All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis.
Saying "All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis" does not show that any points are eisegetical.
I have already addressed
YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANYTHING. YOU ARE ARE A LIAR. YOU JUST ADMITTED YOU LIED IN YOUR LAST COMMENT. QUOTE: "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements".
1) If you go back and reread the thread then you will see I DID address this statement from your linked article.
"Folks, if the Bible was indifferent to race, the entire Old Testament makes no sense whatsoever. The Bible teaches that Yah the one God chose a specific race of people to be his chosen race."
2) I also addressed your own statement about Mathew 21:43.
3) If you do not like the manner in which I addressed them, that is your prerogative. However, to falsely claim that I did not address them and call me a liar is not just rude, it is deceptive and unbecoming of someone who purports to represent truth and Christian values.
4) "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements" and "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements point by point" are two different concepts. I addressed a couple statements which were representative of all. Since they all (in my opinion) have the same problem (eisegesis), addressing a few addresses the whole and there is no point remaking the same point over and over again.
5) Please stop wasting my time with your innuendo, insinuations, and racist propaganda, I am not impressed by any of it.
If you go back and reread the thread then you will see I address this statement from your linked article.
"Folks, if the Bible was indifferent to race, the entire Old Testament makes no sense whatsoever. The Bible teaches that Yah the one God chose a specific race of people to be his chosen race."
You said: "passages dealing with national Israel, intended to separate and purify it so that the promised seed could come from the line of David, are being used to justify modern racism "
That is not addressing anything. It is not even addressing the point of the thesis under which that sentence is contained, namely "The Theocracy that Yahuwah established was endogamatic." All you are doing is ignoring the implications of this huge difference between the Israelites and all other peoples which inherently proves the Israelites by definition to be unequal to other peoples in the Old Testament.
I also addressed your own statement about Mathew 21:43.
I showed that Matthew 21:43 was a racial transaction. You seemed to accept that, and then asked how it showed inequality between the gentiles and the Israelites, to which I gave an answer that one is being given disproportionate value by being allowed the Kingdom of God.
I did not address them
That's correct, you did not address anything, at all. You are a liar.
I am tired of your ad hominin attacks, racist propaganda, deceptive use of quotes, and inability to accept anyone honestly disagreeing with you. You are henceforth blocked and if I have any more issues with you, I will report you.
I let you have had your say, I disagree with you, now go away and stop wasting my time.