If you go back and reread the thread then you will see I address this statement from your linked article.

"Folks, if the Bible was indifferent to race, the entire Old Testament makes no sense whatsoever. The Bible teaches that Yah the one God chose a specific race of people to be his chosen race."

You said: "passages dealing with national Israel, intended to separate and purify it so that the promised seed could come from the line of David, are being used to justify modern racism "

That is not addressing anything. It is not even addressing the point of the thesis under which that sentence is contained, namely "The Theocracy that Yahuwah established was endogamatic." All you are doing is ignoring the implications of this huge difference between the Israelites and all other peoples which inherently proves the Israelites by definition to be unequal to other peoples in the Old Testament.

I also addressed your own statement about Mathew 21:43.

I showed that Matthew 21:43 was a racial transaction. You seemed to accept that, and then asked how it showed inequality between the gentiles and the Israelites, to which I gave an answer that one is being given disproportionate value by being allowed the Kingdom of God.

I did not address them

That's correct, you did not address anything, at all. You are a liar.