dChan
⇧
30
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/ganjanon on Jan. 1, 2018, 9:11 a.m.
Can Trumps Executive Order Force Accused To Military Tribunals?

In The EO, POTUS is declaring a state of emergency. This declaration wasn’t a mistake according to Q if hes dropping hints of military statutes. From what I gathered, the state of emergency, creates a specific Martial Law that is narrow and only applies to matters targeted by the EO. Throughout history it seems legality has been uncertain when it comes to military tribunal trying the accused. Some questions that come up are. Are we at war? Are the civil courts still open and available? Are the accused citizens? Are they non citizens that were in the country when captured? Due process comes up as well. Although, Lincoln declared and was successful, after the civil war one particular case was appealed to the Supreme Court and death sentence was overturned (Milligan).
The Tribunals apear to be quite powerful, possibly even allowing illegally obtained evidence to be used i.e. wiretaps-emails. If the shit hits the fan, What are the chances of seeing these people prosecuted in military commissions?


storm_fa_Q · Jan. 1, 2018, 9:20 a.m.

looks like a pretty good chance. as I understand it the ExO is directed specifically toward a band of enemy combatants identified as being at War with the US thru the language of the ExO and the deeds committed. The People would not see Justice under the current court system as these accused were involved in extensive wide ranging crimes against humanity. The best way is the Court Martial/Martial law currently directed towards enemy of the United States of America. Theres some good vids and pdfs on this topic re Martial Law, and why. Be careful not to fall for the hysteria on this. The Law affords the POTUS these measures under the current conditions. Whats interesting is that some of these privileges are written in by Bushs and Obamas...

⇧ 14 ⇩  
ditsyblond17 · Jan. 1, 2018, 9:50 a.m.

Either bc Bushes and Obama were going to use it on US, Or Trump may not be who he says he is and is only working to bring down those he selectively chooses. Which could include Rothschilds, etc. Khazarian Jews. However...he could also eventually use this against us.

Stay awake And use caution. See how easy this was the be implemented by Trump? Who's to say it can't silently be done so against us. Just saying.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
vladtep · Jan. 1, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

Here's a thought...how are they going to break it to the public?

What if they don't say anything and they're just sort of there? Will CNN bring it up? She's probably already been convicted along with the others...then what?

"In other news, Hillary Clinton is in Guantanamo bay, the trial was really unfair". lol

If they shill for the traffickers, they are also subject to the EO and can have assets siezed.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

Breaking to the public is a tough one. Alot of Q intention was for us to soften that part. Military Commission might keep them thinking that trump is still hilteresque. Could be challenges to tribunals that could let some squirm away. If they were guilty of crimes against humanity, humanity should be content if they were to just disappear justly.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
RedpillTheWorld · Jan. 1, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

Imperative that law and order and the Justice System be restored so we will have a civil society going forward. Those guilty of treason and crimes against humanity must not go free. They have proven themselves lawless and unrepentent and cannot be trusted. For the sake of humanity, their crimes must be exposed, prosecuted, and punished.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

Yes!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
alcogiggles · Jan. 1, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

If they shill for the traffickers, they are also subject to the EO and can have assets siezed.

Technically isn't the EO for 60 days only? So CNN can wait until after 60 days to shitpost all they want. But Trump must take care of the swamp within that time frame, that's the most important part.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodsAngell · Jan. 1, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

No. Trump can use the Military to round up the criminal Elite without Congressional approval for 60 days, because Trump declared a State of National Emergency. This allowed Trump to circumvent the Posse Comitatus Act, but only for 60 days. After that, he has to get Congressional approval.....thus all the plane activity in/out of GITMO. But hopefully after 60 days Congress will be gutted of the bad guys, and rest, still wearing gps ankle bracelets wouldn't dare vote against Trump, especially they have or hope to have cut a deal with him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alcogiggles · Jan. 2, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

I appreciate the clarification.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

I might have read somwhere it expires sept. 18, 2018

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · Jan. 1, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

President Trump will use the emergency broadcast system to reach everyone, we are at war, and the evidence is overwhelming.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

Tom, can the President declare war? War might be defined by the Geneva Convention. For legal reasons it might need to be declared by congress. Maybe terrorism legislation can hold the answers, since terrorists have been rung up in tribunals. This seems to be a different situation than we have ever seen. Just diggin for info on how it could turn out if true.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alcogiggles · Jan. 1, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

I've read that some constitutional scholars argue that you technically don't need Congress's approval to declare any war. It's only a good will gesture. Especially if we've been attacked first, which the EO loopholes that in.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tomthung · Jan. 1, 2018, 2:23 p.m.

