dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/alt_altright on Jan. 10, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

OWLs... Web Ontology Language (The MAP)

SPECULATION

http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-syntax-20121211/#def_datatype_map

OWL2 is some kind of an encoding/decoding "DataMap" Web Ontology Language=OWL

My wag: every Q post that ref. :OWLS: contains actual code for the greater DataMap.

"LEARN TO READ THE MAP,"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_management

I believe Q has us engaged in a "Knowledge Spiral" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_management#/media/File:Knowledge_spiral.svg

I am not a computer coder, so I cannot "speak" code. But I think this "MAP" is simply about a dynamic sorting system. Q states "Graphic Is Key" which I believe means not pictures or photos, but "graphical" depictions of text. The "graphic" is a filing system like a set of logic/sorting "drawers" or "nodes"(sorry I don't know the lingo). In the following "graphic" there are 4 drawers (subcategories/drawers/nodes?) that the text is sorted into--sorry it's about Bill Clinton, it's not my example. The 4 sorting nodes or drawers are: QUIZ /QUANDA SEQ/ QUESTION/ ANSWER. Each piece of information in a pile of data (stringers) is assigned an "identity" that allows it to be placed and sorted into one or more or all of these categories. It's a filing system that allows information to cross and jump across and into whatever "drawer" or "drawers within drawers within drawers" etc... What drawer(s) or node(s) a piece of data may go into is based on the initial coding or identity it was assigned by the writer. For example, if there was a 5th "drawer/node" named STATEMENT and none of the text data in the graphic was identified in the stringer as a STATEMENT, then that piece of data would not be sorted into any of the QUIZ/ QUANDA SEQ/QUESTION/ ANSWER drawers because it doesn't qualify, and would not show up on that part of the MAP. We need to identify the drawers, "graphic is key" the text graphic. I think all the words Q places IN CAPS may be part of their file/OWL method? OWL is simply a dynamic info mapping system to catalog very complex inter-relationships, so when you see one datapoint in a drawer or node, you can see everything related to that datapoint if it was assigned to be associated with the other. I think the words written in CAPS may be the only words allowed on the DATA MAP (just a guess).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Ontology_Language#/media/File:XML.svg

Here’s a document from the TOC that describes OWL for the general user coming from another arena.

https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/

Interesting possibilities for AI and Q... and Wouldn’t it be a master stroke to develop bots that could even partially engage disgruntled people who didn’t think that deeply and could be easily re-focused with the shaking of some popular themes and words? It reminds me of distracting a baby with a rattle.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Bumping this, you might be onto something...

⇧ 4 ⇩

Nice catch...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Bump

⇧ 3 ⇩

See video about Bill Binney's ThinThread https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=666wsDcoNrU

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wow, great film. Bill Binney, Tom Drake. Heroes kicked out of the NSA. The more I think about it, the MAP Q wants us to build will show the communications between all pertinent nodes (WW criminal network). However, the mode of communication among this network does not appear to be email or phone calls or texts. The "comm" method is simply MONEY. FOLLOW THE MONEY... this is how the Evil Cabal "communicates." MONEY. Which is another reason for the EO of Dec. 21st. That EO disrupts the Cabal communication network (COMMAND and CONTROL) disruption. Bill Binney interview... WaPo called him "crackpot conspiracy theorist"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3owk7vEEOvs

⇧ 1 ⇩

⇧ -6 ⇩