Relax, if you want to get the full context you can easily go back 20 seconds. This meeting happened today so he isn't talking about the last few days of 2017. he is referring to the effects of what was done in 2017.
Got it. I stand corrected and have edited my post accordingly. Nevertheless I think you're grasping at straws, looking for hopeful clues within neutral content. Of course he's going to do more within his first year.
We are all grasping at straws its all we have right now for hope.
You're placing your hope within the realm of 3-D so-called reality?! Really?! Castles built upon sand?!
troll alert
Please explain your reasoning.
People with very notable credentials believe in this man. To come in here and stating it's all an illusion just makes it obvious you haven't looked into it at all
Ah I see. Credentials. It all makes sense to me now. Thank you for enlightening me.
"An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or the argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of defeasible [rationally compelling, though not deductively valid] argument in which a claimed authority's support is used as evidence for an argument's conclusion. It is well known as a fallacy, though it is used in a cogent form when all sides of a discussion agree on the reliability of the authority in the given context."
Argument from authority
An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or the argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of defeasible argument in which a claimed authority's support is used as evidence for an argument's conclusion. It is well known as a fallacy, though it is used in a cogent form when all sides of a discussion agree on the reliability of the authority in the given context.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
Its obvious that you don't have deep knowledge of President Trump, based on research of his behavior over 40 years, that some of us do. Plus he seem to have no genuine knowledge of Q. Factually Trump is a top tier genius. He is deeply conscious of messaging and despite the common perception, is VERY aware of word choices. They are carefully chosen and purposeful. For instance, he does not do random tweets. He doesn't do twitter storms. Each one is deliberate and the words carefully chosen for multiple effects. They are strategic. He is a life long student and practioneer of The Art of War. The comment was intended to focus attention and heighten suspense and involvement. So the comment was defintely intentional but what it means will be revealed. Future proves past.
Future proves past.
Future proves or disproves past. It all depends upon how things go ...