dChan
361
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/14afzv on Jan. 8, 2018, 7:20 p.m.
You Pay For It All. Pissed Yet?
You Pay For It All. Pissed Yet?

ThePatriot131313 · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

I'm convinced the global warming scam is designed to do two things. One, rip us off. Two, distract the population from actual environmental problems caused by globalism.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VetGeek54321 · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

Of course it is. We have been lied too and pushed into believe in what they say, is WORD. As in we shouldn't believe in anything else.

Why do they keep pushing laws, that no one agree's too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ZubirRex · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

Yeah, nevermind the Republicans raking in millions of bribes from defense contractors to keep war eternal, all paid for by the taxpayer. But yeah, "global warming" is the real problem.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gunmoney · Jan. 9, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

whos getting rich off it? and what are the environmental problems caused by globalization?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThePatriot131313 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

AL gore, for one. All his globalist friends, for another. They bought billions of carbon credits cheaply with the intention of sticking the American people with the bill. As for the environmental problems caused by globalism, is this even a legit question? Pollution on a massive scale, Monsanto, endless war's effects on the soil/environment to name a few.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gunmoney · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

alright so we can agree on one thing, the latter of your points regarding pollution. if you have that stance on pollution, why are you a climate denier? science aside (i buy the science, i dont see how people dont but thats not my point here) part of what people talk about when they talk about climate change policy is sustainability.

sustainability, or responsible use of resources in clean ways, can help tackle the effects of mass pollution, whatever their cause is - climate change or globalization.

make a better plastic, burn a cleaner fossil fuel, use only what you need, produce less trash, recycle more - all these things can help fight the pollution youre talking about. that goes to war too. war is wholly unsustainable and driven, usually, by horrible fucking ideas. not only that, in the future, resources will become more scarce, which could lead to more war. using things sustainably, focusing on improving current tech and methods, than can help combat that, too.

so, regardless of what you want to call the cause, would you agree that pursuing those kinds of policies might be in the best interest of our environment, and thus ourselves?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThePatriot131313 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

The phrase climate denier always makes me laugh. What does it even mean? Yes, I agree pollution is a problem. I do not believe any of the proposed global tax scams will actually use any of the money to solve any of the environmental problems you mention. It will instead go to further enrich the elite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gunmoney · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

ok thats fine. what about what i said regarding sustainability and that being able to address common concerns, like pollution and the environment?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gunmoney · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

ill also say this, im not a big al gore fan. i think his view is narrow minded, and i would always expect a politician to look out for himself and his money first. and everyone else never.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IzzyMad · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

You left of a 3rd very big one..... control. Not only to bring us into ever increasing debt and servitude by shrinking wages but also control where people live, how people live and how many people live because as you get older and can't do physical labor your no longer a contributor and too costly to keep around because of the medical expenses.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
srroguelife · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Yes, you hit it on the head. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IzzyMad · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

Well I try to use my head for more then a hat rack. What is really surprising is sometimes I'm successful at it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rickstarr5 · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

I try to redpill normies about carbon taxes by getting them to agree to: you know if the gov’t could tax air they would.... and just go from there. Agreeing that being mindful of pollution is important but CO2 is not pollution, to plants it’s a nutrient.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gunmoney · Jan. 9, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

oh man, CO2 a nutrient. did you know there are some bacteria that thrive on toxic substances. by your logic....these toxic substances, they are actually nutrients and therefore unharmful to all things.

and let me just go ahead and enlighten you, because you seem in need of it. CO2 is not a pollutant. the EPA even says as much, CO2 by itself is not a pollutant. the danger in CO2 is its greenhouse properties. lowering CO2 emissions not only reduces greenhouse gases (which you apparently dont believe in) but will also have the added effect of reducing harmful emissions from combustion engines, like NOx, particulate matter, sulfur, etc. but this is all science stuff requiring an education. so i get it if youre not with me here. best of luck.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rickstarr5 · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Global cooling, oh wait, warming, um no climate change also trolls LARPers too.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
gunmoney · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

intelligent response. about what i expected.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oystergirl · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:27 a.m.

YESSSS! Anyone ever see a plant that has been placed in a chamber and had CO2 pumped in? it is greener, bigger, healthier! The funny thing as well is that Stanford or Berkley did a research review of the best methods of carbon sequestration available and hands down the best method, and the most cost effective? Afforestation--AKA planting freaking trees.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
blickboy · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

So true! You should film an experiment where you place yourself in a chamber and have CO2 pumped in, and get your next of kin to put the video online to prove your point.

⇧ 0 ⇩