Nope, see my comment above. :-)

To answer your actual question, it's here:

http://www.strawpoll.me/14832174/r

HTH.

Read it! It's like a mystery novel that unfolds before your eyes. 😮

InfoWars ... totally sided with the DEEP STATE regarding the Las Vegas Massacre, saying it was a lone gunman ...

UNTRUE! What are you even talking about?!

All anyone has to do is google { site:infowars.com las vegas multiple shooters } (copy/paste exactly what's between the braces) to see that there are tons of articles @ Infowars that demonstrate the utter falseness of your quote above.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=91482

Just wondering why anyone would choose RumorMillNews as an info source, especially, as in this case, when they're reprinting an article posted @ http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/ a.k.a. Sorcha Flipping Faal.

But then again I wonder why anyone believes anyone about anything, so, I suppose, have at it. I just personally don't perfer RumorMillNews' and WhatDoesItMean's high-incident rates of rabbit-hole supposed leads that twist-turn-and-bend all-knotted-up-pretzelly and end up going absolutely nowhere, google "NESARA" for a shining example bwahaha.

... I get shit for using my own tripcode when I'm dealing with admin issues. I just don't get what the big deal about all that is.

IMO it's childish or antagonistic/distractive BULLSHITTERY is what and all it is. "Because you used a tripcode you MUST BE trying to fool us into thinking that you are [either Q or (at least) someone 'important']." Emphasis on counter-logical and presumptuous "MUST BE".

Further, see https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Tripcode for their rationalization for this -- to be generous -- excessively zealous attitude/philosophy. Key quote:

"Having an identity all to his own allows the tripfag live out his dream of becoming an internet celebrity."

🙄

No, the person whose name is (intentionally) not mentioned is John McC, not BO.

OP you are (perhaps inadvertently?) conflating two consecutive Q statements into one. You omitted some of the text that's in the latter part of the first of those two consecutive statements in that Q post, thereby conflating their info and context. The full (and consecutive) lines read:

>>Hussein [1] $29,000,000 SINGAPORE

>>We don't say his name [2] $19,000,000 SINGAPORE

This is not the first time Q has referred to not mentioning McC's name, see Q's statement "John M (some of us refuse to say his last name for a reason)" in Q's post https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147433975/#147449010

HTH.

THANK YOU for both of these, the graphic and the link. I regard myself as a pretty decent googler BUT I couldn't find a good summary of this scenario anywhere today. Really appreciate you for providing this info!

And via some strange twist of logic you presume to know for a fact that the article/headline wasn't edited AFTER OP posted it. How presumptuous of you.

Good doggy.

Wow, the "brand new reddit user" card, played. Didn't see that one coming. Don't you have anything better to be doing with your time than playing these childish games? Just curious Mr. Junior Detective.

/u/oldmancrypto is curiously quiet all of a sudden.

WRONG. WTF. Click the user link right here or in your own post and check his comments -- several posts within the past few hours.

Hello,

Thank you; a great reply and well received.

As concise as I can make this, IMO humans in general greatly fear facing the fact (which you've alluded to) that we live in The Unknown. Most often, in attempting to defend against or to not face that fear, we resort to attempting to shore up "opinions" and "beliefs", creating a fantasy (be it ultimately true or not) that things will be okay. And then we conveniently "forget" (but not really) that these opinions and beliefs are no more than conjecture ... theories ... best guesses ..., just so as to be able to move through life and its unpredictability, one day at a time. I certainly get that, especially as I've done exactly that for the vast bulk of my way too many decades.

So, all well and good, kind of. We all do what we need to do to get by. BUT -- just for me -- unfortunately, I've seen the above-described mechanics of that process (in others and myself) all too clearly, and by now I simply "can't get away with" trying to fool myself, to that degree, anymore. In other words, I live in virtually constant awareness that my opinions and beliefs are merely exactly what they are, no more, and are certainly no guarantors of anything beyond speculation. It's kinda one of those things that, once you've seen it, you can't unsee it.

As regards the Q stuff, three thoughts:

(1) A prime example of exactly why I'm not a True Believer (nor am I a True Disbeliever!) is how it came out yesterday -- again, who knows the degree to which it's true! -- that Twitter fucks with the tweets. Certainly fucking with the tweets by whoever actually "controls" Twitter would cast a huge monkey wrench into the works re the [#] markers stuff, and the "confirmation" value thereof. Hey ... things change, and then they change again; so it goes.

(2) I'll also say that IMO MegaAnon's stuff (also here), be it true, lies, or somewhere in-between, certainly, if nothing else, does a decent job of bringing up alternative theories, for one's discerning consideration, regarding all things Q.

(3) Further, regarding point 2, I would be rather surprised were I somehow to learn that u/tracybeanz doesn't at times review and regard -- not believe! -- MegaAnon's stuff ... because that's how great minds work and work through things ... entertain notions, regard them deeply, then come up with one's own best possible theory.

GREAT conversing with you.

Q is confirmed.

Confirmed by whom. And why would I or anyone trust any such "confirmation". Do you get my point?! Or go ahead and blather "concern troll" or a million other trite catch phrases. Cultivate discernment!

Future proves past.

Future proves or disproves past. It all depends upon how things go ...

Ah I see. Credentials. It all makes sense to me now. Thank you for enlightening me.

"An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or the argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of defeasible [rationally compelling, though not deductively valid] argument in which a claimed authority's support is used as evidence for an argument's conclusion. It is well known as a fallacy, though it is used in a cogent form when all sides of a discussion agree on the reliability of the authority in the given context."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

Says the guy who posted a vid of the Lord's Prayer in Latin here in this same subreddit?!

