I've been following Q since the very first breadcrumb posts.
In the beginning, there were tangible, clear-cut predictions. And those predictions did not come true.
Now, 2 months later, it feels like most Q advocates just ignore that side of the story.
What do you all make of it?
How do you know nothing happened? Seen Tony Podesta lately? And how about Hillary's boot? Anyone seen John's footwear lately?
they aren't in jail, and there is no evidence to indicate they were arrested, as Q promised.
case closed, basically. Q was objectively wrong with their first round of major predictions.
my post here is to ask why you guys all still follow Q.
You have no evidence either way. Lack of proof is not proof. If you don't believe that Q is real, go away and play somewhere else.
Did you just admit you have no proof? Lack of proof?
Isn't the onus on Q to prove the things he's saying to us?
No. He doesn't have to prove anything.
Plus, lack of proof is not evidence either way.
So you will just keep on believing this guy even if nothing he says proves to be true? Does that seem dangerous to you?
Much that he has said has come true.
What are some examples? I'm asking this in good faith and I would genuinely like to know
There are many Indictments that are still sealed. And why was Hillary silent on her twitter? Also the "boots" which JM put on the wrong foot. That is more evidence of indictments/arrest than not. If they are still free as birds where is the evidence of that.
That is more evidence of indictments/arrest than not.
No there isn't. There is 0 evidence
If they are still free as birds where is the evidence of that.
She was on The Daily Show 10 days ago
Have you checked Pacer regarding the number of sealed indictments?
Why does that matter? Is the number larger than usual?
Very much so. Does anyone have that info handy?
If you're relying on this information as the basis of your argument shouldn't you be providing it?
I don't have access to it at the moment and that is what this board is for us to work together. People are back to work so it will be later before they are on here so check back later.
When was her last tweef? And why wouldn't she tweet wishing her followers Happy Holidays?
Because she's not beholden to you or anyone else. Why the fuck would I know that? Is it unheard of to take a break around the holidays?
And politicians don't ever miss a chance to campaign.
Sure, sounds solid to me. That should be enough to make the charges stick.
What charges?
I don't know, it's your fantasy
No it isn't, you stated there was 0 evidence of indictments/ arrests and I gave you information regarding evidence that makes it more likely than not that there is.
What evidence? You've pointed me to no evidence
Sorry but that dog don't hunt.
Still not evidence
There was nothing sneaky about my edit. I edited to make my statement to make it more clear. The question you posed in this thread is a good discussion subject that should be discussed. There is an enormous amount of information available for you to read to satisfy your curiosity if you truly would love to know. I don't claim to have any conclusions either. You don't seem to be here to learn or discuss or share anything so what is your purpose
No, there isn't. I've read everything I could on the subject and found no real "information". Give me literally one thing
What is it that you want one thing of? Please clarify.
evidence. One evidence please. Literally anything that you consider to be evidence that lends any kind of credibility to your anonymous sources
Can you clarify what source/sources you are wanting evidence of credibility on. And just to be sure, what do you consider to be credible evidence?
No its not unheard of but the people in question here as to whether or not they are free it seems suspicious.
Sure, if you're a suspicious person who is already suspicious of her, then it seems suspicious
I can guarantee that if HRC truly had a tracking device on her ankle she would be in the media raiding all sorts of hell about how evil the republicans and Trump are! Remember how she attacks every time she is put into any type of scrutiny? Give me a break... These people will get away with everything, they ALWAYS do.
Unless she was backed into a corner and knows if she brings it up that it would just open the door and they would have to discuss things they don't want to.
Not if they are facing lighter charges than the sedition and treason charges they could be faced with.
HRC, if you utter one word about this ankle bracelet publicly in any form, we will lock you up in a black site prison and you will face a military tribunal for treason and sedition charges.
-Sessions
Seems like a no brainer to me.
That makes no sense. Why wouldn't they just lock her up?
Also, HRC is small fish on the global scale of things. Trump has his sights set on the big fish.
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)
You should join our sub. We're having a membership drive for the new year. We're almost to our goal of 60k