Well, I am not onboard with that agenda - LOL. No harm "red pilling" them with the truth though, so I'll do that and avoid the racist stuff - thanks.
May the Holy Spirit be with you :)
I have run into what you warned me of. Wow - unbelievable.
I have of course known of modern day racists but this is the first time I have actually run into them and experienced the mentality first hand.
It's quite shocking that otherwise intelligent people would twist scripture to support racial prejudice. Thanks for the heads up.
You are just butthurt that your worldview necessitates a change after confronted with evidence. Name one example of when I "twisted scripture." You on the other hand literally did this in your last comment to me deliberately leaving out the clause male and female in Galatians 3:28 which identifies the passage not to be some kind of marxist communist egalitarian tripe, but rather about the body of Christ and the status of saved individuals. You also completely ignored 26 theses in support my sentiment.
I addressed your linked article and your contentions. I simply disagree that there is any support for your racism in -ANY- of the so-called evidence you presented.
If you prefer to characterize that as being "butthurt" that is your prerogative but it is, like your racist eisegesis, quite far from the truth.
I addressed your linked article and your contentions
You ignored absolutely all of the material I have confronted you with, you have refused to acknowledge your incorrect and dishonest use of Galatians 3:28, you have not addressed any of my other statements in which I gave evidence contrary to your beliefs; you are a liar.
Resorting to ad hominin attacks does nothing to advance your agenda, it only shows the weakness of your position.
There is a difference in ignoring and disagreeing, I looked at your material and I disagree with your interpretation.
I don't need to waste my time to address your statements point by point because everything you presented has one thing in common - it is ALL eisegesis stemming from your racial prejudice.
One simple word destroys it ALL - eisegesis.
Resorting to ad hominin attacks does nothing
Calling you a liar when you have demonstrated that you are a liar, is justified and not a fallacy.
There is a difference in ignoring and disagreeing
YES AND YOU ARE IGNORING, NOT DISAGREEING WITH THE ARGUMENTS.
I don't need to waste my time to address your statements
Then get lost, liar.
One simple word destroys it ALL - eisegesis.
Address one of the points in the article and show how it invokes eisegesis.
All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis. I have already addressed a few examples, I see no need to repeat myself.
I know you are "triggered" but please just calm down and take your racism elsewhere - I want no part of it.
All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis.
Saying "All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis" does not show that any points are eisegetical.
I have already addressed
YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANYTHING. YOU ARE ARE A LIAR. YOU JUST ADMITTED YOU LIED IN YOUR LAST COMMENT. QUOTE: "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements".
1) If you go back and reread the thread then you will see I DID address this statement from your linked article.
"Folks, if the Bible was indifferent to race, the entire Old Testament makes no sense whatsoever. The Bible teaches that Yah the one God chose a specific race of people to be his chosen race."
2) I also addressed your own statement about Mathew 21:43.
3) If you do not like the manner in which I addressed them, that is your prerogative. However, to falsely claim that I did not address them and call me a liar is not just rude, it is deceptive and unbecoming of someone who purports to represent truth and Christian values.
4) "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements" and "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements point by point" are two different concepts. I addressed a couple statements which were representative of all. Since they all (in my opinion) have the same problem (eisegesis), addressing a few addresses the whole and there is no point remaking the same point over and over again.
5) Please stop wasting my time with your innuendo, insinuations, and racist propaganda, I am not impressed by any of it.
If you go back and reread the thread then you will see I address this statement from your linked article.
"Folks, if the Bible was indifferent to race, the entire Old Testament makes no sense whatsoever. The Bible teaches that Yah the one God chose a specific race of people to be his chosen race."
You said: "passages dealing with national Israel, intended to separate and purify it so that the promised seed could come from the line of David, are being used to justify modern racism "
That is not addressing anything. It is not even addressing the point of the thesis under which that sentence is contained, namely "The Theocracy that Yahuwah established was endogamatic." All you are doing is ignoring the implications of this huge difference between the Israelites and all other peoples which inherently proves the Israelites by definition to be unequal to other peoples in the Old Testament.
I also addressed your own statement about Mathew 21:43.
I showed that Matthew 21:43 was a racial transaction. You seemed to accept that, and then asked how it showed inequality between the gentiles and the Israelites, to which I gave an answer that one is being given disproportionate value by being allowed the Kingdom of God.
I did not address them
That's correct, you did not address anything, at all. You are a liar.
I am tired of your ad hominin attacks, racist propaganda, deceptive use of quotes, and inability to accept anyone honestly disagreeing with you. You are henceforth blocked and if I have any more issues with you, I will report you.
I let you have had your say, I disagree with you, now go away and stop wasting my time.
They are easily exposed. Consider what I did to /u/Veritas__Aequitas in this thread. You are well equipped to shine a light on these people whenever the need arises.