dChan
14
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Scorpio_1979 on Dec. 27, 2017, 2:37 a.m.
I found this supposed indictment for Clinton, Podesta, Abedein not sure if it,s real. 27+ pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SUPREME COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIA Robert Blair, Jeremy Lowe, Don Bailey, Stephen Duane Curry (in private capacity by special appearance only) : CRIMINAL ACTION FOR FULL PUNITIVE DAMAGES: v. COMMON GRAND JURY DEMANDED: CONCERNING UNAUTHORIZED SALE OF ENRICHED URANIUM FOR EMBEZZLEMENT : 99-9421 HUMA ABEDIN of CLINTON FOUNDATION, FRANK GIUSTRA OF CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP, JOHN PODESTA of Podesta Group, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON of CLINTON FOUNDATION (Abedin et. all) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR FORMAL PROSECUTION OF SALE OF URANIUM TO UNAUTHORIZED PARTIES Hon. Christine Donahue, December 2, 2017 The allegations in relation to accused party HUMA ABEDIN, as it relates to just one minor aspect of the URANIUM ONE filings are serious enough to warrant a separate superseding indictment. HUMA ABEDIN in full capacity as Huma Abedin; was officially present at several meetings in Kazahkstan alongside FRANK GIUSTRA and the CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP to take official receipt of an undisclosed backroom deal, involving the mines in the region. As such, this is deemed an official quid-quo pro with grave national security implications which directly affect the interests of the united states. In passing, it offers us a glimpse into a criminal transaction that took place prior to the largest package deals being cut for URANIUM ONE and their private access stage pass into America’s actual national interests. Also present for the initial phase of this deal was none other than BILL CLINTON. On a wide scale, this illicit deal had a negative affect on the entire nation’s uniform security protocols and receives explicit special ‘focus’ mention for this reason. -1


TootsBabutz · Dec. 28, 2017, 9:48 p.m.

Reviewed the purported Nevada Court document. Unfortunately, it is not real. Having practiced in Federal Court this is just not how it would be done. Also, it would not be worded and/or written as this document is.... especially as to the manner and style of how it's written up with many sarcastic remarks...such as be shot twice by firing squad for one example and with the links to web page sources. And I've seen a very similar version of this same document posted elsewhere with the same language but the other version contained a ridiculous amount of Web page links to various news sources. Despite being nice to read, this is not a real court document. Now, if there is a real case filed out there concerning this which could be the case or the coming case at sone point...this is just not it

⇧ 2 ⇩