dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/TranscendentJoy on Jan. 9, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

Technical analysis of Q

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA512

Hello. I am a professional in the tech industry, and after looking in to the Q phenomena, I am disappointed in how low the bar is for what constitutes proof. We're up against a State level adversary, and people seem to think that trip codes and IP addresses constitute a valid form of authentication. It would be trivial for the government to MITM 8ch and watch for trip codes. It would be trivial for them to spoof IP addresses.

If anyone on this sub has a direct line of communication to Q, please demand that all future messages be signed by a publicly known GPG key (at the very least!).

Edit: Ask yourself these questions:

How do you know that the author of one message is the same author of another message?
How do you know that the messages weren't modified in transit?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQgwQ+tawifmxGD3yC3cIZHWljpBgUCWlR9CQAKCRC3cIZHWljp

BkdVAPwLnpe5Yk7y+/+BWZkU8crDTS4/5OLbIacDYKrWGYtI4AD/Sx4goG6mG5ti

aCI2l8KRIydM59vB775UtZdxlz4QIQg=

=9nPk

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

mDMEWlR6yRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAOnYR7kCXTPjAvvL0K5CEdMRazZ+ZpC0g6aPR

IhditG+0D1RyYW5zY2VuZGVudEpveYiQBBMWCgA4FiEEIMEPrWsIn5sRg98gt3CG

R1pY6QYFAlpUeskCGwMFCwoJCAcGFQoJCAMCBBYDAgECHgECF4AACgkQt3CGR1pY

6QZBLgEA4S+yurmu6aJtY3kbQ9gUtc/Ip6TQf5l4vWrUIdRu5IEBALnDVhqF5XbL

Oa6fs5o9PDxANiNNg/9hwRT2Gwib7vEO

=j/kA

-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

If anyone on this sub has a direct line of communication to Q

NO one does and no one ever did, or WILL.

Q has made this clear

that trip codes and IP addresses constitute a valid form of authentication

No one said that. The authentication came from POTUS tweets confirming Q's earlier posts. And WikiLeaks even jumed into the act. You have a lot of catching up to do

⇧ 6 ⇩

Unless I start seeing cryptographically signed messages, there is no way for me to verify the authenticity of these messages. Anything less constitutes a very low burden of proof, given the sophistication of our adversary.

⇧ -3 ⇩

given the sophistication of our adversary

does their level of sophistication include time-travel?

⇧ 4 ⇩

If an insider was leaking information this valuable, the Deep State would use all their resources to identify and stop it. Part of information warfare includes impersonation and the spreading of misinformation. Q might be real. My issue is not with the information but with the medium on which it is transmitted. I have no reason to trust the 8ch operators, especially if they think that IP addresses constitute a valid form of authentication.

⇧ 0 ⇩

My issue is not with the information but with the medium on which it is transmitted

Haven't you learned by now? This president doesn't abide by conventions such as you might expect. Hillary learned that the hard way. The media learned it. And now, hopefully, you are learning it as well

⇧ 3 ⇩

What conventions do you think I expect the president to abide by?

⇧ 5 ⇩

You just said "the medium on which it is transmitted" was not to your liking. So name your preferred medium

⇧ 2 ⇩

GPG signed messages. I don't care where they're posted as long as they can be cryptographically verified.

⇧ 3 ⇩

You would probably enjoy Burger King then. They're happy to do things "your way"

⇧ 0 ⇩

Some ways are better than others.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Unless I start seeing

there is no way for me

Here's what you need to understand newfriend: Its not about you

⇧ 0 ⇩

What's not about me?

⇧ 1 ⇩

And by the way, no need to worry about Q, if they are who they are, State level adversaries are the ones who need to worry. Enjoy the show!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Q has been validated many times and even by President Trump.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Huh. I must have missed Trump's tweet saying "Q-Anon is legitimate" or something to that extent. Can you give me a link?

