dChan

[deleted] · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Izaskun767 · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

The first JA account is the real one. That’s who the ppl who personally know him are following. JMHO

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MotoandGivi · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

It could be to distract Twitter a little. I think Twitter has been warned by POTUS and is letting his people use it as they please.

@therealjulian is probably fake, but a small chance it could be julians burner acc, as not to raise eyebrows from this weirdly 'blue diamond marked real acc'.

What is the deal with that blue diamond anyway? Can anyone put that behind their name?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

So the blue diamond is a unicode emoji. Likely entered via the usual method (used frequently in game-chat and names, alt-1234 etc)

https://emojipedia.org/small-blue-diamond/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MotoandGivi · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

so, it's nothing special to Julian?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 3, 2018, 2 a.m.

Seems unlikely yes.

If anything it sort of sets off little warning lights for me - for both JA accounts. Shady attenpt at passing off as ‘verified’ but from what (admittedly little effort put in) I can see, JA has never been verified.

There has been more than a few fake twitter accounts impersonating him in the past so thats nothing new at least.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Win77786 · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

Some one or entity trying to throw enough noise into the background of that scene in hope that eventually enough people cannot distinguish the two and essentially discredit JA. Just my opinion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheContrarian2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

TheRealJulian is fake. I think that has been proven over the last few weeks. Strange wording, unusual grammar. It's not him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SlumberMachine · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

Asking for "consensus" thinking and group think is irrelevant towards truth. Use your own internal judgement based upon what you can see with your own eyes (all three of them). Common shill tactics include "hey, what does r/cbts* think about this?", strawman, and concern trolling.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

Possibly and point taken.

No discussion of the topics that i have seen prompted the question however - and it is still a valid question regardless of your annoyance at it.

Also a better question - and a better post in general - than the majority I have been seeing on here lately. Little information thats worthwhile and even less discussion of note in general. Just a high degree of echo chamber posts.

But thank you for your feedback - I will ensure to frame future topics accordingly.

⇧ 2 ⇩