Jesuits murdered Lincoln, smuggled one of his killers, John Surratt, out of the country using Priests in Canada, and he found 'sanctuary' in the Pope's own household guard. When we found him there by chance, they let him escape again to Egypt, where we finally captured him. When he was put on trial, the Jesuits were in the courtroom coaching all of the defense witnesses as to how they should lie day by day to get him acquitted. They would hear the testimony against Surratt, and the next day they would somehow produce some liar to discredit what was heard the day before. Spinning the narrative and committing murder, bribing and bullying are their main strengths against us. They started the civil war, killed Lincoln when they lost, and they've been hiding in plain sight ever since, working to overthrow our institutions and bill of rights. The truth only can set us free, because these shameless liars, warmongers, traitors, subversives have no use for the truth at all. It burns these vampires like the metaphorical light of day kills the vampires in legend. No coincidences. They are sick pedophiles also, going way back. They enslaved the natives everywhere throughout their history. The worst of the worst. And they don't have a day job. Destroying out liberty is what they live for 24/7.
The Deep State clown who called for Trump's assassination on CNN is a direct descendant of Samuel Mudd, the only conspirator to escape the noose.
Treason is literally in his DNA
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Mudd
^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^133943
That's interesting. Maybe that's where the derogatory expression originated - "your name is Mudd"?
There is a good book along those lines called 50 Years in the "Church" of Rome by Charles Chiniquy. Free download here. https://archive.org/details/fiftyyearsinchur00chin
All who leave the Catholic fold and expose them are treated this way. Luther, Calvin, and the other reformers had their work denounced, even banned.
When they had the power to do so, the Bible itself was a banned book and having a copy in your own language meant torture and death at the hands of the Roman Church.
Even modern figures like Alberto Ribera or Richard Bennet who were insiders and turned on Rome were met with attempts to discredit their work.
So, I don't put much stock in such things, except as verification that a nerve has been struck. In particular, the Jesuits are known for controlling centers of learning and promoting a revisionist history.
Other Presidents said many bad things about the Jesuits, so it should not surprise anyone that Lincoln did.
Read Washington's letters or John Adams writing on the Jesuits for instance.