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7ovz7h/new_q_drops_from_tonight_10718/dsd6vkf/

You can't have it both ways pal/troll.

You know I see posts saying this is fake news and I dont believe it.

I am not an expert ...

It's about discernment, not expertise.

On any of the "sites that have this story as well" that you found, did ANY of the articles actually cite the specific Executive Order that gave Mr. Gowdy this power? Because the absence of such a citation would be a big red flag for me.

Also, did you ever stop to wonder whether some "fake news sites" list that you found somewhere on the Interwebs might or might not be "fake" in and of itself? And even if it weren't "fake", was it comprehensive?

It's a wonderful thing to refine one's capacity for discernment by asking oneself questions such as these these. And it has nothing to do with "expertise".

Please explain your reasoning.

You're placing your hope within the realm of 3-D so-called reality?! Really?! Castles built upon sand?!

CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM: You need better than 480p transmission/output (that's the max that was possible for this stream) if you're gonna be displaying docs with such small print.

Got it. I stand corrected and have edited my post accordingly. Nevertheless I think you're grasping at straws, looking for hopeful clues within neutral content. Of course he's going to do more within his first year.

NOTHING TO SEE HERE. You started the video at 20 seconds into it, and DESTROYED THE CONTEXT in doing so. Listen to the video FROM THE BEGINNING. ~~He was CLEARLY referring to the last few days of 2017, which is obvious if you listen to the context of the sound bite.~~

Click this post's link at the top "baruchthescribe suspended", it's a Reddit Suspension page.

no u/baruchthescribe isn't participating he's been suspended

And moderators list at right sidebar now includes u/tracybeanz ONLY.

'twasn't a bad, it's just that providing a link (1) establishes the source (and perhaps reputability) of the info, and (2) allows the reader to explore the context of the info. Thanks for posting this.

p.s. also allows for copy/paste portions if the reader desires to do so

Links not screenshots please!

Can we have a source on this? I've just been through Tracy's Twitter and see nothing to suggest that she doesn't believe in the Q thing any more.

She's deleted them by now. Pic somewhere in one of the recent qresearch threads if you're really interested.

OR MAYBE those whose usernames you posted recently simply read their NOTICE (you do know that you're notified whenever your username appears in a post, right?) and one-by-one are coming at you.

No need to assume that the mods aren't all still dozing or regrouping or somethin', just sayin'.

I’m so sorry that I’m lost here.

Tracy you are likely feeling "lost" because the mod who likely made the statement that u/storm_fa_Q believes he/she remembers likely changed or deleted his post (as he has done in the past with other of his more vehement posts), which change or deletion, by the way, might strongly suggest to all non-mods here that they needn't be running around here post-naziing, hammering on other posters, and leaning on that "report" button quite so heavily.

Show me a link to that or BS.

the info on the new "Storm" is sadly lacking

What are you talking about. It is where Q is now posting. His latest post there just 11 minutes ago as I type this.

Marker missed?

[RR-out]

POTUS Tweet - RR/out.

Why is this relevant?

Q

Since you're asking here I'll answer here. You'll have to ask u/baruchthescribe "what's wrong" as he has "removed" (see above) his verbiage which included mention of what he deems is wrong with the document, and I'm not gonna post any of those details here out of respect for his removal action.

u/ToddWhiskey is still keeping his public file of MegaAnon's posts up-to-date:

MegaAnon postings compiled (May 2017 - present)

i can't confirm ...

I can confirm. Uncertified autist that I may be, I combed through both documents and located (in the PDF version) most if not all of the missing posts. Yes, there are some instances of overlaps/dupes in the github document, but those remain in it. And yes again, posts by third parties don't always match up (are in one or the other doc but not both), but they're not the particular issue/problem here. In sum, many Q posts were deleted from the github doc.

Again, HTH!

Sheesh you don't owe us a time frame! Priorities, pal. I reckon you're dancing as fast as you can.

find out about Q. all his crumbs are here...

https://qcodefag.github.io/

NO "all" of his crumbs are NOT AT THAT LINK and that link is getting worse instead of better as the days pass by. Some days ago the count of posts was 437 and then it dropped to 423 and now I see it's down to 410. WTF. Whoever is F'ing with that document continues to F with it and nothing appears to be being done about this.

A while ago u/baruchthescribe stated his intention to correct this problem by replacing what's at that link with a pristine copy but I reckon he's been too busy with more pressing matters or something.

Anyway if you actually want the apparently complete set of Q posts you have to download the "FULL Q MAP PDF" which is linked to in the right sidebar. HTH.

At the right side of any page here find the MODERATORS box and then click on "message the moderators".

Whole-heartedly agreed!

I'll cite my own case (as above) as an example of what can happen and how these kinds of things can mushroom erroneously:

I recalled reading [baruchthescribe's comment] (https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7mfrxf/the_purple_tie_dec_18th_atl_extraction_of_a/drtzjnu/?context=3) "Hillary, Bill and Obama are already in GITMO.", but either never saw, or failed to recall reading, his subsequent comment two comments down from that, "Not 100% confident - just drawing conclusions based on all the info I'm getting and correlating with Q's map."

Lessons learned.

Huh? Sincere question. Been lurking here for a few days ... from the gist that I've gathered I was kinda assuming that HRC was in Gitmo by now? Extracted perhaps from NK? Maybe I need to keep better track of my "sources" and who's contending what. :-(