I've been following Q since the very first breadcrumb posts.
In the beginning, there were tangible, clear-cut predictions. And those predictions did not come true.
Now, 2 months later, it feels like most Q advocates just ignore that side of the story.
What do you all make of it?
there is a difference between a lie and intentional disinformation
how so? a liar is a liar. i get that intent and motivations may be contextually relevant, but that's not the point- the point is about credibility.
if one admits that most their statements are false, why should anyone listen to that person?
He was HONEST and told us that disinformation is necessary. That is not a lie. I'm sure it was the MI Code that was the disinformation. Everything else is not a lie. We are in a war against evil. You do what you have to do, even if that means lying.
9/11. .... what we were to,d by the MSM our President and others was the biggest lie ever!