routed through Chinese companies, according to a United Nations Panel of Experts report.

The following year, foreign journalists on a tour of a Pyongyang factory spotted a shipment of boxes from Calgary-based chemical producer Dow Canada, the Washington Post reported.”

https://globalnews.ca/news/3448765/north-korea-nuclear-weapons/

The article above does not accuse the UK or Canada of wrongdoing. But the use a China as a middle-man for the lucrative exchange of technology from UK/CA did occur during this period. The article states companies could have been duped. But their governments never discovered any evidence of this? Until a NK satellite fell from the sky with components made in the UK?

Might not be what Anon is alluding to, but a sample of what was going on at the time.

What did you have in mind, Anon?

>>9979046

>UK bread #17: https://qanon.news/archives/x/9566053

Well, not derelict as of Oct. 29, 2014, when we have that pic if her with a banner on her railing advertising for private Christmas party bookings. You do raise a good point though. Did the TATTERSHALL CASTLE make a go of (at the end of 2014) it right until the end of the year to bring in as much money before going for repairs, or begin to limit operations before refurb?

I think the reason we have not focused on her operations late in 2014 is because of the “bookend” that was created by the fatal motorcyclist accident on Northumberland which involved the traffic sign shown in the Q pic of the CORINTHIA HOTEL. That traffic sign was thereafter removed and replaced with a safer sign. That is the reason we haven’t been looking beyond March 5, 2014.

But again, in answer to your question about the TATTS already being derelict or in non-operation as early as December 2013, no, we have pictures of her in operation as late as October 2014 before the 2015 refurbishment.

A temporary closure in Dec. 2013? Maybe, but the author of the photo-essay makes a key statement about just flying over his house. He titled his photo-essay, While Londoners Sleep. It must be the wee hours or he wouldn’t have titled his photo-essay that way.

>>9979046

>UK bread #17: https://qanon.news/archives/x/9566053

Well, not derelict as of Oct. 29, 2014, when we have that pic if her with a banner on her railing advertising for private Christmas party bookings. You do raise a good point though. Did the TATTERSHALL CASTLE make a go of (at the end of 2014) it right until the end of the year to bring in as much money before going for repairs, or begin to limit operations before refurb?

I think the reason we have not focused on her operations late in 2014 is because of the “bookend” that was created by the fatal motorcyclist accident on Northumberland which involved the traffic sign shown in the Q pic of the CORINTHIA HOTEL. That traffic sign was thereafter removed and replaced with a safer sign. That is the reason we haven’t been looking beyond March 5, 2014.

But again, in answer to your question about the TATTS already being derelict or in non-operation as early as December 2013, no, we have pictures of her in operation as late as October 2014 before the 2015 refurbishment.

A temporary closure in Dec. 2013? Maybe, but the author of the photo-essay makes a key statement about just flying over his house. He titled his photo-essay, While Londoners Sleep. It must be the wee hours or he wouldn’t have titled his photo-essay that way.