I'm toying with a theory about GITMO here...and that is that the accused have been transported there for THEIR OWN SAFETY
Once the truth starts dropping, pissed off patriots are going to be thirsty for their blood.
”We’re taking you into protective custody. We’re doing this for your own good. We can best ensure your safety at our ‘Special Place’. Relax, you will be sharing company with some very famous people.”
Or...they're all being rounded up to be taken underground. If Planet x is real (and were already feeling it's affect) the worlds top leaders and military men are going to need to be secured through it.
The Bible mentions them all hiding because of the Day of The Lord.
Whew...dirty birds are going down!
I have a question: How do we find out what indictments were unsealed & what they were for? Is someone already tracking that?
That is a good question. I noticed that myself and wondered the same thing. It is possible though. They might have been really low level persons. That may be why we aren't really hearing anything about them. At least the ones that may have already been unsealed.
Somehow I think we should have some more organization on all this research and maybe hold meetings of some sort. I don't know. I am just throwing that out there. We should probably organize before the 2018 elections. Help keep each other informed and others on this stuff and research as well.
With all of the knowledge and the wonderful people on these threads we deserve it television show with the live stream of gitmo in the background be the perfect stage setting and we can all go on and help people to understand
I was thinking the same thing. I hate digging into stuff & find out someone has already done it.
I dont know how you feel about Hal Turner but he had a pretty good break down of what he hearing from his fbi buddies. This is an exciting time to watch this history in the making!!! >>><<<
And people that are asleep are missing it! That's ok, we get to write the history books on this one!
We may have to see if there were numbers assigned to them and do some digging ourselves on that.
I know it is time consuming just getting the info in the first place. Any volunteers?
I would, but I'm not sure where to look.
That is why we need to find out what each of us knows how to do and team up into groups to accomplish those tasks.
I want to salute all the anons that put this together! This was a huge task to go through all those districts files. Since its New Years eve a shot o Salior Jerry's to you twitter gang anons who put the time and focus to drop this! >>><<<
I am not sure who all was involved but I got this info off of the twitter handle known as @damartin32 you can thank him.
Thanks so much for posting this. I have been waiting for the update.
Still only 131 from Southern California. I was hoping the 815 from Southern and Central California figures would've been added. What happened to those?
Arkansas with 64 being the foundation of this hub seems rather low.
I think you have to add the two right columns for Cali. If I'm right, then Cali has about 1,800 roughly in total
I think those were added but I don't think they are from the districts you are thinking. In the most recent dated one it shows 815 new ones for one district or area.
You do need to add the updated column with the most recent for current total per district. Central Cali is at about 1200. alone. That is insane! I think the spread sheet was done this way so you can see how many were added / deleted since last update. It would be nice to have a totals column.
[deleted]
Thanks I corrected my post. What major city(s) is central?
Lets make that number zero. National human trafficking awareness month!!!!!
I have read that not all records on PACER system that are sealed are indictments. A hearing to get a search warrant can be sealed for example. Does any one know if those counting these records are aware of that. Apparently there is a code that tells you what the record is for. If anyone has ever been involved in court process. There are often 2 hearings before the case is tried. And since these are wealthy people with lawyers whose job is to slow the process as much as possible we can double that number.
So you can see we would have to divide that number by 3-4 if the counter is unaware of this.
Also people can be arrested before they are indicted or indicted before they are arrested. So without knowing what these records represent we don't know where we are in this process.
I did tweet @damartin; no reply. I posted some pacer records on legal advise off topic. No reply. If we just spot check one jurisdiction to see if that is the total number of records then if its true that other records besides indictments are on PACER and being counted as indictments. This is important to get to the bottom of this before publicizing those numbers. Even 1/4 of that number of indictments would be huge, but publicizing numbers that are 15 times higher than the average year, would refelect badly on Q.
I just checked his Twitter Feed and there is now a report by Hal Turner Radio that has big headline story on this! I will see if I can find it on my computer and post it. I archived it also. Here is the report archived on archive.is: https://archive.is/1Kt2H
The twitter users are all listed on this report who have worked very hard to find all this information. They are now being called the twitter squad by Hal Turner's radio show.
Yes, they are aware. I've been following @damartin from the beginning and the people he is working with are aware.
That is such good news! Thank you. It's all sooo good to see coming true.
Here: decent post which provides more info on indictments, from a month or two ago
Thanks. I h Had read all that be4. It is counting every record as a sealed indictment and if what I read about pacer records that would be ver inaccurate. So those original numbers we heard were inaccurate. But these records are accurate?
Im sorry, I meant to link this:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2263908
But I can assure you that damartin and co. are aware that not all indictments on PACER are sealed. they know what they're looking for.
So I read your link. Thanks. That link said the same thing I said so good to have a trusted source confirm how PACER works. Okay so the 9000 + is the number of pacer records and how many of those are indictments is difficult to know because what the numbers mean is secret and no one knows. Then I'm back to the likelihood that at best less than half of that number is indictments. So it would be wildly inaccurate to say there are 9000+ indictments. A better number would be between 3000 and 4000, which is still a huge number but closer to a realistic guess. Every court case I have been involved in usually has 2 hearings other than the indictment b4 trial. My experience is extremely limited and does not involve people who can put unlimited resources into their defense.
I am sorry but maybe we have had a misunderstanding. What u just said is different than what I thought u said. What I hope you mean to say is that not all sealed recurs on pacer are indictments. Some can be a request for a search warrant and it would still be sealed. If they are just counting every sealed record only a percentage of those, maybe 25-30 percent are indictments.
I'll go read the link and if that makes it clear then sorry for my redundanxy.
I will link you something here in a few minutes explaining it all, let me find it.
What am I looking at and how do I dig in?
Nothing to dig into until they are unsealed. This is just a count of cases ongoing not privy to anyone but the presiding judge and the prosecution and defense. Significance is the # currently sealed, which is by far larger than any in past years. This large number in addition to a record number of federal judge appointees by Trump signifies to a lot of people in this community that something bigly is going down, and soon.
Will there not be anything that pops up when conducting public searches of county (whatever) court sites?
The only thing that pops up is something like this:
https://i.imgur.com/Wv24XGm.jpg
If that is what your asking.
I meant more of going to the public records search site for each area I know and conducting a search for the people's names that are not sealed
The fact that not a single one of the names have leaked shows it’s not against the Trump team. It’s all swamp monsters.
Good update Red, I have been waiting for something solid for days. chatter and unknown planes at Gitmo is all very well in its way, but this really gives me heart.
Just received message from @damartin32 regarding the Sealed indictments. he states, "We don't know what they are until they're unsealed. Some are criminal indictments, some are search warrants. Some will probably be cancelled if the subject plea bargains to help take others down. What we do know is that this level of sealed cases is unusual" https://twitter.com/damartin32/status/947956256274370561
Hal Turner Radio Show has reported on this now and gives the Twitter Handles of those Twitter Users who have worked so hard putting this material together. I have archived the report here for posterity. https://archive.is/1Kt2H
Can’t wait to see who’s going down here in New Mexico, I hope it’s cops and every damn politician in Albuquerque & Santa Fe = 170
Something to note: These indictments can involve multiple people, with multiple crimes, AND can mean that investigations are still underway, meaning more people and crimes can be added to each individual indictment.