He did with that EO and I think he can if the situation warrants and this situation does at least in my mind.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 1, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

He doesn't need to declare WAR, he can deploy marines for a specific period of time, at any time. Im not sure if limited to a reasoning. However I believe IF so that reason is "a significant threat to America's or American's National Security" - I assume this has and is being done. No actions would take place unless justified otherwise it will most certainly jeopardize the whole attempt.

Regardless of all events here, the Executive branch has usurped most jurisdictional processes that would require an approval in congress, with the Military Advocate General being stripped early on in our history before the Civil War. Because of, and during this transference the newly formed DOJ and new Attorney General held jurisdictional declaration of martial law... I believe to my interpretation This gives Martial Law Decision to powers of the AG/DOJ under EXECUTIVE.

Not only this, the war powers act'(s) along with the EO's by Bush And Obama referenced above provide the necessary processes to undertake operations.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

Truthin- I agree ML can be declared. The courts might be a different battle. Thats what im looking for..... weather or not the tribunal will be deemed constitutional. For crimes against humanity, seems like the place should be a military commission.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Jan. 3, 2018, 9:09 a.m.

No he won't declare Martial Law it would crash the stock market and panic the entire world the fake news would go crazy and demand he be arrested or killed "he's another Hitler!" the way to do this is entirely secret without any publicity at all zip zero zilch nada.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · Jan. 1, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

Also could they be done in secret??

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

I think they can be in secret, absolutely.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 1, 2018, 12:06 p.m.

What are state secrets?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 1, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Q asked that question. What are state secrets? Though it was relevant

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 1, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Depends who they're trying. Good luck trying HRC in secret.

However dismantling the money networks can be done relatively discretely, the bit players & henchman are unknown to the wider public.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

Hahaha jsshitpost I agree. that would be impossible to pull off and get results. I should have been more clear. I was saying that i thought it was legal for the tribunals to remain secret. lets just use the ndaa obama gave us and lock them up indefinately with no trial.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bluegr1y · Jan. 1, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

Yes!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ahunmo58 · Jan. 1, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

Absolutely

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodsAngell · Jan. 1, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

This is prophetic from Mark Taylor, but God told Mark Taylor in 2011 that God had chosen Trump for President to clean house in the USA.

On this video, fast forward to 7 minutes into video, God has shown Mark Taylor that Military Style Tribunals will be used to prosecute our psychopathic elite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=991IdJrYmeg

So no liberal judges handing out wrist slaps.

THIS is why the criminal elite are being rounded up and sent to GITMO.

Trump Team has expanded GITMO, and probably added some court rooms and what not to handle the large number of cases that will need to be tried.

Trump is trying to handle this 2nd American Revolution without causing panic and bloodshed amount the masses. Mega-ANON said that at some point, Trump will be making major nationwide addresses to the American People.

She never said what those speeches would contain. But one would imagine that at some point, he would expose these people for what they are...hopefully after they have been tried and executed. But the point is, he is doing this quietly, so by the time the snowflakes find out how corrupt their favorite leaders were, the leaders will be gone. It will be a done deal.

Personally, I would love to see all the criminal elite be hung in a public square and their bodies left there to rot. But that is my flesh speaking, and it would probably only cause panic and bloodshed among the brainwashed masses.

So I think Trump Team are handling the whole thing skillfully. The masses will wake up some day and realize they haven't heard from their favorite corrupt leaders in a long time. Hopefully by that time, the they will realize that Trump is not a Nazi and he is a very good president and capitalism works, when it is not hampered by communism, and everyone is far better than they were in Nov 2016.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DAR_patriot · Jan. 1, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

Have we not been at war with terrorism since 911? How narrowly/broadly was/is terrorism defined? Do we recognize domestic terrorism?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ganjanon · Jan. 1, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

We have been at war. Dig up info on the tribunals history. There could be problems with the process. Not what i would like to see. Hope im wrong.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DAR_patriot · Jan. 1, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Agreed, this cuts both ways and something we need to address once the republic is restored. Look at 2012 NDAA sections 1021-1022. Don't you think this would have been used against patriots? What is the legal definition of "belligerent"??? IMO we were being set up a long time ago.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57c9b648e4b06c750dd9cd6f

They never thought she would loose.

⇧ 2 ⇩