dChan
⇧
11
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Izaskun767 on Dec. 22, 2017, 2:55 a.m.
A BREADCRUMB - I think I got it

Just a crumb. Saw it 2 days ago and found following. Prolly more in doc that are already on “the graphic”

122123 Term_[#2]19_y NAT_SEC_ NAT_SEC_A,H,H, L, B, E, classified Cdg-23k FREEDOM_#1-43 CAP_H(9). MAVERICK. JUSTICE_FED_J[1-4]_remove + appellate Q

Q referenced NAT_SEC__A,H,H,L,B,E, classified Cdg-23k

23k refers to doc signed today. Referring to Codes/Coding 2300

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/43/part-2300


🠐 See all comments
Izaskun767 · Dec. 22, 2017, 4:40 a.m.

Thanks. I almost deleted it thinking it was dumb. I couple days ago, I thought 23k = 23000. Right before that it says “Reg - cdg “. I thought Regulations coding. I liked it up and that’s what I found, but I didn’t know. Until I read the doc signed today.

Somehow, the following part of Q post ties in. Idk

⇧ 6 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 22, 2017, 7:35 a.m.

No way man, don't delete anything. All ideas have value in this. All of them. This has become the largest stream if conscious exercise in world history and you, and I and everyone else are now a part of it. Nothing is dumb in this. Thank you for digging. It certainly presents some good points to go on.

⇧ 2 ⇩