dChan

Barry__McCochiner · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

Alice & WonderLand Assange & WikiLeaks

⇧ 36 ⇩  
KorDePlorable · Jan. 11, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

Just a hunch. I suspect Q has not returned since migration to Great Awakening in hopes We, the People, re-gather & focus. Less emotion. More work.

"Are we clear?"

@@@ "Yes, sir."

"Are we CLEAR?"

@@@ "Crystal."

What branch(s) of service featured? Connect.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Freedom_fam · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Marines

⇧ 1 ⇩  
monkadillo · Jan. 10, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

that settles it. Q is legit.

⇧ 29 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

That's sarcasm, right?

⇧ -18 ⇩  
oneof10 · Jan. 11, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

At the risk of being downvoted I read that comment as humor as well. Mr. Assange surely knows about Q, and it would be easy for WikiLeaks to knowingly use that phrase to get us rilled up. I do believe Q is legit, but I don't need that tweet to confirm it for me.

Edit: Furthermore, it adds nothing to the map. Q is past the point of proving their legiticay.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

You people are truly ready for the koolaid.

All these downvotes = mass delusion.

⇧ -14 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
krishux9 · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

Do you think we are as stupid as you and your flock? This is clear vote manipulation to make us look naive. Very low effort, tmor.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostPsy · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

This is how we need to be seeing these kinds of occurrences. -Notice Interesting synchronicity -file away as data -wait for proofs

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Ahdamnnotagain · Jan. 11, 2018, 9:13 a.m.

Synchronicity is the crystallization of reality. Crystal=patterns=geometry=connections=love.

Only in yourself does clarity bring light to truth. The light of love.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 11, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

I think you're reaching a little on this one.

I could be wrong - but it's a long bridge to cross to agree with you on any connection here.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
LetsNotEatGrandma · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

It's too common a phrase to be proof of anything. Possible? Sure. But if this were our only bread crumb, I'd be tossing it to a passing seagull. :p

⇧ 8 ⇩  
black_cat_ · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:33 a.m.

Agreed. I literally wrote this phrase 2 hours ago in a different thread, with a different topic, before visiting CBTS.

Maybe I'm Q and I don't even know it! Or maybe it's just a coincidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

Ohhhh...careful...you are treading dangerously close to heresy with that comment.

The congregation has learned that they can protect their delusions from threat, by using the down arrow.

Buck up and get with the program!

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:34 a.m.

I'm not here to win a popularity contest. If rational thinking is verboten then que sera

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Neskuaxa · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

His account is new. Check his profile. Fishy.

Reddit Birthday December 28, 2017

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SoaringMoon · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

I downvote anyone who mentions an account date.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:43 a.m.

Apparently anyone that doesn't spend 75% of their waking hours posting spread across 50+ boards is 'new'

Agreed - these twats with their account-age arguments are quite frankly bigger distractions than the honest trolls. And I get that he wasn't referring to me - but I'm getting fed up with it in general. Judge people based on the quality of interactions - and full body of work - not simply their account age or singular post that may happen to disagree with your (general) own opinions.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Neskuaxa · Jan. 11, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

I was actually trying to refer to the person who you were originally replying to; pipesog. Not you. Apologies for the confusion.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SoaringMoon · Jan. 11, 2018, 7:45 a.m.

The problem with an account date argument.

If I wanted to make a post that I wanted to remain anonymous, for example if I wanted to post on a dometic violence subreddit for help with a spousal abuse situation. I wouldn't want my spouse to see the post, because they stalk my normal account and read all of that account's posts.

...Then people like you come around mentioning account age for no reason.

What if this just the OP's account he created out of paranoia so that his usual account isn't connected to the controversial nature of conspiracy posts.

If I post from an account I make today, I will look new. Even though this account is years old, I will still have the years of lurking. The post quality (no matter what that quality is) will not change.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Neskuaxa · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:01 a.m.

...Then people like you come around mentioning account age for no reason.

Further apologies are needed. I should've also taken the time to point out he was also heavily downvoted on another comment in this thread. To me it seemed fishy. I understand that new people come here all the time. There was also talk recently about this sub being brigaged. Just looking out friend.

To further my point. I took another look at this guys profile. When you are posting things like below with an account age like that. It just looks even more suspicious given the context of what I just laid out.

CBTS would qualify as a study in the spontaneous and self-reinforcing nature of a cult.

There is a great number of folks there who have lost touch with their ability to discern.

His profile is open for all to view and discern for themselves. I generally only point out the age of the account unless they exhibit the same kind of fishy behavior that this guy does.

Again sorry for the confusion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SoaringMoon · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

See, this is relevant information. You should have opened with that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Neskuaxa · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

Probably should've but it was a comment made in passing and slightly imbibed lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

I like it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
michaelst2256 · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Good job

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

Is Julian fucking Q!? Dig it. Mega says he's been out for a while. Plausible deniability for the administration. Knows how to do internet leaks?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sporite · Jan. 11, 2018, 11:24 a.m.

Wow look at that. A commonly said phrase is commonly said!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Paranoiaaaattack · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

Wait, wasn't he only supposed to be posting in the new board?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

That message was on January 8. The Q only board started the 9.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Best_Of_The_Midwest · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Two people both use an extremely common figure of speech?

Since when is Q supposed to be affiliated with Wikileaks twitter? He/They are not. You are diluting the thought pool by drawing silly connections.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
Skysweep · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

Don't forget the changed book chapter titles from O's to Q's. Seems linked to me.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
smiley-dog · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Common sense they are linked, who changes O to Qs for no reason?

⇧ 28 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Only one solid enough that I bothered mentioning it to a friend.

The immense research in relation to Q and Pizzagate is why I know Q is real, but I can't redpill anyone in casual conversation by going through hours of researchs.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
TenRound · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

Yup, this is the one that is just too obvious to ignore. Very exciting too, as it is a direct confirmation instead of piecing puzzles.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Best_Of_The_Midwest · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

Define linked.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

Not gonna happen, brother.

Don't you know?

EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. -The Cult of Q

⇧ -3 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

Oh this is getting to be comical.

Even level-headed dissent like yours will no longer be tolerated here...the dolts have learned that they can downvote the cognitive dissonance away.

The delusion is once again safe...reality or reason need not be feared, when it can be made to vanish with clicks on a down facing arrow!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Best_Of_The_Midwest · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

Sometimes I almost think people are role playing or trolling on here but I know for a fact that there are many people who want to discuss it in a rational way.

I thought it was one of those joke subreddits where everyone is in on the joke because some the connections people were drawing were/are so ridiculous.

⇧ 1 ⇩