>>9974957 LB
absolutely knot you get to make yours but i want you to know real data.
I have made my choice and it is mine alone but if you are not exposed to all the facts you cannot make a good choice - but the choice is yours - even to look at the info or not.
I have over and over in in the data post - not all studies find the same results and I explained that..
Basically Covid is very odd - it causes very different reactions in each individual some way to many antibodies, some none, some way to many inflammatory (cell mediated response) and some it causes the inflammatory and lymphocytes to decline to nothing.
it is very odd.
Real data just one copy pasta real studies. many more and nothing really fits but it is a very odd bioweapone
2007 Paper by Chi Scientists on how they would make the bioweapon corona mixed with HIV – COVID
https://jvi.asm.org/content/jvi/early/2007/12/12/JVI.01085-07.full.pdf
COVID19 in Spleen and Lymph nodes and the 169+ Macrophage and Lymphocyte damage:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.27.20045427v1
More on CD169+ Macrophage and how it works:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212557/
Cats and Ferrets highly susceptible to COVID19, shows infection spread between them:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/04/07/science.abb7015
OFR8 the part (nonfunctional0 area of SARS investigations to change to make SARS more infectious:
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/213/4/579/2459467
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26269185
2015 Paper on Corona Viruses and how to make them a Pandemic:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
TMPRSS2 Mechanism part of pathogenesis for COVID19:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/tmprss2
More on Pseudo HIV
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166093407003254
Lymphocyte and Cytokine response to COVID
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7165294/
Immune changes in COVID19
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22221751.2020.1746199
Lymphocyte death in COVID19 and sepsis
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30920-X/fulltext
COVID19 infect T Lymphocytes:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-020-0424-9
Pathogenic T cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storm in severe COVID-19 patients
https://watermark.silverchair.com/nwaa041.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAmswggJnBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggJYMIICVAIBADCCAk0GCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMF6W8b0w-b2YKqSzDAgEQgIICHntq0ZkXz9tobPCeMJapgsAuPYBKl7SVX8iWVVBp1j66S-FMLJvZ3UCBq6D9ORdw1STi-GYaFpMqEIJaMoINFzAdLbLf6bAUmWgXppOYawPzDDO2gbqIW5CtSAoHC_cwD3LMeXw7rVotZx4ZWjXdNlqvLDJWaw6PVjFm3p_uaKkpA6tHCstd3-xSXud9ZFYB-caizZIqfaRy_Yv5dmQQYxWXjFDxcNZxjyQ2tE-Q2k83yB4Bca6BgFxl4rpcp0DTgZE5IrJrxiGCLh-QMnLQXHGsJNuJhB7l66_UgBOC0GRS6dW0vlCKbUjmDrk-D7QReYEsGoolB4w_Vb2l81SS3hfkccuSKajZLa-92c0F9f6Q2sECOXLUa0Juy8LR4ORJSkh4o5va_DLMtWxoIlIjKe6Vicea1fnUdbgZbEsBQGhBbJSMIKQirt5cj7O3cb9bUvI2Pc6gLMytu69jj-8VNtluc0jHHY1Pk4mnUlXFRkM9FdF6Ye-v2BEQLap1v_KUWJRk4vT2_2daHOxEMINaOpzr67APkld1sjyfhqCF70yhNb2hZE8HGF4G2amH1nrQZo1Mf4ioYc3N23JSLC-V9E_NHGQ7eFKWvqoFUjFVVXsNPfvmg6PgUvY6QbD6MvScC_Va5kYyWOv6PEL7QuT_lKR9uKxdvOzZYXigXFJ6VScZGD8INjz6NXBPw_1YXl37WlceCGvDMMDUK3wHveW_
Coronavirus could attack immune system like HIV by targeting protective cells
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079443/coronavirus-could-target-immune-system-targeting-protective
Please note 2 of these scholarly articles say bad antibody response and one says good.
No evidence antibodies protect against COVID19.
https://time.com/5827450/who-coronavirus-antibodies-reinfection/
science studies:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221519
The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-0321-6
Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309920301961
Conclusion no neutralizing antibodies in natural infection
Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Human Coronaviruses
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471490620300570
Human monoclonal antibody to COVID19
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-020-0426-7
I will not tell you or anyone what to do but i did the research and can read the detailed tech articles and know I would prefer not to get this virus or my family to and know it is more than even the studies show and will not allow politiccs to interfeer with my reasoning on health - so i will wear a n95 - you can wear nything or not you want but if you do n95.
That would destroy it -even in a sleeve.
Once it is hard to breeth, wet or a few days exchange for new.
n95 not mask
and it requires good seal to face or leakage why 3M cone best but almost impossible to get now but can make others work to near 100 percent of 3M.
yes just not human
Mask is your issue - n95 is protective - or go full face sheild n100 when you finally figure it out if you are not infected yet. But in reality just a mask is bs
N95 is 95% chance you will not get infected - less is bs.
I will either apologize in 3 months or be sad you all got sick
Politics is not biology
i allow you all to have your own opinion your own choices and actions
i am allowed mine
I choose to base mine of facts and clinical research and caution not emotion and politice
but that is just me.
I can hand pick any study I want too i would rather read the full sepctrum.
Some kid tried that nearly broke his arm.
that is not true at all!!!
that is surgical masks in reverse.
The N95 filters both ways if sealed well - completely false.
I will stand by my choice - and then if wrong admit it yes. So far I am far from wrong.
Statistics your data is very different that what I can find any can be bs
So i will go by medical papers, caution and by what i have seen happen.
vent is best yes hard to find. Cone is best best seal or air tends to get out by cheeks or nose pinch without modification.
filter in front of vent - pretty basic.
no any supposition not totally scientific is suspect.
I know how salesmen spin thier product.
3M did it right vent near where exhale put filter over vent and thus better seal to the edges of mask and less leak.
you can go that far or just look for jumps of logic - or suppostions in conclusions.
suppositions in the next paper proposed is ok though.
logical well designed experimental procedure, results and conclusion based on results then options for next step to research which can have suppostions on propsed experiment as theory . The esperiment proves one thing disproves or is inconclusive those are the only options.
me too I don't like suppositions in an experiment and case studies easy to do - so facts.
I place my family over my personal comfort or political or emotional beliefs.
didn't you notice this flu season didn't go away when it got hot?
You are missing a few steps in this logic
It never stopped it is not the flu.
True but false negatives are huge issue too -
from sampling to lag time to shed, to intermettent shedding of virus et -
This not the flu and politicians and not even doctors have a handle on this virus - no one is sure. So choose to beleive it is nothing or it is bad - i don't care not my problem - I will place my family first in that scenario.
genetic studies really? Wow how much money and time you got for that?
Kek genetic studies within 4 months of a disease? Funny -
here is one for you
SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein variant D614G increases infectivity and retains sensitivity to antibodies that target the receptor binding domain
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.04.187757
or this one
Mining of epitopes on spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 from COVID-19 patients
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41422-020-0366-x
Well I tried to help people get it…. bioweapon no one has a handle on but chinese and they ain't talking… and you all want to play politics on a bioweapon - ok I gave lots of data and it really isn't my issue if you are not smart enough to get it.
best of luck.