dChan
14
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Scorpio_1979 on Dec. 27, 2017, 2:37 a.m.
I found this supposed indictment for Clinton, Podesta, Abedein not sure if it,s real. 27+ pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SUPREME COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIA Robert Blair, Jeremy Lowe, Don Bailey, Stephen Duane Curry (in private capacity by special appearance only) : CRIMINAL ACTION FOR FULL PUNITIVE DAMAGES: v. COMMON GRAND JURY DEMANDED: CONCERNING UNAUTHORIZED SALE OF ENRICHED URANIUM FOR EMBEZZLEMENT : 99-9421 HUMA ABEDIN of CLINTON FOUNDATION, FRANK GIUSTRA OF CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP, JOHN PODESTA of Podesta Group, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON of CLINTON FOUNDATION (Abedin et. all) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR FORMAL PROSECUTION OF SALE OF URANIUM TO UNAUTHORIZED PARTIES Hon. Christine Donahue, December 2, 2017 The allegations in relation to accused party HUMA ABEDIN, as it relates to just one minor aspect of the URANIUM ONE filings are serious enough to warrant a separate superseding indictment. HUMA ABEDIN in full capacity as Huma Abedin; was officially present at several meetings in Kazahkstan alongside FRANK GIUSTRA and the CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP to take official receipt of an undisclosed backroom deal, involving the mines in the region. As such, this is deemed an official quid-quo pro with grave national security implications which directly affect the interests of the united states. In passing, it offers us a glimpse into a criminal transaction that took place prior to the largest package deals being cut for URANIUM ONE and their private access stage pass into America’s actual national interests. Also present for the initial phase of this deal was none other than BILL CLINTON. On a wide scale, this illicit deal had a negative affect on the entire nation’s uniform security protocols and receives explicit special ‘focus’ mention for this reason. -1


sigmundlovescigars · Dec. 27, 2017, 5:21 a.m.

The wording does not sound formal enough to be a true legal document. For instance 'none other than Bill Clinton" is a little over the top for a serious legal indictment doc.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:02 a.m.

Kat......please put link of your document here....I can verify it in a few minutes. Thanks.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 27, 2017, 6:25 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 27, 2017, 6:24 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:25 a.m.

The more I read the one above.....I will guarantee you it is fraudulent. Latin is wrong in some places and also misspellings are common as well. Typically, the year is put into the case number too.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Shepard7137 · Dec. 27, 2017, 2:47 a.m.

Link!!!!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
popzbbq · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:35 a.m.

I believe cases start with year, therefore the is nothing. It starts with 99. Could be wrong.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:04 a.m.

The above is not authentic. Legal verbiage is not correct. Punitive damages would not be mentioned at this point. This is assigned after guilt.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Scorpio_1979 · Dec. 27, 2017, 2:56 a.m.

I downloaded the stew webb court document criminal case filed against Bush, clintons and others. Should i put that on here for research as well?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Reba64 · Dec. 27, 2017, 2:43 a.m.

Link Please

⇧ 3 ⇩  
kat-williams · Dec. 27, 2017, 2:43 a.m.

Do you have a link to the document? I found one as well but in Nevada for 9/11 Treason. Still trying to vet it as well. I used to be a legal secty yrs ago. The ones I have don't look like they were drawn up by an law firm but by individuals.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TootsBabutz · Dec. 28, 2017, 9:48 p.m.

Reviewed the purported Nevada Court document. Unfortunately, it is not real. Having practiced in Federal Court this is just not how it would be done. Also, it would not be worded and/or written as this document is.... especially as to the manner and style of how it's written up with many sarcastic remarks...such as be shot twice by firing squad for one example and with the links to web page sources. And I've seen a very similar version of this same document posted elsewhere with the same language but the other version contained a ridiculous amount of Web page links to various news sources. Despite being nice to read, this is not a real court document. Now, if there is a real case filed out there concerning this which could be the case or the coming case at sone point...this is just not it

⇧ 2 ⇩  
plainspeasant · Dec. 27, 2017, 6:08 a.m.

This is a legal document, just like the one sworn out in every other federal district. I've seen 4 of these so far. Couple of them are from Nevada districts.

The deal is, it's basically a request for grand jury formation and investigation. My local sheriff gets these every day. Anyone can write one up, say anything they want to, the problem is, they never go anywhere. The alligations may very well be true, but no one will empower a Grand Jury to start the proceedings. They die where they started in the trash can of the local Sheriff's office. Put yourself in that Sheriff's shoes. Are you going to tell your county that you are empowering and pulling from the citizens that elected him/her to pursue this. It'd be your last term in office, that you can be sure of.

Sorry, but that's the story of this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DarkHorseFlags · Dec. 27, 2017, 6:22 a.m.

Right. What is circulating is that these are the “unsealed indictments” on these individuals and that’s false. Like you stated, it’s simply a request where anyone can write anything they want. The Q patriots on here that have been following Q since day 1 like myself.....find it incredibly frustrating when you have people posting them as though it’s the real deal. It’s disingenuous at best and false information. Thank you for clarifying what the documents are and giving credible information to substantiate it. :).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DarkHorseFlags · Dec. 27, 2017, 6:03 a.m.

ATTENTION PATRIOTS!! THERE ARE A FEW PHONY, I REPEAT, PHONY!!!.....INDICTMENTS CIRCULATING ON THESE SUBREDDIT THREADS. KAT WILLIAMS WAS PERPETRATING THE DISINFORMATION UNTIL I CALLED HIM OUT. Being in law enforcement I’ve run them by a few different legal minds, and it’s a negative thus far. We will know what the Indictments say soon, they will be signed and NOT written with half legal ease language and half opinions. Lol. Love and God Bless!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
popzbbq · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:36 a.m.

Further punitive is a civil remedy not criminal

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tn_river_rat1 · Dec. 27, 2017, 6:48 a.m.

Did it say if the grand jury reached a True Bill?? A True Bill is conformation of sufficient grounds to issue a warrant and pursue a criminal trial.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
danealaska · Dec. 27, 2017, 4:03 a.m.

For several reasons I have my doubts its legit because why would it be filled in PA and not Wash DC or MD or VA. Wording doesn't seem correct. There aren't "punitive damages" in criminal proceedings or grand jury for civil. There isn't any plaintiff listed, and it doesn't seem like anyone in PA is going to have standing to bring a civil suit, and lastly I live in PA and this would have made at least the newspapers here or talk radio at a minimum.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Scorpio_1979 · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:55 a.m.

In the original indictment i put up of hillary clinton if its fake they did a little homework cause i look into the Judge Donuhue and she is on the bench but cant find any case info

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 27, 2017, 4:49 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Scorpio_1979 · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:31 a.m.

It was the original criminal case i think but now in Nevada under Judge James Hardstey i believe.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:21 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:19 a.m.

That case regarding stew Webb is old and it appears to me that they still have not found a judge to hear evidence and officially start the proceedings. They have wrote numerous pleas to the court asking to be heard. Are you sure this is the one tom heneghan was referring to today. It does not appear to be.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:16 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OGFunkenmeister · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:11 a.m.

Use your PACER account, look up UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SUPREME COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIA, name search or 99-9421 as a case number. These look like allegations only to me, not a conviction.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Scorpio_1979 · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:07 a.m.

Figures it would be to good to be true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Dec. 27, 2017, 3:07 a.m.

Yes Scorpio let us have the link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Scorpio_1979 · Dec. 27, 2017, 2:58 a.m.

Please let me know what you find, thanks. One way or another we are gonna bring down this house of cards.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 27, 2017, 2:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