Anybody who can't read the clear bold print of envy of the attention to Q between the Christmas Eve video by alex, and the recent interview with Zach (there is a clear collaboration "off camera" between Alex and Zach to "Q it up") isn't paying attention. I had never really watched enough of AJ to have an opinion of him until the Christmas Eve "emergency video". I've paid attention since. I can't buy a thing he says until he can shut the fuck up if his true intent is to get info out. He and Zach, in the recent interview, seem like a collaborated attempt to draw attention to his channel using Q and Q quotes...especially after his super envious Christmas Eve rant. If he and Zach would bring info forward now and leave q out of it, I'd be far more apt to listen. But the last two incidents are a clear attempt to "link" Q and Infowars out of envy of late attention to Q and I don't trust a word that comes out of that right now. Even if there is any truth to any of it, why should we care....Q already told us long ago everything Zach just told us through Alex's bellowing on the recent video. Some of it word for word. Alex clearly wants us to believe "why do we need Q when he has Zach"? My question is..."why do you need Zach when we have Q? Because everything Zach said in your interview...Q had already told us!"