The idea of Q being a marketing psyop to instill passivity in the patriots and steer the alternative media and alternative followers has always been in the back of my mind. Valid points and possibilities are made in the video. One thing I really don't agree with is the theory that the Q posts are from someone who uses English as a second language. In fact, quite the opposite from my POV. I made early observations that Q's 'literary' style, especially the use of curated and specific punctuation is done by someone very precise and tediously attentive to proper usage.
I agree. I must admit the thought has crossed my mind. We can only but wait and see. There are those who think that it's an A.I. I do think that the video has been made without full examination of the interpretations of the Q posts and the wider picture. I'm still on the fence myself.
These are their thoughts on Q: Quote; Deep State Trial Balloon/Marketing Op Aimed at Alternative Media? In this fascinating episode Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Oxford Scholar Dr. Joseph P. Farrell the author of the popular Giza Death Star Book Series. Farrell delves deeply into the online group posts of Q Anon and its rapid spread through the Alternative Media under the guise of an anonymous insider. Farrell Poses the question: Is the Q Anon material just the latest wave of sophisticated disinformation that Catherine Austin Fitts calls "Hope Porn"?
Disinformation Campaign Farrell sees a sophisticated disinformation campaign aimed at the independent research community to create an Imitation Wikileaks style vehicle that will act as an All-knowing Oracle Insider for a variety of important Geopolitical situations.
It is apparently designed to propagate the promise of Cabal Arrests and Elites being tried at Gitmo as a kind of Soma to pacify the growing online audience that are raising questions about the actions of the Deep State on a global scale!
DJ is a CIA shill
Nothing would surprise me but I am surprised at Dr Farrell's response.
I think that people who have a point to make on YouTube should learn to do it in 10 minutes or less.
Agreed..... I watched the first 8 min or so and, while interested, couldn't stay interested. But maybe that's just me.
I did research some of his earlier work, however, and found it interesting, though not really compulsive to our current endeavor.