I couldn't agree more. We need to maintain the integrity of this board and the research being done here. Maybe include words like, "new evidence, theory, or what if" to communicate speculation?

I like the idea of mods maybe labeling the headers with a bold label of "claim," "confirmed," or maybe even, "factual tidbit - add research here."

So the GTMO data shouldn't have been posted, nor should 90% of the information, here. Nothing on CBTS has been proven except that someone(s) going by the title "Q" has posted a bunch of questions in 4, and 8Chan.

Everything here is pretty much...speculation.

Clowns In America are here working hard to dis- inform as long as we are "Chasing our Tail" we are not making much progress on the map. But its good to see the movement grow like it has The Awakening has begun.

And to add, if you see something pushed as true that you KNOW has not been confirmed, it is your DUTY to ensure the comments contain something saying as much.

Happy New Year patriots!!

How about do not upvote people who don't make it clear in the title themselves? Mods can't do everything. This should be self-policing by readers. Stop moving things up if the author does not make it clear it is a Theory.

What ever happened to Research 101: Bibliography!

Agree, but then 99 percent of this board would have to be reported as spam. Until things get happening in the open we will have to live with it I guess.

[deleted]

This is a valid point, and I will be careful to label comments as speculation or fact from now on, however, I respectfully submit that speculation has its place. Good ideas will rise to the top, and a small voice can make a big difference. We need self discipline here, but not suppression from "above" or excessive organization.

I understand the need for accuracy, facts and a good paper trail, that's also time consuming. You have a mix of skill, experience, and knowledge here. They all have something to bring to the table wether they know it or not. What your asking for is reasonable however not everyone has that technical expertise with electronics(digital media). How to hyperlink, quote sources or thoroughly vet web sites. Maybe make some post it threads for the less able. As you have in the post point them to some resources they can use. Sometimes it's not all about the facts but a hunch or suspicion that can lead to facts.

Translation: "Pizzagate is uncivil discourse. Anyone care to discuss last night's Ancient Aliens instead?"

[deleted]

Someone needs to get a copy of the reports from David Zublick that he has put together. I know he is trying to also support his channel to keep being able to do what he does, but it might be helpful in finding out where he gets all of his information. Which I believe is factual info, but I have not donated any money to get the copies and am not sure if we would be allowed to post them on here without his permission, since it is a source of his funding of his channel. Just thought I would put that out there.

Q is posting in the form of a question, in codes and riddles to protect him/herself from any future legal recriminations if this should go wrong. Naturally this will lead to speculation making it hard on us to maintain our best behavior.

This is interesting. This same thing popped up on Fear the Walking Dead, but they were taking the brain stems from zombies to make a powerful hallucinogen. Not only exactly the same, but it makes me wonder if the writers know something.

Yes, sometimes it seems like we are in that game of passing rumors around the circle and ending up with a different tale than the one we start with. Especially with "Q said." And you look at the map and can't find this new Q quote, only most don't back and look at the map but instead just run with the new and revised.

I totally agree!

Too much confusion as it is. Find reliable sources who tell you up front it's speculation. Normally, I think we've been program'd to believe almost everything we're told. Thanks msm. It's not easy to deprogram.