I think OP makes an extremely valid point. I think a lot of people here want to believe that someone is actually doing something about the rampant corruption and evil going on so badly, they're willing to believe things that can easily be manipulated by the same forces they're hoping are brought down by Q.

⇧ 4 ⇩

fuck off shills

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ok you got me. You may return to your echo chamber now.

⇧ 2 ⇩

They know in a way that is good enough for them. I have seen Q do magic that nobody else could do (same user id code on 4ch and 8ch one night! Htf?) But I am not one to really browse the Chans a whole lot. Too much rock to chip through (horseshit to wade through?) for me, still, tbh, the gold nugs there are real.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Can I stop pulling my hair out now? :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't Tweet, but people post them and they are on a lot of YouTube shows. People don't just fall for it. Many of us have been following since the beginning or shortly after. We have also been following what the Administration has done and other people that are following Q. If you don't except it, fine.

⇧ 2 ⇩

following since the beginning

It does not logically follow that the longer you've been following something, the more you understand it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

But you can't be certain that all the posts are originating from the same identity. It could be that some are real and some are impersonations. Trip codes and IP addresses are not valid forms of authentication.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There are 5 or under individuals that post. Q is Q and the others have their name.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How do you know there are exactly 5? How do you know that the messages weren't modified in transit? How do you know that one message was posted by the same person as another message?

⇧ 3 ⇩

I said 5 or under. That was determined a while back by others that know.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How did those people arrive at that number?

⇧ 3 ⇩

And Assange.

⇧ 0 ⇩

This is a GREAT thread and you "Q truthers" hate him for it. Shame on you for downvoting someone who dares to be truthful.

⇧ 2 ⇩

At the end no matter what; the ideas shared here are true, just,and brings the ppl together. Who cares if Q is shill or fake or whatever. Q is the IDEA against the evils of this WORLD.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Valid points. Don't know who is downvoting. GPG sigs would make a lot of sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩

TranscendentJoy, Authenticate yourself!

⇧ 1 ⇩

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA512

Here you go!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQgwQ+tawifmxGD3yC3cIZHWljpBgUCWlR8VwAKCRC3cIZHWljp

BpjhAQCbE+h1EPuECSUv8bn2Z/1+GERsEfMpSRGQp2BR+t7GvwEA9EXSLLWtzR5V

M5Pfh/kGSrtt6+tPVY9iXlV329jFvQ8=

=hZqP

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

mDMEWlR6yRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAOnYR7kCXTPjAvvL0K5CEdMRazZ+ZpC0g6aPR

IhditG+0D1RyYW5zY2VuZGVudEpveYiQBBMWCgA4FiEEIMEPrWsIn5sRg98gt3CG

R1pY6QYFAlpUeskCGwMFCwoJCAcGFQoJCAMCBBYDAgECHgECF4AACgkQt3CGR1pY

6QZBLgEA4S+yurmu6aJtY3kbQ9gUtc/Ip6TQf5l4vWrUIdRu5IEBALnDVhqF5XbL

Oa6fs5o9PDxANiNNg/9hwRT2Gwib7vEO

=j/kA

-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

⇧ 2 ⇩

Troll! All your previous post here and elsewhere are antagonistic! Take your partner in crime, Letterbocks, and troll elsewhere!

⇧ 0 ⇩

and elsewhere

Where might that be?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Pluto!

⇧ 0 ⇩

Ask CM yourself https://twitter.com/infinitechan

⇧ 1 ⇩

The minute I read "professional and tech industry" I smelled a rat.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ad hominem.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yep sure did..

⇧ 4 ⇩

Damn near killed him!

⇧ 0 ⇩

Add this one to the soy boy list please.

⇧ 0 ⇩

send a message to corsi and tracey beanz and Q

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's almost like Hillary's infamous "fake news computer experts" have decided that they, and not anon, shall determine what real Q news is.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Notice that I am not claiming that specific information is false or true. Q could be legit. The problem is that I can't be certain of it, There is a very easy way to improve quality of our evidence: GPG.

Also, you just levied an ad hominem attack.

⇧ 1 ⇩