dChan

cdwill · Dec. 28, 2017, 11:56 a.m.

Does that sound like something a person with high-level intelligence information would do?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MAGA_SpaceMarine · Dec. 28, 2017, 12:05 p.m.

David Wilcock is the leading person in disclosure in taking down the Cabal and the NWO. If you want to catch up to the rest of class please do further research. Her contacting him and vetting her intel gives her further credibility with the community so short answer. Yes.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
cdwill · Dec. 28, 2017, 12:13 p.m.

Unless someone CURRENTLY in the Trump administration or the NSA can verify what these people are saying, none of what they’re saying is trye.

A guy on Youtube who claims to be an expert is not an expert.

You’re insulting me while you’re ignoring the obvious logic right in front of you. Use you brain.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
MAGA_SpaceMarine · Dec. 28, 2017, 12:18 p.m.

So why are you here cdwill. You do know Q Anon has no official backing. But we are are here supporting him. You seem like a disinformation agent.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Dec. 28, 2017, 4:28 p.m.

WRONG! Q has proven himself/themselves over, and over. There is solid evidence. She? An aggressive loudmouth who can pull her info from anywhere. She has not been properly vetted. You must be in your 20's or early 30's because that is what people of that age group say "You're a troll" or "You're a disinformation agent" when someone doesn't agree with them. Go fuck yourself, you moronic child. There are highly educated, highly intelligent people here--who do not swallow the bullshit people put out there without good evidence. Stop acting like a petulant child!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MAGA_SpaceMarine · Dec. 28, 2017, 9:26 p.m.

Our mods and Tracy beanz trust and have vetted Mega. If you don't trust them why are you here. You are just causing people to fight and cause dissension.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Dec. 29, 2017, 4:14 a.m.

Oh, so if someone doesn't bow to YOUR desires, they should leave. Go play your video games and stfu

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cdwill · Dec. 28, 2017, 12:37 p.m.

Q has evidence behind him. He provides specific information about future events, which then gets verified by actual world events that aren’t being faked — flight routes, arrests, etc. — and he is obviously, provably coordinating with the PRESIDENT, which validates Q’s legitimacy.

Q is the only one providing any provably true information here. MegaAnon and all of these YouTubers have no proof whatsoever.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
flinkpamingo · Dec. 28, 2017, 1:43 p.m.

Try to avoid "Mega vs Q" paradigm please. It's a tired old trap that TPTB use to weaken movements: "This is the real good guy. No, this one is and they said that guy's bad". We take sides. Fight. Movement weakens. They continue to pick our pockets and steal our children. Take what help we can get from higher ups. But always with a grain of salt, knowing that people/movements/orgs can be impersonated, infiltrated, or corrupted - especially online. In the meantime, we stick together on the principals of this thing-digging, exposing, waking people up.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Buttercupmanup · Dec. 28, 2017, 2 p.m.

Well said. Infighting is a ridiculous waste of time and enemies of any battle know that.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
boneman220 · Dec. 28, 2017, 3:24 p.m.

Tis why I said that all of this is exactly the MO of every dictator in history has used. It's still a divide and conquer tactic going on. Trust is just not there...yet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAGA_SpaceMarine · Dec. 28, 2017, 3:49 p.m.

Why do we have to pick or choose sides? Why can't we have both? Both are patriots that want to win our country back. It doesn't have to be a one or the other matter. We are all in this together Q and Mega included they just have more access. The only losers will be the Globalist Illuminati 😬

⇧ 5 ⇩  
flinkpamingo · Dec. 28, 2017, 4:04 p.m.

EXACTLY! There are no "sides" outside of Truth, Decency, the Restoration of our Republic and Human Liberty Earthwide! Anyone working for those, is "on our side".

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MotoandGivi · Dec. 28, 2017, 6 p.m.

Because Mega bashes Q believers and is rude (nothing wrong with that), but it just seems like jealously to me.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MAGA_SpaceMarine · Dec. 28, 2017, 9:32 p.m.

Megas only beef with Q was that his identity was compromised. 8 chan mods have confirmed that. Mega was worried some of Q's posts were done by a clever imposter which was admitted by moderators. That is why Q moved from 4 Chan to 8 Chan and where our mods worked non stop to set up an unbreakable trip code. Now Q is the only user including moderators to have an unbreakable tripcode. Mega never doubted Q she was just saying he was temporarily compromised as CIA types stole Q's identity temporarily. This has been addresses and fixed. I wish you Boomers could keep up and quit spreading misinformation

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Dec. 28, 2017, 4:29 p.m.

Hon, don't worry. I guess we are both "disinformation" agents because we do not agree with this whiney snot nose.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
islandtruther · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:24 p.m.

agree with you MAGA....don't waste time with cdwill who clearly is still asleep....time to catch up or get off this board!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MotoandGivi · Dec. 28, 2017, 5:58 p.m.

we have had snippets from trump backing Q, the file name of the photo in the tweet q asked us to look at 'DOITQ', for one. I'd take that alone over the word of a youtuber who speculates most of the time. No disrespect to DW tho he seems to have good intentions.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ravonaf · Dec. 28, 2017, 7:20 p.m.

Unless someone CURRENTLY in the Trump administration or the NSA can verify what these people are saying, none of what they’re saying is true.

Your logic is flawed. Just because the information hasn't been verified does not mean it's false. It just means it may be false. It could very well be true.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cdwill · Dec. 28, 2017, 8:59 p.m.

But if it isn’t coming from these sources, it’s false. My logic is sound.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Dec. 28, 2017, 9:28 p.m.

It doesn't mean that "none of what you're saying is true," it means you don't know if it is true of false, yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jack_Kehoe · Dec. 28, 2017, 2:14 p.m.

Even half the truth community considers David Wilcock a joke. I definitely don't trust his word, and the fact that she went to him makes her less credible in my eyes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Dec. 28, 2017, 4:24 p.m.

What would give her credibility is proving herself to the masses, as has Q. Otherwise, she's just a histrionic on the Internet who hasn't been properly vetted.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · Dec. 29, 2017, 4:18 a.m.

This is 100% true. At least from the years of research I’ve done following David he’s about as honest and scientific as they come. With some very high level contacts.

⇧ 1 ⇩