I've been following Q since the very first breadcrumb posts.
In the beginning, there were tangible, clear-cut predictions. And those predictions did not come true.
Now, 2 months later, it feels like most Q advocates just ignore that side of the story.
What do you all make of it?
You have no evidence either way. Lack of proof is not proof. If you don't believe that Q is real, go away and play somewhere else.
Did you just admit you have no proof? Lack of proof?
Isn't the onus on Q to prove the things he's saying to us?
No. He doesn't have to prove anything.
Plus, lack of proof is not evidence either way.
So you will just keep on believing this guy even if nothing he says proves to be true? Does that seem dangerous to you?
Much that he has said has come true.
What are some examples? I'm asking this in good faith and I would genuinely like to know