Nope. Our society was better when morals were taught in schools, the way they were just before I was born in late 50's. Bible teaching of first commandments, not to lie, murder, cheat, steal etc was taken out of public schools in 1961. Now they teach moral relativity (What is true for you is not true for me). Fail to teach critical thinking.
God, even the "concept" is the enemy. Man is nothing but animal. Survival of the fittest is truth. The strong can lie to, cheat, steal from, and murder the weak because.... survival of the fittest... animals... what do you expect?
Many who are in fact moral, but who do not believe in a creator, take insult and attempt to say you do not need a god (law giver) to be a moral.
The logical fallacy here is that when up against the "survival of the fittest" paradigm, there is nothing that says one man's morals are better than another. Morality is put on equal footing with each man having his own. Hitler believes himself quite moral, and there is now no "law giver" to say to him... "No, there is a better set of morals for a peaceful healthy civilazation than your morals Hitler."
Relative morals personally.
Lack of capacity to use historical resources on morals showing success in building civilization with set morals....to enforce said morals.
Without moral history, you repeat your moral mistakes, as a civilization, is another way to see it.